Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2019View details →

Рис. 1. Pararctia lapponica lemniscata (Stichel, 1911): 1–4 — имаго (1, 2 — самцы; 3, 4 — самки). Δанные сбора имаго: 1 — Буреинский заповеΑник, верховье р. Правая Бурея, 4 км В корΑона «Новый МеΑвежий», 1400 м наΑ уровнем моря, 24.06.2014; 2 — Буреинский заповеΑник, верховье р. Правая Бурея, окрестности корΑона «Новый МеΑвежий», 900 м наΑ уровнем моря; 4.07.2016; 3, 4 — там же, 29–30.06.2018 Fig. 1. Pararctia lapponica lemniscata (Stichel, 1911): 1 – 4 – adults (1, 2 – males; 3, 4 – females). Data labels for imago: 1 – Bureinsky Nature Reserve, upper reach of Pravaya Bureya River, 4 km E Novyi Medvezhii cordon, 1400 m above sea level, 24.06.2014; 2 – Bureinsky Nature Reserve, upper reach of Pravaya Bureya River, near Novyi Medvezhii cordon, 900 m above sea level, 4.07.2016; 3, 4 – at the same place, 29–30.06.2018 in On The Biology Of (Stichel, 1911) (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae) In Northern Amur Region

Рис. 1. Pararctia lapponica lemniscata (Stichel, 1911): 1–4 — имаго (1, 2 — самцы; 3, 4 — самки). Δанные сбора имаго: 1 — Буреинский заповеΑник, верховье р. Правая Бурея, 4 км В корΑона «Новый МеΑвежий», 1400 м наΑ уровнем моря, 24.06.2014; 2 — Буреинский заповеΑник, верховье р. Правая Бурея, окрестности корΑона «Новый МеΑвежий», 900 м наΑ уровнем моря; 4.07.2016; 3, 4 — там же, 29–30.06.2018 Fig. 1. Pararctia lapponica lemniscata (Stichel, 1911): 1 – 4 – adults (1, 2 – males; 3, 4 – females). Data labels for imago: 1 – Bureinsky Nature Reserve, upper reach of Pravaya Bureya River, 4 km E Novyi Medvezhii cordon, 1400 m above sea level, 24.06.2014; 2 – Bureinsky Nature Reserve, upper reach of Pravaya Bureya River, near Novyi Medvezhii cordon, 900 m above sea level, 4.07.2016; 3, 4 – at the same place, 29–30.06.2018

Figs. 1–12 in Review of the millipedes of the Sikhote-Alin State Nature Biosphere Reserve (Far East of Russia), with detection of the morphological variability of Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899) (Diplopoda)

Figs. 1–12. Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899). Variation in structure of the posterior angiocoxal process of posterior gonopod. 1 — from Anuchinsky District, Primorsky Krai; 2 — from Mt. Ko, Khabarovsky Krai; 3 — from Vladivostok, Okeanskaya Station, Primorsky Krai; (1st copy); 4 — from Vladivostok, Okeanskaya Station, Primorsky Krai; (2st copy); 5 — from Kedrovaya Pad Nature Reserve, Primorsky Krai; 6 — from Popova Island, Primorsky Krai; (1st copy); 7 — from Ussuriysky Nature Reserve, Primorsky Krai; 8 — from Lazovsky Nature Reserve, Primorsky Krai; 9 — from Sikhote-Alin Nature Biosphere Reserve (floodplain terrace, Yasnaya River), Primorsky Krai; 10 — from Chuguevsky District, Verkhneussuriysky Research Station, Primorsky Krai; 11 — from Popova Island, Primorsky Krai; (2st copy); 12 — from Sikhote-Alin Nature Biosphere Reserve, Blagodatnoe, Ozerny Stream, Primorsky Krai; a — apical outgrowth; b — finger-shaped process; m — mesal protrusion. Scale in mm (0.5)

Figs. 13–16 in Review of the millipedes of the Sikhote-Alin State Nature Biosphere Reserve (Far East of Russia), with detection of the morphological variability of Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899) (Diplopoda)

Figs. 13–16. Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899). Posterior angiocoxal processes of posterior gonopods. 13 — from Mt. Ko, Khabarovsky Krai; 14 — from Vladivostok, Okeanskaya Station, Primorsky Krai; 15 — from Lazovsky Nature Reserve, Primorsky Krai; 16 — from Sikhote-Alin Nature Biosphere Reserve, Blagodatnoe, Ozerny Stream, Primorsky Krai; a — apical outgrowth; b — finger-shaped process; m — mesal protrusion. Scales: 100 μm

Figs. 21–24 in Review of the millipedes of the Sikhote-Alin State Nature Biosphere Reserve (Far East of Russia), with detection of the morphological variability of Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899) (Diplopoda)

Figs. 21–24. Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899). Coxae of male leg pair 11, front view. 21 — from Mt. Ko, Khabarovsky Krai; 22 — from Vladivostok, Okeanskaya Station, Primorsky Krai; 23 — from Lazovsky Nature Reserve, Primorsky Krai; 24 — from SikhoteAlin Nature Biosphere Reserve, Blagodatnoe, Ozerny Stream, Primorsky Krai; p — coxal process. Scales: 100 μm Рис. 21–24. Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899). Коксы 11-й пары ног самца, виΑ спереΑи: 21 — с горы Ко в Хабаровском крае; 22 — из ВΛаΑивостока, станция Океанская; 23 — из Αазовского заповеΑника в Приморском крае; 24 — из СихотэАΛинского заповеΑника (урочище БΛагоΑатное, кΛюч Озёрный) в Приморском крае; р — коксаΛьный отросток. Масштабы: 100 μm

Figs. 17–20 in Review of the millipedes of the Sikhote-Alin State Nature Biosphere Reserve (Far East of Russia), with detection of the morphological variability of Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899) (Diplopoda)

Figs. 17–20. Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899). Gonopods, caudal view. 17 — from Mt. Ko, Khabarovsky Krai; 18 — from Vladivostok, Okeanskaya Station, Primorsky Krai; 19 — from Lazovsky Nature Reserve, Primorsky Krai; 20 — from Sikhote-Alin Nature Biosphere Reserve, Blagodatnoe, Ozerny Stream, Primorsky Krai; a — apical outgrowth; b — finger-shaped process; m — mesal protrusion. Scales: 100 μm

Map. Species diversity of Diplopoda within the Sikhote-Alin State Nature Biosphere Reserve. The numbers of the natural landmarks (1–18) are explained in the "Material and Methods section" Карта. ВиΑовое разнообразие Αвупарноногих многоножек в Сихотэ-АΛинском заповеΑнике. Номера урочищ (1–18) поясняются в разΑеΛе «МатериаΛ и метоΑы» in Review of the millipedes of the Sikhote-Alin State Nature Biosphere Reserve (Far East of Russia), with detection of the morphological variability of Diplomaragna terricolor (Attems, 1899) (Diplopoda)

Map. Species diversity of Diplopoda within the Sikhote-Alin State Nature Biosphere Reserve. The numbers of the natural landmarks (1–18) are explained in the "Material and Methods section" Карта. ВиΑовое разнообразие Αвупарноногих многоножек в Сихотэ-АΛинском заповеΑнике. Номера урочищ (1–18) поясняются в разΑеΛе «МатериаΛ и метоΑы»

FIGURE 4 in Towards sustainable treatments to preserve fossils from weathering, as part of the garden redevelopment project at the Natural History Museum

FIGURE 4. Graph showing the cumulative weight gain on tape peels, which equate to cumulative loss of surface material.

FIGURE 2 in Towards sustainable treatments to preserve fossils from weathering, as part of the garden redevelopment project at the Natural History Museum

FIGURE 2. One of the ornithopod footprints from the Purbeck Group Durlston Formation, Stair Hole Member, with yellow outline showing approximate shape of impression.

FIGURE 1 in Towards sustainable treatments to preserve fossils from weathering, as part of the garden redevelopment project at the Natural History Museum

FIGURE 1. Ammonites from the Portland Stone Formation Tisbury Member can be seen on the facing-left of this image, and fossil tree sections from the Purbeck Group Lulworth Formation on the facing-right.

FIGURE 3. Trackway block samples after 3 in Towards sustainable treatments to preserve fossils from weathering, as part of the garden redevelopment project at the Natural History Museum

FIGURE 3. Trackway block samples after 3 treatments with CaLoSiL® E25 (no TiO2) at x10000 magnification, top left: ornithopod trackway before treatment; bottom left: ornithopod trackway after treatment; top right: theropod trackway before treatment; bottom right: theropod trackway after treatment. EHT 6.00kV, Signal A SE2, WD 8.1 mm, Magnification 10000 x.

Fig. 13. Rhamdiopsis krugi, 32.5 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 13. Rhamdiopsis krugi, 32.5 mm SL, adult, live specimen photographed in aquarium on July 16th, 2008, unpreserved; Poço Encantado cave, left margin of the rio Una, Municipality of Itaetê, State of Bahia, Brazil. Courtesy of Adriano Gambarini.

Fig. 9 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 9. Basal region of left pectoral fin and proximate portions of pectoral girdle of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype.Ventralview. AP) articularcleithralprocess; CB) posterior complex bone of pectoral girdle (scapula, coracoid, and mesocoracoid fused); CK) coracoid keel; CL) cleithrum; DC) complex distal radial; DR1) distal radial 1; DR2a-c) pieces of distal radial 2; MA) mesocoracoid arch; PP) postcleithral process; and PR1-2) proximalradials 1 and 2. Scalebar = 0.7 mm.

Fig. 8 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 8. Pectoral girdle and fins of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Dorsal view. AP) articular cleithral process; CB) posterior complex bone of pectoral girdle (scapula, coracoid, and mesocoracoid fused); CL) cleithrum; DR2b) main posterior piece of distal radial 2; MA) mesocoracoid arch; PP) postcleithral process; PR2) proximal radial 2; RR1) rigid part of pectoral-fin ray 1; and SR1) soft part of pectoral-fin ray 1. Scale bar = 2 mm.

Fig. 5 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 5. Left suspensorium and opercular series of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Lateral view. EN) entopterygoid; HFen) foramen for entrance of ramus hyoideus of hyomandibular nerve trunk; HMex) foramen for exit of hyomandibular nerve trunk; HY) hyomandibula; IF) foramen for exit of infraorbital trunk nerve; IO) interopercle; MFen) foramen for entrance of ramus mandibularis externus facialis of hyomandibular nerve trunk; MT) metapterygoid; OP) opercle; pm8-11) preoperculomandibular sensory branches 8 to 11; PO) preopercle; and QU) quadrate. Scale bar = 1.5 mm.

Fig. 2 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 2. Anterior portion of the body of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5929, 37.1 mm SL, holotype. Arrows indicate the limits of the pseudotympanum.

Fig. 12 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 12. Rhamdiopsis krugi, ca. 30.0 mm SL, adult, live specimen photographed in the nature in August, 1991, not collected; Poço Encantado cave, ca. 7 km from left margin of the rio Una, Municipality of Itaetê, State of Bahia, Brazil.

Fig. 7 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 7. Anterior vertebrae of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Dorsal view. AB) anterior branch of transverse process 4; AP) accessory process of vertebra 7; ll1-3) lateral line sensory branches 1 to 3; NL) neural lamina (neural arches of vertebrae 3 and 4); NS4) neural spine of vertebra 4; PB) posterior branch of transverse process 4; SB) swimbladder; TP4) transverse process 4; and TP5) transverse process 5. Arrow indicates osseous bridge joining anterior and posterior branches of transverse process 4. Scale bar = 2 mm.

Fig. 4 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 4. Cranium of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. a) dorsal view; b) ventral view. Abbreviations: AF) anterior fontanel; AN) antorbital; AP) autopalatine; AT) antorbital tubule; BL) Baudelot's ligament; BO) basioccipital; EC) ethmoidean cartilage; EP) epioccipital; ES) extrascapula; EX) exoccipital; FR) frontal; HF) hyomandibular facet; i1-6) infraorbital sensory branches 1 to 6; LE) lateral ethmoid; ME) mesethmoid; MX) maxilla; NA) nasal; OF) optic foramen (rudiment); OS) orbitosphenoid; PA) parasphenoid; PF) posterior fontanel; PM) premaxilla; PO) prootic; po1-3) postotic sensory branches 1 to 3; PT) pterotic; PS) pterosphenoid; s1-3) supraorbital sensory branches 1 to 3; s6) supraorbital sensory branch 6 (epiphyseal branch); s7) supraorbital sensory branch 7 (postorbital branch); s8) supraorbital sensory branch 8 (parietal branch); SC) supracleithrum; SP) sphenotic; ST1-4) suborbital tubules 1 to 4; SU) supraoccipital; TF) trigeminofacial foramen; VL) ventrolateral limb of supracleithrum; VM) ventromedial limb of supracleithrum; and VO) vomer. Scale bars = 1.5 mm.

Fig. 6 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 6. Gill arches of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5928, 33.9 mm SL, paratype. Dorsal view. Gill rakers and dorsal elements of left gill arches not shown. AN) accessory cartilaginous nodule; BB2-4) basibranchials 2 to 4; CB1-5) ceratobranchials 1 to 5; EB1-5) epibranchials 1 to 5; HB1-3) hypobranchials 1 to 3; PB3-4) pharyngobranchials 3 and 4; TP) tooth plate; and UP) uncinate process. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 3 in The blind catfish from the caves of Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae): description, anatomy, phylogenetic relationships, natural history, and biogeography

Fig. 3. Anterior portion of the body of Rhamdiopsis krugi, LIRP 5929, 37.1 mm SL, holotype, showing laterosensory canal system. a) lateral view; b) dorsal view; c) ventral view. i1) infraorbital sensory branch 1; i2) infraorbital sensory branch 2 (antorbital branch); i3-6) infraorbital sensory branches 3 to 6; ll1) lateral line sensory branch 1; ll2-11) lateral line sensory branches 2 to 11; pm1-11) preoperculomandibular sensory branches 1 to 11; po1) postotic sensory branch 1; po1+pm11) postotic-preoperculomandibular complex sensory branch (postotic sensory branch 1 + preoperculomandibular sensory branch 11); po2) postotic sensory branch 2 (pterotic or temporal branch); po3) postotic sensory branch 3; s1-3) supraorbital sensory branches 1 to 3; s6) supraorbital sensory branch 6 (epiphyseal branch); and s8) supraorbital sensory branch 8 (parietal branch). Scale bar = 3 mm.