Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
272
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
272 results for “Forest biodiversity”
Figure 3 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 3 Coverage based rarefaction estimates of species richness and diversity of epigaeic beetles at each location in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests of north-central Alberta, 1992–93. Locations are distributed across four Natural Subregions (SR) and two Natural Regions (NR) ACarabidae (97.2% coverage) BStaphylinidae (97.6% coverage). Bars represent species richness (± 95% CI) and points represent the exponential of the Shannon diversity index (± 95% CI). For locations where there was significant interannual variation, the results for species richness are placed at the bottom of each bar, and results for diversity are placed in square brackets [] and are indicated above the point for that location.
Figure 2 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 2 Boxplot of the standardized catch of epigaeic beetles at seven locations in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests in north-central Alberta, 1992–93. Locations are distributed across four Natural Subregions (SR) and two Natural Regions (NR) ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae. Locations with the same letter situated above the bar are not significantly different at α = 0.05 (post hoc Tukey's tests). For locations where there was significant interannual variation, the results are indicated above the bar for that location.
Figure 11 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 11 Principal components analysis of epigaeic beetle assemblages in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests in north-central Alberta, 1992–93 ACarabidae, 1992 BCarabidae, 1993 CStaphylinidae, 1992 DStaphylinidae, 1993. Each point represents the catch from a single pitfall trap. Ellipses represent the standard deviation around the centroid of points in each group.
Figure 10 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 10 Adjusted percentage of variance of species composition in the Lac la Biche dataset explained at each spatial scale – between locations, between lines in the same location and between traps in the same line ACarabidaeBStaphylinidae.
Figure 1 from: Hammond HEJ, García-Tejero S, Pohl GR, Langor DW, Spence JR (2021) Spatial and temporal variation of epigaeic beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in aspen-dominated mixedwood forests across north-central Alberta. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 951-991. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.65776
Figure 1 Location of aspen-dominated mixedwood study sites sampled in north-central Alberta, 1992 and 1993. INSET: location of individual pitfall trap lines at Lac la Biche, with lines used in the regional dataset surrounded with box.
Figure 3 from: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907-927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803
Figure 3 Relationships between ground beetle biomass and canopy cover (A) and herb cover (B). Black lines indicate significant relationships at p < 0.05 obtained from mixed-effects models (keeping other significant predictors fixed at their means) with grey areas indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Points (slightly jittered to improve visibility) represent observed values per trap. The fixed-effects explained 30% of the variation in ground beetle biomass.
Figure 4 from: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907-927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803
Figure 4 Representatives of ground beetles from pitfall traps and flight interception traps in Gutianshan NP ACarabus kiukiangensisBCarabus davidisCLioptera erotyloidesDTricondyla macrodera.
Figure 2 from: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907-927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803
Figure 2 Relationships between ground beetle species richness and canopy cover (A) and herb cover (B). Black lines indicate significant relationships at p < 0.05 obtained from mixed-effects models (keeping other significant predictors fixed at their means) with grey areas indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Points represent observed values per trap. Note that some traps had similar richness and predictor values. The fixed-effects explained 12% of the variation in ground beetle species richness.
Figure 1 from: Zumstein P, Bruelheide H, Fichtner A, Schuldt A, Staab M, Härdtle W, Zhou H, Assmann T (2021) What shapes ground beetle assemblages in a tree species-rich subtropical forest? In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 907-927. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.63803
Figure 1 Relationships between ground beetle abundance and canopy cover (A), herb cover (B) and pH-value of the soil (C). Black lines indicate significant relationships at p < 0.05 obtained from mixed-effects models (keeping other significant predictors fixed at their means) with grey areas indicating the 95% confidence intervals. Points represent observed values per trap. Note that some traps had similar abundance and predictor values. The fixed-effects explained 22% of the variation in ground beetle abundance.
Figure 4 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure 4 Body length (ABL) (mm) for carabid individuals collected in FP and TF forests, excluding Cicindelini. Body length for FP forest was significantly larger than TF forest (P < 0.001).
Figure E1 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure E1 Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination based on Jaccard dissimilarity values (presence/absence data) of Carabidae morphospecies assemblages for FP and TF forests (stress = 13.7, k = 2). Each data point represents one of the 24 sampling sites. Significant differences (P < 0.001) in morphospecies assemblages occurred between FP and TF.
Figure D2 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure D2 Numbers of morphospecies for Carabidae tribes with significant differences (P < 0.05) between FP and TF forests.
Figure D1 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure D1 Numbers of individuals for Carabidae tribes with significant differences (P < 0.05) between FP and TF forests.
Figure 3 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure 3 Inverse Simpson index (1/D) for FP forest and TF forest carabid beetle samples. FP forest had significantly higher 1/D values than TF forest (P = 0.003).
Figure 1 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure 1 Maps of the field sites A country boundaries of South America with the Amazon Basin indicated by the heavier outline B Ecuador with the locations of TBS as a red circle and the boundaries of Yasuní National Park shaded C a DEM of the study area. The 24 sampling sites are indicated, with blue squares representing FP forest sites and green circles for TF forest. Latitude and longitude (in DD) shown along x and y axes. Maps generated through R packages: 'raster' (Hijmans 2015), 'sp' (Pebesma and Bivand 2005; Bivand et al. 2013), 'GISTools' (Brunsdon and Chen 2014), and 'maps' (Becker et al. 2015).
Figure C3 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure C3 Morphospecies relative abundance by the number of sampling sites at which they were present. Point markers represent the 143 morphospecies coded according the three rarity categories: 'dominant' (circle), 'common' (triangles) and 'rare' (diamonds). Morphospecies classified as 'dominant' occurred at a higher number of sampling sites than 'common' morphospecies. 'Common' morphospecies occurred at a higher number of sampling sites than 'rare' morphospecies (P < 0.001).
Figure 6 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure 6 Simpson's evenness index (E1/D) for species assemblages were significantly more even from FP than TF forests (P = 0.008).
Figure 2 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure 2 Carabid beetle rarefaction curves. Interpolation (solid lines) indicated by filled point markers represents the sampling extent of the current study. Extrapolation curves based on the Chao1 nonparametric diversity estimator are shown (dashed lines). Shaded areas depict unconditional 95% confidence intervals A the overall dataset with both forest types combined and richness extrapolated to n = 2,510 (twice the number of individuals collected) B rarefaction curves for FP forests (blue square) and TF forests (green circle) with sample size extrapolated to n = 1,128 (twice the number of individuals collected in FP forests). FP forests (96 ± 8.0) were significantly more species rich than TF forests (72 ± 8.1) at the rarefied sample size (n = 564). The extrapolated rarefaction curves suggest the difference in cumulative morphospecies richness between FP and TF will decrease as sample size increases.
Figure C1 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure C1 Number of individuals for the morphospecies cicindelid Pentacomia species b (Pentb) for FP and TF forests (P = 0.02).
Figure 8 from: Riley Peterson KN, Browne RA, Erwin TL (2021) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 831-876. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62340
Figure 8 Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity for carabid morphospecies assemblages from FP and TF forests (stress = 13.7, k = 2). Each data point represents one of 24 sampling sites, with blue squares representing FP forest sites and green circles representing TF forest sites. Morphospecies assemblages were significantly different between FP and TF (P < 0.001).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.