Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,059
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,059 results for “Journale”
Figure 12. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 12. - Excerpt from a taxonomic treatment with ambiguously structured materialsCitations data in the source document. The top frame shows the published PDF, the lower frame shows the same content in GoldenGATE with the treatment and materialsCitation tags revealed. The source document is ambiguous about how many paratype specimens are deposited in which natural history collection. This is represented in XML by associating the collection event data (place, time, collector) with each of the listed institutional collections but no quantity of specimens is assigned to any collection. The 110 male and 44 female specimens are also associated with the collection event data, but with no institutional collection.
Supplementary material 11: Collecting country dashboard: specimens collected in Russia from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Dashboard charts showing only specimens collected in Russia. This page shows data from species-rank treatments. When viewed using a browser (such as Google Chrome) with an internet connection, this page sends a series of queries to Plazi and integrates the results with the Google Charts API to produce 37 interactive dashboard charts.
Figure 6. from: First record of Neoempheria Osten Sacken (Diptera, Mycetophilidae) biology in the Neotropical region, with associations between its larvae and fungi - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5073 (08 June 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5073
Figure 6. - Neoempheriapuncticoxa Edwards, 1940 adult. Male terminalia, A dorsal view; gcap – gonocoxal apodeme, gcx – gonocoxite, gs – gonostylus, par – parameres, B lateral view of the gonostylus, C Dorsal view of tergite 9, D Dorsal view of the cercus and sternite 10.
Figure 11. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 11. - Dashboard charts summarizing data published in open access articles in Zootaxa and Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders, filtered to show only one lead author: Jeremy A. Miller (Suppl. material 16). Miller was lead author on two publications in Biodiversity Data Journal and one in Zootaxa, and was the only lead author on open access publications featuring spider treatments in both journals. Note that in addition to the three articles on which he is lead author, he is also a contributing author to a fourth article (Wang et al. 2010), but content from this article is not included here (see Discussion: Tracking individuals).
Figure 10. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 10. - Dashboard charts summarizing data published in open access articles in Zootaxa and Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders, filtered to show only one species: Tenuiphantestenuis (Suppl. material 15). Data on Tenuiphantestenuis was included in three treatments, all published in Biodiversity Data Journal.
Figure 9b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 9b. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from one article (Kronestedt and Marusik 2011) (Suppl. materials 13, 14).Figure 9a.Data from all treatments in Kronestedt and Marusik (2011).Figure 9b.Data from one treatment, Pardosazyuzini in Kronestedt and Marusik (2011). <br> Data from one treatment, Pardosazyuzini in Kronestedt and Marusik (2011).
Figure 9a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 9a. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from one article (Kronestedt and Marusik 2011) (Suppl. materials 13, 14).Figure 9a.Data from all treatments in Kronestedt and Marusik (2011).Figure 9b.Data from one treatment, Pardosazyuzini in Kronestedt and Marusik (2011). <br> Data from all treatments in Kronestedt and Marusik (2011).
Supplementary material 10: Institutional collection dashboard: specimens from the collection of the California Academy of Sciences (CAS) from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Dashboard charts showing only specimens from the collection of the California Academy of Sciences. This page shows data from species-rank treatments. When viewed using a browser (such as Google Chrome) with an internet connection, this page sends a series of queries to Plazi and integrates the results with the Google Charts API to produce 37 interactive dashboard charts.
Figure 3b. from: First record of Neoempheria Osten Sacken (Diptera, Mycetophilidae) biology in the Neotropical region, with associations between its larvae and fungi - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5073 (08 June 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5073
Figure 3b. - Neoempheriapuncticoxa Edwards, 1940. Left wing.Figure 3a.Male.Figure 3b.Female. <br> Female.
Figure 7. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 7. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from species-rank treatments published in open access articles in Zootaxa and Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders, filtered to show only specimens collected in Russia (Suppl. material 11). Russia was the country associated with the largest number of specimens in this body of literature. All content shown here is from treatments published in Zootaxa; no specimens collected in Russia were cited in Biodiversity Data Journal treatments on spiders.
Figure 5b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 5b. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from 37 open access articles published in Zootaxa and five articles published in Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 8, 9). These charts illustrate interoperability of data from XML-based publishing and subsequently marked up legacy literature.Figure 5a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 5b.Species-rank treatments. <br> Species-rank treatments.
Figure 6. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 6. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from species-rank treatments published in open access articles in Zootaxa and Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders, filtered to show only specimens from the collection of the California Academy of Sciences (Suppl. material 10). CAS was the institution associated with the largest number of specimens in this body of literature. All content shown here is from treatments published in Zootaxa; no CAS specimens were cited in Biodiversity Data Journal treatments on spiders.
Figure 8. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 8. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from species-rank treatments published in open access articles in Zootaxa and Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders, filtered to show only specimens collected by Y. M. Marusik (Suppl. material 12). Marusik was the collector associated with the largest number of specimens in this body of literature. Note that this count excludes specimens that Marusik collected collaboratively with others (see Discussion: Tracking Individuals). All content shown here is from articles published in Zootaxa; no specimens collected by Marusik were cited in Biodiversity Data Journal treatments on spiders.
Figure 5a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 5a. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from 37 open access articles published in Zootaxa and five articles published in Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 8, 9). These charts illustrate interoperability of data from XML-based publishing and subsequently marked up legacy literature.Figure 5a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 5b.Species-rank treatments. <br> All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.
Figure 4b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 4b. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from five articles published in Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 6, 7). Data elements were XML encoded as part of the routine publication process.Figure 4a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 4b.Species-rank treatments. <br> Species-rank treatments.
Figure 3a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 3a. - Legacy literature dashboard: charts summarizing content from 37 open access articles published in Zootaxa containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 4, 5). Data elements were XML encoded using GoldenGATE.Figure 3a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 3b.Species-rank treatments. <br> All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.
Figure 2b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 2b. - Number of publications (a; Suppl. material 2) and treatments (b; Suppl. material 3) contributing to spider taxonomy sorted by number of treatments per publication source (e.g., journal, book publisher). Source: the World Spider Catalog, accessed 14 October 2014.Figure 2a.12,377 publications listed in the 2014 World Spider Catalog. Zootaxa is the top ranking venue with 509 titles representing just over 4% of spider taxonomy.Figure 2b.The 2014 World Spider Catalog refers to 126,621 treatments. With 3314 treatments (2.6%), Zootaxa is the third ranking all time venue behind two museum monograph series: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History (4537 treatments, 3.6%) and Harvard's Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology (3761 treatments, 3.0%). <br> The 2014 World Spider Catalog refers to 126,621 treatments. With 3314 treatments (2.6%), Zootaxa is the third ranking all time venue behind two museum monograph series: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History (4537 treatments, 3.6%) and Harvard's Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology (3761 treatments, 3.0%).
Figure 2a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 2a. - Number of publications (a; Suppl. material 2) and treatments (b; Suppl. material 3) contributing to spider taxonomy sorted by number of treatments per publication source (e.g., journal, book publisher). Source: the World Spider Catalog, accessed 14 October 2014.Figure 2a.12,377 publications listed in the 2014 World Spider Catalog. Zootaxa is the top ranking venue with 509 titles representing just over 4% of spider taxonomy.Figure 2b.The 2014 World Spider Catalog refers to 126,621 treatments. With 3314 treatments (2.6%), Zootaxa is the third ranking all time venue behind two museum monograph series: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History (4537 treatments, 3.6%) and Harvard's Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology (3761 treatments, 3.0%). <br> 12,377 publications listed in the 2014 World Spider Catalog. Zootaxa is the top ranking venue with 509 titles representing just over 4% of spider taxonomy.
Figure 1a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 1a. - GBIF records proportioned by selected taxonomic groups (Suppl. material 1). Inner ring shows vertebrates, insects, arachnids, other animals, plants, and other kingdoms; outer ring separates birds from other vertebrates, Hymenoptera from other insects, and spiders from other arachnids.Figure 1a.All records in GBIF (n = 517,325,595).Figure 1b.Specimen-based records in GBIF (n = 98,144,242). <br> All records in GBIF (n = 517,325,595).
Figure 3b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 3b. - Legacy literature dashboard: charts summarizing content from 37 open access articles published in Zootaxa containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 4, 5). Data elements were XML encoded using GoldenGATE.Figure 3a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 3b.Species-rank treatments. <br> Species-rank treatments.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.