Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 28 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figure 28. Distribution of Aztecolini plotted against Cretaceous land patterns; submerged, marine Florida terrane and approximate maximal dimensions of the Western Interior Seaway in light blue. Ap, Appalachia. AZ, Aztecolus. C, Chicobolus. L, Laramidia. SA, Presumptive Source Area in the "northern Mexican Highlands." The area encircled with brown squares is that of Tylobolini/Hiltonius/H. carpinus; the area where Aztecolus and Tylobolini/Hiltonius overlap is plausibly the source area.

Figure 30 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figure 30. Distribution of Spirobolini/Narceus plotted against Cretaceous land patterns; submerged, marine Florida terrane and approximate maximal dimensions of the Western Interior Seaway in light blue. Ap, Appalachia. L, Laramidia.

Figure 33 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figure 33. Ring profiles in Spirobolidae. Left two rings, transversely ovoid profile shown by Floridobolinae/ Floridobolini. Right two rings, rounded profile demonstrated by Floridobolinae/Tylobolini and Spirobolinae. Photo courtesy of O. McMonigle.

Figures 22–26 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figures 22–26. "Big Scrub" habitat at the type locality of F. orini. 22) Sand Pine (Pinus clausa) boards that sheltered the holotype near the base of a scrub palmetto (Sabal etonia). 23) Broad environmental view with young Pinus clausa beyond the boards. 24) Lightly moist, porous sandy substrate, potential refuge for both F. orini and N. gordanus, beneath partly decayed Pinus clausa boards near base of Sabal etonia. 25) Prickly pear cactus (Opuntia humifusa). 26) Xeric Pinus clausa forest adjacent to more open scrub habitat where F. orini was discovered.

Figures 14–21. Floridobolus spp., gonopodal features. 14–17 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figures 14–21. Floridobolus spp., gonopodal features. 14–17) F. penneri holotype. 14) Left anterior gonopod, anterior view. 15) Telopodite of left posterior gonopod, anterior view. 16) The same, caudal view. 17) Bifurcate projection of anterior surface of the same, anteriomedial view. 18–21) F. orini holotype. 18) left anterior gonopod, anterior view. 19) Telopodite of left posterior gonopod, anterior view. 20) The same, caudal view. 21) Bifurcate projection of anterior surface of the same, anteriomedial view. A and C, anterior and caudal surfaces, respectively, of posterior gonopod acropodite. at, anterior gonopod telopodite. ce, coxal endite. db, dorsal branch of bifurcate projection. s, sternum. vb, ventral branch of bifurcate projection. asterisk (*), prefemoral process. x, extraneous basal process.

Figure 13 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figure 13. Distributions of Floridobolini and Floridobolus. Star, type locality of F. orini. Black line, known and projected distributions of F. penneri on the Lake Wales Ridge. AR, course of the Apalachicola River in Florida. H, Highlands Co. M, Marion Co. P, Polk Co.

Figures 1–5. Floridobolus orini holotype. 1 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figures 1–5. Floridobolus orini holotype. 1) Head, collum, and anterior pleurotergites, dorsal view. 2) The same, right sublateral view. 3) Entire body, dorsal view. 4) The same, dorsolateral view. 5) Paraprocts, epiproct, and caudal pleurotergites, caudolateral view.

Figure 12 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figure 12. Distribution of Floridobolinae plotted against Cretaceous land patterns; submerged, marine Florida terrane and approximate maximal dimensions of the Western Interior Seaway in light blue. Ap, Appalachia. F, Floridobolus/Floridobolini. L, Laramidia. SA, Presumptive Source Area in the "northern Mexican Highlands." Black lines and dot (delineated by the arrow), Hiltonius/Tylobolini. Red line, Tylobolus/Tylobolini. Green line and dot (in Florida), Floridobolus/Floridobolini. The area where Tylobolini/Hiltonius and Aztecolus overlap constitutes the presumptive source area.

Figure 11 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figure 11. Distribution of Spirobolidae. The red star marks the approximate location of the Mongolian, Cretaceous fossils assigned to Gobiulus (Floridobolinae: Tylobolini).

Figures 6–9 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figures 6–9. Comparison of Floridobolinae posterior gonopods. 6) Floridobolus penneri (Floridobolini), caudal view of caudal acropodital surface of holotype left posterior gonopod. 7) Hiltonius carpinus (Tylobolini), anterior view of right posterior gonopod of male from Cochise Co., Arizona. 8) H. pulchrus (Tylobolini), caudal view of right posterior gonopod of male from Riverside Co., California. 9) The same, caudal view of right posterior gonopod of male from Los Angeles Co., California. Fig. 7 is reproduced from Shelley (2010) with permission from the Center for Systematic Entomology; Fig. 8–9 are reproduced from Keeton (1960a) with permission from the American Entomological Society.

Figure 10 in Expanded concept of the milliped family Spirobolidae Diplopoda: Spirobolida: Spirobolidea): Proposals of Aztecolini n. tribe and Floridobolinae/ini and Tylobolini n. stats.; (re)descriptions of Floridobolus and F. penneri, both Causey, 1957, and F. orini n. sp.; hypotheses on origins and affinities

Figure 10. Relationships among spirobolid tribes, apomorphies are listed in table 1. F, Floridobolini. T, Tylobolini. A, Aztecolini. S, Spirobolini.

Figure 7 in Taxonomic notes on the Asian frogs of the tribe Paini (Ranidae, Dicroglossinae): 1. Morphology and synonymy of Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922), with proposal of a new statistical method for testing homogeneity of small samples

Figure 7. Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922), MNHN 1999.5821, topotype of Rana (Chaparana) fansipani Bourret, 1939, adult male from Fan Si Pan, Vietnam: ventral view of chest and throat showing shape of patch of nuptial spines.

Figure 6 in Taxonomic notes on the Asian frogs of the tribe Paini (Ranidae, Dicroglossinae): 1. Morphology and synonymy of Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922), with proposal of a new statistical method for testing homogeneity of small samples

Figure 6. Plots of factors 1 and 2 of principal component analysis based on varimax rotated coefficients for logtransposed characters (25 measurements) for four adult specimens of Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922) (see Table II) and six adult specimens of Chaparana unculuanus (Liu, Hu and Yang, 1960) (see Table IV).

Figure 3 in Taxonomic notes on the Asian frogs of the tribe Paini (Ranidae, Dicroglossinae): 1. Morphology and synonymy of Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922), with proposal of a new statistical method for testing homogeneity of small samples

Figure 3. Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922). (a–c) MNHN 1989.0712, non-breeding adult male from Doi Inthanon, Chiangmai Province, Thailand: (a) whole body in dorsal view; (b) whole body in ventral view; (c) head in right lateral view. (d–f) MNHN 1948.0139, holotype of Rana (Chaparana) fansipani Bourret, 1939, juvenile male from Fan Si Pan, Vietnam: (d) whole body in dorsal view; (e) whole body in ventral view; (f) head in right lateral view.

Figure 4 in Taxonomic notes on the Asian frogs of the tribe Paini (Ranidae, Dicroglossinae): 1. Morphology and synonymy of Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922), with proposal of a new statistical method for testing homogeneity of small samples

Figure 4. (a–c) Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922), MNHN 1999.5818, topotype of Rana (Chaparana) fansipani Bourret, 1939, adult male from Fan Si Pan, Vietnam: (a) whole body in dorsal view; (b) whole body in ventral view; (c) head in right lateral view. (d–f) Chaparana unculuanus (Liu, Hu and Yang, 1960), MNHN 2001.0280, adult female from Jingdong Xian, Yunnan, China: (d) whole body in dorsal view; (e) whole body in ventral view; (f) head in right lateral view.

Figure 1 in Taxonomic notes on the Asian frogs of the tribe Paini (Ranidae, Dicroglossinae): 1. Morphology and synonymy of Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922), with proposal of a new statistical method for testing homogeneity of small samples

Figure 1. Chaparana aenea (Smith, 1922). (a–c) BMNH 1947.2.2.31 (ex BMNH 1922.7.4.4, ex MAS 5821), holotype of Rana aenea Smith, 1922, juvenile female from Doi Chang, Thailand: (a) whole body in dorsal view; (b) whole body in ventral view; (c) head in right lateral view. (d–f) MNHN 1999.5821, topotype of Rana (Chaparana) fansipani Bourret, 1939, adult male from Fan Si Pan, Vietnam: (d) whole body in dorsal view; (e) whole body in ventral view; (f) head in right lateral view.

Figs 36–44. 36–40 in Identity of taxa proposed inClythra (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae) by Carl Peter Forsberg (1821)

Figs 36–44. 36–40 – Tituboea biguttata (Olivier, 1791) (holotype of Clythra sexpunctata Forsberg, 1821, ♀, 8.5 mm): 36 – dorsal habitus; 37 – lateral habitus; 38 – frontal habitus; 39 – box label; 40 – label of holotype. 41–44 – Tituboea macropus (Illiger, 1800) (holotype of Clythra coalita Forsberg, 1821, J, 10.0 mm): 41 – dorsal habitus; 42 – lateral habitus; 43 – box label; 44 – label of holotype.

Figs 45–49 in Identity of taxa proposed inClythra (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae) by Carl Peter Forsberg (1821)

Figs 45–49. Tituboea biguttata (Olivier, 1791) (holotype of Clythra quadrisignata Forsberg, 1821, ♀, 6.2 mm): 45 – dorsal habitus; 46 – lateral habitus; 47 – frontal habitus; 48 – box label; 49 – label of holotype.

Figs 7–16. 7–11 in Identity of taxa proposed inClythra (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae) by Carl Peter Forsberg (1821)

Figs 7–16. 7–11 – Clytra duodecimmaculata duodecimmaculata (Fabricius, 1775) (holotype of Clythra gigas Forsberg, 1821, J, 11.5 mm): 7 – dorsal habitus; 8 – lateral habitus; 9 – frontal habitus; 10 – box label; 11 – label of holotype. 12–16 – Coptocephala plagiocephala (Fabricius, 1792) (holotype of Clythra bipunctata Forsberg, 1821, ♀, 7.5 mm): 12 – dorsal habitus; 13 – lateral habitus; 14 – frontal habitus; 15 – box label; 16 – label of holotype.

Figs 17–26. 17–21 in Identity of taxa proposed inClythra (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae) by Carl Peter Forsberg (1821)

Figs 17–26. 17–21 – Macrolenes dentipes (Olivier, 1808) (holotype of Clythra crassimana Forsberg, 1821, J, length of elytra 4.0 mm): 17 – dorsal habitus; 18 – lateral habitus; 19 – frontal habitus; 20 – box label; 21 – label of holotype. 22–26 – Megalostomis analis (Forsberg, 1821) (holotype, J, 9.5 mm): 22 – dorsal habitus; 23 – lateral habitus; 24 – frontal habitus; 25 – box label; 26 – label of holotype.