Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 2. Comparison of skulls and mandibles of the seriema (Cariamidae) Noriegavis santacrucensis (Noriega Vizcaíno, and Bargo, 2009) from the early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Argentina (A) with extant Chunga burmeisteri (Hartlaub, 1860) (C) and extant Cariama cristata Bonaparte, 1853 (B, D). A. MPM-PV 15049, skull in left lateral (A 1), right lateral (A 2), dorsal (A 5), and caudal (A 6) views, skull with upper beak oriented in its natural position (A 3); partial mandible in right lateral view (A 4); left os lacrimale in dorsal (A 7) and lateral (A 8) views. B. SMF 1710, skull in dorsal view. C. MACN 2351, skull in dorsal (C 1) and lateral (C 2) views. D. SMF 1862, skull in lateral view.

Fig. 3 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 3. Wing bones and sternum of the seriema (Cariamidae) Noriegavis santacrucensis (Noriega, Vizcaíno, and Bargo, 2009) from the early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Argentina (B), in comparison with extant Cariama cristata Bonaparte, 1853 (A, C). A. SMF 1710, proximal left humerus in cranial view (A 1), proximal right ulna in caudal view (A 2), right phalanx proximalis digiti majoris in ventral view (A 3). B. MPM-PV 15049, proximal half of left humerus in cranial (B 1) and caudal (B 2) views, proximal portion of right ulna in cranial (B 3) and caudal (B 4) views, distal end of left ulna in ventral view (B 5), right phalanx proximalis digiti majoris in ventral view (B 6), sternum in right lateral (B 7) and cranial (B 8) views. C. SMF 2462, sternum in lateral (C 1) and cranial (C 2) views.

Fig. 5 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 5. Hindlimb bones of the seriema (Cariamidae) Noriegavis santacrucensis (Noriega, Vizcaíno, and Bargo, 2009) from the early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Argentina (A) in comparison with extant Cariama cristata Bonaparte, 1853 (B–D). A. MPM-PV 15049. B. SMF 1710. C. SMF 2462. D. SMF 1862. Right femur in caudal (A 1, B) and cranial (A 2) views. Right tibiotarsus: cranial view (A 3, C 1), distal end in caudal (A6) and cranial (A 7) views, proximal end in proximal view (A 8, C 2). Left tarsometatarsus: shaft in cranial (A 4) and caudal (A5) views, distal end in dorsal (A 9, D 1), plantar (A 11), and distal (A 14, D 2) views. Right tarsometatarsus in dorsal (A 10) and plantar (A 12) views, pedal phalanges (A 13)

Fig. 1 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 1. Map of southeastern Patagonia (A) and detail map (B) showing the position of the Monte Tigre locality, from which the new Noriegavis santacrucensis fossil comes, and the holotype locality Punto Estancia La Costa.

Fig. 4 in A well-preserved partial skeleton of the poorly known early Miocene seriema Noriegavis santacrucensis

Fig. 4. Pelvis of the seriema (Cariamidae) Noriegavis santacrucensis (Noriega, Vizcaíno, and Bargo, 2009) from the early Miocene Santa Cruz Formation in Argentina (A) in comparison with extant Cariama cristata Bonaparte, 1853 (B). A. MPM-PV 15049, in ventral (A1), dorsal (A2), and lateral (A3) views, with detail of cristae iliacae dorsales (A4). B. SMF 1862, pelvis in dorsal view (B1) and detail in lateral view (B2).

Fig. 12 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 12. Reconstructed left upper and lower tooth rows of the mackerel shark Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843), in lingual view. A. Reconstruction based on preserved teeth. B. Drawing of the completely reconstructed dentition based on preserved teeth and comparisons with living lamnid sharks.

Fig. 11 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 11. Lower jaw teeth of the mackerel shark Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843), MNU 071-20, from Gross Pampau, the middle–late Miocene. A. Lower left anterior tooth. B. Lower left intermediate tooth. C–H. Lower lateral teeth. Labial (A 1 –H 1) and lingual (A 2 –H 2) views. I. Incomplete anterior lower lateral tooth. J, K. Incompletely mineralized lower replacement teeth.

Fig. 7 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 7. Posteriormost precaudal and caudal vertebrae of the mackerel shark Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843), MNU 071-20, from Gross Pampau, the middle–late Miocene, from anterior (A) to posterior (J).

Fig. 4 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 4. Holotype of the mackerel shark Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843) from the Upper Marine Molasse (Burdigalian-Ottnagian, early Miocene) of Switzerland. A. Original drawings of Agassiz (1843: pl. 36: 16–18), in labial (A1) and lingual (A3) views. B. Photographs of holotype (ETZ 0000000001750), in labial (B1) and lingual (B2) views.

Fig. 9 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 9. Radiographs of vertebrae of the mackerel shark Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843), MNU 071-20, from Gross Pampau, the middle– late Miocene. A. Precaudal vertebra, same as in Fig. 6Q. B. Caudal abdominal/caudal vertebra, same as in Fig. 7J.

Fig. 10 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 10. Upper teeth of the mackerel shark Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843), MNU 071-20, from Gross Pampau, the middle–late Miocene. A. Second upper right anterior tooth. B. Right upper first lateral tooth. C–L. Left (C, D, G, I, K) and right (E, F, H, J, L) upper teeth. Labial (A1–L1) and lingual (A2–L2) views. For positions of lateral teeth within jaw see Fig. 12.

Fig. 8 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 8. Graphic representation of vertebral size decrease in Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843) from anterior to posterior. Steps at positions 10-11, 14-15 and 18-19 indicate missing portions due to collecting and/or taphonomic artefacts.

Fig. 2 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 2. Photograph (A) of mounted specimen MNU 071-20 of the mackerel shark Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz,1843) in the museum and drawing (B) of its in situ finding position, in Gross Pampau, the middle–late Miocene, depicting preserved teeth and vertebral centra. The large anterior vertebrae were recovered from the sediment after the in situ drawing during the excavation was produced.

Fig. 13 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 13. Relative crown heights of the reconstructed dentition of Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843) in comparison to living lamnids. Upper (A) and lower (B) jaw. Scaled logarithmically.

Fig. 5 in A partial skeleton of a new lamniform mackerel shark from the Miocene of Europe

Fig. 5. Trunk vertebrae of the mackerel shark Carcharomodus escheri (Agassiz, 1843), MNU 071-20, from Gross Pampau, the middle–late Miocene, displaying the characteristic lamniform morphology and concentric growth bands from anterior (A) to posterior (P).

Fig. 15 in The appendicular skeleton of Neuquensaurus, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine sauropod from Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 15. Phylogenetic relationships of Archosauriformes, showing main hypotheses of sauropod evolution (adapted from Wilson 2002; Nesbitt et al. 2009; Taylor 2009). Symbols indicate appendicular character evolution according the interpretation given in the present paper. The numbers indicate cladogram nodes as follows: 1, Archosauriformes; 2, Archosauria; 3, Ornithodira; 4, Dinosauromorpha; 5, Dinosauria; 6, Saurischia; 7, Sauropodomorpha; 8, Sauropoda; 9, Eusauropoda; 10, Neosauropoda; 11, Macronaria; 12, Titanosauriformes; 13, Somphospondili; 14, Titanosauria; 15, Saltasauridae; 16, Saltasaurinae.

Fig. 14 in The appendicular skeleton of Neuquensaurus, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine sauropod from Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 14. The saltasaurine sauropod Neuquensaurus, from the Anacleto Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Patagonia, Argentina. Metatarsals. A. Right metatarsal I of Neuquensaurus robustus (Huene, 1929) nomen dubium (MLP−CS 1179) in anterior (A1), posterior (A2), lateral (A3), medial (A4), proximal, anterior towards top (A5), and distal, anterior towards top (A6) views. B. Left metatarsal II of N. robustus nomen dubium (MLP−CS 1183) in anterior (B1), posterior (B2), lateral (B3), medial (B4), proximal, anterior towards top (B5), and distal, anterior towards top (B6) views. C. Left? metatarsal III of Neuquensaurus australis (Lydekker, 1893) (MLP−CS 1191) in anterior (C1), posterior (C2), medial (C3), lateral (C4), proximal, anterior towards top (C5), and distal, anterior towards top (C6) views. D. Right? metatarsal IV? of N. australis (MLP−CS 1193) in anterior (D1), posterior (D2), lateral (D3), medial (D4), proximal, anterior towards top (D5). E. Left metatarsal V of N. australis (MLP−CS 1180) in medial (E1), lateral (E2), and proximal, anterior towards top (E3). F. Pedal phalanx in anterior (F1), posterior (F2), lateral (F3), medial (F4), proximal, anterior towards top (F5), and distal, anterior towards top (F6) views. G. Pedal phalanx in anterior (G1), posterior (G2), lateral? (G3), medial? (G4), proximal, anterior towards top (G5), and distal, anterior towards top (G6) views.

Fig. 13 in The appendicular skeleton of Neuquensaurus, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine sauropod from Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 13. The saltasaurine sauropod Neuquensaurus robustus (Huene, 1929) nomen dubium, from the Anacleto Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Patagonia, Argentina. Fibula. Right fibula (MLP−CS 1265) in lateral (A, B), proximal, medial towards top (C), distal (D), posterior (E), medial (F), and anterior (G) views; photographs (A, E–G) and explanatory drawings (B–D).

Fig. 11 in The appendicular skeleton of Neuquensaurus, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine sauropod from Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 11. The saltasaurine sauropod Neuquensaurus robustus (Huene, 1929) nomen dubium, from the Anacleto Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Patagonia, Argentina. Tibia. A. Left tibia (MLP−CS 1264) in medial (A1), lateral (A2, A3), posterior (A4), anterior (A5), proximal, medial towards top (A6), and distal, medial towards top (A7) views; photographs (A1, A2, A4–A7) and explanatory drawing (A3). B. Right tibia (MCS−6) in medial (B1), lateral (B2), and proximal, medial towards top (B3) views.

Fig. 10 in The appendicular skeleton of Neuquensaurus, a Late Cretaceous saltasaurine sauropod from Patagonia, Argentina

Fig. 10. The saltasaurine sauropod Neuquensaurus, from the Anacleto Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Patagonia, Argentina. Femur. A. Left femur of Neuquensaurus australis (Lydekker, 1893) (MLP−CS 1118) in anterior (A1, A2) and posterior (A3, A4) views; photographs (A1, A3) and explanatory drawings (A2, A4). B. Right femur of Neuquensaurus robustus (Huene, 1929) nomen dubium (MCS−9) as proposed in this contribution in anterior (B1) and posterior (B2) views. C. Lectotype of N. robustus nomen dubium (MLP−CS 1488) as specified by Bonaparte and Gasparini (1978); left femur in anterior (C1) and posterior (C2) views.