Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5 in Taxonomy, typification and karyology of Crepis lacera (Asteraceae)

FIGURE 5. Scatter plot showing karyotype asymmetry of the studied taxa. Accessions of C. lacera subsp. lacera in blue symbols: filled ones corresponding to the five metaphasic plates obtained in this study and empty ones corresponding to the three previously published metaphasic plates (triangle, Chicciricò & Tammaro 1982; dot, Bellomaria & Hruska 1983; square, Aquaro et al. 2004). Accessions of C. lacera subsp. titani in red dots. Intrachromosomal asymmetry (MCA), x axis; interchromosomal asymmetry (CVCL), y axis.

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomy, typification and karyology of Crepis lacera (Asteraceae)

FIGURE 1. Comparison of adult basal leaves. A. Crepis lacera subsp. titani (Mt. Titano, San Marino Republic, 28 April 2014). B. Crepis lacera subsp. lacera (Piano di Ruggio, Basilicata, southern Italy, 6 August 2014). Pictures by L. Peruzzi.

FIGURE 4 in Taxonomy, typification and karyology of Crepis lacera (Asteraceae)

FIGURE 4. Metaphasic plates of C. lacera subsp. lacera (A) and C. lacera subsp. titani (B). Micrometric bar = 10 μm.

FIGURE 3 in Taxonomy, typification and karyology of Crepis lacera (Asteraceae)

FIGURE 3. Distribution map of C. lacera subsp. lacera (in green dots) and C. lacera subsp. titani (in red dots), based on the studied herbarium specimens.

FIGURE 2 in Taxonomy, typification and karyology of Crepis lacera (Asteraceae)

FIGURE 2. Boxplots illustrating the variability of the Index of Incision (IOI) in the basal leaves of C. lacera. On top right, a graphic explanation of the index.

opennotspecifiedAug 2015View details →

FIGURE 2. A in Typification and taxonomical notes on the names published by Roberto de Visiani and Josif Pančić in Plantae Serbicae Rariores aut Novae-Decas II

FIGURE 2. A. Lectotype of Scabiosa achaeta Vis. & Pančić. B. Three fruits on the lectotypes of S. achaeta showing one developed seta (marked in red) and five reduced setae (marked in blue) in total. C. Seven fruits on the lectotype of Scabiosa fumarioides Vis. & Pančić showing only eight developed setae (marked in red) and two reduced setae (marked in blue) in total.

FIGURE 3. Gyroporus cyanescens. Basidiomata. a in Molecular confirmation of Gyroporus lacteus and typification of Boletus cyanescens

FIGURE 3. Gyroporus cyanescens. Basidiomata. a. Bulliard's plate 369 (lectotype, iconotype). b. Collection MCVE 17184 (epitype, photo by G. Simonini). c. Collection MCVE 28580 (photo by P. Di Piazza). Scale bars: 2 cm.

FIGURE 1 in Molecular confirmation of Gyroporus lacteus and typification of Boletus cyanescens

FIGURE 1. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis based on the ITS sequences of Gyroporus spp., with Pisolithus arhizus and Scleroderma verrucosum as outgroup taxa. BPP values (in bold) ≥ 0.70 and MLB values ≥ 50 % are shown on the branches. For each sequence taxon name and Genbank/UNITE accession number are given. Newly sequenced collections are in bold.

FIGURE 2 in Molecular confirmation of Gyroporus lacteus and typification of Boletus cyanescens

FIGURE 2. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis based on the LSU sequences of Gyroporus spp., with Pisolithus arhizus and Scleroderma areolatum as outgroup taxa. BPP values (in bold) ≥ 0.70 and MLB values ≥ 50 % are shown on the branches. For each sequence taxon name and Genbank accession number are given. Newly sequenced collections are in bold.

FIGURE 5. Gyroporus lacteus. a. Basidiomata. b in Molecular confirmation of Gyroporus lacteus and typification of Boletus cyanescens

FIGURE 5. Gyroporus lacteus. a. Basidiomata. b. Basidiospores (in ammoniacal Congo red). c. Cheilocystidia (in ammoniacal Congo red). All from MCVE 28582 (epitype, photos by C. Angelini). Scale bars: a = 5 cm; b = 10 μm; c = 20 μm.

FIGURE 4. Gyroporus lacteus. Basidiomata. a in Molecular confirmation of Gyroporus lacteus and typification of Boletus cyanescens

FIGURE 4. Gyroporus lacteus. Basidiomata. a. Léveillé' s plate 9 (1–2) (lectotype, iconotype). b–e. Collection MCVE 28582 (epitype, photos by C. Angelini). Scale bars: 5 cm.

FIGURES 4–15. Fragilaria rhombus. 4–7 in Staurosirella rhombus (Ehrenberg), Ognjanova-Rumenova, Buczkó, Wojtal & R. Jahn, comb. nov.-Typification, morphology and biostratigraphic significance

FIGURES 4–15. Fragilaria rhombus. 4–7. Drawings and light microscopy documentation of F. rhombus in the original Ehrenberg's slides. 8–15. Staurosirella rhombus (Ehrenb.) Ognjanova-Rumenova, Buczkó, Wojtal & R. Jahn from materials #2847, Jastrabá Kieselgur (present study), LM. Figs. 8, 9 and 11–13 represent the same valvae at different focus, showing details of their ornamentation.

FIGURES 16–22. Staurosirella rhombus, SEM. 16, 17 in Staurosirella rhombus (Ehrenberg), Ognjanova-Rumenova, Buczkó, Wojtal & R. Jahn, comb. nov.-Typification, morphology and biostratigraphic significance

FIGURES 16–22. Staurosirella rhombus, SEM. 16, 17. External view of valves showing features of valve outline, sternum, striae and spines. 18, 19. Apical pore fields. 20. Striae structures. 21. Ribbon like colony. Note the number and the width of the girdle bands. 22. The diffusely branched spines. Scale bars = 1μm (Figs. 18, 19, 20, 22), 5 μm (Figs. 16, 17), 10 μm (Fig. 21).

FIGURES 26–29 in Staurosirella rhombus (Ehrenberg), Ognjanova-Rumenova, Buczkó, Wojtal & R. Jahn, comb. nov.-Typification, morphology and biostratigraphic significance

FIGURES 26–29. Staurosirella rhombus, SEM. Internal view of valves showing broader costae than striae, structure of the striae and the apical pore field. Scale bars = 5 μm (Figs. 27, 29), 10 μm (Figs. 26, 28).

FIGURES 1–3. Original C.G in Staurosirella rhombus (Ehrenberg), Ognjanova-Rumenova, Buczkó, Wojtal & R. Jahn, comb. nov.-Typification, morphology and biostratigraphic significance

FIGURES 1–3. Original C.G. Ehrenberg material and micas from the Ehrenberg Collection deposited in the Natural History Museum, Humbolt University in Berlin (BHUPM). 1. Raw materials #2847, Jastrabá Kieselgur. 2. Ehrenberg's original slides 440101–440109. 3. Ehrenberg's original drawing 'Zeichenblatt #2423'.

FIGURES 23–25 in Staurosirella rhombus (Ehrenberg), Ognjanova-Rumenova, Buczkó, Wojtal & R. Jahn, comb. nov.-Typification, morphology and biostratigraphic significance

FIGURES 23–25. Staurosirella rhombus, SEM. Ribbon like colonies of valves in a girdle view. 23. Two frustules joined by the spines. Note the several girdle bands in each individual and the larger valvocopulae than the rest of the elements. Scale bars = 5 μm (Fig. 25), 10 μm (Figs. 23, 24).

opennotspecifiedAug 2015View details →

FIGURE 1 in Typification of the Linnaean name Aphyllanthes monspeliensis (Asparagaceae)

FIGURE 1. Lectotype of Aphyllanthes monspeliensis L., Herb. Burser XI: 97 (UPS!). © Herbarium UPS, reproduced with permission.

FIGURE 1 in Typification of the marine siphonous green algae Caulerpa prolifera (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta)

FIGURE 1. Lectotype of Caulerpa prolifera (Forsskål) J.V. Lamouroux [Herbarium Forsskålii nº 878 C (barcode C–A–93369)]. © Herbarium C, reproduced with permission.

FIGURE 2 in Typification of the marine siphonous green algae Caulerpa prolifera (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta)

FIGURE 2. Lectotype of Caulerpa prolifera f. obovata J. Agardh [Herbarium Agardh at LD (LD-Ag-16391)]. © Herbarium LD, reproduced with permission.

FIGURE 3 in Typification of the marine siphonous green algae Caulerpa prolifera (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta)

FIGURE 3. Lectotype of Caulerpa prolifera f. zosterifolia Børgesen [St. Croix, I. Havgraesformation vest for Krauses Lagun, F. BØrgesen Nº 1650 iter tertium 1905-06, C (barcode C-A-92172)]. © Herbarium C, reproduced with permission.