Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
434
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
434 results for “conspecifics”
FIGURE 1 in A case of taxonomic inflation in coccoid algae: Ellipsoidion parvum and Neocystis vischeri are conspecific with Neocystis (=Nephrodiella) brevis (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae)
FIGURE 1: Comparison of the ITS2 sequences and predicted secondary structures of Neocystis brevis and Neocystis mucosa. Base numbering is indicated every 10 bases, and the four helices are numbered with Roman numerals. The structure shown corresponds to N. brevis; positions conserved in N. mucosa are portrayed in green, bases substituted in N. mucosa are shown by the structure and connected to the respective position by a short line, insertions and deletions are indicated with plus and minus symbols, respectively. The base pair marked in a grey box is a compensatory base change (CBC). The highly conserved U–U mismatch in the helix II and UGGU motif in the helix III (Schultz et al. 2005) are marked by arrows.
FIGURE 4 in A case of taxonomic inflation in coccoid algae: Ellipsoidion parvum and Neocystis vischeri are conspecific with Neocystis (=Nephrodiella) brevis (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae)
FIGURE 4: Unit-less centroid size values of strains of Neocystis spp. Boxplots with a full outline represent strains of N. mucosa. Boxplots with a dashed outline represent strains of N. brevis.
FIGURE 2 in A case of taxonomic inflation in coccoid algae: Ellipsoidion parvum and Neocystis vischeri are conspecific with Neocystis (=Nephrodiella) brevis (Chlorophyta, Trebouxiophyceae)
FIGURE 2: Morphometric characteristics of Neocystis strains. a) Visualisation of the multivariate regression model illustrating the relation of the shape and size of cells in the entire investigated dataset. b) The PCA ordination plot based on geometric morphometric data illustrating mean positions of individual strains and their standard deviations on PC1 (spanning 65.9% of the variation) and PC2 (23.2%). The theoretical cell shapes of marginal morphospace positions were reconstructed from the landmark coordinates of the original data.
FIG UR E 3 (a) Dated phylogeny of the genus Theodoxus constructed in BEAST based on COI, 16S and ATPα. Node labels denote divergence times in millions of years ago (Ma); node bars indicate the 95% credibility interval around these dates. Small squares at nodes indicate significant support of divergence events found with BEAST and other phylogenetic analyses (see Figures S2.1 and S2.2), as explained through the key. Where MOTUs (A–R) show conspecifics among a number of morphospecies, species names are given in order of their year of description. Morphospecies, incorporated from GenBank, where determination was potentially dubious are highlighted by an asterisk. Clades (C) and subclades (SC) are demarcated by dashed lines between MOTUs. (b) LTT plots indicating the build‐up of lineages in Theodoxus over geological time. Dashed lines surrounding the solid LTT lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals. Where intra‐ and interspecific diversity diverge, interspecific diversity is highlighted in blue and intraspecific diversity in red. Transitions in geological ages are highlighted by narrow grey lines, while the grey bar marks the period of pronounced glacial cycles (last 900 kyr) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] in Contributions of biogeographical functions to species accumulation may change over time in refugial regions
FIG UR E 3 (a) Dated phylogeny of the genus Theodoxus constructed in BEAST based on COI, 16S and ATPα. Node labels denote divergence times in millions of years ago (Ma); node bars indicate the 95% credibility interval around these dates. Small squares at nodes indicate significant support of divergence events found with BEAST and other phylogenetic analyses (see Figures S2.1 and S2.2), as explained through the key. Where MOTUs (A–R) show conspecifics among a number of morphospecies, species names are given in order of their year of description. Morphospecies, incorporated from GenBank, where determination was potentially dubious are highlighted by an asterisk. Clades (C) and subclades (SC) are demarcated by dashed lines between MOTUs. (b) LTT plots indicating the build‐up of lineages in Theodoxus over geological time. Dashed lines surrounding the solid LTT lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals. Where intra‐ and interspecific diversity diverge, interspecific diversity is highlighted in blue and intraspecific diversity in red. Transitions in geological ages are highlighted by narrow grey lines, while the grey bar marks the period of pronounced glacial cycles (last 900 kyr) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Data from: Field trials of chemical suppression of embryonic cane toads (Rhinella marina) by older conspecifics
<p>1. Laboratory experiments have shown that the viability of embryos of the invasive cane toad (<i>Rhinella marina</i>) can be reduced by exposure to chemical cues from older conspecific larvae. These effects (very strong in laboratory trials) may offer an exciting new approach to controlling this problematic invasive species in Australia. However, the degree to which the method works in natural environments has yet to be assessed.</p> <p>2. Our experiments in the laboratory and in semi-natural outdoor waterbodies show that chemical cues from tadpoles do indeed suppress the growth, development and survival of conspecific larvae that are exposed as embryos and do so in a dose-dependent manner; higher tadpole densities cause greater suppression of embryos.</p> <p>3. In semi-natural outdoor waterbodies, suppressor-exposed tadpoles were less than half as likely to survive to metamorphosis as were controls, and were much smaller when they did so and hence, less likely to survive the metamorph stage. Additionally, female cane toads were less likely to oviposit in a waterbody containing free-ranging (but not cage-enclosed) tadpoles, suggesting that the presence of tadpoles (rather than the chemical cues they produce) may discourage oviposition.</p> <p>4. Broadly, our results suggest that the suppression effect documented in laboratory studies does indeed occur in the field also, and hence that we may be able to translate that approach to develop new and more effective ways to reduce rates of recruitment of peri-urban populations of cane toads in their invasive range.</p>
Figures 70–72 in Study of the external morphology of Leptodora kindtii Focke, 1844 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda), with notes on its relation to Cladocera and on conspecificity of populations of the species over the Eurasian range
Figures 70–72. (70) Specimens with tl I of different size (The Gulf of Finland); (71) male's clasping organs of both tl I of one specimen; (72) prominences of clasping organ (Lake Khanka, Far East of Russia).
Figures 36–45 in Study of the external morphology of Leptodora kindtii Focke, 1844 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda), with notes on its relation to Cladocera and on conspecificity of populations of the species over the Eurasian range
Figures 36–45. SEM micrographs. (36) Basal parts of thoracic limbs from outer side; (37) limb of first pair (tl I), general view (seta on basal segment is indicated by arrow); (38) end of basal segment of tl I, outer side; (39) the same, inner side; (40) middle part of basal segment of tl I; (41) end of distal seta of third segment of tl I; (42) armament of proximal seta of fourth segment of tl I; (43) armament of distal seta of tl I; (44) gnathobase near the base of tl I; (45) gnathobase. Scale bars – 100 mm (36, 37), 50 mm (38–40), 20 mm (41, 44, 45), 10 mm (42, 43).
Figures 31–35 in Study of the external morphology of Leptodora kindtii Focke, 1844 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda), with notes on its relation to Cladocera and on conspecificity of populations of the species over the Eurasian range
Figures 31–35. (31) Limb of first pair (tl I); 32) limb of second pair (tl II); (33) limb of third pair (tl III); (34) median seta on the end of second segment of tl II; (35) median seta on the end of third segment of tl III. (median setae in Figures 32, 33 are indicated by arrows).
Figures 46–55 in Study of the external morphology of Leptodora kindtii Focke, 1844 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda), with notes on its relation to Cladocera and on conspecificity of populations of the species over the Eurasian range
Figures 46–55. (46) Limb of fourth pair (tl IV); (47) limb of fifth pair (tl V); (48) limb of sixth pair (tl VI); (49) ends of two mandibles of one specimen (Lake Bolon, Far East of Russia); (50) setae on the middle part of basal segments of tl I of one specimen (Lake Khanka, Far East of Russia); (51) the same (The Gulf of Finland); (52) basal part of male's antennule; (53) the same, median part; (54) the same, apical end; (55) male's shell, lateral view (median setae in Figures 46, 47 are indicated by arrows).
Figures 25–30 in Study of the external morphology of Leptodora kindtii Focke, 1844 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda), with notes on its relation to Cladocera and on conspecificity of populations of the species over the Eurasian range
Figures 25–30. SEM micrographs. (25) Upper (labrum) and lower lips (arrows indicate papillae of labrum); (26) prominences of median lobe of lower lip; (27) prominences of lateral lobe of lower lip; (28) mandible and labrum; (29) distal mandibular denticles; (30) armament of mandibular apical end. Scale bars – 50 mm (25, 28), 20 mm (26, 29), 10 mm (27, 30).
Figures 13–18 in Study of the external morphology of Leptodora kindtii Focke, 1844 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda), with notes on its relation to Cladocera and on conspecificity of populations of the species over the Eurasian range
Figures 13–18. SEM micrographs. (13) End of antennule (sensory seta indicated by arrow); (14) ventral head pore; (15) distal outer seta of antennal basipodite; (16) proximal anterodorsal proximal seta of antennal basipodite; (17) distal dorsal seta of antennal basipodite (insertion in left corner – the same of another specimen); (18) end of second segment of upper antennal branch. Scale bars – 20 mm.
Figures 19–24 in Study of the external morphology of Leptodora kindtii Focke, 1844 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda), with notes on its relation to Cladocera and on conspecificity of populations of the species over the Eurasian range
Figures 19–24. SEM micrographs. (19) End of third segment of upper antennal branch; (20) end of upper antennal branch; (21) end of fourth segments of lower antennal branch; (22) end of lower antennal branch; (23) setae of lower antennal branch (insertion in right corner – the base of antennal seta); (24) antennal setules. Scale bars – 20 mm (20–23), 10 mm (24), 5 mm (24, insertion).
Figures 2–12 in Study of the external morphology of Leptodora kindtii Focke, 1844 (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Haplopoda), with notes on its relation to Cladocera and on conspecificity of populations of the species over the Eurasian range
Figures 2–12. (2) Antennule; (3) proximal setae on antero-dorsal side of basipodite; (4) distal end of antennal basipodite, outer side; (5) denticles on lower side of basipodital distal end in front of upper branch; (6) upper four-segmented antennal branch (exopodite); (7) lower fivesegmented antennal branch (endopodite); (8) basal part of lower branch, inner side; (9) the same, upper side; (10) two abnormally long basal parts of setae of lower antennal branch; (11) postabdomen, lateral view; (12) seta natatoriae (10 – Lake Khanka, all others – Lake Glubokoe).
FIGURE 6. Stage Immature. A in Larval development of the shrimp Hippolyte sapphica d'Udekem d'Acoz, 1993 forma A and B (Decapoda: Caridea: Hippolytidae) reared in the laboratory, confirmation of the conspecific status of the two forms
FIGURE 6. Stage Immature. A. Maxilla; B. 1st Maxilliped; C. 2nd Maxilliped; D. 3rd Maxilliped; E. 1st Pereiopod; F. 2nd Pereiopod; G. 3rd Pereiopod. Scales: A. 0.036mm; B. 0.046mm; C. 0.011mm; D. 0.038mm; E. 0.043mm; F. 0.046mm; G. 0.023mm.
FIGURE 4. A–E Stage V, F–H Stage VI and I– K Stage VII. A in Larval development of the shrimp Hippolyte sapphica d'Udekem d'Acoz, 1993 forma A and B (Decapoda: Caridea: Hippolytidae) reared in the laboratory, confirmation of the conspecific status of the two forms
FIGURE 4. A–E Stage V, F–H Stage VI and I– K Stage VII. A. Telson; B. Uropod; C. 3rd Maxilliped; D. 1st Pereiopod; E. 2nd Pereiopod; F. Telson; G. 1st Maxilliped; H. 2nd Maxilliped; I. 1st and 2nd Pleopods; J. Telson; K. Antennula. Scales: A. 0.015mm; B. 0.040mm; C. 0.003mm; D. 0.0011mm; E. 0.028mm; F. 0.038mm; G. 0.066mm; H. 0.028mm; I. 0.019mm; J. 0.039mm; K. 0.046mm.
FIGURE 2. A – G Stage II and H – N Stage III. A in Larval development of the shrimp Hippolyte sapphica d'Udekem d'Acoz, 1993 forma A and B (Decapoda: Caridea: Hippolytidae) reared in the laboratory, confirmation of the conspecific status of the two forms
FIGURE 2. A – G Stage II and H – N Stage III. A. Eye; B. Telson; C. Antennula; D. Antenna; E. Maxillula; F. 3rd Maxilliped; G. 1st Pereiopod; H. Telson; I. Pleopod; J. Antenna; K. Maxilla; L. 2nd Maxilliped; M.1st Pereiopod; N. Pereiopods. Scales: A. 0.0731mm; B. 0.0731mm; C. 0.033mm; D. 0.044mm; E. 0.002mm; F. 0.0044mm; G. 0.0066mm; H. 0.078mm; I. 0.018mm; J. 0.034mm; K. 0.002mm; L. 0.028mm; M. 0.0012mm; N. 0.045mm.
FIGURE 5. Stage Immature. A and B. Forma A in Larval development of the shrimp Hippolyte sapphica d'Udekem d'Acoz, 1993 forma A and B (Decapoda: Caridea: Hippolytidae) reared in the laboratory, confirmation of the conspecific status of the two forms
FIGURE 5. Stage Immature. A and B. Forma A Rostrum; C. Forma B Rostrum; D. 1st Pleopod (male); E. 2nd Pleopod (male); F. 1st Pleopod (female); G. 2 nd Pleopod (female); H. Telson; I. Uropod; J. Antennula. Scales: A. 0.019mm; B. 0.019mm; C. 0.2475mm; D. 0.044mm; E. 0.044mm; F. 0.039mm; G. 0.038mm; H. 0.090mm; I. 0.090mm; J. 0.026mm.
FIGURE 3. Stage IV. A in Larval development of the shrimp Hippolyte sapphica d'Udekem d'Acoz, 1993 forma A and B (Decapoda: Caridea: Hippolytidae) reared in the laboratory, confirmation of the conspecific status of the two forms
FIGURE 3. Stage IV. A. Pleopod; B. Telson; C. Antenna; D. Maxillula; E. Maxilla; F. 1st Maxilliped; G. 2nd Maxilliped; H. 3rd Maxilliped; I. 1st Pereiopod; J. 2nd Pereiopod; K. 3rd Pereiopod. Scales: A. 0.029mm; B. 0.039mm; C. 0.016mm; D. 0.021mm; E. 0.0013mm; F. 0.0044mm; G. 0.0025mm; H. 0.044mm; I. 0.017mm; J. 0.017mm; K. 0.028mm.
FIGURE 5 in Millettia lantsangensis is conspecific with Cruddasia insignis (Fabaceae)
FIGURE 5. Distribution map of Cruddasia insignis Prain (triangle, made by the software ArcGIS 10.2).
FIGURE 3. Cruddasia insignis Prain. A in Millettia lantsangensis is conspecific with Cruddasia insignis (Fabaceae)
FIGURE 3. Cruddasia insignis Prain. A. habit; B. 5-foliolate leaf; C. immature inflorescence; D‒E. part of inflorescence in flowering; F. part of inflorescence after flowering; G. abaxial surface of leaflet, showing the dense and appressed hairs; H. flower with the different parts separated (c1 = abaxial surface of calyx, c2 = adaxial surface of calyx, s1 = adaxial surface of standard, s2 = abaxial surface of standard, w1 & w2 = wing, k1 & k2 = keel, m1 & m2 = monadelphous stamens, o1 & o3 = ovary with sheathing floral disk at base, showing the penicillate stigma, o2 = ovary after removing the floral disk), bar = 1 cm; I. pod with 6 seeds.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.