Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 1 in Eriophyoid mites (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea) of Rosales trees in Iran: two new species and three new records

FIGURE 1. Schematic drawings of Rhinophytoptus nemalobos n. sp.: LM. Lateral view; AD. Prodorsal shield; CG. Female coxigenital region; em. Empodium; IG. Internal female genitalia (all specimens heavily sclerotized: poor visibility of spermathecal tubes). Scale bar: 10 Μm for AD, LM, CG, IG; 2.5 Μm for em.

FIGURE 3 in Eriophyoid mites (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea) of Rosales trees in Iran: two new species and three new records

FIGURE 3. Schematic drawings (all originally drawn by Lotfollahi from specimens collected in Iran) of the prodorsal shield for: A. Aceria mori (Keifer, 1939); B. Eriophyes similis (Nalepa, 1890); C. Eriophyes pyri (Pagenstecher, 1857); D. Calepitrimerus baileyi Keifer, 1938; E. Phyllocoptes abaenus Keifer, 1940; F. Aculus fockeui (Nalepa & Trouessart, 1890). Scale bar: 10 Μm.

FIGURE 2 in Eriophyoid mites (Acari: Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea) of Rosales trees in Iran: two new species and three new records

FIGURE 2. Schematic drawings of Aceria lobolinguae n. sp.: AL. Lateral view of anterior body region; AD. Prodorsal shield; CG. Female coxigenital region; em. Empodium; IG. Internal female genitalia; LO. Lateral view of annuli; L1. Leg I; PM. Lateral view of posterior opisthosoma. Scale bar: 10 Μm for AD, AL, CG, IG, PM; 5 Μm for LO, L1; 2.5 Μm for em.

FIGURE 10 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 10. Spermathecal apparatus and anterior genital apodemes (in horizontal ventral aspect) of Retracrus (A,B) and Propilus (C,D) mites (redrawn from original descriptions and coloured). A—Retracrus johnstoni Keifer, 1965b; B—Retracrus elaeis Keifer, 1975; C—Propilus gentyi Keifer, 1975; D—Propilus spinosus Keifer, 1975. Note: spermathecae (a), spermathecal tube (b), horizontal part of anterior genital apodeme (c) and apical plates of the apodeme (d) are coloured in yellow, green, grey and red respectively.

FIGURE 3 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 3. LT SEM images of female Mackiella reclinata n. sp. A—frontal lobe; B—gnathosoma; C—apical tarsus and lateral empodium, leg II; D—postero-dorsal opisthosoma; E—postero-ventral opisthosoma; F—external genitalia; G—lateral mite; H—dorsal mite. Scale bar: A, C = 1 µm; B = 3 µm; D, E, F = 5 µm; G = 10 µm; H = 15 µm. Note. Small bubble-like light granules on the surface of mite present on this figure are artifacts appearing because of the LT SEM method used; palpi are telescoped in Fig. 3A and rest in Fig. 3B. Notation: a—basal part of frontal lobe, b—apical part of frontal lobe, c—palpcoxae, d—lateral notch, e—?rudimentary pregenital plate.

FIGURE 2 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 2. Semischematic drawings (A–D) and LTSEM (E,F) images of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. female. A—prodorsal shield, B—empodium, C—ventral leg I, D—ventral leg II; E—lateral view of prosoma; F—prodorsal shield. Scale bar: A = 20 µm; B = 7 µm; C, D = 14 µm. Note: arrows on the Figs. 2 E,F indicate the longitudinal indentations.

FIGURE 1 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 1. Angles between structures of the internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. (for details see text and Table 2).

FIGURE 4 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 4. Inverted CLSM (A,C), DIC LM (B,D) and LT SEM (E,F) images of female of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. A, B—prodorsal shield; C,D,E—coxigenital area; F—ventral aspect of gnathosoma. Scale bar: A, B = 10 µm; C, D = 5 µm. Notation: a—basal part of frontal lobe, b—apical part of frontal lobe, c—eye-like structure, d—medioposterior fovea, e—subcapitular plate, f—two longitudinal ridges of subcapitular plate.

FIGURE 8 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 8. CLSM images (A,D—volume rendering, same female; B—surface rendering, C—maximum intensity projection) of internal genitalia of three females of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. (internal structures viewed from ventral aspect). Notation: a—posterior part of longitudinal bridge, b—anterior part of longitudinal bridge, c—triangular cuticular process from posteromedial genital rim, d—genital rim, e—distal segment of spermathecal tube, f—proximal segment of spermathecal tube, g—spermatheca, h (= i+j+k+l)—anterior genital apodeme, i—coverflap hinge, j—lateral arm of anterior genital apodeme, k—apex (or apical plate) of anterior genital apodeme, l—apical denticles. Note: In Fig. 8B, because the apex of the anterior genital apodeme was destroyed, its remnants are cut, therefore the two terminal denticles are not present in this image.

FIGURE 7 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 7. Position of the holotype female (white arrow) on the type slide (see text for explanation).

FIGURE 9 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 9. Distribution of mackielline mites (■ Retracrus, ● Propilus ▲Mackiella) within subfamilies of Arecaceae. Phylogeny of Arecaceae according to Stevens (2001 onwards), divergence ages of nodes (in million years, Ma) approximately calculated based on the time scale from Kissling et al. (2012). Note. Numbers inside the coloured symbols indicate numbers of the species within the mite genus.

FIGURE 6 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 6. CLSM (A,B) and PC LM (C) images of a nymph of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. A—ventral view; B—dorsal view; C—anterior-ventral opisthosoma. Scale bar: A, B = 40 µm; C = 20 µm.

FIGURE 5 in CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae)

FIGURE 5. PH LM (A,B), inverted CLSM (C), SEM (D) and inverted SEM (E) images of male external genitalia (A,B,D,E) and coxigenital area (C) of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. Note. Image E is an inverted enlargement of image D showing detail of genitalic elements. Notation: a—genital coverflap (coloured green), b—thin posterior plate (coloured pink), с—cuticular fold, d—partially opened gonopore, e—postgenital region, f—arch-shaped semiannulus, g—coxigenital semiannuli that curve posteriorly at their lateral ends, following the shape of the genital shield. Scale bar: A,B,C = 5 µm.

FIGURE 12 in Hidden diversity of endoparasitic eriophyoid mites: two new Novophytoptus Roivainen, 1947 (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) species from the parenchymatous tissues of rushes (Juncaceae)

FIGURE 12. DIC images of genital region of Novophytoptus maritimus n. sp. showing difference in the thickness of opisthosomal setae in females (A,B) and males (C). Scale bar = 15 Μm.

FIGURE 11 in Hidden diversity of endoparasitic eriophyoid mites: two new Novophytoptus Roivainen, 1947 (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) species from the parenchymatous tissues of rushes (Juncaceae)

FIGURE 11. DIC images of legs and tarsal appendages of normal (A,B) and aberrant (C,D) females of Novophytoptus maritimus n. sp. А—dorsal view of leg I and II on the level of ω I and II in focus; B—empodia I and II (same mite as on Fig. A); C, D—aberrant tarsus I, with ω I displaced medially and seta ft' short and stout. Note: on Fig. C tarsus is coloured in red and tibia is coloured in green. Scale bar: A = 15 Μm; B = 10 Μm; C, D = 5 Μm.

FIGURE 10 in Hidden diversity of endoparasitic eriophyoid mites: two new Novophytoptus Roivainen, 1947 (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) species from the parenchymatous tissues of rushes (Juncaceae)

FIGURE 10. DIC images showing variation of prodorsal shield ornamentation in females (A−G) and males (H,I) of Novophytoptus maritimus n. sp. Scale bar: A–I = 15 Μm.

FIGURE 7 in Hidden diversity of endoparasitic eriophyoid mites: two new Novophytoptus Roivainen, 1947 (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) species from the parenchymatous tissues of rushes (Juncaceae)

FIGURE 7. DIC images of telosome regions of Novophytoptus aculeatus Pye 2012 (A−D) and Novophytoptus luzulis n. sp. (E−G) Note: arrows indicate setae h1. Scale bar = 10 Μm.

FIGURE 6 in Hidden diversity of endoparasitic eriophyoid mites: two new Novophytoptus Roivainen, 1947 (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) species from the parenchymatous tissues of rushes (Juncaceae)

FIGURE 6. DIC images of female external genitalia of Novophytoptus luzulis n. sp. (A–С) and Novophytoptus maritimus n. sp. (D–G). Note: arrows indicate a pair of pores (presumably external openings of spermathecal tubes). Scale bar: A–C = 5 Μm; D–G = 6 Μm.

FIGURE 5 in Hidden diversity of endoparasitic eriophyoid mites: two new Novophytoptus Roivainen, 1947 (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) species from the parenchymatous tissues of rushes (Juncaceae)

FIGURE 5. Schematic drawings of Novophytoptus luzulis n. sp. (A–I) and Novophytoptus maritimus n. sp. (J–R): prodorsal shields (A,M), antero-ventral part of body (B,J); legs I (D,K); legs II (C,L); empodia I (E,O); empodia II (G,Q); tarsal solenidia I (F,P); tarsal solenidia II (H,R); male empodia I (I,N). Note: all images except I and N represent females. Scale bar: A, M=15; B, J=25; С, D, K, L=15; E–H and N–R=10.

FIGURE 13 in Hidden diversity of endoparasitic eriophyoid mites: two new Novophytoptus Roivainen, 1947 (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) species from the parenchymatous tissues of rushes (Juncaceae)

FIGURE 13. DIC (A–C) and CLSM (D–H) images of internal genitalia of Novophytoptus aculeatus Pye 2012 (A,B), Novophytoptus maritimus n. sp. (C, F–H) vs. Novophytoptus luzulis n. sp. (D,E). Scale bar: A, B = 5 µm; C–H = 8 µm.