Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
565
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
565 results for “higher classification”
FIGURE 9A–B. Megapogon crucifer. A–B in Description of new chiactine-bearing sponges provides insights into the higher classification of Calcaronea (Porifera: Calcarea)
FIGURE 9A–B. Megapogon crucifer. A–B: sections of the holotype BMNH-1884.4.22.46a. Abbreviations: Di = diactines; Mic = microdiactines.
FIGURE 5A–H. Achramorpha glacialis. A in Description of new chiactine-bearing sponges provides insights into the higher classification of Calcaronea (Porifera: Calcarea)
FIGURE 5A–H. Achramorpha glacialis. A: preserved lectotype BMNH-1907.8.6.101. B: histological section including cortical layer, choanosome and atrial cavity. C: histological section of the cortical layer. D: SEM image of microdiactine. E: histological sections of the oscular region. F–H: SEM images of spicules; cortical diactine (F), cortical triactines (G) and chiactines (H). Abbreviations: Apa = apical actines of tetractines; At = atrial cavity; Chc = choanocyte chamber; Chi = chiactines; Cor = cortical layer/cortex; Ctr = cortical triactines; Di = diactines; Inc = inhalant cavity; Os = osculum; Tet = tetractines; Tric = trichoxeas.
FIGURE 4A–F in Description of new chiactine-bearing sponges provides insights into the higher classification of Calcaronea (Porifera: Calcarea)
FIGURE 4A–F. Spicules of Achramorpha antarctica sp. nov. A: long cortical diactines. B: long and short cortical diactines. C: cortical triactines. D: atrial triactines. E–F: chiactines.
FIGURE 21 in Description of new chiactine-bearing sponges provides insights into the higher classification of Calcaronea (Porifera: Calcarea)
FIGURE 21. Phylogenetic reconstruction using Bayesian inference (MrBayes, Doublet+GTR/GTR+I+G) of 18S + C-region rDNA for the chiactine/pugiole-bearing sponges. Posterior probability and bootstrap values are given at the nodes, respec- tively.
FIGURE 11A–D in Description of new chiactine-bearing sponges provides insights into the higher classification of Calcaronea (Porifera: Calcarea)
FIGURE 11A–D: Spicules of Megapogon raripilus. A: diactines. B: microdiactine. C: cortical triactines. D: chiactines.
FIGURE 2A–F. Achramorpha truncata. A in Description of new chiactine-bearing sponges provides insights into the higher classification of Calcaronea (Porifera: Calcarea)
FIGURE 2A–F. Achramorpha truncata. A: preserved holotype MNHN C1968-810. B: SEM image of the cortical layer. C–D: SEM images of the cortical diactines and details of the distal end. E: SEM images of chiactines and cortical triactines. F: atrial triactine. Abbreviations: Chi = chiactines; Ctr = cortical triactines; Di = diactines.
Data from: Molecular phylogeny, revised higher classification, and implications for conservation of endangered Hawaiian leaf-mining moths (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae: Philodoria)
The leaf-mining moth genus Philodoria Walsingham (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) is composed of 30 described species, all of which are endemic to the Hawaiian Islands. Philodoria is known to feed on 10 families of endemic Hawaiian host plants, with several species recorded only from threatened or endangered hosts. Beyond their dependence on these plants, little is known of their evolutionary history and conservation status. We constructed a molecular phylogeny of Philodoria to assess validity of its current subgeneric classification and to help guide future work on this threatened Hawaiian lineage. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences from three genes (CO1, CAD, EF-1α) combining for a total of 2,041 base pairs, were collected from 11 Philodoria species, incorporating taxa from both currently recognized subgenera. These data were analyzed using both parsimony and model-based phylogenetic approaches. Contrary to the most recent systematic treatment of Philodoria, our results indicate strongly that the two currently recognized Philodoria subgenera are not monophyletic and that morphological characters used to classify them are homoplasious. Based on our robust results, we revised the higher classification of Philodoria: the subgenus Eophilodoria Zimmerman, 1978 is established as subjective junior synonym of Philodoria Walsingham, 1907. We also present new host plant and distribution data and discuss host range of Philodoria as it pertains to endangered Hawaiian plants.
Figure 1 in A new higher classification of planarian flatworms (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida)
Figure 1. Phylogenetic supertree of the major taxa within the Tricladida, as generalized from various published studies, forming the backbone for the classification presented.
EOL Dynamic Hierarchy version 3.1 with higher classification
<p>The Encyclopedia of Life (EOL, eol.org) aggregates biodiversity information from more than 400 sources and provides access to the data through taxon pages, visual query and application programming interfaces. Scientific names are essential elements of the data integration infrastructure, but their shortcomings as key identifiers are well documented. Complex automated workflows and continuous manual curation are required to address idiosyncrasies of source taxonomies, variation in data quality, and conflicting taxonomic opinions. To achieve a harmonized taxonomic view of EOL content, names from data sources are mapped to a dynamic reference hierarchy (<a title="EOL Dynamic Hierarchy all versions" href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13239662">see current version here</a>) using an algorithm that leverages canonical name strings, hierarchical information (ancestry, descendants), taxonomic ranks, synonym data, and author strings. Names that cannot be associated with a reference taxon are still accessible, but their unmapped status excludes them and any associated content from certain core EOL functions. For more information about the EOL taxonomy, see <a href="https://eol.org/docs/eol-dynamic-hierarchy">EOL Dynamic Hierarchy</a>.</p>
Data from: A molecular phylogeny and revised higher-level classification for the leaf-mining moth family Gracillariidae and its implications for larval host-use evolution
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Molecular phylogeny, revised higher classification, and implications for conservation of endangered Hawaiian leaf-mining moths (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae: Philodoria)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ANNEX 1 in A proposal towards classification of the Raspy Crickets (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatoidea: Gryllacrididae) with zoogeographical comments: An initial contribution to the higher classification of the Gryllacridines
ANNEX 1. Check list of Gryllacrididae taxa in this new classification.
FIGURE 12. Metopina howseae Disney, female abdominal tergites 4–5 in The dorsal abdominal glands and the higher classification of the Phoridae (Diptera)
FIGURE 12. Metopina howseae Disney, female abdominal tergites 4–5. Scale bar = 0.1 mm.
FIGURE 4. Eutermiphora abdominalis Lea, female abdominal terga 5–6 in The dorsal abdominal glands and the higher classification of the Phoridae (Diptera)
FIGURE 4. Eutermiphora abdominalis Lea, female abdominal terga 5–6. Scale bar = 0.1 mm.
Supplementary material 2 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Phylogeny of Caesalpinioideae including all accessions
Figure 91 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Figure 91 Distribution of Mora based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.
Figure 87 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Figure 87 Generic relationships in tribe Dimorphandreae. For description of phylogeny and support values, see Fig. 6 caption (page 63).
Figure 88 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Figure 88 Leaves and inflorescences of tribe DimorphandreaeAMora paraensis (Ducke) Ducke (Simon 1663) BStachyothyrsus staudtii Harms CBurkea africana Hook. DDimorphandra mediocris Ducke (Simon 4209) EDimorphandra cuprea Sprague & Sandwith (Farroñay 1804) FDimorphandra parviflora Spruce ex Benth. (Simon 1176) GDimorphandra mollis Benth. HDimorphandra pennigera Tul. IDimorphandra ignea Ducke JDimorphandra vernicosa Spreng. ex Benth. (Cardoso 3279) KBurkea africanaLDimorphandra gardneriana Tul. (Silva 21). Photo credits A, D, F, G MF Simon B Nicolas Texier (CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0) C AR Lecuona (CC-BY-NC-4.0) E, H, I F Javier Farroñay Pacaya J D Cardoso K AE van Wyk and S Malan L G Sousa da Silva.
Figure 86 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Figure 86 Distribution of Tachigali based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.
Figure 84 from: Bruneau A, Queiroz LP, Ringelberg JJ, Borges LM, Bortoluzzi RLC, Brown GK, Cardoso DBOS, Clark RP, Conceição AS, Cota MMT, Demeulenaere E, Duno de Stefano R, Ebinger JE, Ferm J, Fonseca-Cortés A, Gagnon E, Grether R, Guerra E, Haston E, Herendeen PS, Hernández HM, Hopkins HCF, Huamantupa-Chuquimaco I, Hughes CE, Ickert-Bond SM, Iganci J, Koenen EJM, Lewis GP, Lima HC, Lima AG, Luckow M, Marazzi B, Maslin BR, Morales M, Morim MP, Murphy DJ, O'Donnell SA, Oliveira FG, Oliveira ACS, Rando JG, Ribeiro PG, Ribeiro CL, Santos FS, Seigler DS, Silva GS, Simon MF, Soares MVB, Terra V (2024) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae. Part 2: Higher-level classification. PhytoKeys 240: 1-552. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.240.101716
Figure 84 Distribution of Arapatiella based on quality-controlled digitised herbarium records. See Suppl. material 1 for the source of occurrence data.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.