Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in New marine Thinophilus species (Diptera: Dolichopodidae: Hydrophorinae) from the Thai Andaman Sea coast and new records from peninsular Thailand

Fig. 3. Thinophilus inaequalis Samoh & Grootaert sp. nov. Female habitus (Abdulloh Samoh leg., PSUNHM (PSUZCDIP0012)).

Fig. 4 in New marine Thinophilus species (Diptera: Dolichopodidae: Hydrophorinae) from the Thai Andaman Sea coast and new records from peninsular Thailand

Fig. 4. Thinophilus inaequalis Samoh & Grootaert sp. nov. Male terminalia (Abdulloh Samoh leg., PSUNHM (PSUZCDIP0011)). A. Ventral view on epandrium. B. Tip of right surstylus. C. Lateral view on left side of epandrium with a pointed left surstylus. D. Dorsal view on cerci. Scale = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 1 in New marine Thinophilus species (Diptera: Dolichopodidae: Hydrophorinae) from the Thai Andaman Sea coast and new records from peninsular Thailand

Fig. 1. Map of peninsular Thailand which is bordered by the Gulf of Thailand, a part of the South China Sea in the East and the Andaman Sea (Indian Ocean) in the West. The provenance of the three new species is indicated.

Fig. 2 in New marine Thinophilus species (Diptera: Dolichopodidae: Hydrophorinae) from the Thai Andaman Sea coast and new records from peninsular Thailand

Fig. 2. Thinophilus inaequalis Samoh & Grootaert sp. nov. Male habitus (Abdulloh Samoh leg., PSUNHM (PSUZCDIP0011)).

Figure 6 in New records of Monogenoidea (Platyhelminthes) from three marine fish species from the coast of Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Figure 6. Aristocleidus hastatus: (A) whole mount; (B) copulatory complex; (C) haptor, with anchor bars complex. Scale bars: A, C = 50 Μm, B = 20 Μm.

Figure 2 in New records of Monogenoidea (Platyhelminthes) from three marine fish species from the coast of Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Figure 2. Pseudotagia pomadasys: (A) whole mount; (B) anterior region with buccal suckers; (C) genital atrium; (D) clamp. Scale bars: A = 500 Μm, B = 100 Μm, C, D = 50 Μm.

Figure 4 in New records of Monogenoidea (Platyhelminthes) from three marine fish species from the coast of Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Figure 4. Acanthocercodes bullardi: (A) whole mount; (B) copulatory complex; (C) haptor. Scale bars: A = 150 Μm, B = 20 Μm, C = 50 Μm.

Figure 5 in New records of Monogenoidea (Platyhelminthes) from three marine fish species from the coast of Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Figure 5. Neodiplectanum mexicanum: (A) whole mount; (B) detail of the anterior region, showing copulatory complex and vagina; (C) haptor, showing the anchor bars complex and squamodisc. Scale bars: A = 100 Μm; B, C = 50 Μm.

Fig. 7 in Studies on Three Diverse Frontonia Species (Ciliophora, Peniculida), with Brief Notes on 14 Marine or Brackish Congeners

Fig. 7. BI tree inferred from small subunit rRNA gene sequences. Numbers near the branches represent BI posterior probabilities and nonparametric maximum likelihood bootstrap values. All branches are drawn to scale. The scale bar corresponds to 5 substitutions per 100 nucleotide position. The subclass Peniculia is highlighted in gray. The species newly sequenced in this work is in bold. ZH – Zhuhai population of F. magna, QD – Qingdao population of F. magna.

Fig. 4 in Studies on Three Diverse Frontonia Species (Ciliophora, Peniculida), with Brief Notes on 14 Marine or Brackish Congeners

Fig. 4. Frontonia schaefferi in vivo (A–C, H–N) and after protargol (E–G, O–Q) and silver nitrate (D) impregnation. A, H – ventral view of a typical individual, arrow shows the single contractile vacuole and arrowhead shows a large algal cell; B – different body shapes; C – single contractile vacuole with about 8 long collecting canals; D – part of argyrome; E, F – infraciliature in ventral and dorsal views, macronucleus, and contractile vacuole pore; G – infraciliature of the buccal area; I, K – ventral view of two individuals showing different shapes; J – buccal area, arrows show anterior suture; L – extrusomes (arrows) beneath pellicle; M – lateral view; N – extruded extrusomes; O-Q – structure of buccal region, arrow on P depicts paroral membrane, arrows on Q depict cytopharyngeal fibers. CF – cytopharyngeal fibres; CVP – contractile vacuole pore; Ma – macronucleus; P1–P3 – peniculi 1, 2, 3; PM – paroral membrane; PK – postoral kineties; VK – vestibular kineties. Scale bars: A = 40 μm, E, F = 50 μm, H, I, K, M = 70 μm.

Fig. 2 in Studies on Three Diverse Frontonia Species (Ciliophora, Peniculida), with Brief Notes on 14 Marine or Brackish Congeners

Fig. 2. Frontonia ocularis in vivo (A–D) and after protargol impregnation (E–G). A – ventral view of a typical individual; B – ventral view showing position of contractile vacuoles; C – different body shapes; D – extruded extrusomes; E, F – infraciliature in ventral and dorsal views, macronucleus, and contractile vacuole pore; G – infraciliature of the buccal area. CV – contractile vacuole, CVP – contractile vacuole pore, Ma – macronucleus, P1–P3 – peniculi 1, 2, 3, PM – paroral membrane, PK – postoral kineties, VK – vestibular kineties. Scale bars: A = 60 μm, E, F = 40 μm.

Fig. 3 in Studies on Three Diverse Frontonia Species (Ciliophora, Peniculida), with Brief Notes on 14 Marine or Brackish Congeners

Fig. 3. Frontonia ocularis in vivo (A–F, K, L) and after silver carbonate (I, N) and protargol impregnation (G, H, J, M, O). A – ventral view of a typical individual, arrow shows the black brown pigment spot; B – ventral view, to show two contractile vacuoles (arrowheads), arrow shows the prominent brown pigment spot; C – different body shapes; D, F – buccal area; E – posterior part of cell, arrowheads mark caudal cilia; G, H, N – detailed structure of buccal area, arrowhead (G) marks paroral membrane, arrow (N) shows argentophilic line; I – part of argyrome; J, O – anterior suture (arrowheads in J) and postoral suture (arrowheads in O); K – extrusomes (arrowheads) forming distinct seam underneath cortex, arrow shows the black brown spot; L – extruded extrusomes; M – ventral view to show closely arranged somatic kineties. P1–P3 – peniculus 1, 2, 3. Scale bars: A, B = 50 μm, C = 80 μm.

Fig. 3A–M in Taxonomic Studies on Three Marine Ciliates from China, Including a New Species (Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida)

Fig. 3A–M. Trochilioides recta from life (A, B, E–G, K) and after protargol impregnation (C, D, H–J, L, M). A – ventral view of a typical individual; B, F – right view, arrowhead (F) indicates contractile vacuole; C, D – to show infraciliature, arrows mark kinetosome-like granules at base of podite; E, G – ventral view, arrowheads (E) point to tooth and arrow (G) shows podite; H – anterior portion, double arrowheads point to circumoral kineties, arrow refers to preoral kinety, arrowhead indicates terminal fragment; I – posterior portion, arrow marks kinetosome-like granules at base of podite; J – anterior portion, arrows point to postoral kineties; K – details of cytoplasm, arrows show contractile vacuoles, arrowheads refer to nematodesmal rods; L – right portion of ventral side, arrowhead points to equatorial fragment; M – infraciliature. Co – circumoral kineties, EF – equatorial fragment, FvK – frontoventral kineties, Ma – macronucleus, Pr – preoral kinety, TF – terminal fragment. Scale bars: 20 µm (A, C), 15 µm (E, G, M).

Fig. 1A–M in Taxonomic Studies on Three Marine Ciliates from China, Including a New Species (Ciliophora, Cyrtophorida)

Fig. 1A–M. Orthotrochilia sinica spec. nov. from life (A–C, F–J, L) and after protargol impregnation (D, E, K, M). A – ventral view of a representative individual; B, L – lateral view; C – to show contractile vacuoles (arrowheads) and the furrow in dorsal side; D, E – infraciliature of ventral (D) and dorsal (E) side; F, G – ventral view, arrow (F) indicates cytostome and arrowheads (G) mark contractile vacuoles; H – dorsal view; I, J – ventral view of different individuals, arrowhead (I) indicates the podite; K – posterior portion; M – infraciliature. EF – equatorial fragment, Ma – macronucleus, PK – perioral kineties, TF – terminal fragment. Scale bars: 30 μm.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2018View details →

Figs. 5 a-f Entogonia briggeri n in Entogonia Briggeri N. Sp., A New Diatom Species From The Middle Miocene Of Romania And New Insights On The Fossil Marine Diatom Genus Entogonia Greville

Figs. 5 a-f Entogonia briggeri n. sp. sample 1315; SEM internal views; a-b Internal view illustrating the outer and inner triangles, internal costae, and internal coil system; c-d Details of poles of the specimen figured in b showing the ramifying of some costae to form a dense network, hyaline center of the inner triangle, inner coil with costae joined to one another by curved bars; e Detail of a pole showing the apices of the coil fusing to a siliceous punctate membrane within the exit pore on the side of the orifice touching the elevation; f Detail of a pole of the specimen figured in a showing the internal view of the elevation with delicate puncta. Scale bars: 20 µm.

Figure 5 in Distribution and diversity of intertidal marine faunal species along with Maharashtra and Goa coast, India

Figure 5. Relative proportion of species composition in the major phyla of intertidal marine faunal diversity.

Figure 2 in Distribution and diversity of intertidal marine faunal species along with Maharashtra and Goa coast, India

Figure 2. Shannon – Wiener (H') diversity indices of intertidal marine faunal communities from different stations of Maharashtra and Goa.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Figure 6 in Toxicity effects of copper on two species of marine diatoms microalgae and two species of dinoflagellates

Figure 6. Dynamics of organic carbon content, C (a), the Fv/Fm value (b) and the relative electronic transport rate, rETR on 3-ed day (c) in L. fissa at different copper ions concentrations: 1 – control, 2 – 3 µg·L-1, 3 – 5 µg·L-1, 4 – 10 µg·L-1, 5 – 50 µg·L-1, 6 – 100 µg·L-1, 7 – 200 µg· L-1. The average values of ± standard deviation are presented.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Figure 4 in Toxicity effects of copper on two species of marine diatoms microalgae and two species of dinoflagellates

Figure 4. Dynamics of organic carbon content, C (a, b), Fv/Fm (c) and relative electron transport rate, rETR on 3-ed day (d) in C. pelagica culture at different copper ions concentrations in small celled culture (a, c, d): 1 – control, 2 – 10 µg·L-1, 3 – 100 µg·L-1, 4 – 200 µg.L-1, 5 – 400 µg.L-1, 6 – 600 µg.L-1 and in large cell culture (b): 1 – control, 2 – 1 µg·L-1, 3 – 3 µg·L-1, 4 – 5 µg·L-1, 5 – 10 µg·L-1, 6 – 50 µg·L-1. The average values of ± standard deviation are presented.