Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,101
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,101 results for “tables”
РИС. 4. Места находок Amuranodonta kijaensis в бассейне р. Амур: черные точки – ранее иЗвестные местонахождениЯ, белые квадраты – впервые обнаруженные колонии. Номера локалитетов соответствуют таковым в таблице 1. FIG. 4. Localitions of finds of Amuranodonta kijaensis in the Amur River basin: black dots are previously known locations, white squares are newly discovered colonies. The locality numbers correspond to those in Table 1. in Новые данные об охранЯемом пресноводном двустворчатом моллюске Amuranodonta kijaensis Moskvicheva, 1973 (Unionidae, Anodontinae)
РИС. 4. Места находок Amuranodonta kijaensis в бассейне р. Амур: черные точки – ранее иЗвестные местонахождениЯ, белые квадраты – впервые обнаруженные колонии. Номера локалитетов соответствуют таковым в таблице 1. FIG. 4. Localitions of finds of Amuranodonta kijaensis in the Amur River basin: black dots are previously known locations, white squares are newly discovered colonies. The locality numbers correspond to those in Table 1.
Table 1 in Fossil or non-fossil? A best-practice guide for archaeobotanical taxa
<p><b>Table 1.</b> The nomenclature of archaeobotanical finds.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Taxa</th><th>Original archaeobotanical material</th><th>Status</th><th>Related taxa</th><th>References</th></tr><tr><th><b>Amaranthaceae Juss.</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Chenopodium berlandieri</i> subsp. <i>jonesianum</i> B.Sm. in Phytologia 57(7): 445–448. 1985</th><td>Type: U.S.A., Ohio, Hocking County, 3 miles southeast of Bloomingville, Ash Cave (33Hol), 1876, <i>Ebenezer Andrews s.n</i>. (holotype, US No. 3036256)</td><td>Holotype at US designated as specimen No. 3036256.</td><td><i>Chenopodium berlandieri</i> Moq.</td><td>Smith, 1985; Smith & Funk, 1985; Smith & Cowan, 1987; Crawford & al., 2019</td></tr><tr><th><b>Arecaceae Bercht. & J.Presl, nom. cons.</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Areca passalacquae</i> Kunth in Passalacqua, Catalogue Raisonné et Historique des Antiquités Découvertes en Égypte: 228– 229. 1826 [and in Ann. Sci. Nat. (Paris) 8: 420. 1826]</th><td>Desiccated? Fruits. Possibly in the Passalacqua collection in the Egyptian Museum in Berlin?</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Medemia argun</i> (Mart.) Württemb. ex H.Wendl.</td><td>Kunth, 1826a,b; Buschan, 1895; Ibrahim & Baker, 2009; Vartavan & al., 2010</td></tr><tr><th><b>Fabaceae Lindl</b>.</th></tr><tr><th><i>Faba vulgaris</i> var. <i>celtica-nana</i> Heer, Pfl. Pfahlbauten: 22–23, fig. 44–47. 1865 [or var. <i>celtica</i>]</th><td>Carbonized seeds. “[…] from the pile dwellings in Montelier at Murtnersee […] the Petersinsel and […] Parma; exactly the same form from a Roman settlement in Hungary can be found in the Museum of Industry in Lausanne” (our trans.) [cf. Fig. 1A,B in this paper]</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Vicia faba</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Deininger, 1892; Buschan, 1895; Jessen & Helbaek, 1944; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><b>Juglandaceae DC. ex Perleb.</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Juglans sieboldiana</i> subsp. <i>hosenjiana</i> Krysht. in J. Geol. Soc. Tokyo 25(296): 248. 20 Mai 1918</th><td>Hosenji, Shimosueyoshi, Tsurumi, Yokohama City, Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan</td><td>Pleistocene remains doubtfully archaeobotanical</td><td><i>Juglans mandshurica</i> var. <i>sachalinensis</i> (Komatsu) Kitam.</td><td>Kryshtofovich, 1918; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><b>Poaceae Barnhart, nom. cons</b>.</th></tr><tr><th>“ <i>Hordeum lagunculiforme</i> ” Bachteev in Dokl. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R., n.s., 110(1): 153. 1 Sep 1956</th><td>Carbonized grains, Tiritaki, near Kerch, Crimea Republic, … Teishebaini Castle, Karmir-Blur, left bank of Zanga River, below Erevan, Armenia; Uzerlik-Tepe & Kul-Tepe, near Nakhichevan, Azerbaijan [cf. Fig. 2A,B in this paper]</td><td>Not validly published (Russian)</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Bachteev, 1956; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hordeum palaeoparalellum</i> A.A.H.Schulz in Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 34(8): 617. Nov 1916</th><td>Desiccated? Spikes from the six-rowed barley remains found in Ani’ s grave in Gebelên</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Schulz, 1916; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hordeum polystichum</i> var. <i>densum</i> Heer ex Deininger in Wosinsky, Prähist. Schanzwerk Lengyel 3: 270. 1892</th><td>Based on “Die dichte sechszeilige Gerste (Hordeum hexastichum, densum). Fig. 9”; “Ich habe sie nur von Robenhausen, Montelier und Parma” (Heer, 1865: 13) [cf. Fig. 1E in this paper]</td><td>Valid publication questionable</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Deininger, 1892; Neuweiler, 1924; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hordeum polystichum</i> var. <i>pannonicum</i> Deininger in Wosinsky, Prähist. Schanzwerk Lengyel 3: 270–271, fig. 3. 1892</th><td>Carbonized grains, Lengyel</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Deininger, 1892; Buschan, 1895</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hordeum polystichum</i> var. <i>sanctum</i> Heer ex Deininger in Wosinsky, Prähist. Schanzwerk Lengyel 3: 267. 8 Jun 1892</th><td>Based on “Die kleine Pfahlbautengerste (Hordeum hexastichumsanctum). Fig. 1 bis 8, vervollständigt S. 5 Fig. 3”; “von Robenhausen” (Heer, 1865: 12) [cf. Fig. 1E,F in this paper]</td><td>Valid publication questionable</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Neuweiler, 1924; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hordeum spontaneum</i> var. <i>lagunculiforme</i> Bachteev in Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 47: 847. 1962</th><td>Likely to be designated as epitype: “Turkmen SSR, Ashgabat region, 40–50 km to the south-east. from the city of Ashgabat, a deposit along the foothill slopes of the Kopet-Dag, in the wide valley of the Kelte-Chinar river, near the village of Manysh, May 26, 1960, herbarium sheets 1–9, collected by F. Kh. Bakhteev; herbarium sheet 10 was collected by Bakhteev and A. N. Belavskaya June 1, 1961 Stored in Leningrad” (Bachteev, 1962: 846–847; our trans.)</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Bachteev, 1962; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> var. <i>densum</i> Heer ex Neuweiler in Mitt. Antiquar. Ges. Zürich 29(4): 257 [“245”] (113). 1924</th><td>Based on “Die dichte sechszeilige Gerste (Hordeum hexastichum, densum). Fig. 9”; “Ich habe sie nur von Robenhausen, Montelier und Parma” (Heer, 1865: 13)</td><td>Valid publication questionable</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Deininger, 1892; Neuweiler, 1924; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> var. <i>palaeoaegyptiacum</i> A.A.H.Schulz in Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 34(8): 616. Nov 1916</th><td>Desiccated? Spikes from the barley remains found in Ani’ s grave in Gebelên. From the larger memory model in the grave of Rahotep at Mer near Kusijeh. Spikes in the Egyptian Museum (Berlin) …</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Schulz, 1916; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> var. <i>sanctum</i> Heer ex Neuweiler in Mitt. Antiquar. Ges. Zürich 29(4): 257 [“245”] (113). 1924</th><td>Based on “Die dichte sechszeilige Gerste (Hordeum hexastichum, densum). Fig. 9”; “Ich habe sie nur von Robenhausen, Montelier und Parma” (Heer, 1865: 13)</td><td>Valid publication questionable</td><td><i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Neuweiler, 1924; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum aestivum</i> subsp. <i>compactum</i> var. <i>antiquorum</i> (Heer) H.Messik., Pfahlbauten Robenhausen: 81. Mar–5 Apr 1913</th><td>Carbonized spikes and grains, mainly from Robenhausen, but also, Moosfeedorf, Montelier and Olmuz …</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Messikommer, 1913; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum aestivum</i> f. <i>antiquorum</i> (Heer) Neuweiler in Vierteljahrsschr. Naturf. Ges. Zürich 80(1–2): 104. 24 Mai 1935</th><td>Carbonized spikes and grains, mainly from Robenhausen, but also, Moosfeedorf, Montelier and Olmuz …</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Neuweiler, 1935; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum compactum</i> var. <i>antiquorum</i> (Heer) Flaksb. in Izv. Glavn. Bot. Sada S.S.S.R. 29(1–2): 85. 1930</th><td>Carbonized spikes and grains, mainly from Robenhausen, but also, Moosfeedorf, Montelier and Olmuz …</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Flaksberger, 1930; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum compactum</i> var. <i>globiforme</i> Buschan, Vorgeschichtl. Bot. Cultur-Nutzpfl. Alten Welt: 11, 16–17. 1895</th><td>Cf. <i>T. vulgare</i> var. <i>antiquorum</i> Heer</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.</td><td>Buschan, 1895</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum durum</i> var. <i>trojanum</i> Wittm. in Monatsschr. Vereines Beförd. Gartenbaues Königl. Preuss. Staaten. Ges. Gartenfr. Berlins 22(10): 479. Oct 1879</th><td>Troy [Hisarlik, Turkey]</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum turgidum</i> L.</td><td>Wittmack, 1879</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum monococcum</i> var. <i>trojanum</i> (Wittm.) Wittm. in Z. Ethnol. 22(6 [Verh. Berliner Ges. Anthropol., Ethnol. & Urgeschichte]): 615. 20–31 Dec 1890</th><td>Troy [Hisarlik, Turkey]</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum monococcum</i> L.</td><td>Wittmack, 1890</td></tr><tr><th>“ <i>Triticum parvicoccum</i> ” Kislev in Israel J.</th><td>Carbonized grains and rachises from different sites, Bar-Ilan</td><td>Invalid</td><td><i>Triticum</i></td><td>Kislev, 1980, 1981, 1984, 2009;</td></tr><tr><th>Bot. 28(2): 97. Jun 1980</th><td>University</td><td>publication (English)</td><td><i>turgidum</i> L.</td><td>Tan, 1985; Kislev & Melamed, 2000; Kislev & al., 2006; IFPNI, 2014, Schultze-Motel, 2019</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum sativum</i> var. <i>scythicum</i> Deininger in Wosinsky, Prähist. Schanzwerk Lengyel 3: 272–273, fig. 5. 1892</th><td>Carbonized grains, Lengyel</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.</td><td>Deininger, 1892; Buschan, 1895</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum vulgare</i> var. <i>antiquorum</i> Heer, Pfl. Pfahlbauten: 13, fig. 14–18. 1865</th><td>Carbonized spikes and grains, mainly from Robenhausen, but also, Moosfeedorf, Montelier and Olmuz … [cf. Fig. 1C,D.1 in this paper]</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.</td><td>Heer, 1865, 1866; Dyer, 1886; Deininger, 1892; Buschan, 1895; Flaksberger, 1930; Jessen & Helbaek, 1944; IFPNI, 2014</td></tr><tr><th><i>Triticum vulgare</i> var. <i>trojanum</i> (Wittm.) Wittm. in Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 4(11): xxxiii. 19 Nov 1886</th><td>Troy [Hisarlik, Turkey]</td><td>Pending typification</td><td><i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.</td><td>Wittmack, 1886a,b</td></tr><tr><th><b>Polygonaceae Juss.</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Polygonum erectum</i> subsp. <i>watsoniae</i> N.G.Muell. in Novon 25(2): 176. 2017</th><td>Type: U.S.A., Arkansas, Benton Co., Whitney Bluff rock shelter (3BE20), 1932, <i>W. Henbest & C. Finger Jr. 32-57-5c</i> (holotype, UARK barcode UARK 20121)</td><td>Holotype at UARK designated as specimen 20121; isotype at Arkansas Museum</td><td><i>Polygonum erectum</i> L.</td><td>Mueller, 2017a,b, 2019</td></tr></tbody></table><p>(Continues)</p><p>(Continues)</p>
Table 2 in The dung beetles of Venezuela (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae): catalogue and updated distribution
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Comparison of catalogues and checklists recording dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) species for Venezuela.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Autor</b></th><th><b>Year of publication Geographical coverage</b></th><th><b>Number of species recorded from Venezuela</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Harold Gillet</th><td>1869 1911</td><td>world world</td><td>5 15</td></tr><tr><th>Blackwelder</th><td>1944</td><td>Latin America</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><th>Roze</th><td>1955</td><td>Venezuela</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><th>Krajcik</th><td>2012</td><td>world</td><td>40</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in DNA barcoding of the genus Verbascum (Scrophulariaceae) in the Arabian Peninsula
<p><b>Table 1.</b> PCR Primers used for amplification in DNA regions.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Region</th><th>Primer</th><th>Sequence (5′–3′)</th><th>Reference</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>rbcL</i></th><td>rbcLa-F rbcLa-R</td><td>ATGTCACCACAAACAGAGACTAAAGC GTAAAATCAAGTCCACCRCG</td><td>Levin & al. (2003)</td></tr><tr><th><i>matK</i></th><td>matK472F matK1248R</td><td>CCCRTYCATCTGGAAATCTTGGTTC GCTRTRATAATGAGAAAGATTTCTGC</td><td>Yu & al. (2011)</td></tr><tr><th><i>trnL</i></th><td>trnL-f trnL-c</td><td>ATTTGAACTGGTGACACGAG CGAAATCGGTAGACGCTACG</td><td>Taberlet & al. (1991)</td></tr><tr><th>ITS</th><td>ITS2F ITS3R</td><td>ATGCGATACTTGGTGTGAAT GACGCTTCTCCAGACTACAAT</td><td>Chen & al. (2010)</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in The dung beetles of Venezuela (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae): catalogue and updated distribution
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Number of species by genera of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) recorded for Venezuela and the world.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Dung beetle genera present in Venezuela</b></th><th><b>Species in Venezuela (Roze 1955)</b></th><th><b>Species in Venezuela (current work)</b></th><th><b>Species in the world (Cupello <i>et al</i>. 2023b; Schoolmeesters 2023)</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Agamopus</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th><i>Anisocanthon</i></th><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><th><i>Anomiopus</i></th><td>–</td><td>8</td><td>63</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ateuchus</i></th><td>4</td><td>10</td><td>102</td></tr><tr><th><i>Bdelyropsis</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><th><i>Bdelyrus</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><th><i>Bradypodidium</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><th><i>Canthidium</i></th><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><th><i>Canthon</i></th><td>29</td><td>13</td><td>163</td></tr><tr><th><i>Canthonella</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><th><i>Copris</i></th><td>1</td><td>–</td><td>280</td></tr><tr><th><i>Coprophanaeus</i></th><td>–</td><td>9</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><th><i>Cryptocanthon</i></th><td>–</td><td>4</td><td>43</td></tr><tr><th><i>Deltochilum</i></th><td>3</td><td>10</td><td>114</td></tr><tr><th><i>Dendropaemon</i></th><td>1</td><td>4</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><th><i>Diabroctis</i></th><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th><i>Dichotomius</i></th><td>13</td><td>20</td><td>200</td></tr><tr><th><i>Digitonthophagus</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><th><i>Eurysternus</i></th><td>3</td><td>15</td><td>53</td></tr><tr><th><i>Genieridium</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><th><i>Gromphas</i></th><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hansreia</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><th><i>Malagoniella</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><th><i>Ontherus</i></th><td>2</td><td>8</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><th><i>Onthophagus</i></th><td>5</td><td>8</td><td>2257</td></tr><tr><th><i>Oxysternon</i></th><td>–</td><td>5</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><th><i>Phanaeus</i></th><td>4</td><td>6</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><th><i>Pseudocanthon</i></th><td>–</td><td>2</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><th><i>Scatimus</i></th><td>–</td><td>2</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><th><i>Scybalocanthon</i></th><td>–</td><td>4</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><th><i>Sulcophanaeus</i></th><td>–</td><td>4</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><th><i>Sylvicanthon</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><th><i>Tetraechma</i></th><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th><i>Uroxys</i></th><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>59</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 3 b in Description of Epistylis camprubii n. sp., a Species Highly Tolerant to Ammonium and Nitrite
<p><b>Table 3b.</b> Comparison between <i>Epistylis camprubii</i> and the other <i>Epistylis</i> species mentioned in the manuscript: characteristics of stalk, macronucleus and contractile vacuole.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>Stalk width <i>in vivo</i> (µm)</th><th>Stalk striation / segmentation</th><th>Macronucleus</th><th>Contractile vacuole</th><th>Data source</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Epistylis camprubii</i></th><td>3.1–8.4</td><td>Longitudinally striated, occasionally transeverse segmentation</td><td>C-shaped, transversely oriented; adoral half of the body</td><td>1, adoral third of the body, on dorsal wall of vestibulum</td><td>Present manuscript</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. balatonica</i></th><td>–</td><td>Longitudinally finely striated</td><td>Horinzotal horsehoe-shaped in the middle of the body</td><td>1, in the heigh of the peristomial lip</td><td>Stiller 1971</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. chrysemydis</i></th><td>13–25</td><td>Longitudinally striated, occasionally transeverse segmentation</td><td>C-shaped, transversely oriented; adoral half of the body</td><td>1, close or in the heigh of the peristomial lips, on ventral wall of vestibulum</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. coronata</i></th><td>11–18</td><td>–</td><td>Semicircular, adoral half of the body</td><td>1, in the height of the peristomial lips, on dorsal wall of vestibulum</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. entzii</i></th><td>18</td><td>–</td><td>3/4 circular, adoral half of the body</td><td>1, in the heigh of the peristomial lip, on dorsal wall of vestibulum</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. epistyliformis</i></th><td>–</td><td>Transverse segmentation</td><td>Intenselly flattened, horsehoe-shaped</td><td>1, adoral third of the body</td><td>Stiller 1971</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. hentscheli</i></th><td>12–20, sometimes 25</td><td>Occasionally finely annulated</td><td>Semicircular, adoral half of the body</td><td>1, in the heigh of the peristomial lip, on ventral wall of vestibulum</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. plicatilis</i></th><td>7–18</td><td>Longitudinally finely striated</td><td>Semicircular, adoral half of the body</td><td>1, in the heigh of the peristomial lip, on dorsal wall of vestibulum</td><td>Foissner <i>et al.</i> 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. rotans / E. procumbens</i></th><td>–</td><td>Fine longitudinally striated, transverse segmentation</td><td>Reniform to semicircular, in transverse axis and adoral half of zooid</td><td>1, at level of peristomial lip, on dorsal wall Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1999 of vestibulum</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. rotans</i></th><td>–</td><td>Longitudinally striated, transeverse segmentation</td><td>C-shaped, transversely oriented, adoral third of the body</td><td>1, located in the adoral third of the body</td><td>Curds 1969</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. thienemanni</i></th><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Flattened ribbon-like and horsehoe-shaped, adoral third of the body</td><td>1, located in the peristomial disc, on dorsal wall of vestibulum</td><td>Stiller 1971</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. variabilis</i></th><td>Variable</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>1, at the level of the peristomial lip</td><td>Stiller 1971</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 3 a in Description of Epistylis camprubii n. sp., a Species Highly Tolerant to Ammonium and Nitrite
<p><b>Table 3a.</b> Comparison between <i>Epistylis camprubii</i> and the other <i>Epistylis</i> species mentioned in the manuscript: characteristics of zooid and persitome.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>Body lenght <i>in vivo</i> (µm)</th><th>Body width <i>in vivo</i> (µm)</th><th>Zooid shape</th><th>Peristomial disc diameter <i>in vivo</i> (µm)</th><th>Peristomial disc shape</th><th>Peristomial lip height <i>in vivo</i> (µm)</th><th>Peristomial lip width <i>in vivo</i> (µm)</th><th>Number of peristomial lips</th><th>Data source</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Epistylis camprubii</i></th><td>35.3–98.1</td><td>18.0–65.2</td><td>Vase-shaped</td><td>11.2–21.3</td><td>Rounded, pointed, rarely umbilicated</td><td>5.0–10.6</td><td>16.2–31.7</td><td>1</td><td>Present manuscript</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. balatonica</i></th><td>90–100</td><td>45–55</td><td>Vase-shaped</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>2</td><td>Stiller 1971</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. chrysemydis</i></th><td>120–220</td><td>60–110</td><td>Vase-shaped</td><td>–</td><td>Umbilicated</td><td>–</td><td>50–80</td><td>2</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. coronata</i></th><td>70–120</td><td>–</td><td>Vase-shaped</td><td>–</td><td>Slightly umbilicated and oblique</td><td>–</td><td>32–65</td><td>1</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. entzii</i></th><td>125–190</td><td>80</td><td>Cylindrical</td><td>–</td><td>Convex, slightly oblique</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. epistyliformis</i></th><td>43–62</td><td>20–27</td><td>Vase-shaped</td><td>–</td><td>Convex, sometimes – conical</td><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>Stiller 1971</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. hentscheli</i></th><td>110–170</td><td>38–60</td><td>Asymmetric and bell-shaped, narrowed down to the stem</td><td>–</td><td>Convex, slightly oblique</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. plicatilis</i></th><td>90–160</td><td>25–50</td><td>Funnel-shaped</td><td>–</td><td>Not umbilicated</td><td>–</td><td>36–60</td><td>1</td><td>Foissner <i>et al</i>. 1992</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. rotans / E. procumbens</i></th><td>60–140</td><td>2–2½ times as long as wide</td><td>Irregular (sigmoidal – shape, bent at right</td><td>Flat or slightly convex, slightly</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>Foissner <i>et al.</i> 1999</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>angles, slightly tilted backwards)</td><td>oblique</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>E. rotans</i></th><td>70–100</td><td>–</td><td>Vase-shaped</td><td>–</td><td>Arched</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>Curds 1969</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. thienemanni</i></th><td>67–120</td><td>–</td><td>Vase-shaped</td><td>–</td><td>Conical</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>Stiller 1971</td></tr><tr><th><i>E. variabilis</i></th><td>50–100</td><td>–</td><td>Funnel-shaped</td><td>–</td><td>Slightly convex and obliquely protuberant</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>1</td><td>Stiller 1971</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Latitudinal Diversity Gradients in Free-living Microorganisms - Hoogenraadia a Key Genus in Testate Amoebae Biogeography
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Characters and distribution of six species of the genus <i>Hoogenraadia</i> (L – length, W – width). Many of the earlier papers do not report a sample size for number of tests measured – so it is possible that some of these data may be based on a very low sample size.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>Size <b>(</b>µm<b>)</b></th><th>Distribution regions and publication</th><th>Habitats</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>H. africana</i></th><td>L = 95–115, W = 47–60</td><td>Moyen-Congo (Gauthier-Lièvre and Thomas 1958), Guinea and Equatorial Guinea (Golemansky 1962), Brasil (Leiptniz <i>et al</i>. 2003), China (Qin <i>et al</i>. 2011)</td><td><i>Sphagnum</i>, water, river, forest marsh</td></tr><tr><th><i>H. asiatica</i></th><td>L = 95, W = 70</td><td>China (Wang and Min 1987)</td><td>Quaternary deposit</td></tr><tr><th><i>H. cryptostoma</i></th><td>L = 130–140, W = 105–110</td><td>Moyen-Congo (Gauthier-Lièvre and Thomas 1958), States of Parana, Mato Grosso du Sul, Brasil (Velho <i>et al</i>. 1996, 2000)</td><td>Swamp quite shady in the bed of a stream</td></tr><tr><th><i>H. humicola</i></th><td>L = 143–146, W = 96–100</td><td>Nepal, Himalayas (Bonnet 1977, 1978), Philippines (Bonnet 1980), Cote d’Ivoire, Africa (Bonnet 1976, 1978), Tonga and Western Samoa Islands (Korganova 1994), China (this paper)</td><td>Soils rich in organic debris in forest-gallery backwaters. The ground litter and sublitter horizons of white subtropical soils</td></tr><tr><th><i>H. ovata</i></th><td>L = 60–67, W = 36–39</td><td>Cote d’Ivoire, Africa (Bonnet 1976)</td><td>Soils rich in organic debris in forest-gallery backwaters</td></tr><tr><th><i>H. sylvatica</i></th><td>L = 82–93, W = 60–70</td><td>Punta Lara Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina (Vucetich 1974)</td><td>Moss in marginal forest</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in A new fossil Euspira? (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Naticidae) from the Gubik Formation on the North Slope of Arctic Alaska
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Correction of Pliocene and Pleistocene marine transgressions of western and northern Alaska (after Marincovich and Powell, 1991).</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Age</b> (Hopkins 1965, 1967, Carter et al. 1986)</th><th><b>Bering Sea</b> (Kaufman et al. 1989, Hopkins, written common., 1990 in Marincovich and Powell 1991)</th><th><b>Western and northern Alaska</b> (Brouwers et al. 1984)</th><th><b>Skull Cliff (northwest Alaskan coast)</b> (Brigham 1985, these units are all informal)</th><th><b>Arctic Coastal Plain</b> (Carter et al. 1986)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b><4 ka</b></th><td>Krusensternian</td><td>Flandrian</td><td>—</td><td>Flandrian</td></tr><tr><th><b>circa. 25 ka</b></th><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>Middle Wisconsin</td></tr><tr><th><b>90–105 ka</b></th><td>—</td><td>Flaxsman Fm.</td><td>—</td><td>Simpsonian</td></tr><tr><th><b>120–130 ka</b></th><td>Pelukian</td><td>Pelukian</td><td>Walakpa beds</td><td>Pelukian</td></tr><tr><th><b>circa. 500 ka</b></th><td>Anvilian</td><td>Kotzebuan</td><td>Karmuk beds</td><td>Wainwrightian</td></tr><tr><th><b>>1.5 Ma, <2.4 Ma</b></th><td>Beringian III</td><td>Fishcreekian</td><td>Tuapaktushak beds</td><td>Fishcreekian</td></tr><tr><th><b>>2.4 Ma</b></th><td>Beringian II</td><td>Anvilian</td><td>Killi Creek beds</td><td>Bigbendian</td></tr><tr><th><b><3.5 Ma</b></th><td>Beringian I</td><td>Beringian</td><td>Nulavik beds</td><td>Colvillian</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Two new species of megasporangiate Sigillariostrobus Schimper (Sigillariostrobaceae) fructifications from the British Coal Measures
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Morphological comparison of <i>Sigillariostrobus</i> cones with in situ spores referable to <i>Laevigatisporites glabratus</i>.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th><i>S. tieghemi</i></th><th><i>S. quadrangularis</i> (Les-</th><th><i>S. czarnockii</i> Bochen-</th><th><i>S. leiosporous</i> Abbott,</th><th><i>Sigillariostrobus</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td>Zeiller, 1884</td><td>quereux) White, 1903</td><td>ski, 1936</td><td>1963</td><td><i>saltwellensis</i> sp.</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>nov.</td></tr><tr><th>Cone size</th><td>160 mm long</td><td>Up to 160 mm long, av-</td><td>ca. 180 mm long, 17–</td><td>Up to 180 mm long,</td><td>At least 86 mm</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>25–50 mm</td><td>erage width 11.6 mm</td><td>25 mm broad</td><td>20 mm broad</td><td>long, 17–20 mm</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>broad</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>broad</td></tr><tr><th>Cone axis</th><td></td><td>1 mm</td><td>7–8 mm</td><td>4–7 mm</td><td>1.2 mm</td></tr><tr><th>Sporophyll</th><td>Alternating</td><td>In whorls</td><td>Helical with sporo-</td><td>Alternating verticils</td><td>Helical</td></tr><tr><th>arrangement</th><td>whorls with</td><td></td><td>phylls lying above one</td><td>of 4–5 sporophylls;</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>8–10 per whorl</td><td></td><td>another</td><td>3–4 mm between</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>verticils</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Sporophyll</th><td>With prominent</td><td>Sporophyll laminae</td><td>Sporophylls 20–25 mm</td><td>Pedicels: 5–7 mm long,</td><td>Laminae ca.</td></tr><tr><th>shape</th><td>heel</td><td>9 mm long</td><td>long; upper part</td><td>1 mm broad at attach-</td><td>6.5 mm long,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>sharply pointed with a</td><td>ment point, widening to</td><td>spreading out-</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>hollowed-out deltoid</td><td>4 mm</td><td>wards from</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>shape, margin ciliate.</td><td>Laminae: broadly</td><td>cone</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>triangular, acuminate,</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>5–8 mm long, 4–6 mm</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>broad, margin ciliate</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Sporangia</th><td>None observed</td><td>4 mm long, 5 mm high,</td><td>4–7 mm long, breadth</td><td>4–5 mm long, 2 mm</td><td>7 mm long,</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>4 mm broad</td><td>2–4.5 mm;</td><td>high, 4–4.5 mm wide;</td><td>2.5 mm high</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>contain three tetrads of</td><td>contains one tetrad of</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>megaspores</td><td>megaspores</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Peduncle</th><td>Acicular leaves</td><td>None observed</td><td>At least 40 mm long</td><td>At least 65 mm long</td><td>None observed</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>or bracts</td><td></td><td>and 7–8 mm broad,</td><td>and 2–5 mm broad,</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>attached to the</td><td></td><td>uppermost 30 mm with</td><td>covered with minute</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>upper portion</td><td></td><td>long, triangular and</td><td>stiff spines up to 1 mm</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>pointed sterile leaves</td><td>long</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>25 mm long and 25 mm</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td>wide at the base</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Age and</th><td>Age unknown,</td><td>Brazil Formation,</td><td>Duckmantian, Upper</td><td>Upper Freeport (no.</td><td>Upper Langsettian–</td></tr><tr><th>locality</th><td>Valenciennes,</td><td>Upper Pottsville,</td><td>Silesian Basin, Poland</td><td>7) Coal Allegheny,</td><td>Duckmantian</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>France</td><td>Duckmantian/</td><td></td><td>mid-Pennsylvanian,</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Bolsovian</td><td></td><td>Bolsovian/Asturian,</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Indiana, USA</td><td></td><td>southeastern Ohio,</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>USA</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in New species and new combination in Calotelea Westwood, 1837 (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) from India
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Checklist of species of <i>Calotelea</i> Westwood, 1837 of the Oriental region.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Species</th><th>Distribution</th><th><b>Reference</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1</th><td><i>C. acuta</i> Rajmohana & Debnath sp. nov.</td><td>India (Karnataka)</td><td>present study</td></tr><tr><th>2</th><td><i>C. andamanensis</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Andaman and Nicobar Islands)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>3</th><td><i>C. aurea</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Karnataka, Tamil Nadu)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>4</th><td><i>C. auriventria</i> Sharma, 1978</td><td>India (Western Ghats)</td><td>Saraswat & Sharma (1978)</td></tr><tr><th>5</th><td><i>C. brevinotaularis</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Karnataka)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>6</th><td><i>C. chitraka</i> Rajmohana & Debnath sp. nov.</td><td>India (Karnataka)</td><td>present study</td></tr><tr><th>7</th><td><i>C. foveata</i> Rajmohana & Debnath sp. nov.</td><td>India (Kerala)</td><td>present study</td></tr><tr><th>8</th><td><i>C. fulva</i> Rajmohana & Debnath sp. nov.</td><td>India (Karnataka)</td><td>present study</td></tr><tr><th>9</th><td><i>C. hodgsoni</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Tamil Nadu, Karnataka)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>10</th><td><i>C. immaculata</i> Sharma,1978</td><td>India (Tamil Nadu)</td><td>Saraswat & Sharma (1978)</td></tr><tr><th>11</th><td><i>C. indica</i> Mani, 1975</td><td>India (Maharashtra)</td><td>Mani (1975)</td></tr><tr><th>12</th><td><i>C. kannagiae</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Andaman and Nicobar Islands)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>13</th><td><i>C. lambodara</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Karnataka)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>14</th><td><i>C. laminaris</i> Rajmohana, 2013</td><td>India (Karnataka)</td><td>Rajmohana (2013)</td></tr><tr><th>15</th><td><i>C. longistriata</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Tamil Nadu, Karnataka)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>16</th><td><i>C. malabarica</i> (Narendran & Ramesh Babu, 1999) comb. nov.</td><td>India (Kerala)</td><td>Narendran & Ramesh Babu (1999); present study</td></tr><tr><th>17</th><td><i>C. mandavyai</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Tamil Nadu, Karnataka)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>18</th><td><i>C. marykingsleyae</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Tamil Nadu, Karnataka)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>19</th><td><i>C. microtrichiana</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Andaman and Nicobar Islands)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>20</th><td><i>C. montana</i> (Kieffer, 1906)</td><td>India (Maharashtra)</td><td>Kieffer (1906); Popovici & Kamalnathan (2019)</td></tr><tr><th>21</th><td><i>C. nigriventris</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Karnataka)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>22</th><td><i>C. oloftoreni</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Great Nicobar)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>23</th><td><i>C. sibyllamerianae</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Karnataka, Tamil Nadu)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>24</th><td><i>C. sushrutai</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Tamil Nadu, Karnataka)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr><tr><th>25</th><td><i>C. trikona</i> Veenakumari & Popovici, 2022</td><td>India (Karnataka, Kerala, Meghalaya, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh)</td><td>Kamalanathan <i>et al.</i> (2022)</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Evolution of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) in the Albertine Rift – The endemic Impatiens purpureoviolacea complex consists of ten species
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Sequence characterstics of each datamatrix.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Taxa</th><th>Characters</th><th>Parsimony-informative characters</th><th>Variable characters</th><th>Consistency index</th><th>Retention index</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>atpB-rbcL</i></th><td>17 + 1*</td><td>729</td><td>2</td><td>15</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><th><i>ImpDEF1/ImpDEF2</i></th><td>18 + 2(1)*#</td><td>1023</td><td>43</td><td>145</td><td>0.95</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><th>Combined</th><td>18</td><td>1752</td><td>45</td><td>160</td><td>0.95</td><td>0.93</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Consistency index: Kluge & Farris (1969), retention index: Farris (1989).</p><p>* indicates inclusion of the hybrid accession, <sup>#</sup> indicates inclusion of two copies of the nuclear genes <i>ImpDEF1</i> and <i>ImpDEF2</i> of the hybrid accession.</p>
Table 1 in A new genus and species of spring snails (Caenogastropoda, Tateidae) from the ultramafic South of New Caledonia
<p><b>Table 1 (continued on next page).</b> Species used in phylogenetic analyses and their GenBank accession numbers.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>COI</th><th>16S rRNA</th><th>18S rRNA</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Austropyrgus niger</i> (Quoy & Gaimard, 1834)</th><td>KT313290</td><td>KT313133</td><td>KT313166</td></tr><tr><th><i>Austropyrgus turbatus</i> Ponder, Colgan, Clark & Miller, 1994</th><td>KT313291</td><td>KT313134</td><td>KT313167</td></tr><tr><th><i>Beddomeia krybetes</i> Ponder & Clark, 1993</th><td>KT313292</td><td>KT313135</td><td>KT313168</td></tr><tr><th><i>Caldicochlea globosa</i> Ponder, Colgan, Terzis, Clark & Miller, 1996</th><td>KT313293</td><td>KT313136</td><td>KT313169</td></tr><tr><th><i>Catapyrgus matapango</i> Haase, 2008</th><td>KT313294</td><td>KT313137</td><td>KT313170</td></tr><tr><th><i>Crosseana melanosoma</i> (Haase & Bouchet, 1998)</th><td>KJ490902</td><td>KJ490813</td><td>KT313206</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa brevior</i> (Ancey, 1905)</th><td>KC875084</td><td>KC875004</td><td>KT313171</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa bula</i> Zielske & Haase, 2014</th><td>KF939760</td><td>KF939677</td><td>KT313190</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa dromodromo</i> Zielske & Haase, 2014</th><td>KF939781</td><td>KF939698</td><td>KT313192</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa espiritusantoana</i> Haase, Fontaine & Gargominy, 2010</th><td>KC875095</td><td>KC875018</td><td>KT313175</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa espiritusantoana</i> Haase, Fontaine & Gargominy, 2010</th><td>KC875091</td><td>KC875011</td><td>KT313174</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa gracilis pupa</i> (Iredale, 1944)</th><td>KT313295</td><td>KT313138</td><td>KT313176</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa herminae</i> Zielske & Haase, 2014</th><td>KC875113</td><td>KC875042</td><td>KT313177</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa irinimeke</i> Haase, Ponder & Bouchet, 2006</th><td>KF939798</td><td>KF939715</td><td>KT313178</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa jeanyvesi</i> Haase, Gargominy & Fontaine, 2005</th><td>KT313296</td><td>KT313139</td><td>KT313179</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa pascali</i> Haase, Fontaine & Gargominy, 2010</th><td>KC875097</td><td>KC875022</td><td>KT313181</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa raivavaeensis</i> Haase, Gargominy & Fontaine, 2005</th><td>KT313297</td><td>KT313140</td><td>KT313183</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa ramsayi royana</i> (Iredale, 1944)</th><td>KT313298</td><td>KT313141</td><td>KT313184</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa riva</i> Zielske & Haase, 2014</th><td>KC875086</td><td>KC875006</td><td>KT313185</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa rurutua</i> Haase, Gargominy & Fontaine, 2005</th><td>KT313300</td><td>KT313143</td><td>KT313187</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa seasea</i> Haase, Ponder & Bouchet, 2006</th><td>KF939756</td><td>KF939673</td><td>KT313188</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa torresiana</i> Haase, Fontaine & Gargominy, 2010</th><td>KC875101</td><td>KC875029</td><td>KT313196</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa tubuaia</i> Haase, Gargominy & Fontaine, 2005</th><td>KT313302</td><td>KT313145</td><td>KT313198</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa tunuloa</i> Zielske & Haase, 2014</th><td>KF939793</td><td>KF939710</td><td>KT313194</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fluviopupa uka</i> Zielske & Haase, 2014</th><td>KF939736</td><td>KF939653</td><td>KT313189</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fonscochlea accepta</i> Ponder, Hershler & Jenkins, 1989</th><td>KT313303</td><td>KT313146</td><td>KT313199</td></tr><tr><th><i>Fonscochlea zeidleri</i> Ponder, Hershler & Jenkins, 1989</th><td>AY622460</td><td>KT313148</td><td>KT313201</td></tr><tr><th><i>Halopyrgus pupoides</i> (Hutton, 1882)</th><td>JX970616</td><td>KT313149</td><td>KT313202</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hemistomia cockerelli.</i> Haase & Bouchet, 1998</th><td>KJ490853</td><td>KJ490768</td><td>KT313208</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hemistomia gemma gemma</i> Ponder, 1982</th><td>KT313305</td><td>KT313150</td><td>KT313203</td></tr><tr><th><i>Hemistomia rusticorum</i> Haase & Bouchet, 1998</th><td>KJ490836</td><td>KJ490755</td><td>KT313207</td></tr><tr><th><i>Kanakyella gentilsiana</i> (Crosse, 1874)</th><td>KJ490914</td><td>KJ490825</td><td>KT313209</td></tr><tr><th><i>Leiorhagium kavuneva</i> Haase & Bouchet, 1998</th><td>KJ490860</td><td>KJ490775</td><td>KT313211</td></tr><tr><th><i>Meridiopyrgus murihiku</i> Haase, 2008</th><td>AY631086</td><td>KT313152</td><td>KT313212</td></tr><tr><th><i>Novacaledonia numee</i> (Haase & Bouchet, 1998)</th><td>KJ490832</td><td>KJ490751</td><td>KT313210</td></tr><tr><th><i>Opacuincola delira</i> Haase, 2008</th><td>KT313306</td><td>KT313154</td><td>KT313214</td></tr><tr><th><i>Phrantela daveyensis tristis</i> Ponder & Clark, 1993</th><td>KT313307</td><td>KT313155</td><td>KT313215</td></tr><tr><th><i>Posticobia brazieri</i> (E.A. Smith, 1882)</th><td>KT313309</td><td>KT313157</td><td>KT313217</td></tr><tr><th><i>Potamopyrgus estuarinus</i> Winterbourn, 1971</th><td>AY631104</td><td>KT313158</td><td>KT313218</td></tr><tr><th><i>Rakiurapyrgus cresswelli</i> (Climo, 1974)</th><td>KT313310</td><td>KT313159</td><td>KT313219</td></tr><tr><th><i>Sororipyrgus raki</i> Haase, 2008</th><td>KT313311</td><td>KT313160</td><td>KT313221</td></tr><tr><th><i>Sulawesidrobia abreui</i> Zielske, Glaubrecht & Haase, 2011</th><td>HM587351</td><td>HM587394</td><td>HM587420</td></tr><tr><th><i>Sulawesidrobia anceps</i> Zielske, Glaubrecht & Haase, 2011</th><td>HM587346</td><td>HM587388</td><td>HM587417</td></tr><tr><th><i>Tatea huonensis</i> (Tenison-Woods, 1876)</th><td>KT313312</td><td>JX970550</td><td>KT313222</td></tr><tr><th><i>Trochidrobia punicea</i> Ponder, Hershler & Jenkins, 1989</th><td>KT313313</td><td>KT313161</td><td>KT313223</td></tr><tr><th><i>Victodrobia victoriensis</i> Ponder & Clark, 1993</th><td>KT313314</td><td>KT313162</td><td>KT313224</td></tr><tr><th><i>Viriiella touaouroua</i> gen. et sp. nov.</th><td>PP545377</td><td>PP545463</td><td>PP545464</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in A phylogenetic survey of the ascomycete genus Arthrorhaphis (Arthrorhaphidaceae, Lecanoromycetes) including new species in Arthrorhaphis citrinella sensu lato
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Strictly lichenicolous species of <i>Arthrorhaphis</i> with their host lichens and references.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Taxon</th><th>Hosts</th><th>References</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Arthrorhaphis aeruginosa</i></th><td><i>Cladonia</i> spp. squamules, rarely podetia</td><td>Santesson & Tønsberg, 1994</td></tr><tr><th><i>Arthrorhaphis arctoparmeliae</i></th><td><i>Arctoparmelia incurva</i></td><td>Kocourková & Van den Boom, 2005</td></tr><tr><th><i>Arthrorhaphis grisea</i></th><td><i>Baeomyces rufus</i>, <i>B. placophyllus</i></td><td>Obermayer, 1994</td></tr><tr><th><i>Arthrorhaphis muddii</i></th><td><i>Dibaeis baeomyces</i></td><td>Obermayer, 1994</td></tr><tr><th><i>Arthrorhaphis olivaceae</i></th><td><i>Melanohalea olivacea</i></td><td>Santesson & Tønsberg, 1994</td></tr><tr><th><i>Arthrorhaphis phyllobaeis</i></th><td><i>Phyllobaeis imbricata</i></td><td>Etayo, 2017</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Taxonomic revision of the antlion tribe Myrmeleontini (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae) of Taiwan
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Pairwise distance of COI sequences between Taiwanese species of Myrmeleontini Latreille, 1802. Grids framed in red show intraspecific distances, others show interspecific distances.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>B. asakurae</th><th>B. brunneipennis</th><th>M. tenuipennis</th><th>M. littoralis</th><th>M. wangi</th><th>M. heppneri</th><th>M. persimilis</th><th>M. punctinervis</th><th>M. taiwanensis</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>B. asakurae</i></th><td>0–0.037</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>B. brunneipennis</i></th><td>0.115–0.135</td><td>0–0.024</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>M. tenuipennis</i></th><td>0.174–0.192</td><td>0.166–0.180</td><td>0–0.023</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>M. littoralis</i></th><td>0.147–0.170</td><td>0.139–0.154</td><td>0.160–0.167</td><td>0–0.006</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>M. wangi</i></th><td>0.143–0.161</td><td>0.149–0.167</td><td>0.173–0.177</td><td>0.144–0.153</td><td>0–0.010</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>M. heppneri</i></th><td>0.160–0.174</td><td>0.172–0.178</td><td>0.175–0.179</td><td>0.164–0.168</td><td>0.166–0.171</td><td>0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>M. persimilis</i></th><td>0.171–0.200</td><td>0.172–0.186</td><td>0.189–0.203</td><td>0.179–0.189</td><td>0.155–0.166</td><td>0.121–0.133</td><td>0–0.010</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>M. punctinervis</i></th><td>0.184–0.196</td><td>0.187–0.198</td><td>0.194–0.216</td><td>0.179–0.188</td><td>0.177–0.189</td><td>0.196–0.208</td><td>0.179–0.193</td><td>0–0.009</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>M. taiwanensis</i></th><td>0.198–0.213</td><td>0.166–0.182</td><td>0.177–0.187</td><td>0.193–0.208</td><td>0.186–0.198</td><td>0.174–0.181</td><td>0.208–0.224</td><td>0.193–0.207</td><td>0–0.013</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1 in The sternum and interclavicle of Aelurognathus tigriceps (Broom & Haughton, 1913) (Therapsida: Gorgonopsia), with comments on sternal evolution in therapsids
<p>TABLE 1. — Representative measurements from the associated skeleton of <i>Aelurognathus tigriceps</i> (Broom & Haughton, 1913) (NHCC LB350). All measurements are in millimeters. Symbols: <b>‡</b>, estimated; <b>*</b>, measurement taken between proximal and distal articulation surfaces.</p><table><thead><tr><th>Skeleton</th><th><b>Mesurements</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Skull preorbital length</th><td>167‡</td></tr><tr><th colspan="2">Humerus (left)</th></tr><tr><th>length*</th><td>211</td></tr><tr><th>width across distal epicondyles</th><td>97</td></tr><tr><th>minimum midshaft diameter</th><td>22</td></tr><tr><th colspan="2">Humerus (right)</th></tr><tr><th>length*</th><td>214</td></tr><tr><th>width across distal epicondyles</th><td>112</td></tr><tr><th>minimum midshaft diameter</th><td>23</td></tr><tr><th colspan="2">Femur</th></tr><tr><th>midshaft diameter, transverse</th><td>37</td></tr><tr><th>midshaft diameter, anteroposterior</th><td>22</td></tr><tr><th>head transverse width</th><td>57</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1 in Skeletal reconstruction of fossil vertebrates as a process of hypothesis testing and a source of anatomical and palaeobiological inferences
<p>TABLE 1. — Ratio of the length of phalanx I-1 to the length of metatarsal I in several ceratopsids. Length measurements were made from images with metatarsal I and phalanx I-1 in the same focal plane, using ImageJ (Schneider <i>et al.</i> 2012). The median ratio was used to determine that the expected length of phalanx I-1 for UALVP 42 was approximately 88.45% the length of phalanx I-1 in UALVP 16248. The digital model was scaled accordingly for the reconstruction.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>Specimen</b></th><th><b>Taxon</b></th><th><b>Ratio</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>AMNH 5351 cast (right foot)</th><td><i>Centrosaurus apertus</i> (Lambe, 1905)</td><td>1.021</td></tr><tr><th>CMN 8547</th><td>Indeterminate chasmosaurine</td><td>0.986</td></tr><tr><th>TMP 2002.076.0001</th><td>Indeterminate pachyrinosaurin</td><td>0.893</td></tr><tr><th>CMN 41357</th><td><i>Vagaceratops irvinensis</i> (Holmes Holmes, Forster, Ryan & Shepherd, 2001)</td><td>0.885</td></tr><tr><th>TMP 1989.097.0001</th><td><i>Styracosaurus albertensis</i> Lambe, 1913</td><td>0.883</td></tr><tr><th>AMNH 5351 cast (left foot)</th><td><i>Centrosaurus apertus</i></td><td>0.859</td></tr><tr><th>Median</th><td>–</td><td>0.889</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 5 in Paleoclimate estimates for the Paleogene-Neogene in southern South America using fossil leaves as proxies
<p>TABLE 5 — Fossil locations from Southern South America and age in million of years.Studied geological formations and sites used for comparison in the discussion.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>Fossil Site</b></th><th><b>Geological Formation</b></th><th><b>Age (Ma)</b></th><th><b>Source</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Pico Quemado</th><td>Ñirihuau</td><td>middle Miocene?</td><td>Caviglia 2018</td></tr><tr><th>Cancha Carreras, Estancia Tres Marías</th><td>Río Guillermo</td><td>≤21.7 ± 0.3 to ≤23.5 ± 0.3</td><td>Fosdick <i>et al.</i> 2011; 2015a, b</td></tr><tr><th>Aluminé Basin</th><td>Rancahué</td><td>25.0 ± 1.4 to 26.0 ± 1.5</td><td>Brea <i>et al.</i> 2015; Franzese <i>et al.</i> 2011</td></tr><tr><th>Sierra Baguales</th><td>Río Leona</td><td>33.0 ± 2.8</td><td>Gutiérrez <i>et al.</i> 2017, 2019</td></tr><tr><th>Upper Río Turbio</th><td>Río Turbio</td><td>≤26.6 ± 0.2 to ≤33.4 to</td><td>Fosdick <i>et al.</i> 2015a</td></tr><tr><th>Lower Río Turbio</th><td>Río Turbio</td><td>≤46.3 ± 1.3 to ≤47.1 ± 2.7</td><td>Fosdick <i>et al.</i> 2015a</td></tr><tr><th>Río Pichileufú</th><td>Ventana</td><td>47.46 ± 0.05</td><td>Wilf <i>et al.</i> 2005</td></tr><tr><th>Laguna del Hunco</th><td>La Huitrera</td><td>51.91 ± 0.22</td><td>Wilf <i>et al.</i> 2005</td></tr><tr><th>Ligorio Márquez</th><td>Ligorio Márquez</td><td><57</td><td>Suárez <i>et al.</i> 2000; Hinojosa 2005</td></tr><tr><th>Palacio de los Loros</th><td>Salamanca</td><td>61.7</td><td>Iglesias <i>et al.</i> 2007</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 2 in Paleoclimate estimates for the Paleogene-Neogene in southern South America using fossil leaves as proxies
<p>TABLE 2 — Estimated values of temperature and precipitation for the upper Río Turbio Formation member. *Scarce fossil material.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>Upper RTF</b></th><th></th><th><b>Equation</b></th><th><b>Dataset</b></th><th><b>R</b> <b>2</b></th><th><b>Error</b></th><th><b>Source</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Temperature (°C)</th><td>15.3</td><td colspan="2">MAT = 3.25 + 0.24*% non-tooth CLAMP 3B SA</td><td>0.9</td><td>2.1°C</td><td>Hinojosa 2005; Hinojosa & Villagrán 2005</td></tr><tr><th>Temperature (°C)</th><td>14.3</td><td>MAT = 26.03pE + 1.31</td><td>SA</td><td>0.82</td><td>2.8°C</td><td>Hinojosa <i>et al.</i> 2011</td></tr><tr><th>Temperature (°C)</th><td>14.8</td><td>MAT = 0.204*E + 4.6</td><td>LMA</td><td>0.58</td><td>4.8°C</td><td>Peppe <i>et al.</i> 2011</td></tr><tr><th>Precipitation (mm)</th><td>*</td><td>Ln(MAP) = 1.63 + 0.49*MLnA</td><td>CLAMP 3B SA</td><td>0.6</td><td>Ln(0.5) cm</td><td>Hinojosa 2005; Hinojosa & Villagrán 2005</td></tr><tr><th>Precipitation (mm)</th><td>*</td><td>lnMAP = 0.283(MlnA) + 2.92</td><td>LAA</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.61</td><td>Peppe <i>et al.</i> 2011</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 3 in Paleoclimate estimates for the Paleogene-Neogene in southern South America using fossil leaves as proxies
<p>TABLE 3 — Estimated values of temperature and precipitation for the Río Guillermo Formation.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>RGF</b></th><th></th><th><b>Equation</b></th><th><b>Dataset</b></th><th><b>R</b> <b>2</b></th><th><b>Error</b></th><th><b>Source</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>Temperature (°C)</th><td>5.3</td><td>MAT = 3.25 + 0.24*% non-tooth</td><td>CLAMP 3B SA</td><td>0.9</td><td>2.1°C</td><td>Hinojosa 2005; Hinojosa & Villagrán 2005</td></tr><tr><th>Temperature (°C)</th><td>3.5</td><td>MAT = 26.03pE + 1.31</td><td>SA</td><td>0.82</td><td>2.8°C</td><td>Hinojosa <i>et al.</i> 2011</td></tr><tr><th>Temperature (°C)</th><td>6.3</td><td>MAT = 0.204E + 4.6</td><td>LMA</td><td>0.58</td><td>4.8°C</td><td>Peppe <i>et al.</i> 2011</td></tr><tr><th>Precipitation (mm)</th><td>682</td><td>Ln(MAP) = 1.63 + 0.49*MLnA</td><td>CLAMP 3B SA</td><td>0.6</td><td>Ln(0.5) cm</td><td>Hinojosa 2005; Hinojosa & Villagrán 2005</td></tr><tr><th>Precipitation (mm)</th><td>829</td><td>lnMAP = 0.283(MlnA) + 2.92</td><td>LAA</td><td>0.23</td><td>0.61</td><td>Peppe <i>et al.</i> 2011</td></tr></tbody></table>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.