Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
76,402,788
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
76,402,788 results
FULFILL dataset round 2 France
<p>This dataset and codebook correspond to the second round of survey data gathered in France in 2023, within the project FULFILL - Fundamental Decarbonisation Through Sufficiency By Lifestyle Changes. </p> <p>As part of Work Package 3 (WP3) in the FULFILL project, we collected quantitative data from six countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, and India. The first round of the survey, consisted of recruiting a representative sample of approximately 2000 households in each country. In this second survey round, we recruit around 500 respondents from the initial survey round, ensuring representativity is maintained.</p> <p>This survey is very similar to the survey in the first round and includes a lot of identical items, including a quantitative assessment of the carbon footprint in the housing, mobility, and diet sectors, socio-economic factors such as age, gender, income, education, household size, life stage, and political orientation. Furthermore, the survey includes measures of quality of life, encompassing aspects such as health and well-being, environmental quality, financial security, and comfort.</p> <p>New for this second round, we have incorporated questions regarding the measures respondents adopted in response to the 2022 energy crisis.</p>
D3.3_20230919_ProbeField_Aligned_Spectra_V1
<p>A dataset of 470 laboratory-acquired soil spectra has been aligned using the white Lucky Bay sands as an internal soil standard (ISS). Soil samples were collected in Sweden by SLU, in Italy by CNR, in France by INRAE, and in Poland by IUNG. Spectra were acquired in the laboratory on dry soil samples, and each spectrum is associated with a laboratory measurement of soil organic carbon (SOC).</p> <p>Each partner also scanned the ISS using the same instrument as for the soil samples, allowing the computation of a correction factor for each instrument.</p> <p>Along with the main dataset, an explanatory document and an R script are provided. The R script can be used to align spectral data acquired with different instruments. Within the provided file <code>"CF_lb"</code> you can find five correction factors corresponding to five instruments. These factors were computed using the Lucky Bay spectra scanned by each instrument (ISS) and the master Lucky Bay spectrum acquired at the CSIRO laboratory.</p> <p>When using this dataset, please cite the following article: </p> <div>Castaldi, F., Stenberg, B., Liebisch, F., Metzger, K., Ben-Dor, E., Knadel, M., Koganti, T., Wetterlind, J., Barbetti, R., Debaene, G., Klumpp, K., Lippl, M., Lorenzetti, R., Lozano Fondon, C., Sanden, T., Schaumberger, A., & Stajnko, D. (2025). Estimating soil organic carbon using field VNIR-SWIR spectroscopy and existing soil spectral libraries: Mitigating heterogeneity, roughness and moisture effects. <em>Smart Agricultural Technology</em>, <em>12</em>, 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATECH.2025.101353</div>
Input data for MFAssignR Galaxy workflow tutorial
<p>This is the input dataset for the MFAssignR Galaxy training workflow. The input dataset corresponds to the model data of MFAssignR (<a title="Raw_Neg_ML" href="https://github.com/skschum/MFAssignR/tree/master/MFAssignR/data" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Raw_Neg_ML</a>), containing a raw mass list, measured in a negative ESI mode.</p>
Supporting Data for Crawford et al. 2024, Effects of Cropland Abandonment on Biodiversity
<p><strong>This archive contains derived and supporting data products to support:</strong></p> <blockquote>Crawford CL*, Wiebe RA, Yin H, Radeloff VC, and Wilcove DS. 2024. Effects of cropland abandonment on biodiversity. <em>Nature Sustainability.</em> In press.</blockquote> <p>*Contact Christopher L. Crawford at ccrawford@alumni.princeton.edu with any questions.</p> <p>A public Zenodo archive of the Github repository containing analysis scripts developed for this project (https://github.com/chriscra/biodiversity_abandonment) can be found here: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13777205">10.5281/zenodo.13777205</a></p> <p>This analysis builds on: Crawford, C. L., Yin, H., Radeloff, V. C. & Wilcove, D. S. Rural land abandonment is too ephemeral to provide major benefits for biodiversity and climate. <em>Science Advances </em>8, 1–13 (2022). Data and scripts from Crawford et al. 2022 are archived and publicly available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm8999).</p> <p>The annual land cover maps (1987-2017, 30 meter resolution) that underlie our analysis were developed on Google Earth Engine using publicly available Landsat satellite imagery (Yin et al. 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111873).<br>These annual land cover maps, along with other derived data that were produced by Crawford et al. 2022, are archived and publicly available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5348287).</p> <p>This archive includes important derived data products created for Crawford et al. 2024. Note that these and other project data are described in detail in **util/_util_files.R** (https://github.com/chriscra/biodiversity_abandonment). This is a convenience script that loads many of the relevant input and derived data that are used throughout the project. The primary required data files for reproducing this work are archived here, but "_util_files.R" also includes information about where additional files can be accessed (if external, e.g., https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5348287) or created across the various .R and .Rmd files in this repository (e.g., "habitats.Rmd" chunk {r land-cover-of-abn-pixels}).</p> <p>Naming conventions for sites and raster files follow Crawford et al. 2022, as described here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5348287</p> <p><strong>Site file names correspond to the following geographic locations:</strong><br>belarus = Vitebsk, Belarus / Smolensk, Russia<br>bosnia_herzegovina = Bosnia & Herzegovina<br>chongqing = Chongqing, China<br>goias = Goiás, Brazil<br>iraq = Iraq<br>mato_grosso = Mato Grosso, Brazil<br>nebraska = Nebraska / Wyoming, USA<br>orenburg = Orenburg, Russia / Uralsk, Kazakhstan<br>shaanxi = Shaanxi/Shanxi, China<br>volgograd = Volgograd, Russia<br>wisconsin = Wisconsin, USA</p> <h1><strong>This archive includes the following files:</strong></h1> <ul> <li>site_df.csv</li> <li>crop_to_abn_iucn_observed.zip</li> <li>crop_to_abn_iucn_potential.zip</li> <li>max_abn_lcc_iucn.zip</li> <li>max_abn_lcc_iucn_potential.zip</li> <li>lcc_iucn_habitat.zip</li> <li>lcc_iucn_habitat_potential.zip</li> <li>frag_df.csv</li> <li>frag_hypo_no_abn_2017_df.csv</li> <li>iucn_lc_crosswalk.csv</li> <li>habitat_age_req_coded.csv</li> <li>centroids_df.csv</li> <li>aoh_l.parquet</li> <li>aoh_feols.parquet</li> <li>aoh_start_end_l.parquet</li> <li>aoh_change_df.parquet</li> <li>aoh_est_change_tmp_all.csv</li> <li>aoh_obs_change_tmp_all.csv</li> <li>taxonomy_df.parquet</li> <li>final_species_list.csv</li> <li>trait_mod_df_modx1.rds</li> </ul> <h3>site_df.csv</h3> <p>A list of site names and related metadata describing our study sites, taken from https://zenodo.org/records/5348287</p> <h2>Derived habitat rasters:</h2> <h3>crop_to_abn_iucn_observed.zip (Calculation 1a)<br>crop_to_abn_iucn_potential.zip (Calculation 1b)<br>max_abn_lcc_iucn.zip (Calculation 2a)<br>max_abn_lcc_iucn_potential.zip (Calculation 2b)<br>lcc_iucn_habitat.zip (Calculation 3a)<br>lcc_iucn_habitat_potential.zip (Calculation 3b)</h3> <p>These maps show IUCN Level 2 habitat types (Jung et al. 2020) interpolated onto the land cover classes in the Yin et al. (2020) abandonment maps at multiple spatial and temporal extents, which serve as inputs for the three primary calculations in our manuscript. Accompanying each calculation is a corresponding map for a scenarios in which no abandoned croplands were recultivated over the course of the time series (marked as "potential"). Each .zip file contains maps for each of 11 sites.</p> <p><strong>Calculation 1. </strong>This calculation isolates the direct effect of abandonment on habitat availability, by comparing the habitat provided before and after abandonment. These "crop_to_abn_iucn" maps show IUCN Level 2 habitats in cropland pixels that experienced abandonment, including the abandonment period as well as the immediately preceding period of cultivation (to allow for a proper before and after comparison). As a result, these maps show only habitat provided by croplands when they were actively cultivated, abandoned, or, where appropriate, recultivated, which allows for a proper before and after comparison. These maps are created in the script "cluster/noncrop_precrop_mask.R".</p> <p><strong>Calculation 2.</strong> This calculation considered changes in habitat that took place exclusively in pixels that experienced abandonment at some point during the time series (following Calculation 1), but expanded to track changes across our entire time series, from 1987 through 2017, in order to account for any land cover that was cleared for agriculture prior to abandonment. These "max_abn_lcc_iucn" maps therefore show IUCN Level 2 habitat types for each pixel that was abandoned at any point during the time series, across the full time series. These maps were created in the script "habitats.Rmd" code chunks {r mask-lcc-iucn-habitat-to-abn} and {r *potential_max}. </p> <p><strong>Calculation 3. </strong>This calculation tracks habitat area provided by every pixel throughout the entire spatial and temporal extent (1987-2017), in order to place abandonment into the context of broader land-cover change dynamics like ongoing cropland expansion taking place alongside of abandonment. These "lcc_iucn" maps therefore show the IUCN Level 2 habitat types for each pixel at each site in each year of our time series. These maps were created in the script "habitats.Rmd" code chunks {r lcc-iucn-habitat-composite} and {r *potential-lcc-full} and the script "cluster/potential_full_iucn.R".</p> <p>Some analyses require these .tif files (manipulated as SpatRasters using {terra}, https://rspatial.org/terra/) to be converted to tabular format (data.tables, via {data.table} (https://rdatatable.gitlab.io/data.table/) and saved as .parquet files (via {arrow}, https://arrow.apache.org/docs/r/). This can be accomplished via scripts "cluster/save_spatraster_as_dt.R" and "cluster/save_parquet.R."</p> <h3><br>frag_df.csv<br>frag_hypo_no_abn_2017_df.csv</h3> <p>These tabular files contain derived fragmentation statistics calculated using the {landscapemetrics} R package (https://r-spatialecology.github.io/landscapemetrics/). The second file contains metrics for a scenario in which no croplands were abandoned through the year 2017, in order to assess the effect cropland abandonment on landscape configuration. Each file contains 11 columns: </p> <ol> <li>"layer" -- the spatial raster layer for which the metric is calculated, corresponding to a year.</li> <li>"level" -- the level at which the metric is calculated, in our case, the land cover "class."</li> <li>"class" -- corresponding the to land cover class for which the metric is calculated (1 = non-vegetation, 2 = woody vegetation [i.e., forest], 3 = cropland, and 4 = herbaceous vegetation [i.e., grassland]).</li> <li>"id" -- An unused field containing NA values.</li> <li>"metric" -- the specific term used for each metric by {landscapemetrics} ("area_mn", "clumpy", or "para_mn").</li> <li>"value" -- the numerical value of the statistic.</li> <li>"name" -- the name of the landscape metric being calculated ("patch area," "clumpiness index," or "perimeter-area ratio").</li> <li>"type" -- the broad type of metric being calculated ("area and edge metric," "aggregation metric," or "shape metric").</li> <li>"function_name" -- the name of the {landscapemetrics} function used to calculate the statistic.</li> <li>"site" -- the site (out of 11 study sites) for which this statistic was calculated.</li> <li>"year" -- the year corresponding to the metric statistic, between 1987-2017 (including 1986-2018 for Nebraska and 1987-2018 for Wisconsin)<br>Additional details on these metrics can be found at https://r-spatialecology.github.io/landscapemetrics/.</li> </ol> <p>The spatial IUCN data underlying our analyses (species range maps) are available upon request from BirdLife International (http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/requestdis) and IUCN (https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/spatial-data-download). Tabular species assessment data (including habitat and elevation preferences) are freely available from IUCN (https://www.iucnredlist.org/). Here we share three IUCN-related data files that serve as important inputs throughout our analyses:</p> <h3>iucn_lc_crosswalk.csv</h3> <p>This tabular file outlines the crosswalk between the 4 land cover classes in Yin et al. 2020 and the IUCN Level 2 habitat types mapped by Jung et al. 2020. It contains five columns:</p> <ol> <li>"map_code" -- the habitat code corresponding to Jung et al. (2020).</li> <li>"Coarse_Name" -- the broad Level 1 habitat grouping.</li> <li>"lc" -- the corresponding land cover type from Yin et al. (2020) (1 = non-vegetation, 2 = woody vegetation [i.e., forest], 3 = cropland, and 4 = herbaceous vegetation [i.e., grassland]).</li> <li>"IUCNLevel" -- the full IUCN Level 2 habitat type name. </li> <li>"code" -- the IUCN Level 2 habitat code. </li> </ol> <h3>habitat_age_req_coded.csv</h3> <p>This tabular file lists whether each species was determined (by R. Alex Wiebe [AW] and Christopher L. Crawford [CLC]) to be a "mature forest obligate" (i.e., requiring forest older than 30 years, our time series length) or not. Species determined to be "mature forest obligate" species were excluded from our final analysis. The file includes 11 columns: </p> <ol> <li>"vert_class" -- Vertebrate class ("bird" or "mam" [mammal])</li> <li>"binomial" -- Species' binomial scientific name containing genus and species.</li> <li>"common_names" -- Species' common names listed by IUCN.</li> <li>"mature_forest_obl" -- Whether a species is determined to be a "mature forest obligate" species (1) or not (0). Some species are marked as 0.9, 0.75, 0.25, or 0.1 as an indication of some uncertainty, but these were rounded to the nearest integer for the final analysis.</li> <li>"water_obl" -- Whether a species is determined to be a "water obligate" species (1) or not (0). Some species were marked as 0.9, 0.75, 0.25, or 0.1 as an indication of some uncertainty. Note: this field was not used in the analysis.</li> <li>"habitat" -- The description of the species' habitat, drawn from individual IUCN assessments (see https://www.iucnredlist.org/).</li> <li>"site_presence" -- Where each species is present across our 11 study sites.</li> <li>"suitable_habitats" -- A list of IUCN Level 2 habitat types consider suitable habitat by each species.</li> <li>"major_habitats" -- A list of IUCN Level 2 habitat types listed as having "Major Importance" for that species.</li> <li>"coder" -- The author that assigned the mature forest obligate and water obligate codes ("AW" = R. Alex Wiebe, "CLC" = Christopher L. Crawford).</li> <li>"Chris_notes" -- A text field contains notes on coding process.</li> </ol> <h3>centroids_df.csv</h3> <p>This is a simple tabular dataset containing the longitude and latitude of the centroid of each bird and mammal species' range that overlaps with one of my sites. Columns include "binomial," which lists each species binomial scientific name, "centroid_longitude," and centroid_latitude." Centroid positions were calculated in QGIS using species range files from IUCN and BirdLife International.</p> <h3><br>aoh_l.parquet</h3> <p>This tabular file contains the raw AOH results produced using the script "cluster/aoh.R." This file contains the area of each suitable IUCN Level 2 habitat for each bird and mammal species at each site in each year of our time series (1987-2017), calculated across a range of calculations and scenarios. This file includes the primary data that serve as inputs for much of the rest of the analysis. The overall area of habitat for each species in each year at each site (a tabular data file named "aoh") summed across suitable habitat types and filtered to include or exclude passage areas for migratory birds, is calculated from "aoh_l" in the "AOH.Rmd" script in code chunks "filter-aoh-suitability-by-season" and "**calculate-aoh" (similarly to other derived datasets that serve as inputs for various parts of the analysis). This "aoh" file provides input data for the linear models used to extract AOH trends and test for significance. "aoh_l.parquet" includes 20 columns: </p> <ol> <li>"aoh_type" -- A label indicating the temporal and spatial scale at which AOH is calculated: "crop_abn_iucn" (Calc. 1a), "crop_abn_potential_iucn" (Calc. 1b), "max_abn_iucn" (Calc. 2a), "max_potential_abn_iucn" (Calc. 2b), "full_iucn" (Calc. 3a), and "full_potential_iucn" (Calc. 3b). "abn_iucn" and "potential_abn_iucn" correspond to calculations that only capture habitat following abandonment (i.e., not including habitat provided by croplands prior to abandonment); these calculations are not included in our final analysis.</li> <li>"vert_class" -- Vertebrate class ("amp," amphibians; "bird," birds; or "mam," mammals). Note that only birds and mammals were included in our final analysis.</li> <li>"site" -- One of our 11 study sites (see above).</li> <li>"binomial" -- Species binomial scientific name.</li> <li>"year" -- Year for which AOH is calculated (1987-2017).</li> <li>"map_code" -- Code indicating the IUCN Level 2 habitat associated with the area statistic. See "iucn_lc_crosswalk.csv."</li> <li>"season" -- Seasonal code indicating the season in which a species considers the habitat to be suitable, drawn from IUCN. Codes are: 1 ("Resident"), 2 ("Breeding") (2), "Non-breeding Season" (3), Passage (4), and Seasonal Occurrence Uncertain (5)</li> <li>"area" -- Area of Habitat, in hectares (ha).</li> <li>"mature_forest_obl" -- Whether a species is determined to be a "mature forest obligate" species (1) or not (0), drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above). Some species are marked as 0.9, 0.75, 0.25, or 0.1 as an indication of some uncertainty, but these were rounded to the nearest integer for the final analysis.</li> <li>"redlistCategory" -- IUCN Red List Category: "Extinct," "Extinct in the Wild," "Critically Endangered," "Endangered," "Vulnerable," "Near Threatened," "Least Concern," "Data Deficient," or "Not Evaluated."</li> <li>"IUCN_aoh_ha" -- [Unused] A preliminary summation of all habitat area for each species in each year, prior to filtering. We did not use this field in our analysis. Our final AOH calculation involved first filtering out mismatched season and habitat suitability combinations.</li> <li>"time" -- The time required for the area of habitat calculation (in seconds).</li> <li>"className" -- Vertebrate class: "AMPHIBIA," "AVES," or "MAMMALIA."</li> <li>"category" -- Duplicate field for IUCN Red List Category, unused.</li> <li>"core_index" -- An index used to assign specific AOH calculations to run in parallel across multiple computing cores on Princeton's High-Performance Computing Cluster.</li> <li>"total_range_area" -- The species total range area, in square kilometers (km^2), calculated across all range polygons for each species provided by IUCN and BirdLife International. See "cluster/calc_range_area.R."</li> <li>"range_size_quantile" -- A numerical index representing global species range size quantiles, within each class. Values range from 0 (the smallest global range within a class) to 1 (the largest global range within a class). These quantiles are used to define "small-ranged species," as species with global range sizes smaller than the median global range size in their class. See "cluster/calc_range_area.R."</li> <li>"water_obl" -- Whether a species is determined to be a "water obligate" species (1) or not (0). Some species were marked as 0.9, 0.75, 0.25, or 0.1 as an indication of some uncertainty. Note: this field was not used in the analysis. Drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above).</li> <li>"coder" -- The author that assigned the mature forest obligate and water obligate codes ("AW" = R. Alex Wiebe, "CLC" = Christopher L. Crawford). Drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above).</li> <li>"common_names" -- Species' common names listed by IUCN, drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above).</li> </ol> <h3><br>aoh_feols.parquet</h3> <p>This tabular data contains the results of linear regressions predicting area of habitat as a function of time. We parameterized models for each species in each site for each of the 6 AOH calculation types described above and in Crawford et al. 2024 (Calculations 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b). We used the R package {fixest} to parameterize these ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regressions, using the Newey-West estimator to calculate standard errors. We used the R package {broom} to extract ("tidy") the model coefficient estimates and statistics. See "AOH.Rmd" chunk {r **feols}. This file includes 20 columns:</p> <ol> <li>"term" -- The name of the regression term: "(Intercept)" or slope ("year0").</li> <li>"estimate" -- The estimated value of the regression term.</li> <li>"std.error" -- The standard error of the regression term.</li> <li>"statistic" -- The value of a T-statistic to use in a hypothesis that the regression term is non-zero.</li> <li>"p.value" -- The two-sided p-value associated with the observed statistic.</li> <li>"conf.low" -- Lower bound on the confidence interval for the estimate (in our case 5%).</li> <li>"conf.high" -- Upper bound on the confidence interval for the estimate (in our case, 95%).</li> <li>"aoh_type" -- A label indicating the temporal and spatial scale at which AOH is calculated: "crop_abn_iucn" (Calc. 1a), "crop_abn_potential_iucn" (Calc. 1b), "max_abn_iucn" (Calc. 2a), "max_potential_abn_iucn" (Calc. 2b), "full_iucn" (Calc. 3a), and "full_potential_iucn" (Calc. 3b). "abn_iucn" and "potential_abn_iucn" correspond to calculations that only capture habitat following abandonment (i.e., not including habitat provided by croplands prior to abandonment); these calculations are not included in our final analysis.</li> <li>"run_index" -- An index used to easily pull observations for each model run. There is one index for each unique species at each site, in each of the aoh_types, calculated including and excluding passage areas.</li> <li>"vert_class" -- Vertebrate class ("amp," amphibians; "bird," birds; or "mam," mammals). Note that only birds and mammals were included in our final analysis.</li> <li>"site" -- One of our 11 study sites (see above).</li> <li>"binomial" -- Species binomial scientific name.</li> <li>"n_obs" -- The number of observations included in the model run.</li> <li>"n_unique_obs" -- The number of unique observations included in the model run (used to exclude species with constant AOH).</li> <li>"redlistCategory" -- IUCN Red List Category: "Extinct," "Extinct in the Wild," "Critically Endangered," "Endangered," "Vulnerable," "Near Threatened," "Least Concern," "Data Deficient," or "Not Evaluated."</li> <li>"mature_forest_obl" -- Whether a species is determined to be a "mature forest obligate" species (1) or not (0), drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above). Some species are marked as 0.9, 0.75, 0.25, or 0.1 as an indication of some uncertainty, but these were rounded to the nearest integer for the final analysis.</li> <li>"common_names" -- Species' common names listed by IUCN, drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above).</li> <li>"start_year" -- The first year for which this species has area of habitat at this site (i.e., the first observation included in the model).</li> <li>"end_year" -- The last year for which this species has area of habitat at this site (i.e., the last observation included in the model).</li> <li>"passage_type" -- Whether a model run includes passage areas ("include_passage") or does not include passage areas ("exclude_passage") when calculating area of habitat (AOH) for migratory birds.</li> </ol> <p><br><strong>Two files contain model effect sizes for AOH models:</strong></p> <h3>aoh_start_end_l.parquet</h3> <p>This tabular data file contains observed effect sizes: the observed change in AOH for each species at each site, in each calculation, derived directly from observations from the start and end of the time series. These data are calculated in "AOH.Rmd" chunk: {r observed-change-in-aoh-by-window-size}. This data serves as direct input for the file "aoh_obs_change_tmp_all" (see below), which is the primary input for the traits linear models in our analysis (see "traits.Rmd", "_util_files.R"). This file contains 24 columns:</p> <ol> <li>"run_index" -- An index used to easily pull observations for each model run. There is one index for each unique species at each site, in each of the aoh_types, calculated including and excluding passage areas.</li> <li>"start" -- The mean area of habitat (AOH), in hectares (ha), at the "start" of the time series, as calculated across the number of years specified in "window_size."</li> <li>"start_year" -- The year of the first AOH observation.</li> <li>"end" -- The mean area of habitat (AOH), in hectares (ha), at the "end" of the time series, as calculated across the number of years specified in "window_size."</li> <li>"end_year" -- The year of the last AOH observation.</li> <li>"window_size" -- The number of years across which "start" and "end" AOH values are averaged (e.g., if "window_size" is 5, "start" is then the mean AOH across the first 5 years of observations, and "end" is the mean AOH across the last 5 years of observations).</li> <li>"abs_change" -- The absolute change in AOH, calculated as the difference between the mean AOH at the end of the time series and the mean AOH at the start of the time series (i.e., end - start).</li> <li>"prop_change" -- The proportional change in AOH, calculated as the absolute change in AOH divided by the AOH value at the start of the time series (i.e., abs_change/start).</li> <li>"percent_change" -- The percent change in AOH, calculated as 100 times the proportional change in AOH (i.e., 100 * prop_change).</li> <li>"ratio" -- The ratio of the mean AOH at the end of the time series to the mean AOH at the start of the time series (i.e., end/start).</li> <li>"ratio_mod" -- A modified ratio of the ending AOH to the starting AOH, for which ratio values less than 1 are replaced by additive inverse of the reciprocal value (i.e., 1/ratio * -1). Ratios greater than 1 are left the same.</li> <li>"abs_change_as_prop_site_area" -- The absolute change in AOH as a proportion of site area (i.e., abs_change / total_site_area_ha_2017).</li> <li>"aoh_type" -- A label indicating the temporal and spatial scale at which AOH is calculated: "crop_abn_iucn" (Calc. 1a), "crop_abn_potential_iucn" (Calc. 1b), "max_abn_iucn" (Calc. 2a), "max_potential_abn_iucn" (Calc. 2b), "full_iucn" (Calc. 3a), and "full_potential_iucn" (Calc. 3b). "abn_iucn" and "potential_abn_iucn" correspond to calculations that only capture habitat following abandonment (i.e., not including habitat provided by croplands prior to abandonment); these calculations are not included in our final analysis.</li> <li>"vert_class" -- Vertebrate class ("amp," amphibians; "bird," birds; or "mam," mammals). Note that only birds and mammals were included in our final analysis.</li> <li>"site" -- One of our 11 study sites (see above).</li> <li>"binomial" -- Species binomial scientific name.</li> <li>"passage_type" -- Whether a model run includes passage areas ("include_passage") or does not include passage areas ("exclude_passage") when calculating area of habitat (AOH) for migratory birds.</li> <li>"common_names" -- Species' common names listed by IUCN, drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above).</li> <li>"redlistCategory" -- IUCN Red List Category: "Extinct," "Extinct in the Wild," "Critically Endangered," "Endangered," "Vulnerable," "Near Threatened," "Least Concern," "Data Deficient," or "Not Evaluated."</li> <li>"mature_forest_obl" -- Whether a species is determined to be a "mature forest obligate" species (1) or not (0), drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above). Some species are marked as 0.9, 0.75, 0.25, or 0.1 as an indication of some uncertainty, but these were rounded to the nearest integer for the final analysis.</li> <li>"total_site_area_ha_2017" -- The total site area (ha) in 2017. (Drawn directly from "area_summary_df," from https://zenodo.org/records/5348287)</li> <li>"area_ever_abn_ha" -- The total area of those pixels that were abandoned at least once during the time series (corresponding to the area of potential abandonment, as of 2017). (Drawn directly from "area_summary_df," from https://zenodo.org/records/5348287)</li> <li>"trend" -- The overall trend in AOH ("gain," "loss," or "no trend"), determined by the sign of slope coefficients and statistical significance at p < 0.05.</li> <li>"factor_change" -- The factor change in AOH, calculated as either the proportional change in AOH (i.e., prop_change) for values greater than 0, or as the reciprocal of the proportional change in AOH (i.e., 1/prop_change) for values greater than 0.</li> </ol> <h3>aoh_change_df.parquet</h3> <p>This tabular data file contains effect sizes estimated from linear regression coefficients (i.e., slopes and intercepts), calculated in "AOH.Rmd" chunk {r estimated-changes-aoh-change-df}. This file contains 29 columns:</p> <ol> <li>"run_index" -- An index used to easily pull observations for each model run. There is one index for each unique species at each site, in each of the aoh_types, calculated including and excluding passage areas.</li> <li>"est_type" -- The estimate type, whether the estimated model slope ("estimate") or the lower ("conf.low") or upper ("conf.high") bounds of the 95% confidence interval around the slope estimate.</li> <li>"vert_class" -- Vertebrate class ("amp," amphibians; "bird," birds; or "mam," mammals). Note that only birds and mammals were included in our final analysis.</li> <li>"site" -- One of our 11 study sites (see above).</li> <li>"start_year" -- The year of the first AOH observation.</li> <li>"end_year" -- The year of the last AOH observation.</li> <li>"slope" -- The model estimated slope value.</li> <li>"intercept" -- The model estimated intercept value.</li> <li>"aoh_type" -- A label indicating the temporal and spatial scale at which AOH is calculated: "crop_abn_iucn" (Calc. 1a), "crop_abn_potential_iucn" (Calc. 1b), "max_abn_iucn" (Calc. 2a), "max_potential_abn_iucn" (Calc. 2b), "full_iucn" (Calc. 3a), and "full_potential_iucn" (Calc. 3b). "abn_iucn" and "potential_abn_iucn" correspond to calculations that only capture habitat following abandonment (i.e., not including habitat provided by croplands prior to abandonment); these calculations are not included in our final analysis.</li> <li>"passage_type" -- Whether a model run includes passage areas ("include_passage") or does not include passage areas ("exclude_passage") when calculating area of habitat (AOH) for migratory birds.</li> <li>"binomial" -- Species binomial scientific name.</li> <li>"mature_forest_obl" -- Whether a species is determined to be a "mature forest obligate" species (1) or not (0), drawn directly from "habitat_age_req_coded.csv" (see above). Some species are marked as 0.9, 0.75, 0.25, or 0.1 as an indication of some uncertainty, but these were rounded to the nearest integer for the final analysis.</li> <li>"total_site_area_ha_2017" -- The total site area (ha) in 2017. (Drawn directly from "area_summary_df," from https://zenodo.org/records/5348287)</li> <li>"area_ever_abn_ha" -- The total area of those pixels that were abandoned at least once during the time series (corresponding to the area of potential abandonment, as of 2017). (Drawn directly from "area_summary_df," from https://zenodo.org/records/5348287)</li> <li>"trend" -- The trend in AOH experienced by the species at this site for this aoh_type calculation ("gain," "loss," or "no trend"), determined by the sign of slope coefficients and assigning statistical significance when p < 0.05.</li> <li>"n_trends" -- The number of distinct trends in AOH experienced by the species across all of the sites overlapping with its range, including this site.</li> <li>"trend_types" -- The types of trends in AOH experienced by this species across all sites overlapping with its range (some combination of "gain", "loss", and/or "no trend").</li> <li>"overall_trend" -- The overall trend in AOH experienced by this species across all sites overlapping with its range ("gain" - experiencing "gain" trends at all occurring sites; "loss" - experiencing "loss" trends at all occurring sites; "no trend" - experiencing "no trend" at all occurring sites; "weak gain" - experiencing "gain" trends at some sites and "no trend" at others; "weak loss" - experiencing "loss" trends at some sites and "no trend" at others; or "context dependent" - experienced "gain" trends at some sites and "loss" trends at other sites [referred to as "mixed" effects in Crawford et al. 2024])</li> <li>"trend_direction" -- The general direction of the trend in AOH for the species across all occurring sites ("gain" when overall_trend is either "gain" or "weak_gain"; "loss" when overall_trend is either "loss" or "weak_loss"; "context dependent" when overall_trend is "context dependent" [i.e., "mixed" effects]; and "no trend" when overall_trend is "no trend").</li> <li>"trend_consistency" -- An indication of how consistent the trend in AOH is across all occurring sites ("consistent" if overall_trend is "gain" or "loss"; "weak" if "weak_gain" or "weak_loss"; and "opposite" if "context dependent" [i.e., "mixed" effects]).</li> <li>"time_range" -- The number of years for which the species has AOH observations at this site for this aoh_type calculations.</li> <li>"aoh_start_est" -- The estimated AOH at the start of the time series, calculated from linear regression slope and intercept coefficients.</li> <li>"aoh_end_est" -- The estimated AOH at the end of the time series, calculated from linear regression slope and intercept coefficients.</li> <li>"abs_change" -- The absolute change in estimated AOH over the course of the time series (i.e., aoh_end_est - aoh_start_est).</li> <li>"abs_change_as_prop_site_area" -- The absolute change in estimated AOH as a proportion of site area (i.e., abs_change / total_site_area_ha_2017).</li> <li>"ratio_change" -- The ratio of the estimated AOH at the end of the time series to the estimated AOH at the start of the time series (i.e., aoh_end_est / aoh_start_est).</li> <li>"prop_change" -- The proportional change in estimated AOH, calculated as the absolute change in estimated AOH divided by the estimated AOH value at the start of the time series (i.e., abs_change / aoh_start_est).</li> <li>"factor_change" -- The factor change in estimated AOH, calculated as either the proportional change in estimated AOH (i.e., prop_change) for values greater than 0, or as the reciprocal of the proportional change in estimated AOH (i.e., 1/prop_change) for values greater than 0.</li> <li>"percent_change" -- The percent change in estimated AOH, calculated as 100 times the proportional change in estimated AOH (i.e., 100 * prop_change).</li> </ol> <h3>taxonomy_df.parquet</h3> <p>This tabular data file contains basic taxonomic information used in the analysis, including 10 columns:</p> <ol> <li>"vert_class" -- Vertebrate class ("bird," birds; or "mam," mammals).</li> <li>"binomial" -- Species binomial scientific name, drawn from IUCN or BirdLife International.</li> <li>"redlistCategory" -- IUCN Red List Category: "Extinct," "Extinct in the Wild," "Critically Endangered," "Endangered," "Vulnerable," "Near Threatened," "Least Concern," "Data Deficient," or "Not Evaluated."</li> <li>"order" -- Taxonomic order.</li> <li>"family" -- Taxonomic family.</li> <li>"n_sp_in_family_sample" -- The number of species contained in the family included in our analysis.</li> <li>"order_common" -- A common name to refer to the order.</li> <li>"family_common" -- A common name to refer to the family.</li> <li>"n_in_family" -- The total number of species contained in the family globally.</li> <li>"threatened" -- Whether a species is considered threatened with extinction (i.e., is listed as "Critically Endangered," "Endangered," or "Vulnerable" on the IUCN Red List).</li> </ol> <h3><br>aoh_obs_change_tmp_all.csv<br>aoh_est_change_tmp_all.csv</h3> <p>These two tabular data files contain data used as inputs for the linear models involved in our traits analysis exploring how species' responses to cropland abandonment are affected by habitat suitabilities and other traits. The key variables are the response variables for our models ("binary_gain_v_loss", "abs_change_percent_site", and "log(ratio)") and predictor variables c("forest_occ", "savanna_occ", "shrubland_occ", "grassland_occ", "wetlands_occ", "rocky_occ", "caves_occ", "desert_occ", "urban_occ", "arable_occ", "n_suitable_habitats_lvl2", "vert_class", "threatened", "Trophic_level", "log10(Body_mass_g)", "log10(total_range_area)", "abs(centroid_latitude)", and "max_abn_ext_percent_site"). Further details are contained in "traits.Rmd"</p> <p>These two files are developed from "aoh_start_end_l" and "aoh_change_df," but filtered to include only birds and mammals, to exclude passage areas from AOH calculations, to exclude mature forest obligate species, and to use only a window_size of 5 years (for "aoh_obs_change_tmp_all") and model estimates (rather than 95% confidence interval bounds, for "aoh_est_change_tmp_all"). </p> <p><strong>aoh_obs_change_tmp_all.csv contains 63 columns.</strong></p> <ul> <li>Columns 1-24 match "aoh_start_end_l". </li> <li>Columns 25-31 match "taxonomy_df" columns 3 through 10.</li> <li>Columns 32-34: "Body_mass_g" (species body mass, in grams), "Trophic_level" (whether a species is a "Carnivore", a "Herbivore," or an "Omnivore"), and "Habitat_breadth_IUCN" (the number of IUCN Level 2 habitats a species can occupy) were taken from from Etard et al. 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13184)</li> <li>Column 35: "total_range_area" -- drawn from "aoh_l," see above</li> <li>Columns 36-37: "centroid_longitude" and "centroid_latitude" are drawn from "centroids_df," see above.</li> <li>Columns 38-50 are Boolean variables that indicate whether a species can occupy a specific IUCN Level 1 habitat type (i.e., whether IUCN lists that Level 1 habitat as suitable for the species). These variables are as follows, with the IUCN Level 1 habitat code listed in brackets: "forest_occ" [1], "savanna_occ" [2], "shrubland_occ" [3], "grassland_occ" [4], "wetlands_occ" [5], "rocky_occ" [6], "caves_occ" [7], "desert_occ" [8], "marine_intertidal_occ"[12], "marine_coastal_occ" [13], "artificial_terrestrial_occ" [14], "artificial_aquatic_occ" [15], and "introduced_occ" [16].</li> <li>Columns 51-52 represent the number of IUCN Level 1 ("n_suitable_habitats") and IUCN Level 2 ("n_suitable_habitats_lvl2") habitats a species has listed as suitable habitats by IUCN, respectively.</li> <li>Columns 53-56 are Boolean variables indicating whether a species can occupy a subset of IUCN Level 2 habitats, which are listed in brackets: "arable_occ" [14.1 Arable Land]; "farmland_occ" [14.1 Arable Land, 14.2 Pastureland, or 14.4 Rural Gardens]; "ag_occ" (duplicate of "farmland_occ"); "urban_occ" [14.5 Urban Areas].</li> <li>Columns 57-58 represent the maximum spatial extent of abandonment at a give site (i.e., the area of all lands that were abandoned at least once during the time series), whether divided by site area ("max_abn_extent_div_site_area," i.e,. area_ever_abn_ha / total_site_area_ha_2017) or as a percent of site area ("max_abn_ext_percent_site").</li> <li>Column 59 is "abs_change_percent_site," calculated as 100 * abs_change_as_prop_site_area.</li> <li>Columns 60-63 are binary values (1 or 0) indicating the whether the species experienced statistically significant gains in AOH ("binary_trend_gain"), statistically significant losses in AOH ("binary_trend_loss"), no trend in AOH ("binary_trend_no_trend"). Column 63 ("binary_gain_v_loss") is a binary value assigning a value of 1 for gains, 0 for losses, and NA for other values.</li> </ul> <p><br><strong>aoh_est_change_tmp_all.csv contains 70 columns:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Columns 1-29 match "aoh_change_df".</li> <li>Columns 30-37 match "taxonomy_df" columns 3 through 10.</li> <li>Columns 38-40: "Body_mass_g" (species body mass, in grams), "Trophic_level" (whether a species is a "Carnivore", a "Herbivore," or an "Omnivore"), and "Habitat_breadth_IUCN" (the number of IUCN Level 2 habitats a species can occupy) were taken from from Etard et al. 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13184)</li> <li>Column 41: "total_range_area" -- drawn from "aoh_l," see above</li> <li>Columns 42-43: "centroid_longitude" and "centroid_latitude" are drawn from "centroids_df," see above.</li> <li>Columns 44-56 are Boolean variables that indicate whether a species can occupy a specific IUCN Level 1 habitat type (i.e., whether IUCN lists that Level 1 habitat as suitable for the species). These variables are as follows, with the IUCN Level 1 habitat code listed in brackets: "forest_occ" [1], "savanna_occ" [2], "shrubland_occ" [3], "grassland_occ" [4], "wetlands_occ" [5], "rocky_occ" [6], "caves_occ" [7], "desert_occ" [8], "marine_intertidal_occ"[12], "marine_coastal_occ" [13], "artificial_terrestrial_occ" [14], "artificial_aquatic_occ" [15], and "introduced_occ" [16].</li> <li>Columns 57-58 represent the number of IUCN Level 1 ("n_suitable_habitats") and IUCN Level 2 ("n_suitable_habitats_lvl2") habitats a species has listed as suitable habitats by IUCN, respectively.</li> <li>Columns 59-62 are Boolean variables indicating whether a species can occupy a subset of IUCN Level 2 habitats, which are listed in brackets: "arable_occ" [14.1 Arable Land]; "farmland_occ" [14.1 Arable Land, 14.2 Pastureland, or 14.4 Rural Gardens]; "ag_occ" (duplicate of "farmland_occ"); "urban_occ" [14.5 Urban Areas].</li> <li>Columns 63-64 represent the maximum spatial extent of abandonment at a give site (i.e., the area of all lands that were abandoned at least once during the time series), whether divided by site area ("max_abn_extent_div_site_area," i.e,. area_ever_abn_ha / total_site_area_ha_2017) or as a percent of site area ("max_abn_ext_percent_site").</li> <li>Columns 65-68 are binary values (1 or 0) indicating the whether the species experienced statistically significant gains in AOH ("binary_trend_gain"), statistically significant losses in AOH ("binary_trend_loss"), no trend in AOH ("binary_trend_no_trend"). Column 63 ("binary_gain_v_loss") is a binary value assigning a value of 1 for gains, 0 for losses, and NA for other values.</li> <li>Column 69, "slope_prop_site", is the estimated linear regression coefficient, or slope, as a proportion of site area, calculated as slope / total_site_area_ha_2017. </li> <li>Column 70 is "abs_change_percent_site," calculated as 100 * abs_change_as_prop_site_area.</li> </ul> <h3><br>final_species_list.csv</h3> <p>The final list of bird and mammal species included in our analysis, including the vertebrate class ("vert_class") and binomial species scientific name ("binomial") along with the overall response to cropland abandonment ("overall_trend"), the sites where that species had AOH affected by cropland abandonment ("sites"), the IUCN Red List Category ("redlistCategory"), the "obligate_type" (i.e., whether a species is a mature forest obligate, or not), the "range_size_quantile" (ranking species by global geographic range size), and "common_names". Note that mature forest obligates were excluded from our final results. These columns match the definitions included above.</p> <h3>trait_mod_df_modx1.rds</h3> <p>This R data file contains the results of our regression models run in "traits.Rmd" code chunk "*many-models", which is where our three traits linear regression models are run. These data are contained in the form of a nested tibble, or a set of tibbles nested within columns of a tibble (see: https://tidyr.tidyverse.org/articles/nest.html). These data include the input data ("data"), resulting models ("model"), model coefficients ("tidy"), regression tables ("gt"), and diagnostic statistics ("glance") for our many model runs across different response variables ("response") and AOH calculations ("aoh_type"). See "traits.Rmd" code chunk "*many-models" for more information.</p>
Image data of co-localization of IgG and HEV ORF2 protein in a case of hepatitis E-associated kidney disease
<p><span>Image data for a co-localization study of IgG with HEV ORF2 protein in a </span><span>de novo immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis (GN) case in</span><span> a kidney transplant recipient </span><span>with chronic hepatitis E (Leblond and Helmchen, et al. 2024).<span> </span>Immunofluorescence images are provided for 25 glomeruli at low magnification (20x, 0.227 micron/pixel) and for 16 glomeruli at high magnification (100x, 0.0454 micron/pixel). For each example glomeruli the green channel represents IgG antibody staining with FITC, and the magenta channel represent anti-HEV ORF2 staining using Alexa Fluor 546.</span></p> <p><span>Methods: </span></p> <p><span>Mouse monoclonal antibody clone 1E6 against the HEV ORF2 protein was incubated for 1h at a dilution of 1:125 followed by a mix of Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Invitrogen BV, A11018) and FITC-conjugated Rabbit anti-Human IgG (Gamma chain, Diagnostic Biosystem, F008) for 1hat a dilution of 1:50. Following automated staining, the slides were hand -washed in distilled H<sub>2</sub>O. Tissue was covered with Vectashield® Antifade Mounting Medium with DAPI (VectorLaboratories, H-1200), covered with a coverslip and stored at 4°C until evaluation.</span></p> <p><span>Immunofluorescence images were acquired with an upright fluorescence microscope (AxioImager.Z2 controlled by ZEN Blue software; 89 North Photofluor LM-75 light source, and Axiocam 503 mono camera; Zeiss, Jena, Germany), equipped with the following objectives: 20x (NA 0.5, Plan-NEOFLUAR), 40x (NA 1.4 oil, Plan-APOCHROMAT), and 100x (NA 1.45 oil, Plan-APOCHROMAT) objectives. This setup provides an excellent spatial resolution (nominally about 200 nm lateral resolution in our study; pixel size was 45.4 nm for 100x objective). High resolution images were taken with the 100x objective using the ApoTome.2 module with deconvolution (grid 5 lp/mm; section thickness 0.7 µm). We used Vysis Abbott Chroma filter sets (Blue: excitation (ex) 335-383 nm, emission (em) 420-470; green: ex 481-507 nm; em 521-551 nm; red: ex 534-556 nm, em 574- 606 nm). Co-localization of IgG and HEV ORF2 staining was quantified using Fiji software (Schindelin et al., 2012) and the JACoP ImageJ plug-in. </span></p>
Data for Reducing leakage of single-qubit gates for superconducting quantum processors using analytical control pulse envelopes
<p>This dataset contains the experimental data used in the figures of the paper "Reducing leakage of single-qubit gates for superconducting quantum processors using analytical control pulse envelopes" by E. Hyyppä, A. Vepsäläinen, ..., and J. Heinsoo published in PRX Quantum 5, 030353 (2024): https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.030353.</p> <p>The data is stored mostly as csv-files, the contents of which are explained in the readme-files. Each subfolder corresponds to one figure of the paper and also contains a Jupyter Notebook for plotting the data. The subfolders S1-S10 correspond to the supplementary figures, i.e., figures 6-15 in the Appendix of the paper.</p> <p>Furthermore, we provide a Jupyter notebook in the folder Code_to_plot_FAST_and_HD_DRAG_pulses/ that provides Python functions for evaluating and plotting the proposed FAST DRAG and HD DRAG pulses in time domain and frequency domain. Please cite our paper if you use the Python code for your published research.</p> <p>The notebooks have been tested using the following Python package versions<br>Python 3.11<br>scipy 1.14.1<br>numpy 2.1.0<br>matplotlib 3.9.2</p>
Figures data for doi.org/10.1364/OL.514637
<div>This Dataset contains the data included in the figures of the following journal article:</div> <div>S. Tomczewski, P. Wegrzyn, M. Wojtkowski, and A. Curatolo, "Chirped flicker optoretinography for in vivo characterization of human photoreceptors' frequency response to light," Opt. Lett. 49, 2461-2464 (2024).</div> <div>https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.514637</div>
Four lipidomics datasets (mouse liver, mouse pancreatic islets, mouse soleus muscle and mouse visceral adipose tissue), generated for the publication Mehl et al., "A multiorgan map of metabolic, signalling, and inflammatory pathways that coordinately control fasting glycemia in mice"
<p>Mehl, Thorens et al present a multiomics study aimiing to<span> identify the pathways that are coordinately regulated in pancreatic </span><span>b</span><span>-cells, muscle, liver, and fat to control fasting glycemia we fed C57Bl/6, DBA/2 and Balb/c mice a regular chow or a high fat diet for 3, 10 and 30 days. We measured fasted glycemia, insulinemia and whole-body insulin resistance. Transcriptomic and lipidomic analysis were used in a data fusion approach to identify organ-specific pathways related to the glycemic levels across all conditions investigated. In pancreatic islets, constant insulinemia despite higher glycemic levels were associated with reduced expression of mRNAs encoding hormone and neurotransmitter receptors as well as OXPHOS, cadherins, integrins and gap junction proteins. Higher glycemia and whole-body insulin resistance were associated, in muscle, with reduced expression of mRNAs encoding insulin signaling proteins and enzymes of the glycolysis, Krebs’ cycle and OXPHOS pathways, as well as endocytosis and exocytosis proteins; in hepatocytes, with lower expression of mRNAs of the insulin signaling pathway, of branched chain amino acid catabolism and of OXPHOS; in adipose tissue, with increased expression of mRNAs of innate immunity and lipid catabolism. These data provide a map of the pathways that are coordinately recruited in the investigated tissues to control fasting glycemia and a resource for further studies of interorgan communication in glucose homeostasis. </span></p>
cfDNA UniFlow Testfiles
<p>This repository contains files used for testing the correct execution of cfDNA UniFlow prior to productive use. It contains small bam and fastQ files based on IC17 from Snyder et al. 2016 (Cell): <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM1833242">GSM1833242</a> / <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?term=SRX1120780">SRX1120780</a>.</p> <p>A step-by-step documentation of how these files were generated from the original IC17 sample is included in "create_testsample.md".</p> <p>Original paper:</p> <p>Snyder MW, Kircher M, Hill AJ, Daza RM, Shendure J. Cell-free DNA Comprises an In Vivo Nucleosome Footprint that Informs Its Tissues-Of-Origin. Cell. 2016; doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.050.</p>
TyrosineKinaseData
<p><strong>TyrosineKinaseData</strong> provides position specific weight matrices (PWMs) for 93 canonical and non-canonical human tyrosine kinases originally published in Yaron-Barir et al. 2024 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07407-y). It includes gene annotation for each kinase PWM and also includes PWM matching scores for a set of 6659 experimentally verified tyrosine phosphosites.</p> <p>The data is made available in the Bioconductor ExperimentHub package <strong>JohnsonKinaseData</strong>.</p>
PE-HRI-temporal: A Multimodal Temporal Dataset in a robot mediated Collaborative Educational Setting
<p><em><strong>Please note that this dataset corresponds to the training data used in "Social robots as skilled ignorant peers for supporting learning "[7]. This (second) version of the dataset additionally includes labels (PE score and cluster labels for each datapoint). </strong></em></p> <p> </p> <p>This data set consists of <strong>multi-modal temporal team behaviors as well as learning outcomes </strong>collected in the context of a robot mediated collaborative and constructivist learning activity called JUSThink [1,2]. The data set can be useful for those looking to explore evolution of log actions, speech behavior, affective states, and gaze patterns for students to model constructs such as engagement, motivation, collaboration, etc. in educational settings. </p> <p>In this data set, team level data is collected from 34 teams of two (68 children) where the children are aged between 9 and 12. There are two files: </p> <p><strong>PE-HRI_learning_and_performance.csv:</strong> This file consists of the <strong>team level performance and learning metrics</strong> which are defined below: </p> <ul> <li> <p><em>last_error:</em> This is the error of the last submitted solution. Note that if a team has found an optimal solution (error = 0) the game stops, therefore making last error = 0. This is a metric for performance in the task. </p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_LG_absolute:</em> It is a team-level learning outcome that we calculate by taking the average of the two individual absolute learning gains of the team members. The individual absolute gain is the difference between a participant’s post-test and pre-test score, divided by the maximum score that can be achieved (10), which grasps how much the participant learned of all the knowledge available.</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_LG_relative:</em> It is a team-level learning outcome that we calculate by taking the average of the two individual relative learning gains of the team members. The individual relative gain is the difference between a participant’s post-test and pre-test score, divided by the difference between the maximum score that can be achieved and the pre-test score. This grasps how much the participant learned of the knowledge that he/she didn’t possess before the activity. </p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_LG_joint_abs: </em>It is a team-level learning outcome defined as the difference between the number of questions that both of the team members answer correctly in the post-test and in the pre-test, which grasps the amount of knowledge acquired together by the team members during the activity</p> </li> </ul> <p><strong>PE-HRI_behavioral_timeseries_w_labels.csv:</strong> In this file, for each team, the interaction of around 20-25 minutes is organized in windows of 10 seconds; hence, we have a total of 5048 windows of 10 seconds each. We report team level log actions, speech behavior, affective states, and gaze patterns for each window. More specifically, within each window, 26 features are generated in two ways: </p> <ol> <li>non-incremental</li> <li>incremental</li> </ol> <p>A non-incremental type would mean the value of a feature <em>in</em> that particular time window while an incremental type would mean the value of a feature <em>until</em> that particular time window. The incremental type is indicated by an "_inc" at the end of the feature name. Hence, in the end, within each window, we have 52 values: </p> <ul> <li> <p><em>T_add/(_inc): </em>The number of times a team added an edge on the map in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_remove/(_inc): </em>The number of times a team removed an edge from the map in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_ratio_add_rem/(_inc): </em>The ratio of addition of edges over deletion of edges by a team in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_action/(_inc):</em> The total number of actions taken by a team (add, delete, submit, presses on the screen) in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_hist/(_inc): </em>The number of times a team opened the sub-window with history of their previous solutions in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_help/(_inc): </em>The number of times a team opened the instructions manual in that window/(until that window). Please note that the robot initially gives all the instructions before the game-play while a video is played for demonstration of the functionality of the game. </p> </li> <li> <p><em>T1_T1_rem/(_inc): </em>The number of times either of the two members in the team followed the pattern consecutively: I add an edge, I then delete it in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T1_T1_add/(_inc): </em>The number of times either of the two members in the team followed the pattern consecutively: I delete an edge, I add it back in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T1_T2_rem/(_inc): </em>The number of times the members of the team followed the pattern consecutively: I add an edge, you then delete it in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T1_T2_add/(_inc): </em>The number of times the members of the team followed the pattern consecutively: I delete an edge, you add it back in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>redundant_exist/(_inc): </em>The number of times the team had redundant edges in their map in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>positive_valence/(_inc): </em>The average value of positive valence for the team in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>negative_valence/(_inc): </em>The average value of negative valence for the team in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>difference_in_valence/(_inc): </em>The difference of the average value of positive and negative valence for the team in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>arousal/(_inc): </em>The average value of arousal for the team in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>gaze_at_partner/(_inc): </em>The average of the the two team member's gaze when looking at their partner in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's gaze is calculated as a percentage of time in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>gaze_at_robot/(_inc): </em>The average of the the two team member's gaze when looking at the robot in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's gaze is calculated as a percentage of time in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>gaze_other/(_inc): </em>The average of the the two team member's gaze when looking in the direction opposite to the robot in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's gaze is calculated as a percentage of time in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>gaze_at_screen_left/(_inc): </em>The average of the the two team member's gaze when looking at the left side of the screen in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's gaze is calculated as a percentage of time in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>gaze_at_screen_right/(_inc):</em> The average of the the two team member's gaze when looking at the right side of the screen in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's gaze is calculated as a percentage of time in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_speech_activity/(_inc): </em>The average of the two team member's speech activity in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's speech activity is calculated as a percentage of time that they are speaking in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_silence/(_inc): </em>The average of the two team member's silence in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's silence is calculated as a percentage of time in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_short_pauses/(_inc): </em>The average of the two team member's short pauses over their speech activity in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's short pause refers to a brief pause of 0.15 seconds and is calculated as a percentage of time in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_long_pauses/(_inc): </em>The average of the two team members long pauses over their speech activity in that window/(until that window). Each individual member's long pause refers to a pause of 1.5 seconds and is calculated as a percentage of time in that window/(until that window). </p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_overlap/(_inc): </em>The average percentage of time the speech of the team members overlaps in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> <li> <p><em>T_overlap_to_speech_ratio/(_inc): </em>The ratio of the speech overlap over the speech activity of the team in that window/(until that window).</p> </li> </ul> <p>Apart from these 52 values, within each window, we also indicate: </p> <ul> <li><em>team: </em>The team to which the window belongs to.</li> <li><em>time_in_secs:</em> Time in seconds until that window.</li> <li><em>window: </em>The window number.</li> <li><em>normalized_time: </em>The time when this window occurred with respect to the total duration of the task for a particular team. </li> <li>cluster_labels: The cluster number associated with each time window in reference to the productive and non-productive clusters found in [3]</li> <li>PE_score: The Productive Engagement score in each window</li> </ul> <p>Lastly, we briefly elaborate on how the features are operationalised. We extract log behaviors from the recorded rosbags while the behaviors related to both gaze and affective states are computed through the open source library OpenFace [6] that returns both facial actions units (AUs) as well as gaze angles. For voice activity detection (VAD), that classifies if a piece of audio is voiced or unvoiced, we made use of the python wrapper for the open source Google WebRTC VAD. The literature that inspired our log, audio and video features as well as the tools used to extract them are described in more detail in [3,4]. However, in those papers, we make use of only the aggregate version of this data [5].</p> <p><em><strong>Please note that this dataset corresponds to the training data used in [7]. This (second) version of the dataset additionally includes labels (PE score and cluster labels for each datapoint). </strong></em></p>
Nucleus and cell segmentations for data in the mudRapp-seq paper
<p>Segmentation masks for images published with the paper describing </p> <p>"<em>Multiple direct RNA padlock probing in combination with in-situ sequencing (mudRapp-seq)</em>":</p> <blockquote> <p>Ahmad S, Gribling-Burrer AS, Schaust J, Fischer SC, Ambil UB, Ankenbrand MJ, Smyth RP. <em>Visualizing the transcription and replication of influenza A viral RNAs in cells by multiple direct RNA padlock probing and in-situ sequencing (mudRapp-seq)</em> (in review)</p> </blockquote> <p>Raw images are published in the <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/bioimage-archive/">Bioimage Archive</a> (identifier pending). To use these masks, run the data formatting code in the accompanying code repository to get the raw data in the correct structure and extract this zip archive into the repository root (the folder structure in the archive matches the folder structure of the repository).</p> <p>Filenames in `analysis/segmentation` contain a hint about how they were created:</p> <ul> <li>cp: direct segmentation with a cellpose model (<a href="https://github.com/BioMeDS/mudRapp-seq/blob/main/models/cellpose/nuclei">nuclei</a>, <a href="https://github.com/BioMeDS/mudRapp-seq/blob/main/models/cellpose/cells">cells</a>)</li> <li>cpws: cell segmentation through watershed with nucleus masks as seeds</li> <li>cpmc: manually corrected cellpose segmentations</li> </ul> <p>Besides the final segmentation masks, the training data are included in `data/training` and the models in `models/cellpose`.</p> <p>Changes:</p> <ul> <li>v1.1 training data and models added</li> </ul>
TESS-validated Gaia DR3 Pulsating Variables of δ Scuti and γ Doradus: II. 360+ Eclipsing Binaries with δ Scuti and γ Doradus Components
<div> <div> <div> <p>I present serendipitous discoveries of 380 eclipsing binaries with δ Scuti and γ Doradus pulsators, 46 eclipsing binaries exhibiting rotational variability, and 8 new RR Lyrae stars, identified for the first time during a validation project of pulsating variables from Gaia Data Release 3. Gaia DR3 Part 4 Variability released 12.4 million variables, including 748,058 pulsating variable stars of `DSCT|GDOR|SXPHE' types among the variability classification results of all classifiers -- 9,976,881 objects (in the file vclassre.dat, https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/I/358}). Among 75,369 analyzed stars, I confirmed 12,145 δ Scuti stars (including 8,710 new) and 8,192 γ Doradus stars (including 7,531 new). This work has significantly expanded the bona fide DSCT and GDOR catalogs to include 98,968 and 19,466 stars, respectively, providing a valuable resource for future studies. The discovery of the remarkable number of pulsating binaries underscores the significance of this project in validating Gaia’s variable star catalog. </p> </div> </div> </div> <p>The attached CSV files report the current validation results. If you use any data from the catalogs in your research, I appreciate your citation to the paper: </p> <p><strong>Zhou, A.-Y., 2024, Research Notes of the AAS, Volume 8, Number 4, 110 (ADS bibcode: 2024RNAAS...8..110Z) </strong></p> <ul> <li>CSV file GaiaDR3_vari_DSCTgDorSXPhe_Validated_R2_NewEB_Pul.csv for the newly identified Eclipsing Binaries with Pulsating components;</li> <li>CSV file GaiaDR3_vari_DSCTgDorSXPhe_Validated_R2.csv for the entire validated and newly identified results from 75,369 analyzed samples.</li> </ul> <p>This is a developing story. Check back for updates.</p>
NMR screen reveals the diverse structural landscape of a G- quadruplex library
<p>This is the NMR dataset for the manuscript '<span>NMR screen reveals the diverse structural landscape of a G-</span><br><span>quadruplex library</span>'</p> <p>Abstract</p> <p><span>G-quadruplexes are noncanonical nucleic acid structures</span><br><span>formed by stacked guanosine tetrads. Despite their functional and</span><br><span>structural diversity, a single consensus model is typically used to</span><br><span>describe</span><span> </span><span>sequences</span><span> </span><span>with</span><span> </span><span>the</span><span> </span><span>potential</span><span> </span><span>to</span><span> </span><span>form</span><span> </span><span>G-quadruplex</span><br><span>structures. We are interested in developing more specific sequence</span><br><span>models</span><span> </span><span>for</span><span> </span><span>G-quadruplexes.</span><span> </span><span>In</span><span> </span><span>previous</span><span> </span><span>work,</span><span> </span><span>we</span><span> </span><span>functionally</span><br><span>characterized each sequence in a 496-member library of variants of a</span><br><span>monomeric</span><span> </span><span>reference</span><span> </span><span>G-quadruplex</span><span> </span><span>for</span><span> </span><span>the</span><span> </span><span>ability</span><span> </span><span>to</span><span> </span><span>bind</span><span> </span><span>GTP,</span><br><span>promote a model peroxidase reaction, generate intrinsic fluorescence,</span><br><span>and to form multimers. Here we used NMR to obtain a broad overview</span><br><span>of the structural features of this library. After determining the</span><span> </span><span>1</span><span>H NMR</span><br><span>spectrum of each of these 496 sequences, spectra were sorted into</span><br><span>multiple classes, most</span><span> </span><span>of</span><span> </span><span>which could be rationalized based on</span><br><span>mutational patterns in the primary sequence. A more detailed screen</span><br><span>using representative sequences provided additional information about</span><br><span>spectral classes, and confirmed that the classes determined based on</span><br><span>analysis of</span><span> </span><span>1</span><span>H NMR spectra are correlated with functional categories</span><br><span>identified in previous studies. These results provide new insights into</span><br><span>the surprising structural diversity of this library. They also show how</span><br><span>NMR can be used to identify classes of sequences with distinct</span><br><span>mutational signatures and functions.</span></p> <p><span>Link to journal article: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202401437"><span>https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202401437</span></a></span></p>
Imaging Data from Sub-Seasonal Variation in Neptune's Mid-Infrared Emission by Roman et al.
<p>Images of Neptune as used in <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00033"><strong>Imaging Data from Sub-Seasonal Variation in Neptune's Mid-Infrared Emission </strong></a>by Michael T. Roman, Leigh N. Fletcher, Glenn S. Orton, Thomas K. Greathouse, Julianne I. Moses, Naomi Rowe-Gurney, Patrick G. J. Irwin, Arrate Antunano, James Sinclair, Yasumasa Kasaba, Takuya Fujiyoshi, Imke de Pater, Heidi B. Hammel.</p> <p>Data are from various observatories/telescope instruments, including:</p> <ul> <li>The European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope, VISIR</li> <li>Keck Observatory, LWS</li> <li>Subaru Observatory, COMICS</li> <li>Gemini North, Michelle and TEXES</li> <li>Gemini South, T-ReCS</li> </ul> <p>Data were acquired from observatory archives and flux calibrated, when possible, by comparison to standard stars, with spectral radiances expressed in units of W/m<sup>2</sup>/sr/micron. North is up in the images. The first extension (ext=0) is the image in native spatial resolution. The second extension (ext=1) features the disk normalized in size to that of the finest data (i.e., to a disk with an equatorial width of 51.8 pixels, as imaged by VLT-VISIR on August 13, 2018).</p> <p>Image file names and times correspond to approximate mid-time of combined image sequences, and will differ from original file headers.</p> <p>Questions concerning these data should be directed towards Michael Roman, m.t.roman@le.ac.uk or michael.thomas.roman@gmail.com</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
UMA-Offices
<p>The UMA-Offices dataset was collected in our facilities at the University of Málaga. It consist of 25 scenarios captured through an RGB-D sensor mounted on a robot. More info here: <a href="https://mapir.isa.uma.es/mapirwebsite/?p=2407" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://mapir.isa.uma.es/mapirwebsite/?p=2407</a></p> <p>If you use the dataset, please cite it as:</p> <blockquote> <pre>@INPROCEEDINGS{Ruiz-Sarmiento-KBS-2015, author = {Ruiz-Sarmiento, J. R. and Galindo, Cipriano and Gonz{\'{a}}lez-Jim{\'{e}}nez, Javier}, title = {Exploiting Semantic Knowledge for Robot Object Recognition}, journal = {Knowledge-Based Systems}, volume = {86}, year = {2015}, doi = {doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.032}, pages = {131--142}, } @inproceedings{fernandez2013fast, title = {Fast place recognition with plane-based maps}, author = {Fern{\'a}ndez-Moral, Eduardo and Mayol-Cuevas, W and Ar{\'e}valo, Vicente and Gonz{\'a}lez-Jim{\'e}nez, J}, booktitle = {Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on}, pages = {2719--2724}, year = {2013}, organization = {IEEE}</pre> </blockquote>
THÖR-MAGNI: A Large-scale Indoor Motion Capture Recording of Human Movement and Interaction
<h1>The THÖR-MAGNI Dataset Tutorials</h1> <p>THÖR-MAGNI datasets is a novel dataset of accurate human and robot navigation and interaction in diverse indoor contexts, building on the previous <a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8954833/">THÖR dataset protocol</a>. We provide position and head orientation motion capture data, 3D LiDAR scans and gaze tracking. In total, THÖR-MAGNI captures <strong>3.5 hours of motion of 40 participants on 5 recording days</strong>.</p> <p>This data collection is designed around systematic variation of factors in the environment to allow building cue-conditioned models of human motion and verifying hypotheses on factor impact. To that end, THÖR-MAGNI encompasses 5 scenarios, in which some of them have different conditions (i.e., we vary some factor):</p> <ul> <li>Scenario 1 (plus conditions A and B): <ul> <li> Participants move in groups and individually;</li> <li> Robot as static obstacle;</li> <li> Environment with 3 obstacles and lane marking on the floor for <strong>condition B</strong>;</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li> Scenario 2: <ul> <li> Participants move in groups, individually and transport objects with variable difficulty (i.e. bucket, boxes and a poster stand);</li> <li> Robot as static obstacle;</li> <li> Environment with 3 obstacles;</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li>Scenario 3 (plus conditions A and B): <ul> <li> Participants move in groups, individually and transporting objects with variable difficulty (i.e. bucket, boxes and a poster stand). We denote each role as: <em>Visitors-Alone, Visitors-Group 2, Visitors-Group 3, Carrier-Bucket, Carrier-Box, Carrier-Large Object;</em></li> <li> Teleoperated robot as moving agent: in <strong>condition A</strong>, the robot moves with differential drive; in <strong>condition </strong>B, the robot moves with omni-directional drive;</li> <li> Environment with 2 obstacles;</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li>Scenario 4 (plus conditions A and B): <ul> <li> All participants, denoted as <em>Visitors-Alone HRI</em> interacted with the teleoperated mobile robot;</li> <li> Robot interacted in two ways: in <strong>condition A</strong> (Verbal-Only), the Anthropomorphic Robot Mock Driver (ARMoD), a small humanoid NAO robot on top of the mobile platform, only used speech to communicate the next goal point to the participant; in <strong>condition B</strong> the ARMoD used speech, gestures and robotic gaze to convey the same message;</li> <li> Free space environment</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li>Scenario 5: <ul> <li> Participants move alone (<em>Visitors-Alone</em>) and one of the participants, denoted as <em>Visitors-Alone HRI</em>, transport objects and interact with the robot;</li> <li> The ARMoD is remotely controlled by an experimenter and proactively offers help;</li> <li> Free space environment;</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h2>Preliminary steps</h2> <p>Before proceeding, make sure to download the data from ZENODO</p> <h3>1. Directory Structure</h3> <p>├── CLiFF_Maps <- Directory for CLiFF Maps for all files</p> <p> ├── Files <- Directory for the csv files</p> <p> ├── Readme.md</p> <p>├── CSVs_Scenarios <- Directory for aligned data for all scenarios</p> <p> ├── Scenario_1 <- Directory for the csv files for Scenario 1</p> <p> ├── Scenario_2 <- Directory for the csv files for Scenario 2</p> <p> ├── Scenario_3 <- Directory for the csv files for Scenario 3</p> <p> ├── Scenario_4 <- Directory for the csv files for Scenario 4</p> <p> ├── Scenario_5 <- Directory for the csv files for Scenario 5</p> <p>├── docs</p> <p> ├── tutorials.md <- Tutorials document on how to use the data</p> <p>├── Lidar_sample</p> <p> ├── Files <- Directory for sample files</p> <p> ├── 170522_SC3B_1 <- Directory for the pcd files</p> <p> ├── 170522_SC3B_1.csv <- Synchronization file with QTM</p> <p> ├── manual_view_point.json <- json file with manual view point for visualization</p> <p> ├── requirements.txt <- script pip requirements</p> <p> ├── visualize_pcd.py <- script visualize the lidar data</p> <p> ├── Readme.md</p> <p>├── maps <- Directory for maps of the environment (PNG files) and offsets (json file)</p> <p> ├── offsets.json <- Offsets of the map with respect to the global coordinate frame origin</p> <p> ├── {date}_SC{sc_id}_map.png <- Maps for `date` in {1205, 1305, 1705, 1805} and `sc_id` in {1A, 1B, 2, 3}</p> <p> ├── 3009_map.png <- Map for the Scenarios 4A, 4B and 5</p> <p>├── MP4_Videos</p> <p> ├── Files <- Directory for the mp4 files</p> <p> ├── pupil_scene_camera_instrinsics.json <- json file with the intrinsics of pupil camera</p> <p>├── TSVs_RAWET <- Directory for the TSV files for the Raw Eyetracking data for all Scenarios</p> <p> ├── synch_info.csv <- Event markers necessary to align motion capture with eyetracking data</p> <p> ├── Files <- Directory with all the raw eyetracking TSV files</p> <p>├── goals_positions.csv <- File with the goals locations</p> <p> </p> <h3>2. Data Structure and Dataset Files</h3> <p>Withing each Scenario directory, each csv file contains:</p> <p><strong>2.1. Headers</strong></p> <p>The dataset metadata overview contains important information found in the CSV file headers. This reference is designed to help users understand and use the dataset effectively. The headers include details such as FILE_ID, which provides information on the date, scenario, condition, and run associated with each recording. The header of the document includes important quantities such as the number of frames recorded (N_FRAMES_QTM), the count of rigid bodies (N_BODIES), and the total number of markers (N_MARKERS).</p> <p>It also provides information about the order of the contiguous rotation matrix (CONTIGUOUS_ROTATION_MATRIX), modalities measured with units, and specified measurement units. The text presents details on the eyetracking devices used in each recording, including their infrared sensor and scene camera frequencies, as well as an indication of the presence of eyetracking data.</p> <p>The header provides specific information about rigid bodies, including their names (BODY_NAMES), role labels (BODY_ROLES), and the number of markers associated with each rigid body (BODY_NR_MARKERS). Finally, the table lists all marker names used in the file.</p> <p>This metadata provides researchers and practitioners with essential guidance on recording information, data quantities, and specifics about rigid bodies and markers. It is a valuable resource for understanding and effectively using the dataset in the CSV files.</p> <p><strong>2.2. Trajectory Data</strong></p> <p>The remaining portion of the CSV file integrates merged data from the motion capture system and eye tracking devices, organized based on participants' helmet rigid bodies. Columns within the dataset include XYZ coordinates of all markers, spatial centroid coordinates, 6DOF orientation of the object's local coordinate frame, and <em>if available</em> eye tracking data, encompassing 2D/3D gaze coordinates, scene recording frame numbers, eye movement types, and IMU data.</p> <p>Missing data is denoted by "N/A" or an empty cell. Temporal indexing is facilitated by the "Time" or "Frame" column, indicating timestamps or frame numbers. The motion capture system records at 100Hz, Tobii Glasses at 50Hz (Raw); 25 Hz (Camera), and Pupil Glasses at 100Hz (Raw); 30 Hz (Camera). The dataset is structured around motion capture recordings, and for each rigid body, such as "Helmet_1," details per frame include XYZ coordinates of markers, centroid coordinates, and a 9-element rotational matrix describing helmet orientation.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Header</strong></td> <td><strong>Explanation</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 - 1 X</td> <td>X-Coordinate of Marker Number 1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 - 1 Y</td> <td>Y-Coordinate of Marker Number 1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 - 1 Z</td> <td>Z-Coordinate of Marker Number 1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 - [...]</td> <td><em>Same for Marker 2 and 3 of Helmet_1</em></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 Centroid_X</td> <td>X-Coordinate of the Centroid</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 Centroid_Y</td> <td>Y-Coordinate of the Centroid</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 Centroid_Z</td> <td>Z-Coordinate of the Centroid</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 R0</td> <td>1st Element of the CONTIGUOUS_ROTATION_MATRIX</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 R[..]</td> <td>Same for R1- R7</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_1 R8</td> <td>9th Element of the CONTIGUOUS_ROTATION_MATRIX</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p><strong>2.3. Eyetracking Data</strong></p> <p>The eye tracking data in the dataset includes 16 participants, providing a comprehensive dataset of over 500 minutes of recorded data across the different activities and scenarios with three different eyetracking devices. Devices are denoted with a special "Tracker_ID" in the dataset, i.e.:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Tracker ID</strong></td> <td><strong>Eyetracking Device</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>TB2</td> <td>Tobii 2 Glasses</td> </tr> <tr> <td>TB3</td> <td>Tobii 3 Glasses</td> </tr> <tr> <td>PPL</td> <td>Pupil Insivisible Glasses</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Gaze points are classified into fixations and saccades using the Tobii I-VT Attention filter, which is specifically optimized for dynamic scenarios with a velocity threshold of 100°. Eyetracking devices were systematically repeated after each 4-minute recording to account for natural variations in participants' eye shapes and to improve the gaze estimation algorithms. In addition, gaze estimation adjustments for the pupil invisible glasses were made after each 4-minute recording to mitigate potential drifts. It's worth noting that the scene cameras of the eye tracking glasses had different fields of view. The scene camera of the Pupil Invisible Glasses had a 1088x1080 image with both horizontal (HFOV) and vertical (VFOV) opening angles of 80°, while the Tobii Glasses provided a 1920x1080 image with different opening angles for Tobii Glasses 3 (HFOV: 95°, VFOV: 63°) and Tobii Glasses 2 (HFOV: 82°, VFOV: 52°).</p> <p><strong>NOTE AS OF 2024:</strong> <strong>Videos are NOW part</strong> of the dataset</p> <p>For one participant, wearing the Tobii Glasses 3 and Helmet_6, the data would be denoted as:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Header</strong></td> <td><strong>Explanation</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td><em>Helmet_6 - [...]</em></td> <td><em>*X,Y,Z Coordinates for 5 markers*</em></td> </tr> <tr> <td><em>Helmet_6 [...]</em></td> <td><em>X,Y,Z Coordinates for 1 Centroid* </em></td> </tr> <tr> <td><em>Helmet_6 R[...]</em></td> <td><em>9 Elements of the CONTIGUOUS_ROTATION_MATRIX</em></td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>Helmet_6 TB3_Accelerometer_[...]</p> </td> <td>Accelerometer data along the X,Y,Z Axis</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_6 TB3_Gyroscope_[...]</td> <td>Gyroscope data along the X,Y,Z Axis</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_6 TB3_Magnetometer_[...]</td> <td>Magnetometer data along the X,Y,Z Axis</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_6 TB3_G2D_[...]</td> <td>2D Eye tracking data (X,Y)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_6 TB3_G3D_[...]</td> <td>3D Cyclopic Eye gaze Vector (X,Y,Z)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_6 TB3_Movement</td> <td>Eye movement type (N/A, Fixation or Saccade)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Helmet_6 TB3_SceneFNr</td> <td>Frame number of the scene camera recording </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h2>How to use and tools</h2> <p><a href="https://github.com/tmralmeida/magni-dash/tree/dash-public">magni-dash</a></p> <p><a href="https://magni-dash.streamlit.app">This</a> is a dashboard to quickly visualize our data: trajectories, speeds, eye-tracking data and LiDAR visualization (for Scenario 3). If you cannot use the dashboard from the streamlit cloud service, just run it locally by following the <a href="https://github.com/tmralmeida/magni-dash/tree/dash-public">README File</a>.</p> <p><a href="https://github.com/tmralmeida/thor-magni-tools">thor-magni-tools</a></p> <p>To install and use the package, follow the instructions on the <a href="https://github.com/tmralmeida/thor-magni-tools/blob/main/README.md">README file</a> . This package comprises:</p> <ul> <li>3D trajectory restoration: agents in the scene wore an helmet. The helmet is equipped with markers, which are tracked by the Mocap system. 3D trajectory restoration stands for <a href="https://github.com/tmralmeida/thor-magni-tools/blob/main/thor_magni_tools/preprocessing/cfg.yaml#L3">two different ways</a> of aggregating the trackings of the various markers in each helmet: (1) <em>3D-restoration</em> and (2) <em>3D-best marker</em>. The former applies an average over the locations of all visible markers while the latter uses the marker with highest tracking duration.</li> <li>3D pre-processing of restored trajectories: interpolation, downsampling and smoothing. To run the 3D pre-processing, check <a href="https://github.com/tmralmeida/thor-magni-tools?tab=readme-ov-file#preprocessing#preprocessing">this</a>.</li> <li>trajectory analysis: trajectory-related metrics like tracking duration (in seconds), number of 8s <em>tracklets</em>, motion speed, path efficiency score, and minimal distance between people. To run the trajectory analysis, check <a href="https://github.com/tmralmeida/thor-magni-tools?tab=readme-ov-file#preprocessing#analysis">this</a>.</li> </ul>
Conserved mechanism of Xrn1 regulation by glycolytic flux and protein aggregation
<p>This dataset contains the raw and processed microscopy data that form the basis of our research article titled <em><a href="https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)14817-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Conserved mechanism of Xrn1 regulation by glycolytic flux and protein aggregation</a></em> (DOI: <a href="https://kwnsfk27.r.eu-west-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.heliyon.2024.e38786/1/010201924b2cde3a-4e9b4379-d805-432d-b94e-11d8b32354dc-000000/-WTssLbV_1JADo7ZwuFgWEmy9i0=394" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38786</a>) publlished in the <a href="https://www.cell.com/">CellPress</a> journal <a href="https://www.cell.com/heliyon/home">Heliyon</a> (<a title="Go to table of contents for this volume/issue" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/heliyon/vol/10/issue/19"><span><span>Volume 10, Issue 19</span></span></a>, 15 October 2024, e38786).<em> </em>The paper describes the mechanism underlying the binding of <a href="https://www.yeastgenome.org/locus/S000003141">yeast Xrn1</a> to the plasma membrane microdomain stabiliser <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.073">eisosome</a> in a glucose-dependent manner. The images stored in the dataset were acquired with a <a href="https://www.iem.cas.cz/en/devices/zeiss-lsm-880-airyscan-en/">Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope</a> performed at the <a href="https://www.iem.cas.cz/en/department/microscopy-unit/">Microscopy Service Centre</a> of the <a href="https://www.iem.cas.cz/en/home-en/">Institute of Experimental Medicine CAS</a> supported by the MEYS CR (LM2023050 <a href="https://www.czech-bioimaging.cz/">Czech-Bioimaging</a>). Detailed step-by-step instructions for live microscopy sample preparation that we follow can be found at protocols.io: <a href="https://www.protocols.io/view/live-cell-microscopy-sample-preparation-yeast-cult-8epv5r23dg1b">https://www.protocols.io/view/live-cell-microscopy-sample-preparation-yeast-cult-8epv5r23dg1b</a>. The quantification of microscopy data was performed using our custom-developed Fiji and R scripts that can be found at <a href="https://github.com/jakubzahumensky/microscopy_analysis">https://github.com/jakubzahumensky/microscopy_analysis</a>. Their use is described in detail in the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.28.587214">https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.28.587214</a>. For further information, please refer to the README file attached to the dataset.</p> <p>Note: This final version of datasets supplements the previous datasets of version 1 (DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12748899">10.5281/zenodo.12748899</a>) and version 2 (DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13772845">10.5281/zenodo.13772845</a>).</p>
Plasma circulating microRNA-expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) data in the Rotterdam Study
<p>The dataset contains GWAS summary statistics for 2,083 plasma circulating microRNAs, obtained from nearly 2,178 participants of the Rotterdam Study. The dataset includes three files, as outlined below:</p> <p><strong>File1: SNP_reference_file_maf0.01_Rsq0.7.txt</strong></p> <p>A reference file for SNPs with good imputation quality (Rsq > 0.7) and minor allele frequency > 0.01 among participants included in our GWAS in the Rotterdam Study (N=2,178). The headers are:</p> <p>SNP: rsID</p> <p>chr: chromosome number according to GRCh37</p> <p>bp: basepair position according to GRCh37</p> <p>effect_allele: effect allele</p> <p>other_allele: other allele</p> <p>eaf: effect allele frequency</p> <p><strong>File2: miReQTLs_1e-5_maf0.01_Rsq0.7.txt</strong></p> <p>Summary statistics for all SNPs significantly associated with 2083 miRNAs (p-value < 1e-5), filtered by minor allele frequency > 0.01 and Rsq > 0.7. The headers are:</p> <p>SNP: rsID</p> <p>beta: effect estimate</p> <p>se: standard error</p> <p>pval: p-value</p> <p>miRNA: miRNA ID</p> <p><strong>File3: miReQTLs_nominal_sig.csv.gz</strong></p> <p>Summary statistics for all SNPs nominally associated with 2083 miRNAs (p-value < 0.05). The headers are:</p> <p>RSID: SNP ID</p> <p>p-value: p-value</p> <p>phenotype: miRNA</p> <p>SE: standard error</p> <p>BETA: effect estimate</p> <p> </p> <p>The SNP allelic information and frequency can be found in the reference file (<strong>File1</strong>). </p> <p><br>For more information, please contact: m.ghanbari@erasmusmc.nl</p>
Extended data for the paper: "SentemQC - A novel and cost-efficient method for quality assurance and quality control of high-resolution frequency sensor data in fresh waters"
<p>Extended data 1 to 4 for the software article:<br>SentemQC - A novel and cost-efficient method for quality assurance and quality control of high-resolution frequency sensor data in fresh waters. </p> <p>The extended data is tables and a Figure output and input from/to SentemQC runs relevant for the SentemQC paper.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.