Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2014View details →

Figure 2 in Nucleolar organizer region distribution in Nannospalax ehrenbergi (Nehring, 1898) (Rodentia: Spalacidae) from Iraq

Figure 2. Ag-NOR stained metaphase plate of Nannospalax ehrenbergi (arrows indicate NOR-bearing chromosomes).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2014View details →

Figure 1 in Nucleolar organizer region distribution in Nannospalax ehrenbergi (Nehring, 1898) (Rodentia: Spalacidae) from Iraq

Figure 1. Conventionally stained karyotype of Nannospalax ehrenbergi in Mosul province (Al-Jurn), Iraq (male).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2015View details →

Figure 2 in Nucleolus organizer regions of Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) and Miniopterus schreibersii (Kuhl, 1817) (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Turkey

Figure 2. Ag-NOR stained metaphase plate of Miniopterus schreibersii (arrow indicates the secondary constriction, inset the NOR-bearing chromosome pairs).

Figure 4 in Polymorphism among anterior and posterior sets of teeth in the periphallic organ of three species of Drosophila

Figure 4. Frequency of anterior, posterior, and extra teeth showing perfect bilateral symmetry in D. malerkotliana. SGP – Sangatigopp forest, YSC – Yalakki Shettar Colony, KUC – Karnatak University campus, KUN – Kundagol, LAB – laboratory populations.

Figure 3 in Polymorphism among anterior and posterior sets of teeth in the periphallic organ of three species of Drosophila

Figure 3. Frequency of anterior, posterior, and extra teeth showing perfect bilateral symmetry in D. bipectinata. SGP – Sangatigopp forest, YSC – Yalakki Shettar Colony, KUC – Karnatak University campus, KUN – Kundagol, LAB – laboratory populations.

Figure 2 in Polymorphism among anterior and posterior sets of teeth in the periphallic organ of three species of Drosophila

Figure 2. Frequency of anterior, posterior, and extra teeth showing perfect bilateral symmetry in D. ananassae. DM – Dharwad market, HM – Hubli market, KUC – Karnatak University campus, NAVN – Navanagar, LAB – laboratory populations.

Figure 1 in Polymorphism among anterior and posterior sets of teeth in the periphallic organ of three species of Drosophila

Figure 1. Arrangement of anterior and posterior sets of teeth in periphallic organs of different species of Drosophila: a) D. ananassae, bilateral symmetry; b) D. bipectinata, bilateral symmetry; c) D. malerkotliana, bilateral symmetry; d) D. ananassae, altered symmetry; e) D. bipectinata, altered symmetry; f) D. malerkotliana, altered symmetry. Arrows indicate presence of extra teeth.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Figure 1 in C-Heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer region distribution of Myotis emarginatus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Turkey

Figure 1. Collection sites of Myotis emarginatus in Dubnisa Cave from Kırklareli (1); in old church from Karaisalı, Adana (2); and in Black Cave from Yozgat (3) in Turkey.

Fig. 3 in The role of visual organs in the locomotor behavior of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 3. Take-off (%) by adult Chinese citrus flies, Bactrocera minax, males and females tested separately with 6 visual blinding treatments. Values are mean ± standard error. Histograms with different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among treatments (P <0.05).

Fig. 2 in The role of visual organs in the locomotor behavior of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 2. Schematic diagrams of experimental chambers. A. Take-off platform; B. Horizontal crawling device; C. Vertical crawling device; a. take-off platform; b. Plexiglass box; c. video camera; d. Petri dish; e. crawling column; f. ruler.

Fig. 1 in The role of visual organs in the locomotor behavior of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of visual blinding treatments on adult Chinese citrus flies, Bactrocera minax. The white arrow indicates the blinded visual organ.

Fig. 5 in The role of visual organs in the locomotor behavior of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Fig. 5. Vertical crawling distance (cm in 30 s) of adult Chinese citrus flies, Bactrocera minax, males and females tested separately with 6 visual blinding treatments. Values are mean ± standard error. Histograms with different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among treatments (P <0.05).

Fig. 6 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 6. Grouping of assemblies Dolichopodidae flies in different habitats: vegetables, fallow, agroforestry, and native vegetation based on coefficient similarity (Bray-Curtis) on organic farms cultivating vegetables in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 5 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 5. Number of exclusive and shared (intersections) Dolichopodidae species in vegetable crops and fallow habitats, agroforestry, and native vegetation.

Fig. 2 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 2. Mean abundance (± SE) of Dolichopodidae flies collected in different rural properties with vegetable crops, fallow, agroforestry, and native vegetation in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 1 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 1. Organic vegetable farms sampled in Ceilândia (I), Taguatinga (II), Paranoá (III), and Lamarão (IV), Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 4 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 4. Adjustment to the log normal distribution model of the Dolichopodidae assembly per habitat on organic farms producing vegetable in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 3 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 3. Distribution of relative abundance by species of Dolichopodidae flies collected on organic farms producing vegetables in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 2 in Impact of years in bahiagrass and cultivation techniques in organic vegetable production on epigeal arthropod populations

Fig. 2. Mean abundance of total predatory beetles during the 4 crop rotation in 2013. An asterisk (*) denotes significant effects (P <0.05) of yr in bahiagrass. Double asterisks (**) denote significant effects of tillage method.

Fig. 1 in Impact of years in bahiagrass and cultivation techniques in organic vegetable production on epigeal arthropod populations

Fig. 1. Mean abundance of total carabid beetles during the 4 crop rotation in 2013. An asterisk (*) denotes significant effects (P <0.05) of yr in bahiagrass. Double asterisks (**) denote significant effects of tillage method.