Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 9 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904

Fig. 9. Lateral, ventral, and dorsal views of an adult female gorilla skull showing the craniodental measures taken in this study. A = skull length, from prosthion to inion, B = vault height, from bregma to basion, C = vault length from glabella to inion, D = facial height from prosthion to glabella, E = postfacial height, from palatal spine to glabella, F= Maximum biglenoid width, G= biC1 diameter, H= maximum biP3 diameter, I= maximum incisor row length, J= premolar row length, K=cheek tooth row

Fig. 3 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904

Fig. 3. The skull of ZMUB 12789, the male holotype of G. diehli (Matschie, 1904) in A dorsal, B ventral, C anterior and D posterior views. Note the large wide and flat zygoma, the superoinferiorly wide zygomatic arch with only a mild mediolateral curvature, the perpendicular set of the zygoma relative to the zygomatic arch, the pronounced malar tubercles, and the inferomedial concavity of the zygoma circumscribing the infraorbital foramen (see also male paratypes in fig. 6).

Fig. 7 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904

Fig. 7. Dorsal and ventral views of the calvaria of ZMBU 12799 from Basho, assigned by Matschie (1904) to G. g. gorilla. Note many of the characters typical of G. g. diehli (table 10). Multivariate analyses showed this specimen to group with the Cross River female gorillas.

Fig. 5 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904

Fig. 5. The calvarium of ZMUB 12794: A dorsal, B ventral, C anterior, D posterior views. Note the welldeveloped torus along the midnasal suture, the perpendicular set of the zygomatic arch relative to the zygoma, the strong development of the postglenoid and entoglenoid processes, and the waisting of the nuchal crest.

Fig. 2 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904

Fig. 2. Distribution map of western gorillas showing the western equatorial forest and the allopatry of G. g. diehli and G. g. gorilla. Bounded area represents CrossRiver watershed mapped in fig. 1. All collecting localities for nonCrossRiver western gorillas considered are marked by dots with the exception of Bamba Mayombe, which yielded a single specimen and is not marked. G. g. gorilla is

Fig. 1 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904

Fig. 1. Map of Cross River watershed showing national parks or forest reserves and the four separate areas inhabited by the Cross River gorillas.

Fig. 4 in The Cross River Gorillas: A Distinct Subspecies, Gorilla gorilla diehli Matschie 1904

Fig. 4. Lateral views of ZMUB 12789 (A) and of the lone female paratype of G. diehli (Matschie 1904) ZMUB 12794 (B). The photograph shows the left side of ZMUB 12794 reversed for comparison. Note the strong concavity at the nasal bridge (especially in the female) and the inferior position of the mastoid relative to the external acoustic meatus. In the male the mastoid inflation is within the suboccipital plane, with only a very slight inferior protrusion. The development of the sagittal crest in the holotype is not characteristic of G. g. diehli males.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2002View details →

Fig. 83. Albunea elioti Benedict, 1904 in A Worldwide Revision Of The Recent And Fossil Sand Crabs Of The Albuneidae Stimpson And Blepharipodidae, New Family (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Hippoidea)

Fig. 83. Albunea elioti Benedict, 1904: A, B, ♀, 16.2 mm cl, USNM 26169, holotype; C–K, Ƌ, 16.5 mm cl, USNM 281472. A. Carapace, branchiostegite, and ocular peduncles, dorsal view. B. Ocular peduncles, dorsal view. C. Ocular peduncles, dorsal view. D. Left antennule, lateral view. E. Left antenna, lateral view. F. Left mandible, mesial view. G. Left maxillule, lateral view. H. Left maxilla, lateral view. I. Left maxilliped I, lateral view. J. Left maxilliped II, lateral view. K. Left maxilliped III, lateral view. Scale = 1.6 mm (C), 2.2 mm (G), 3.3 mm (B, F, J), 4.4 mm (D, E, H, I, K), and 5.9 mm (A).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2002View details →

Fig. 7. Lophomastix diomedeae Benedict, 1904 in A Worldwide Revision Of The Recent And Fossil Sand Crabs Of The Albuneidae Stimpson And Blepharipodidae, New Family (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Hippoidea)

Fig. 7. Lophomastix diomedeae Benedict, 1904: A, C–J, Ƌ, 16.0 mm cl, LACMAHF 15188; B, ♀, 21.4 mm cl, LACMAHF 1122–40. A. Carapace and ocular peduncles, dorsal view. B. Ocular peduncles, dorsal view. C. Right antennule, lateral view. D. Left antenna, lateral view. E. Left mandible, mesial view. F. Left maxillule, lateral view. G. Left maxilla, lateral view. H. Left maxilliped I, lateral view. I. Left maxilliped II, lateral view. J. Left maxilliped III, lateral view. Scale = 1.6 mm (B), 2.2 mm (F), 3.0 mm (C), 3.3 mm (D, E, G–J), and 5.8 mm (A).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2002View details →

Fig. 8. Lophomastix diomedeae Benedict, 1904 in A Worldwide Revision Of The Recent And Fossil Sand Crabs Of The Albuneidae Stimpson And Blepharipodidae, New Family (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Hippoidea)

Fig. 8. Lophomastix diomedeae Benedict, 1904: A, B, D–F, Ƌ, 16.0 mm cl, LACMAHF 15188; C, G, ♀, 21.4 mm cl, LACMAHF 1122–40. A. Right pereopod I, lateral view. B. Left pereopod II, lateral view. C. Left pereopod III, lateral view. D. Left pereopod IV, lateral view. E. Abdominal somites I–VI, dorsal view. F. Telson of Ƌ, dorsal view. G. Telson of ♀, dorsal view. Scale = 2.2 mm (G), 3.3 mm (A, F), 4.4 mm (E), 5.9 mm (C, D), and 6.7 mm (B).

FIG. 6. — A-D in Review of the genera Eulimastoma Bartsch, 1916 and Egila Dall & Bartsch, 1904 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Pyramidellidae) from Brazil

FIG. 6. — A-D, "Egila" virginiae Altena, 1975; A, MNHN; B-D, MMUFRPE; A-C, whole shells, respective lengths: 3.65 mm, 1.78 mm; 1.52 mm; D, protoconch; E-H, "Egila" ektopa n. sp.; E-G, holotype (MNRJ 10255); E, whole shell, length 2.00 mm; F, last whorl; G, protoconch; H, protoconch of paratype (IBUFRJ 7800). Scale bars: 100 µm.

FIG. 2 in Review of the genera Eulimastoma Bartsch, 1916 and Egila Dall & Bartsch, 1904 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Pyramidellidae) from Brazil

FIG. 2. — Eulimastoma engonium (Bush, 1885); A, B, lectotype here designated (YPM 16145), A, whole shell, length 6.10 mm; B, last whorl; C, pararalectotype (YPM 16146), length 4.95 mm; D-F, syntypes of E. engonium var. teres (Bush, 1885); D, E, YPM 16153; F, YPM 16150; D, F, whole shells, respective lengths: 4.00 mm, 3.08 mm; E, last whorl of syntype of E. engonium var. teres (YPM 16153); G-J, Brazilian specimens; G-I, whole shells, respective lengths: 1.95 mm, 3.73 mm, 2.04 mm; G, H, IBUFRJ 9621; I, MNHN; J, protoconch (MNHN). Scale bars: B, E, 200 µm; J, 100 µm.

FIG. 5. — A, B in Review of the genera Eulimastoma Bartsch, 1916 and Egila Dall & Bartsch, 1904 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Pyramidellidae) from Brazil

FIG. 5. — A, B, Eulimastoma weberi (Morrison, 1965), holotype, length 1.40 mm (USNM 635638), courtesy Dr Jerry Harasewych, Yolanda Villacampa (USNM); C-G, Eulimastoma aff. weberi (IBUFRJ 12678); C, D, whole shells, respective lengths: 1.73 mm, 1.26 mm; E, last whorl; F, G, protoconchs. Scale bars: 100 µm.

FIG. 1 in Review of the genera Eulimastoma Bartsch, 1916 and Egila Dall & Bartsch, 1904 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Pyramidellidae) from Brazil

FIG. 1. — Eulimastoma canaliculatum (C. B. Adams, 1850); A, holotype (MCZ 186101), length 3.20 mm; B-F, Brazilian specimens (all from off Pernambuco State, MNHN); B, C, whole shells, respective lengths: 2.56 mm, 2.60 mm; D, whole shell of E. cf. canaliculatum, length 2.52 mm; E, aperture; F, protoconch of E. cf. canaliculatum. Scale bars: 100 µm.

FIG. 3 in Review of the genera Eulimastoma Bartsch, 1916 and Egila Dall & Bartsch, 1904 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Pyramidellidae) from Brazil

FIG. 3. — Eulimastoma surinamense Altena, 1975 from Brazil (MNHN); A, B, whole shells, respective lengths: 3.17 mm, 2.95 mm; C, last whorl; D, base of last whorl; E, protoconch. Scale bars: 100 µm.

FIG. 4. — A in Review of the genera Eulimastoma Bartsch, 1916 and Egila Dall & Bartsch, 1904 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Pyramidellidae) from Brazil

FIG. 4. — A, Eulimastoma didyma (Verrill & Bush, 1900), holotype, length 1.78 mm (YPM 15706); B-I, E. didyma, Brazilian material, B, E, UERJ 1973; C, D, F-I, MNHN; B-D, whole shells, respective lengths: 1.70 mm, 1.73 mm, 1.65 mm; E-G, last whorls; H, I, protoconchs; J, K, Eulimastoma aff. didyma (UERJ 1973); J, whole shell, length 1.60 mm; K, protoconch; L, Eulimastoma humboldti (Weisbord, 1962), holotype, length 1.40 mm (PRI 26351). Scale bars: 100 µm.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2008View details →

Fig. 7 in Diagnoses for Leiognathus Lacepède 1802, Equula Cuvier 1815, Equulites Fowler 1904, Eubleekeria Fowler 1904, and a New Ponyfish Genus (Teleostei: Leiognathidae)

Fig. 7. Lateral view of anterodorsal margin of left cleithrum showing two pronglike protuberances as observed in (A) Eubleekeria splendens, CAS 56441, 95.7 mm SL, and more highly developed state in (B) Karalla daura, ANSP 89582, 85.1 mm SL.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2008View details →

Fig. 1 in Diagnoses for Leiognathus Lacepède 1802, Equula Cuvier 1815, Equulites Fowler 1904, Eubleekeria Fowler 1904, and a New Ponyfish Genus (Teleostei: Leiognathidae)

Fig. 1. Generic-level phylogeny for Leiognathidae based on Sparks et al. (2005) and Chakrabarty et al. (MS).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in A new species of the genus Sinoennea Kobelt, 1904 (Pulmonata: Diapheridae) from Son La, Northwestern Vietnam

Fig. 2. Sinoennea copiaensis, new species, holotype (SORC 1130) ((SH 13.56 mm, SW 3.43 mm, AH 3.11 mm, AW 2.85 mm): A, apertural view; B and D, side view; C, dorsal view; E, close up view of the aperture (P, parietal tooth; pC, plate-like tooth; b, basal tooth).