Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2012View details →

Fig. 4 in Volgian and Santonian-Campanian radiolarian events of the Russian Arctic and Pacific Rim

Fig. 4. Scanning electron micrographs of Late Jurassic radiolarians from siliceous clay rocks in northern Russia, Barents offshore. Sample 234, Middle Volgian (Dorsoplanites panderi Ammonite Zone) of the Pesha River Basin, borehole 234 (A–C, E–G, I–T). Sample G2, Late Volgian (Craspedites subditus Ammonite Zone) of the Uljanovsk Volga Basin, species from siliceous clay rocks in northern Russia, section Gorogische (D, H). A. Pentalastrum sp., GIN N 234−R−15. B. Praeconocaryomma hexagona (Rüst, 1898), GIN N 234−R10. C. Stylartus sp., GIN N 234−R12. D. Stichocapsa devorata arctica Vishnevskaya and Murchey, 2002, GIN N G−2−R1−3. E, F. Hagiastridae. E. GIN N 234−R11a. F. GIN N 234−R11b. G. Orbiculiforma? retuza (Kozlova, 1971), GIN N 234−R13. H. Spinicingula ceratina Kozlova and Vishnevskaya sp. nov., GIN N G−2−R1−5b. I. Praeparvicingula aff. sencilla Hull, 1995, GIN N 234−R21. J, M. Parvicingula cf. jonesi Pessagno, 1977. J. GIN N 234−R18b. M. GIN N 234−R18c. K. Parvicingula jonesi Pessagno, 1977, GIN N 234−R18a. L. Parvicingula blowi Pessagno, 1977, GIN N 234−R16. N. Parvicingula cf. grantensis Pessagno and Whalen, 1982, GIN N 234−R19b. O. Praeparvicingula holdsworthi (Yang, 1993), GIN N 234−R17. P. Parvicingula cf. obstinata Hull, 1995, GIN N 234−R23b. Q. Stichocapsa sp., GIN N 234−R27. R. Parvicingula rothwelli Pessago, 1977, GIN N 234−R24. S. Praeparvicingula rotunda Hull, 1995, GIN N 234−R25. T. Parvicingula alata Kozlova and Vishnevskaya sp. nov., GIN N 234−R1−2.

Fig.8 in Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland

Fig.8."Mosasaurus (Leiodon)cfr. anceps" sensu Arambourg(1952),fromtheupperUpperMaastrichtianopokaatNasiłów. A.ZPALR.9/3inposterior (A1) and buccal (A2) views. B. ZPAL R. 9/4 in anterior (B1), buccal (B2), posterior (B3), and lingual (B4) views.

Fig.7 in Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland

Fig.7. Mosasaurus cf. lemonnieri Dollo,1889c,fromtheupperUpperMaastrichtianopokaatNasiłów. A.ZPALR.9/2inlingual(A1),anterior(A2),buccal (A3),andposterior(A4)views. B.ZPALR.9/1inbuccal (B1),posterior(B2),anterior(B3),andlingual(B4)views. C.ZPALR.9/5inobliquebuccalview.

Fig.6 in Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland

Fig.6. Mosasaurus cf. hoffmanni Mantell,1829,fromthe Upper Campanian opoka at Maruszów. A. ZPAL R.I/1, left−handsidetoothinBin anterior(A1),buccal(A2),and posterior (A3) views. B. ZPAL R.I/1, three tooth crowns preserved in original jaw position (although jaw bone is not preserved).

Fig.1 in Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland

Fig.1.LocationofoutcropsincentralPoland(starlets),whichhaveyielded the mosasaur remains referred to in the text.

Fig.4 in Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland

Fig.4. Mosasaurus cf. hoffmanni Mantell,1829,fromtheUpperCampanianopokaatMaruszów,ZPALR.I/1,partialupperjawinbuccal(A),occlusal(B), and lingual (C) views.

Fig. 10. A, B in Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland

Fig. 10. A, B. Prognathodon sp. from the Upper Campanian opoka at Piotrawin (IGPUWAR−6) in buccal (A1),lingual(A2),andposterior(A3)views. B.Magnification of the apical part of the same specimen to show the anastomosed ornament mentioned in the text (specimen coated with ammonium chloride). Ą

Fig.3 in Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland

Fig.3. Mosasaurus cf. hoffmanni Mantell,1829,fromtheupperUpperMaastrichtianopokaatNasiłów. A.IGPUWAR−4inposterior(A 1),buccal(A2),anterior (A3), and lingual (A4) views. B. OGP 1254 in lingual (B1), posterior (B2), buccal (B3), and anterior (B4) views.

Fig.2 in Campanian and Maastrichtian mosasaurid reptiles from central Poland

Fig.2. Mosasaurus cf. hoffmanni Mantell,1829,fromtheDaniangreensandatNasiłów(redepositedlateLateMaastrichtianmaterial). A.IGPUWAR−1in buccal(A1),lingual(A2),andanterior(A3)views. B.IGPUWAR−2inposterior(B 1)andlingual(B2)views. C.IGPUWAR−3inposterior(C 1),buccal(C2), and anterior (C3) views.

Fig. 7. A in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 7. A. Cymatoceras cf. honmai Matsumotoand Miyauchi, 1983 (specimenPIW2002IV−5 fromtheLower CampanianBykov Formation,Member10, locality35attheManujRiversection,Sakhalin)inlateral(A1),ventral(A2),andseptal(A3)views. B.Reconstructionofwhorlsection. C.Sutureline(not to scale) (all figures natural size except C).

Fig. 6. A in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 6. A. Cymatoceras pseudoatlas (Yabe and Shimizu, 1924b). PIW2002IV−2 from the Krasnoyarka Formation, Member 2, locality 12 (Canadoceras multicostatum Zone, Upper Campanian), Naiba River valley, Sakhalin; apertural view [see also Fig. 5B]. B. Cymatoceras cf. bifidum Shimansky, 1975. PIW2002IV−4 from the Krasnoyarka Formation, Member 1 (Pachydiscus (P.) aff. egertoni Zone, Upper Campanian), locality 0.6, Naiba River valley, Sakhalin; in lateral (B1, B3) and ventral (B2) views. Scale bar in the middle is for A, B1, and B3. Scale bars 2 cm.

Fig. 5 in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 5. Cymatoceras pseudoatlas (Yabe and Shimizu, 1924b). A. PIW2002IV−3 from the Krasnoyarka Formation, Member 2, locality 431 (Canadoceras multicostatum Zone,UpperCampanian),ManujRivervalley,Sakhalin,inlateral(A1)andventral(A2)views. B.PIW2002IV−2fromtheKrasnoyarkaFormation,Member2,locality12(Canadoceras multicostatum Zone,UpperCampanian),NaibaRivervalley,Sakhalin,inlateral(B1)andventral(B2)views. Scale bar 2 cm.

Fig. 3 in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 3. Synoptic ammonite and inoceramid bivalve biostratigraphy of the areas discussed in the text (compiled after Zonova et al. 1993; Toshimitsu et al. 1995; Shigeta et al. 1999; Yazykova 2002; Yazykova et al. 2002). Abbreviation: Sant., Santorians.

Fig. 2 in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 2. Stratigraphic log of the Upper Santonian to Lower Maastrichtian of Sakhalin; numbers of lithostratigraphic members, nautiloid occurrences and biostratigraphic events (first and last appearance data, FAD/LAD) are indicated (modified after Yazykova 2002: fig. 2).

Fig. 4 in Early evolution of Coriariaceae (Cucurbitales) in light of a new early Campanian (ca. 82 Mya) pollen record from Antarctica

Fig. 4. The evolution of chromosome numbers in Coriaria inferred under a best-fitting maximum-likelihood model (Materials and Methods).

Fig. 1 in Early evolution of Coriariaceae (Cucurbitales) in light of a new early Campanian (ca. 82 Mya) pollen record from Antarctica

Fig. 1. Distribution map of Coriaria species generated from georeferenced data available in GBIF (accessed Jan 2019).

Fig. 2 in Early evolution of Coriariaceae (Cucurbitales) in light of a new early Campanian (ca. 82 Mya) pollen record from Antarctica

Fig. 2. Selected extant and fossil species of Coriaria. A, C. myrtifolia (photo by Tanja M. Schuster); B, Holotype of C. longaeva G. de Saporta, 1866, showing the characteristic venation pattern, leaf attachment, and terminal inflorescence; C, C. sarmentosa flowers showing protogyny (photo by Pieter Pelser, PhytoImages, Nickrent & al., 2006 –); D, Fruits of C. sarmentosa with accrescent corollas (photo by Tanja M. Schuster); E, The characteristically small leaves of C. microphylla or C. ruscifolia subsp. microphylla (photo by Axel Dalberg Poulsen); F, C. ruscifolia in Chile (photo by Mark Olson).

Fig. 6 in Early evolution of Coriariaceae (Cucurbitales) in light of a new early Campanian (ca. 82 Mya) pollen record from Antarctica

Fig. 6. Fossil and extant representatives of Coriariaceae observed with scanning electron microscopy. A, Pollen of Coriaripites goodii sp. nov. from the late Cretaceous of Antarctica (blue frame); polar view showing details of sculpture, big apocolpium and short colpi (arrowheads); B, Extant pollen of Coriaria arborea (magenta frame); polar view showing details of sculpture and colpi length (arrowhead). — Scale bars = 5 μm.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2000View details →

Fig. 67 in Late Campanian (Cretaceous) Heteromorph Ammonites From The Western Interior Of The United States

Fig. 67. Suture of Solenoceras elegans, n. sp. E is the external lobe, L is the lateral lobe, U is the umbilical lobe, and I is the internal lobe. The heavy, straight line marks the middle of the venter. USNM 482825, USGS Mesozoic locality D1387 (fig. 2, loc. 27).