Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
373
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
373 results for “Chloroplast”
Plate 1 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
Plate 1 Endosamara, Sigmoidala and Kanburia. A, BEndosamararacemosa, Thailand, Sakon Nakhon Prov., S.Mattapha s.n.. C, DSigmoidalakityana Thailand, Nan Prov. S.Mattapha 1117EKanburiachlorantha Thailand, Kanchanaburi Prov. Y.Sirichamorn Y2014-15-1FKanburiatenasserimensis Thailand, Ratchaburi, Khao Chon waterfall Y.Sirichamorn YS2015-8.
Plate 3 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
Plate 3 Wisteriopsis and Wisteria. AWisteriopsisjaponica, Cultivated, J.C.Raulston Arboretum, North Carolina 980008-17 BWisteriopsisjaponica Japan, Honshu near Kyoto G.Lewis, unvouchered C, DWisteriopsisjaponica, Cultivated, J.C.Raulston Arboretum, North Carolina 980008-17 EWisteriopsisreticulata Cultivated, J.Compton s.n.. unvouchered FWisteriafrutescens Cultivated, B.Schrire unvouchered GWisteriabrachybotrys cultivated, B.Schrire unvouchered.
Figure 4 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
Figure 4 Nanhaiaspeciosa (Champ. ex Benth.) J.Compton & Schrire. A Habit B flower bud with bract and bracteole C calyx exterior and bracteole D detail of calyx exterior E detail of calyx interior F standard petal G wing petal H keel petal I staminal column J staminal column lateral view K stamen ventral and dorsal view L ovary and style M style and stigma N pod O seed lateral view P seed ventral view (all from Shiu Ling Hu 6091). Drawn by Margaret Tebbs.
Figure 2 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
Figure 2 Distinctive morphological characters in Tribe Wisterieae. AEndosamararacemosa standard petal inner surface BPadbruggeadasyphylla standard petal inner surface CPadbruggeadasyphylla pod DPadbruggeadasyphylla seed lateral view EAustrocalleryaaustralis standard petal inner surface FAustrocalleryapilipes pod GAustrocalleryapilipes seed lateral view HPadbruggeafilipes standard petal IAfgekiasericea standard petal inner surface JAfgekiasericea seed lateral view KAfgekiasericea seed angled lateral view LCalleryanitida pod MCalleryanitida seed ventral view NCalleryanitida seed polar view OCalleryacinerea pod PWhitfordiodendronnieuwenhuisii pod QWhitfordiodendronerianthum seed RWisteriopsiseurybotrya gibbosity SWisteriopsischampionii gibbosity A from Luang Vanpruk 188 B from Scortechini 429 C, D from Lamb 395/91 E from L.J.Brass 32129 F, G from B.Gray 04319 H from Maung Po Khant 15326 I from C. Chermsirivathana 996 J, K from Mrs Collins 104/9 L–N from Theophilus SampsonO from G.Forrest 19279 P from J.P.Mogea 4182 Q from photo Y.Sirichamorn s.n..R from J. & M.S.Clemens 3637 S from Shiu Ying Hu 10476. See Appendix 1 for voucher details. Drawn by Margaret Tebbs.
Supplementary material 1 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
: Data type: molecular data
Figure 1 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
Figure 1 Combined Maximum Liklihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) Phylogenetic tree of Tribe Wisterieae. The tree is derived from the combined plastid and ITS, RAxML bipartitions analysis representing 77 (36) ingroup samples (taxa) and 59 (40) outgroup samples (taxa). The outgroup Schefflerodendron is used to root the trees. Lines in bold on the phylogeny incorporate results from the combined Bayesian Inference analysis, demarcating clades with BPP (0.95) support and above. Nodes are marked up with bootstrap values as percentages derived from the combined ML analysis with values of 50% or less marked in red. The collapsed portion of the tree, below the IRLC and above Schefflerodendron, represents the following genera (see Suppl. material 1: Figs S1–S6): Tribe Robinieae (Coursetia, Gliricidia, Poissonia & Poitea); Tribe Sesbanieae (Sesbania), Tribe Loteae (Coronilla, Lotus & Securigera); Tribe Millettieae (Millettia), Tribe Abreae (Abrus); Tribe Phaseoleae (Clitoria & Ophrestia); Tribe Indigofereae (Phylloxylon) and basal millettioids (Austrosteenisia, Disynstemon, Xeroderris & Platycyamus). Tribe Wisterieae is treated within five clades (Clades A–E), colour coded green for Clade A (Sarcodum, Endosamara & Sigmoidala); cyan for Clade B (Nanhaia & Wisteriopsis), red for Clade C (Callerya, Serawaia, Whitfordiodendron, Kanburia & Afgekia); orange for Clade D (Padbruggea & Austrocallerya) and yellow for Clade E (Wisteria). Each clade is further subdivided to represent the genera (except for the single accession of Serawaia which is incorporated with Whitfordiodendron in Clade C2) and E1 and E2 represent the geographical disjunction of species in Wisteria. Outgroups within the IRLC in purple include Glycyrrhiza, Adinobotrys and representatives of the Temperate Tribe block. The ingroup (IRLC) and Tribe Wisterieae are demarcated with arrows on the tree.
Figure 6 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
Figure 6 Austrocalleryaaustralis (Endl.) J.Compton & Schrire. A Habit B leaf and detail of leaflet apex C flower buds with bract and 2 bracteoles D flower E calyx external surface F calyx detail of inner surface G standard petal inner surface H wing petal I keel petal J staminal column ventral view K stamens dorsal and ventral views L staminal column lateral view M ovary lateral view N stigma O pod P seed angled lateral view (all from Martin 1392). Drawn by Margaret Tebbs.
Figure 3 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
Figure 3 Sigmoidalakityana (Craib) J.Compton & Schrire. A Habit B young leaf C lower surface of leaf D leaflet detail of hairs E inflorescence F flower bud with bracteole and pedicel G calyx external surface H standard petal inner surface I wing petal J keel petal K staminal column lateral view L staminal column ventral view M stamen dorsal and ventral views N ovary lateral view O style and stigma P pod Q pod detail of surface R seed ventral view S seed lateral view (all from Clark 245). Drawn by Margaret Tebbs.
Plate 2 from: Compton JA, Schrire BD, Könyves K, Forest F, Malakasi P, Mattapha S, Sirichamorn Y (2019) The Callerya Group redefined and Tribe Wisterieae (Fabaceae) emended based on morphology and data from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. PhytoKeys 125: 1-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.125.34877
Plate 2 Afgekia, Sarcodum and Padbruggea. AAfgekiamahidoliae, Thailand, Sai Yok distr. Kanchanaburi, Y.Sirichamorn s.n.. B, CAfgekiasericea Thailand S.Mattapha 1158DSarcodumscandens Vietnam, Quang Binh Prov. Lôc & Quang P11554EAfgekiamahidiliae Thailand, Sai Yok distr. Kanchanaburi Y.Sirichamorn s.n.. FSarcodumscandens Vietnam, Quang Binh Prov. Lôc & Quang P11554GSarcodumscandens Laos, Sop Teuang, Bolikhamxai Prov. S.Lanorsavanh 1299H, IPadbruggeafilipes Thailand, Chiang Mai, Y.Sirichamorn & S.Mattapha YSM2017-1.
Data from: Chloroplast phylogenomic analysis resolves deep-level relationships within the green algal class Trebouxiophyceae
Background: The green algae represent one of the most successful groups of photosynthetic eukaryotes, but compared to their land plant relatives, surprisingly little is known about their evolutionary history. This is in great part due to the difficulty of recognizing species diversity behind morphologically similar organisms. The Trebouxiophyceae is a species-rich class of the Chlorophyta that includes symbionts (e.g. lichenized algae) as well as free-living green algae. Members of this group display remarkable ecological variation, occurring in aquatic, terrestrial and aeroterrestrial environments. Because a reliable backbone phylogeny is essential to understand the evolutionary history of the Trebouxiophyceae, we sought to identify the relationships among the major trebouxiophycean lineages that have been previously recognized in nuclear-encoded 18S rRNA phylogenies. To this end, we used a chloroplast phylogenomic approach. Results: We determined the sequences of 29 chlorophyte chloroplast genomes and assembled amino acid and nucleotide data sets derived from 79 chloroplast genes of 61 chlorophytes, including 35 trebouxiophyceans. The amino acid- and nucleotide-based phylogenies inferred using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods and various models of sequence evolution revealed essentially the same relationships for the trebouxiophyceans. Two major groups were identified: a strongly supported clade of 29 taxa (core trebouxiophyceans) that is sister to the Chlorophyceae + Ulvophyceae and a clade comprising the Chlorellales and Pedinophyceae that represents a basal divergence relative to the former group. The core trebouxiophyceans form a grade of strongly supported clades that include a novel lineage represented by the desert crust alga Pleurastrosarcina brevispinosa. The assemblage composed of the Oocystis and Geminella clades is the deepest divergence of the core trebouxiophyceans. Like most of the chlorellaleans, early-diverging core trebouxiophyceans are predominantly planktonic species, whereas core trebouxiophyceans occupying more derived lineages are mostly terrestrial or aeroterrestrial algae. Conclusions: Our phylogenomic study provides a solid foundation for addressing fundamental questions related to the biology and ecology of the Trebouxiophyceae. The inferred trees reveal that this class is not monophyletic; they offer new insights not only into the internal structure of the class but also into the lifestyle of its founding members and subsequent adaptations to changing environments.
Figure 2 from: Duan L, Han L-N, Sirichamorn Y, Wen J, Compton JA, Deng S-W, Arslan E, Ertuğrul K, Schrire B, Chen H-F (2021) Proposal to recognise the tribes Adinobotryeae and Glycyrrhizeae (Leguminosae subfamily Papilionoideae) based on chloroplast phylogenomic evidence. PhytoKeys 181: 65-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.181.71259
Figure 2 Bayesian maximum clade credibility tree of the GAW clade and related groups based on chloroplast CDSs. Bayesian posterior probabilities are given above branches, Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values below branches. Asterisks indicate PP = 1 and LBS = 100%. W. nieuwenhuisii indicates Whitfordiodendron nieuwenhuisii.
Figure 1 from: Duan L, Han L-N, Sirichamorn Y, Wen J, Compton JA, Deng S-W, Arslan E, Ertuğrul K, Schrire B, Chen H-F (2021) Proposal to recognise the tribes Adinobotryeae and Glycyrrhizeae (Leguminosae subfamily Papilionoideae) based on chloroplast phylogenomic evidence. PhytoKeys 181: 65-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.181.71259
Figure 1 Representative plants of Adinobotryeae and Glycyrrhizeae. Inflorescences (A) and fruits (B) of Adinobotrys atropurpureus; inflorescence (C) and infructescence (D) of Glycyrrhiza pallidiflora; inflorescence (E) and infructescence (F) of Glycyrrhiza uralensis; fruits (G) of Glycyrrhiza inflata; inflorescence (H) and part of dried infructescence [I; photographed on herbarium specimen: A. Eustace 31 (E!)] of Glycyrrhizopsis flavescens.
Figure 2 from: Ballardini M, Mercuri A, Littardi C, Abbas S, Couderc M, Ludeña B, Pintaud J (2013) The chloroplast DNA locus psbZ-trnfM as a potential barcode marker in Phoenix L. (Arecaceae). ZooKeys 365: 71-82. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5725
Figure 2 - Structure and variation of the minisatellite in the trnG-trnfM intergenic spacer. The repeats of the two mutational motifs (1 and 2) are indicated above the sequence alignment of the 7 haplotypes recorded. The pattern of inverted repeats generated by the two motifs and their reverse complements (RC) is shown below the alignment. See Table 1 for haplotype distribution among species.
Figure 1 from: Ballardini M, Mercuri A, Littardi C, Abbas S, Couderc M, Ludeña B, Pintaud J (2013) The chloroplast DNA locus psbZ-trnfM as a potential barcode marker in Phoenix L. (Arecaceae). ZooKeys 365: 71-82. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5725
Figure 1 - The sequenced cpDNA psbZ-trnfM region.The location of PCR primers used and polymorphisms found in this study are shown. DNA fragment length refers to the Phoenix dactylifera cv. Khalas cpDNA sequence (Yang et al. 2010), characterised by a 4-repetitions minisatellite haplotype (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_013991.2).
Figure 4 from: Morton CM (2015) Phylogenetic relationships of Zieria (Rutaceae) inferred from chloroplast, nuclear, and morphological data. PhytoKeys 44: 15-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.44.8393
Figure 4 - Bayesian majority rule consensus tree using molecular and morphological data. Numbers above the nodes are posterior probability values. A–F at the end of the taxa names corresponds to Armstrong (2002) classification system. The 1-8 listed on the tree corresponds to this study's finding.
Figure 2 from: Morton CM (2015) Phylogenetic relationships of Zieria (Rutaceae) inferred from chloroplast, nuclear, and morphological data. PhytoKeys 44: 15-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.44.8393
Figure 2 - The strict MP consensus tree (L. = 749 steps, CI = 0.57, RI = 0.39) obtained from all molecular data. Numbers above nodes are bootstrap values.
Figure 1 from: Morton CM (2015) Phylogenetic relationships of Zieria (Rutaceae) inferred from chloroplast, nuclear, and morphological data. PhytoKeys 44: 15-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.44.8393
Figure 1 - MP majority rule consensus tree of the expanded trnL-trnF dataset using a broad sampling of genera of Rutaceae as well as Simaba (Simaroubaceae) and Swietenia (Meliaceae) as outgroups. Numbers below nodes are bootstrap values.
Figure 3 from: Morton CM (2015) Phylogenetic relationships of Zieria (Rutaceae) inferred from chloroplast, nuclear, and morphological data. PhytoKeys 44: 15-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.44.8393
Figure 3 - MP majority rule consensus tree using molecular and morphological data. Numbers below nodes are bootstrap values.
FIGURE. Chloroplast genome maps of Strobilanthes lupulina and S. glandulata. in Strobilanthes glandulata (Acanthaceae), a new species from Sri Lanka based on the morphological and molecular evidences
FIGURE. Chloroplast genome maps of Strobilanthes lupulina and S. glandulata.
Supplementary material 1 from: Li Z, Huang Z, Wan X, Yu J, Dong H, Zhang J, Zhang C, Wang S (2023) Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Rhododendron mariesii and comparative genomics of related species in the family Ericaeae. Comparative Cytogenetics 17: 163-180. https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.17.101427
Taxonomic and accession information on cp genomes downloaded from NCBI database
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.