Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,473
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,473 results for “Geographic distribution”
Figure 8 in Survey of European mites from the suborder Uropodina: II. Morphology, geographical distribution, biology, and ecology of Trematurella elegans (Kramer, 1882)
Figure 8 Trematurella elegans – Deutonymph, dorsal side: A – General view; B – Anterior part of idiosoma; C – Central part of dorsal shield; D – Posterior part of idiosoma; E – Lateral part of idiosoma.
Figure 11 in Survey of European mites from the suborder Uropodina: II. Morphology, geographical distribution, biology, and ecology of Trematurella elegans (Kramer, 1882)
Figure 11 Trematurella elegans – Protonymph, ventral side: A – General view; B – Hypostome; C – intercoxal region; D – Opisthosoma.
Figure 4 in Survey of European mites from the suborder Uropodina: II. Morphology, geographical distribution, biology, and ecology of Trematurella elegans (Kramer, 1882)
Figure 4 Trematurella elegans – Female, ventral side: A – General view; B – Intercoxal region; C – Opisthosoma; D – Anal region, E – Pedofossae III and IV.
Figure 10 in Survey of European mites from the suborder Uropodina: II. Morphology, geographical distribution, biology, and ecology of Trematurella elegans (Kramer, 1882)
Figure 10 Trematurella elegans – Protonymph, dorsal side: A – General view; B – Vertex and anterior part of the idiosoma; C – Sculpture and setae in the midpart of shield; D – Posterior part of the idiosoma; E – Marginal setae.
Figure 7 in Survey of European mites from the suborder Uropodina: II. Morphology, geographical distribution, biology, and ecology of Trematurella elegans (Kramer, 1882)
Figure 7 Trematurella elegans – Male, ventral side: A – General view; B – Intercoxal region, P – pores; C –Gnathosoma.
Text-fig. 4. Known geographic distribution of Microtscoptini on a modern-day biome map (Arc-GIS feature TNC terrestrial ecoregions). 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. 1–20, 30–32 – Steppe biomes, 21–29, 33 – xeric shrubland biomes. in Comments On The Age And Dispersal Of Microtoscoptini (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Text-fig. 4. Known geographic distribution of Microtscoptini on a modern-day biome map (Arc-GIS feature TNC terrestrial ecoregions). 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. 1–20, 30–32 – Steppe biomes, 21–29, 33 – xeric shrubland biomes.
Text-fig. 1. Known geographic distribution of Microtoscoptini. 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. in Comments On The Age And Dispersal Of Microtoscoptini (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Text-fig. 1. Known geographic distribution of Microtoscoptini. 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole.
Fig. 17. Geographical distribution maps. A in The Smicridea (Smicridea) fasciatella species group (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Brazil: six new species and new distributional records
Fig. 17. Geographical distribution maps. A. Distribution of Smicridea (Smicridea) paranensis Flint, 1983. B. Distribution of Smicridea (Smicridea) sattleri Denning & Sykora, 1968.
Fig. 16. Geographical distribution maps. A in The Smicridea (Smicridea) fasciatella species group (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Brazil: six new species and new distributional records
Fig. 16. Geographical distribution maps. A. Distribution of Smicridea (Smicridea) erecta Flint,1974. B. Distribution of Smicridea (Smicridea) obliqua Flint,1974.
Fig. 15. Geographical distribution maps. A in The Smicridea (Smicridea) fasciatella species group (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Brazil: six new species and new distributional records
Fig. 15. Geographical distribution maps. A. Distribution of Smicridea (Smicridea) albosignata Ulmer, 1907. B. Distribution of Smicridea (Smicridea) bivittata (Hagen, 1861).
Fig. 7 in Four new species of Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) from south and southwestern Brazil, with notes on the morphological variation and geographic distribution of H. mexicanus ZaldívarRiverón & Belokobylskij, 2009
Fig. 7. Hecabolus mexicanus Zaldívar-Riverón & Belokobylskij, 2009, ♂ (CNIN-IBUNAM). A. Habitus, lateral view; inset: head, frontal view. B. Mesosoma, lateral view. C. Fore wings showing pterostigma with dense dark setae (arrow). D. Metasoma, dorsal view.
Fig. 5 in Four new species of Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) from south and southwestern Brazil, with notes on the morphological variation and geographic distribution of H. mexicanus ZaldívarRiverón & Belokobylskij, 2009
Fig. 5. Hecabolus transversalis sp. nov., ♀, holotype (NHMUK). A. Habitus, lateral view. B. Head, frontal view. C. Mesosoma, lateral view. D. Mesosoma, dorsal view. E. Fore wing. F. Hind wing. G. Metasoma, dorsal view, showing the transverse anterior striation of the second metasomal tergite.
Fig. 6 in Four new species of Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) from south and southwestern Brazil, with notes on the morphological variation and geographic distribution of H. mexicanus ZaldívarRiverón & Belokobylskij, 2009
Fig. 6. Hecabolus mexicanus Zaldívar-Riverón & Belokobylskij, 2009, ♀ (CNIN-IBUNAM). A. Habitus, lateral view. B. Head, frontal view. C. Mesosoma, lateral view. D. Mesosoma, dorsal view. E. Fore and hind wings. F. Metasoma, dorsal view.
Fig. 3 in Four new species of Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) from south and southwestern Brazil, with notes on the morphological variation and geographic distribution of H. mexicanus ZaldívarRiverón & Belokobylskij, 2009
Fig. 3. Hecabolus gavinbroadi sp. nov., ♀, holotype (NHMUK). A. Habitus, lateral view. B. Head, frontal view. C. Mesosoma, lateral view. D. Mesosoma, dorsal view. E. Fore and hind wings, showing the wide pterostigma. F. Metasoma, dorsal view.
Fig. 2 in Four new species of Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) from south and southwestern Brazil, with notes on the morphological variation and geographic distribution of H. mexicanus ZaldívarRiverón & Belokobylskij, 2009
Fig. 2. Hecabolus chrisaxeli sp. nov., ♀, holotype (NHMUK). A. Habitus, lateral view. B. Head, frontal view. C. Mesosoma, lateral view. D. Mesosoma, dorsal view. E. Fore wing. F. Hind wing. G. Metasoma, dorsal view.
Fig. 1 in Four new species of Hecabolus Curtis, 1834 (Braconidae, Doryctinae) from south and southwestern Brazil, with notes on the morphological variation and geographic distribution of H. mexicanus ZaldívarRiverón & Belokobylskij, 2009
Fig. 1. Hecabolus acutus sp. nov., ♀, holotype (NHMUK). A. Habitus, lateral view. B. Head, frontal view. C. Mesosoma, lateral view. D. Mesosoma, dorsal view, black arrows indicate the middle mesoscutal pointed edges above notaulli. E. Fore wing. F. Hind wing. G. Metasoma, dorsal view.
Fig. 5 in Predicting the geographic distribution of Lucilia sericata and Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in South Africa
Fig. 5. Plots showing the correlation between the predicted distribution of Lucilia cuprina (A & C) and Lucilia sericata (B & D) to grease mass (kg) and human population density values (log values).
Fig. 6 in Predicting the geographic distribution of Lucilia sericata and Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in South Africa
Fig. 6. Mean predicted distribution maps for Lucilia sericata (A) and Lucilia cuprina (B), produced using museum records, survey data and personal contact localities. The colour range indicates the likelihood of species distribution from dark blue (least likely) to red (most likely).
Fig. 3 in Predicting the geographic distribution of Lucilia sericata and Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in South Africa
Fig. 3. Wool production of magisterial districts, estimated by total grease mass produced in 2011/2012 in South Africa.
Fig. 8 in Predicting the geographic distribution of Lucilia sericata and Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in South Africa
Fig. 8. Mean distribution maps for Lucilia sericata (A & B) and Lucilia cuprina (C & D) from museum (A & C) and survey (B & D) data only.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.