Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 8 in Contributions to the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi River drainages. Part 2: Lizards (Sauria), chelonians, and crocodiles

Fig. 8. Adult female Chamaeleo dilepis (not collected) from lower Quembo River. Photo by Werner Conradie.

Fig. 9 in Contributions to the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi River drainages. Part 2: Lizards (Sauria), chelonians, and crocodiles

Fig. 9. Adult female Afroedura wulfhaackei (PEM R22490) from 1 km west of Candumbo on road to Boas Águas. Photo by Luke Verburgt.

Map 1 in Contributions to the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi River drainages. Part 2: Lizards (Sauria), chelonians, and crocodiles

Map 1. Distribution of Acanthocercus cf. cyanocephalus in Angola. Historical records are indicated by white dots while all new records are indicated by black dots. Axis values are in degrees (°). Purple polygon – Okavango River basin, blue polygon – Cuando River basin, brown polygon – Zambezi River basin.

Fig. 5 in Contributions to the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi River drainages. Part 2: Lizards (Sauria), chelonians, and crocodiles

Fig. 5. Adult male Agama schacki (PEM R23367) from near source of the Cubango River. Photo by Werner Conradie.

Fig. 2 in Contributions to the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi River drainages. Part 2: Lizards (Sauria), chelonians, and crocodiles

Fig. 2. Adult male Acanthocercus cf. cyanocephalus (PEM R27387) from Luvu River camp. Photo by Chad Keates.

Fig. 1 in Contributions to the herpetofauna of the Angolan Okavango-Cuando-Zambezi River drainages. Part 2: Lizards (Sauria), chelonians, and crocodiles

Fig. 1. Adult female Acanthocercus cf. cyanocephalus (PEM R23560) from Quembo River source. Photo by Werner Conradie.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Fig. 1 in Lack of evidence of vertical transmission of Karyolysus blood parasites in Iberian green lizards (Lacerta schreiberi)

Fig. 1. Karyolysus sp. Trophozoite (a–c) and gamonts (d–f) found in blood smears of L. schreiberi lizards. Scalebar = 10 μm.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →

Figs 5, 6. Liolaemus occipitalis Boulenger, 1885 in Effects of anthropogenic disturbance in the survival of the sand lizard, Liolaemus occipitalis (Squamata: Liolaemidae)

Figs 5, 6. Liolaemus occipitalis Boulenger, 1885 size in State Park of Itapeva (green circle) and Real beach (blue circle), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 5, female; 6, male.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Effects of anthropogenic disturbance in the survival of the sand lizard, Liolaemus occipitalis (Squamata: Liolaemidae)

Fig. 1. Location map of sampling areas for the two populations of Liolaemus occipitalis Boulenger, 1885 in the study, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Triangle: Real beach; Circle: State Park of Itapeva (PEI).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →

Figs 2-4 in Effects of anthropogenic disturbance in the survival of the sand lizard, Liolaemus occipitalis (Squamata: Liolaemidae)

Figs 2-4. Abundance of Liolaemus occipitalis Boulenger, 1885 estimated in each primary sampling occasion for State Park of Itapeva (P) and Real beach (R), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 2, adult males; 3, adult females; 4, juveniles. Samplings 1 – 3 were conducted in 2015 and 4 – 6 in 2016; Vertical lines are representative of confidence intervals of 95%.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in The lizard that never sleeps: activity of the pampa marked gecko Homonota uruguayensis

Fig. 1. Daily activity of Homonota uruguayensis (Vaz-Ferreira & Sierra de Soriano, 1961) (histogram) and hourly means of environmental temperatures (air temperature: solid line, substrate temperature: dotted lines) in autumn (a), winter (b), spring (c) and summer (d) in the study area at Rosário do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, between May 2010 and January 2011.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →

Fig. 2 in The lizard that never sleeps: activity of the pampa marked gecko Homonota uruguayensis

Fig. 2. Relative frequency of active Homonota uruguayensis (Vaz-Ferreira & Sierra de Soriano, 1961) at different air (Ta) and substrate (Tsb) temperatures (2 °C intervals) in the study area at Rosário do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil, between May 2010 and January 2011.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in Thermoregulation in the Andean lizard Anolis heterodermus (Squamata: Dactyloidae) at high elevation in the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia

Fig. 3. (A) Average hourly variation of body temperature (Tb) and operative temperatures (T e) of light exposed, shaded and all models in function of time of the day. Striped area corresponds to preferred temperature interval. (B) Daily activity pattern of Anolis heterodermus (Duméril, 1851).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in Thermoregulation in the Andean lizard Anolis heterodermus (Squamata: Dactyloidae) at high elevation in the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia

Fig. 2. Frequency of body (T b) and operative (T e) temperatures during wet and dry season in Anolis heterodermus (Duméril, 1851). Average values are shown by black arrows. Striped area corresponds to averaged preferred temperature (T pref) interval for both seasons.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Thermoregulation in the Andean lizard Anolis heterodermus (Squamata: Dactyloidae) at high elevation in the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia

Fig. 1. Thermal gradient scheme: (A) shrubs to create a suitable habitat for liZards in the gradient; (B) cooling packs.

Fig. 7 in Evolution of postcranial skeleton in worm lizards inferred from its status in the Cretaceous stem-amphisbaenian Slavoia darevskii

Fig. 7. Forelimb (with details of manus) of the stem-amphisbaenid Slavoia darevskii Sulimski, 1984 from late Campanian of Mongolia. A. ZPAL MgR-III/79, CT-scans. The dotted line in A1 marks surface where the digit I and II are eroded; outlines in A2 mark phalanges and metacarpals (preserved and reconstructed). B. ZPAL MgR-I/9; photograph (B1), outlines of the forearm and partially preserved hand (B2). C. ZPAL MgR-I/8, partially preserved hand.

Fig. 9 in Evolution of postcranial skeleton in worm lizards inferred from its status in the Cretaceous stem-amphisbaenian Slavoia darevskii

Fig. 9. Hindlimb of Slavoia darevskii. A. Based on ZPAL MgR-I/9, tibia in ventral view. B. Based on PIN 3142/358, outlines of hindlimb in dorsal (B1) and anterior (B2) views.

Fig. 4 in Evolution of postcranial skeleton in worm lizards inferred from its status in the Cretaceous stem-amphisbaenian Slavoia darevskii

Fig. 4. Pectoral girdle of the stem-amphisbaenid Slavoia darevskii Sulimski, 1984 from late Campanian of Mongolia. A. ZPAL MgR-III/76, scapulacoracoid in anterior view; the black line marks missing parts seen in other specimens. B. ZPAL MgR-I/8, pectoral girdle with ventral edge of clavicle, interclavicle (morphotype I), coracoids, and proximal part of humerus. C. PIN 4487/14, sternum with rib attachments, coracoids with epicoracoids, interclavicle (morphotype I), humerus, cervical, and skull in ventral view.

Fig. 3 in Evolution of postcranial skeleton in worm lizards inferred from its status in the Cretaceous stem-amphisbaenian Slavoia darevskii

Fig. 3. Reconstruction of scapulocoracoid of Slavoia darevskii based on different specimens, in anterior (A), dorsal (B), lateral (C), and ventral (D) views. E. Reconstruction of epicoracoid assuming that it did not reach the suprascapula.

Fig. 13 in Evolution of postcranial skeleton in worm lizards inferred from its status in the Cretaceous stem-amphisbaenian Slavoia darevskii

Fig. 13. Evolution of pectoral girdles of Lacertidae, Slavoia darevskii, and families of Amphisbaenia. Crosses mark at least three independent losses of the forelimbs among worm lizards.