Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,144
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,144 results for “ITS barcode”
Figure 1 from: Martínez-Domínguez L, Nicolalde-Morejón F, Lorea-Hernández FG, Vergara-Silva F, Stevenson DWm (2020) A novelty in Ceratozamia (Zamiaceae, Cycadales) from the Sierra Madre del Sur, Mexico: biogeographic and morphological patterns, DNA barcoding and phenology. PhytoKeys 156: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.156.53502
Figure 1 Distribution map of the genus Ceratozamia (black solid circles). Distributions for species morphologically similar to Ceratozamia leptoceras are represented with an asterisk and a double circle. Guerrero state and Putla subregion of cloud forest are shown with outline and shaded area, respectively. Inset: points corresponding to the Guerrero mountain range where Ceratozamia was collected.
Figure 9 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 9 Morphometric relationships and fecundity characteristics of Macropodia czernjawskii. a. Relationships between carapace width (CW) and the geometric mean of chela length, height and thickness (ChGM). b. Relationships between CW and decimal logarithm of the number of developing eggs (I or II stage of development) on pleopods (F). For statistical data see Table 2.
Figure 7 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 7 Macropodia czernjawskii. a. Right chela, male, CW 11.0 (ZMMU Ma 3547); b. Right chela, male. CW 6.0 mm (ZMMU Ma 3544) c. Malformed right chela, male, CW 8.0 mm (ZMMU Ma 3543); d, e. Same specimen as c. dactylus and propodus of P 5. Scale bars: 1 mm (a–c, e), 0.5 mm (d).
Figure 6 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 6 Macropodia czernjawskii. a. Anterior part of the body with basal antennal segment (ZMMU Ma 3543); b. Anterior part of the body with basal antennal segments, male (ZMMU Ma 3547). c. Male pleon (ZMMU Ma 3547); d. Female sterno-pleonal cavity with exposed genital segment (ZMMU Ma 3538). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 5 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 5 Macropodia czernjawskii, photographs in natural coloration. a. male (ZMMU Ma 3547), dorsal view. b. Same specimen as a. ventral view. c. female ov (ZMMU Ma 3542), dorsal view. d. Same specimen as c. ventral view. Scale bar: 10 mm. Photographs by SE Anosov.
Figure 4 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 4 Macropodia czernjawskii (a, b. possible paralectotype ZIN-RAS 1609; c, d.ZIN-RAS 35102) and Macropodia longirostris (JC Fabricius, 1775) (e.SMF 3752). a. Right cheliped, ventral view. b. Right cheliped, dorsal view. c. Cphalothorax, dorsal view. d. Cephalothorax, ventral view. e. Cephalothorax, dorsal view. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 3 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 3 Comparison of Macropodia czernjawskii (a–d. possible paralectotype, male, ZIN-RAS 88750) to Macropodia tenuirostris (Leach, 1814) (a'–d'. male, SMF 3749) and Macropodia rostrata (Linnaeus, 1761) (a''–d''.SMF 40660). a. Dorsal view. b. Lateral view. c. Anterior part of the body, with antennules, basal antennal segments, and epistome, ventral view. d. Dactylus of pereopod 5. Scale bars: 10 mm (a–a''–b–b''), 1 mm (c–c''–d–d'').
Figure 2 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 2 Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880), female lectotype (ZIN-RAS 88751). a. Dorsal view. b. Ventral view. c. Lateral view. Scale bar: 5 mm.
Figure 8 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 8 Macropodia czernjawskii. Male (ZMMU Ma 3543), right gonopod . a. Pleonal view. b. Sternal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 12 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 12 Phylogenetic relationships of Macropodia spp. based on partial sequence of the COI gene, obtained using Bayesian inference. Tips of the tree colored according to their morphological identification. Numbers above the branches are the posterior probabilities.
Figure 10 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 10 Natural habitats of Macropodiz czernjawskii in the Black Sea. a, b. Male (ZMMU Ma 3549) in Cystoseira sp., on rock, Tuaphat coastal rock masif, near Gelendzhik. c. Male (ZMMU Ma 3547), on sand, of Blagoveschenskaya village, near Anapa. d. Specimen collected of Blagoveschensakya in aquarium, decorated with red algae after few days of keeping. e. A characteristic biotope of M. czernjawskii in Tuaphat. f. Biotope in Kazachya Cove, Crimean Peninsula where M. czernjawskii has been repeatedly observed. Photographs by SE Anosov.
Figure 1 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 1 Study area and the original records of Macropodia czernjawskii in the Black Sea presented in this study.
Figure 11 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 11 Estimates of evolutionary divergence over sequence pairs within and between species of Macropodia (M. czernjawskii; M. rostrata – M. parva; M. tenuirostris – M. longipes; the latter two pairs and M. parva, M. rostrata – Macropodia sp. are indicated as "?", meaning their possible conspecificity); and between genera of Majoidea. The number of base substitutions per site from averaging over all sequence pairs between groups are shown. Analyses were conducted using the Kimura 2-parameter mode. For values of K2P see also Table 3.
Supplementary material 1 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Table S1
Supplementary material 1 from: Nugent CM, Adamowicz SJ (2020) Alignment-free classification of COI DNA barcode data with the Python package Alfie. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e55815. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.55815
File S1 – Training, test, and validation data sets used in model training and analysis
Figure 5 from: Egger C, Neusser TP, Norenburg J, Leasi F, Buge B, Vannozzi A, Cunha RL, Cox CJ, Jörger KM (2020) Uncovering the shell game with barcodes: diversity of meiofaunal Caecidae snails (Truncatelloidea, Caenogastropoda) from Central America. ZooKeys 968: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.968.52986
Figure 5 A–DMeioceras nitidum, specimen MNHN-IM-2013-72087 A light microscopic picture BSEM scan CSEM close-up of mucro and D microsculpture EM. cubitatum, specimen USNM 1618851 F, GC. cf. corrugulatum, specimen USNM 1618861 F light microscopic picture G light microscopic close-up of microstructure H MOTU II, specimen USNM 1618853 I–L MOTU I, specimen ZSM-Mol-20200039 I light microscopic picture JSEM scan KSEM close-up of mucro and L microsculpture MC. glabrum, specimen ZSM-Mol-20200096 NC. glabellum auctt. non Adams, specimen ZSM-Mol-20200074 O–RC. invisibile sp. nov., holotype ZSM-Mol-20100320 O light microscopic picture PSEM scan QSEM close-up of mucro and R microsculpture. Scale bars: 10 µm (R); 20 µm (C, K, L, Q); 50 µm (D, E) 100 µm (I, J, O, P); 200 µm (A, B, M, N).
Figure 7 from: Egger C, Neusser TP, Norenburg J, Leasi F, Buge B, Vannozzi A, Cunha RL, Cox CJ, Jörger KM (2020) Uncovering the shell game with barcodes: diversity of meiofaunal Caecidae snails (Truncatelloidea, Caenogastropoda) from Central America. ZooKeys 968: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.968.52986
Figure 7 A–FCaecum pulchellumA, C, E, F specimen ZSM-Mol-20090485 B, D juvenile specimen ZSM-Mol-20200118 A, B light microscopic pictures C, DSEM scans E close-up of mucro and F microsculpture H–KC. donmoorei, specimen USNM 1618844 H–KC. regulare, specimen ZSM-Mol-20100321, juvenile H light microscopic picture ISEM scans J close-up of mucro and K microsculpture L–TC. cf. teres and C. cf. strangulatumL specimen ZSM-Mol-20200033, juvenile specimen with larval shell still attached M, N, Q, S specimen ZSM-Mol-20200032, juvenile M light microscopic picture NSEM scan Q close-up of mucro and S microsculpture O, P, R, TC. cf. strangulatum, specimen ZSM-Mol-20200038, juvenile O light microscopic picture PSEM scan R close-up of mucro and T microsculpture U–XC. cf. semilaeve, specimen ZSM-Mol-20200034 U Light microscopic picture VSEM scan W close-up of mucro and X microsculpture. Scale bars: 10 µm (F, S, T, W, X); 20 µm (J, K, Q, R); 50 µm (E); 100 µm (H, I, L–P, U, V); 200 µm (A–D).
Figure 1 from: Egger C, Neusser TP, Norenburg J, Leasi F, Buge B, Vannozzi A, Cunha RL, Cox CJ, Jörger KM (2020) Uncovering the shell game with barcodes: diversity of meiofaunal Caecidae snails (Truncatelloidea, Caenogastropoda) from Central America. ZooKeys 968: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.968.52986
Figure 1 Morphology of Caecum (Caecidae) including important shell features used for morphological species identification. USNM 1618850 Caecum imbricatum – specimens to the left. Abbreviations: a, aperture; cgs, ciliated gliding sole; eg, egg; ey, eye; fp, fecal pellets; hf, retracted head and foot; mu, mucro; op, operculum; se, septum; st, shell structure (ornamentation); t, tentacle; tb, tube. Scale bar: 500 µm.
Figure 4 from: Egger C, Neusser TP, Norenburg J, Leasi F, Buge B, Vannozzi A, Cunha RL, Cox CJ, Jörger KM (2020) Uncovering the shell game with barcodes: diversity of meiofaunal Caecidae snails (Truncatelloidea, Caenogastropoda) from Central America. ZooKeys 968: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.968.52986
Figure 4 Molecular based species delimitation of Central American Caecidae. Guide tree used for PTP and bPTP based on the optimal likelihood tree of the concatenated three-marker dataset. Color codes indicate our preliminary species hypothesis derived from the phylogenetic tree. Color bars reflect the species delimitation suggested by the four consulted species delimitation programs (including ML and Bayesian implementation for PTP and single and multiple threshold for GMYC). Bars are missing where no sequence data obtained.
Figure 6 from: Egger C, Neusser TP, Norenburg J, Leasi F, Buge B, Vannozzi A, Cunha RL, Cox CJ, Jörger KM (2020) Uncovering the shell game with barcodes: diversity of meiofaunal Caecidae snails (Truncatelloidea, Caenogastropoda) from Central America. ZooKeys 968: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.968.52986
Figure 6 A–ECaecum heptagonumA specimen USNM 1618866 juvenile specimen with larval shell still attached B–E specimen ZSM-Mol-20200030, juvenile specimen already resembling closely the adult form B light microscopic picture CSEM scan D close-up of mucro and E microsculpture F–IC. cooperi, specimen MNHN-IM-2019-32 F light microscopic picture GSEM scan H close-up of mucro and I microsculpture whole specimen and close-up of mucro and microsculpture J–MC. debile, specimen MNHN-IM-2019-27 J light microscopic picture KSEM scan L close-up of mucro and M microsculpture N–QC. striatum, specimen ZSM-Mol-20100322 N light microscopic picture OSEM scan P close-up of mucro and Q microsculpture R–UC. clathratum, specimen MNHN-IM-2019-17 R light microscopic picture SSEM scan T close-up of mucro and U microsculpture. Scale bars: 10 µm (D, E, I, Q); 20 µm (H, M, P, U); 100 µm (A, B, C, L, N, O, T); 200 µm (F, G, J, K whole specimen); 300 µm (R, S).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.