Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
854
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
854 results for “Disparity”
Fig. 2 in Morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of South American Sericini chafers (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) contrasts patterns of morphological disparity and current classification
Fig. 2. Characters illustrated: pronotum and elytra. A-I) Pronotum, dorsal view; J-L) Elytra, dorsal view; M O) Elytra, lateral view. A) Astaena baroni; B) A. explaniceps; C, M) A. fuscipennis; D) A. peruana; E) A. producta; F) A. pygidiallis; G) A. ruficollis; H) A. suturalis; I) Symmela flavimana; J) A. longula; K) A. pilosa; L) A. pinguins; N) A. marginicollis; O) A. tarsalis. Scale bars: A-O) 1 mm.
Fig. 3 in Morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of South American Sericini chafers (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) contrasts patterns of morphological disparity and current classification
Fig. 3. Characters illustrated: Abdomen and legs. A) Abdomen, lateral view; B, C) Abdomen, ventral view; D F) Prolegs, dorsal view; G, H) Protarsi, lateral view; I,J) Metacoxa, lateral view; K,L) Metatibia, lateral face; M) Metatibia, interior face; N) Metatibia, dorsal view; O,P) Metatarsi, dorsal view; Q) Metatarsi, ventral view. A) Astaena fuscipennis; B) A. tarsalis; C) Symmela opaca; D) A. montivaga; E) S. jatahyensis; F) S. mutabilis; G) Raysymmela boliviensis; H) Parasymmela amazonica; I, L, O) A. aequatorialis; J) A. rosettae; K) Astaena heterophylla; M) A. andina; N) A. semiopaca; P) A. longicornis; Q) A. boliviana. Scale bars: A-F, I-Q) 1 mm; G, H) 0.3 mm.
Fig. 8. A in Morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of South American Sericini chafers (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) contrasts patterns of morphological disparity and current classification
Fig. 8. A - Unrooted single most parsimonious tree from implied weighting (K = 71.62) on the reduced data set (run 9); B - Unrooted single tree from distancebased clustering.
El Disparate
Levantamiento fotogramétrico del predio "el Disparate". Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
TR frequency distributions and TR disparity scores
<p><span>TR frequency distributions and TR disparity scores</span></p>
Data and code for 'Global disparity in synergy of solar power and vegetation growth'
<p>The 'stepwisefit' requires Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox installed in the MATLAB to run the code. The import data are attached.</p>
A new bohaiornithid-like bird from the Lower Cretaceous of China fills a gap in enantiornithine disparity
<p>A new enantiornithine – <em>Musivavis amabilis</em> n. gen. n. sp. – is reported from the Lower Cretaceous Jehol Biota in western Liaoning, China. The new taxon is similar to the bohaiornithids in the robust subconical teeth, bluntly expanded omal ends of the furcula, caudolaterally oriented lateral trabeculae with triangular distal ends of the sternum, and a robust second pedal digit, yet it differs from members of Bohaiornithidae in several features recalling other enantiornithine lineages, such as the acuminate rostral ramus of maxilla, the shape of the coracoid lateral margin, the presence of craniolateral processes on the sternum, the proportions of the manual phalanges, and the unspecialized third pedal ungual phalanx. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of Mesozoic birds shows that homoplasy significantly impacts the reconstruction of enantiornithine relationships. When all phylogenetic characters are considered of equal weight, <em>Musivavis</em> is reconstructed in a lineage related to a radiation of large-bodied enantiornithines including Bohaiornithidae and Pengornithidae. Alternative scenarios based on progressive downweighting of the homoplastic characters support more basal placements of the pengornithids among Enantiornithes, but do not alter the affinity of <em>Musivavis</em> as a member of the "bohaiornithid-grade" group.</p>
Increasing morphological disparity and decreasing optimality for jaw speed and strength during the radiation of jawed vertebrates
<p>The Siluro-Devonian adaptive radiation of jawed vertebrates, which underpins almost all living vertebrate biodiversity, is characterised by the evolutionary innovation of the lower jaw. Multiple lines of evidence have suggested that the jaw evolved from a rostral gill arch, but when the jaw took on a feeding function remains unclear. We quantified the variety of form in the earliest jaws in the fossil record and , from which we generated a range of theoretical morphospacelogies within this morphological range, which that we then tested for their functional optimality. By drawing comparisons with the real jaw data and reconstructed ancestral forms, our results show that the earliest jaw shapes were optimised for fast closure and stress resistance, inferring a feeding rather than solely ventilation function. Jaw shapes then became less optimal for these functions during the later radiation of jawed vertebrates. Thus, the evolution of jaw morphology has continually explored new morphospace and accumulated disparity through time, laying the foundation for diverse feeding strategies and the success of jawed vertebrates.</p>
Phylogeny and disparate selection signatures suggest two genetically independent domestication events of pea (Pisum L.)
<p>Domestication is considered a model of adaptation that can be used to draw conclusions about the <em>modus operandi</em> of selection in natural systems. Investigating domestication may give insights into how plants react to different intensities of human manipulation, which has direct implication for the continuing efforts of crop improvement. Therefore, scientists of various disciplines study domestication-related questions to understand the biological and cultural bases of the domestication process. We employed restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) of 494 <em>Pisum sativum</em> (pea) samples from all wild and domesticated groups to analyze the genetic structure of the collection. Patterns of ancient admixture were investigated by analysis of admixture graphs. We used two complementary approaches, one diversity based and one based on differentiation, to detect the selection signatures putatively associated with domestication. An analysis of the subpopulation structure of wild <em>P. sativum</em> revealed five distinct groups with a notable geographic pattern. <em>Pisum abyssinicum</em> clustered unequivocally within the <em>P. sativum</em> complex, without any indication of hybrid origin. We detected 32 genomic regions putatively subjected to selection: 29 in <em>P. sativum</em> ssp. <em>sativum</em> and three in <em>P. abyssinicum</em>. The two domesticated groups did not share regions under selection and did not display similar haplotype patterns within those regions. Wild <em>P. sativum</em> is structured into well-diverged subgroups. Although <em>Pisum sativum</em> ssp<em>. humile</em> is not supported as a taxonomic entity, the so-called 'southern <em>humile</em>' is a genuine wild group. Introgression did not shape the variation observed within the sampled germplasm. The two domesticated pea groups display distinct genetic bases of domestication, suggesting two genetically independent domestication events.</p>
Zenarchopterus dispar SPAdes preassembly
<p>.</p>
Zenarchopterus dispar decontaminated FSCR
<p>.</p>
Zenarchopterus dispar decontaminated gx
<p>.</p>
On following pages: 626. Niceforo Maria's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys nicefori); 627. Popayan Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys popayanus); 628. Short-faced Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys baeops); 629. Snow-footed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys niveipes); 630. Principal Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys princeps); 631. Silky Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys bombycinus); 632. Red Andean Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys auricularis); 633. Cinnamon-colored Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinnameus); 634. Central Andes Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys contradictus); 635. Ashy-bellied Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinereiventen; 636. Colombian Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys dispar); 637. Soft-furred Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys lanigen); 638. Ash-colored Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinereus); 639. Wandering Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys erro); 640. Paramo Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys paramorum); 641. Forest Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomyssilvestris); 642. Smoky Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys fumeus); 643. Pichincha Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys vulcani); 644. Ucucha Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ucucha); 645. Taczanowski's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys taczanowskii); 646. Golden Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys aureus); 647. White-tipped Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys caudivarius); 648. Hudson's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys hudsoni); 649. Reddish-backed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys pyrrhonotus); 650. Montane Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys oreas); 651. Cajamarca Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys praetor; 652. Distinguished Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys notatus); 653. Apeco Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys apeco); 654. Peruvian Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys eleusis); 655. Strong-tailed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ischyrus); 656. Reddish-nosed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys rosalinda); 657. Large-eared Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys macrotis); 658. Ashaninka Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys onkiro); 659. Inca Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys incanus), 660. Kalinowski's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys kalinowskii); 661. Slender Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys gracilis); 662. Daphne's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys daphne); 663. Anderson's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys anderson); 664. Austral Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys australis); 665. Ladew's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ladewi). in Cricetidae
On following pages: 626. Niceforo Maria's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys nicefori); 627. Popayan Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys popayanus); 628. Short-faced Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys baeops); 629. Snow-footed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys niveipes); 630. Principal Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys princeps); 631. Silky Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys bombycinus); 632. Red Andean Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys auricularis); 633. Cinnamon-colored Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinnameus); 634. Central Andes Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys contradictus); 635. Ashy-bellied Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinereiventen; 636. Colombian Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys dispar); 637. Soft-furred Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys lanigen); 638. Ash-colored Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys cinereus); 639. Wandering Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys erro); 640. Paramo Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys paramorum); 641. Forest Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomyssilvestris); 642. Smoky Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys fumeus); 643. Pichincha Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys vulcani); 644. Ucucha Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ucucha); 645. Taczanowski's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys taczanowskii); 646. Golden Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys aureus); 647. White-tipped Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys caudivarius); 648. Hudson's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys hudsoni); 649. Reddish-backed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys pyrrhonotus); 650. Montane Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys oreas); 651. Cajamarca Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys praetor; 652. Distinguished Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys notatus); 653. Apeco Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys apeco); 654. Peruvian Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys eleusis); 655. Strong-tailed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ischyrus); 656. Reddish-nosed Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys rosalinda); 657. Large-eared Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys macrotis); 658. Ashaninka Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys onkiro); 659. Inca Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys incanus), 660. Kalinowski's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys kalinowskii); 661. Slender Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys gracilis); 662. Daphne's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys daphne); 663. Anderson's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys anderson); 664. Austral Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys australis); 665. Ladew's Oldfield Mouse (Thomasomys ladewi).
Light field scenes with disparity maps (LFQD)
<p>The dataset includes distorted versions of synthetic scenes created by the authors of the <a href="https://lightfield-analysis.uni-konstanz.de/">4D Light Field Benchmark</a>, as well as scenes created by us. The scenes were distorted by:</p> <ul> <li>Compression-based distortions (JPEG, JPEG2000, BPG, VP9, AV1, AVC, HEVC, JPEG Pleno 4D-Transform Mode)</li> <li>Non-compression-based distortions (Gaussian noise, impulse noise, contrast enhancement via unsharp mask)</li> </ul> <p>The disparity maps were estimated using:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/chshin10/epinet">EPINET</a></li> <li><a href="https://github.com/LIAGM/LFattNet">LFattNet</a></li> <li><a href="http://clim.inria.fr/research/FlexDepthEstim/index.html">LFDE-Flex</a></li> <li><a href="https://github.com/shuozh/Spinning-Parallelogram-Operator">SPO</a></li> </ul> <p>The dataset is composed of three archives. <strong>GT_scenes</strong>.zip is comprised of ground truth light field images directly created by us (the rest of the ground truths can be downloaded from <a href="https://lightfield-analysis.uni-konstanz.de">https://lightfield-analysis.uni-konstanz.de</a>). <strong>ALL_scenes</strong>.zip includes both the ground truths for scenes created by us, as well as all the distorted versions (13 scenes in total). The last archive (<strong>ALL_disparity</strong>.zip) is comprised of distorted disparity maps generated by the above-mentioned disparity estimation algorithms.</p> <p>The entire dataset, together with detailed information about how the scenes were distorted can be access at <a href="https://sites.google.com/fel.cvut.cz/lfqd">https://sites.google.com/fel.cvut.cz/lfqd</a>.</p> <p>The dataset was created primarily for an accompanying article <em>Regarding the quality of disparity estimation from distorted light fields</em> - <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2022.116867">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2022.116867</a>.</p>
FIGURE 7. Aphanius stoliczkanus, FSJF 3670, female 28 in Aphanius kruppi, a new killifish from Oman with comments on the A. dispar species group (Cyprinodontiformes: Aphaniidae)
FIGURE 7. Aphanius stoliczkanus, FSJF 3670, female 28 mm SL, male, 30 mm SL; India: Narara-Salt Pans.
FIGURE 4 in Aphanius kruppi, a new killifish from Oman with comments on the A. dispar species group (Cyprinodontiformes: Aphaniidae)
FIGURE 4. Aphanius kruppi, FSJF DNA-2588, female, 45 mm SL, male, 34 mm SL; Oman: spring in Al Mudayrib.
FIGURE 9 in Aphanius kruppi, a new killifish from Oman with comments on the A. dispar species group (Cyprinodontiformes: Aphaniidae)
FIGURE 9. Aphanius cf. dispar, FSJF 3487, female, 43 mm SL, male, 37 mm SL; Israel: salt marshes at Atlit.
FIGURE 1 in Aphanius kruppi, a new killifish from Oman with comments on the A. dispar species group (Cyprinodontiformes: Aphaniidae)
FIGURE 1. Maximum likelihood estimation of the phylogenetic relationships based on the mitochondrial COI barcode region (Kimura 2-parameter model, discrete Gamma distribution for rate differences with 5 categories +G parameter = 0.3241. Nucleotide positions with less than 95 % site coverage were eliminated resulting in 581 analysed positions. Numbers of major nodes indicate bootstrap values from 1000 pseudoreplicates from the ML, NJ and MP method. Except to outgroup, the tree is drawn to scale with branch lengths depicting number of substitutions per site. Solid black bar shows the delimitation result using the PTP approach (eleven groups), dashed line the result based on the mPTP model (two groups).
FIGURE 3. Aphanius kruppi, FSJF 3771 in Aphanius kruppi, a new killifish from Oman with comments on the A. dispar species group (Cyprinodontiformes: Aphaniidae)
FIGURE 3. Aphanius kruppi, FSJF 3771, paratypes, left side from top: males 28, 37 and 44 mm SL; right side from top: females, 23, 35 and 49 mm SL; Oman: spring in Al Mudayrib.
FIGURE 6 in Aphanius kruppi, a new killifish from Oman with comments on the A. dispar species group (Cyprinodontiformes: Aphaniidae)
FIGURE 6. Aphanius cf. kruppi, not preserved, female, about 40 mm SL, male, about 45 mm SL; Oman: Al-Hoota. Photo by Barbara Nicca (female), Kai Borkenhagen (male).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.