Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 1 in Fine-scale abundance variation in New Zealand migratory and non-migratory Galaxias fish species

Figure 1. – Map of survey sites, including sites upstream of Lakes Ohau, Pukaki and Tekapo (white boxes), and non-lake stream sites (grey shaded boxes). The number of fish caught at the different sites is shown within the boxes, with Galaxias brevipinnis at the top and non-migratory Galaxias spp. at the bottom of the boxes.

Figure 5 in Fine-scale abundance variation in New Zealand migratory and non-migratory Galaxias fish species

Figure 5. – Principal component analysis (PCA) biplot of the microhabitat environmental factors. Each dot repre- sents one sampling point. The symbols indicate sites upstream of lakes (circles) and sites without lakes (triangles), with the 95% confidence ellipses enclosing sample units from each group. Ellipses that do not overlap represent groups that differ significantly. Dim1, the first PCA axis; Dim2, the second PCA axis.

Figure 4 in Fine-scale abundance variation in New Zealand migratory and non-migratory Galaxias fish species

Figure 4. – Representation of size-class structure of Galaxias brevipinnis in lake tributary sites with different distance categories from their recruitment sources (lakes). Sample sizes (n) and distances (in km) are shown inside the panels.

Figure 3 in Fine-scale abundance variation in New Zealand migratory and non-migratory Galaxias fish species

Figure 3. – The relationship between square-root transformed galbre Galaxias brevipinnis and non-migratory species (galpau; G. paucispondylus) abundance with distance from the lakes.

Figure A2 in A student-based expansion of the strategies of reproduction in fish (STOREFISH) database to 288 North American freshwater and anadromous species for 14 egg and larval traits

Figure A2. – Summary of the 162 answers for survey questions 5-9 (see Tab. A1 for details). Letter refer to the difficulties associated with (A) finding information (B) reading articles in English, (C) accessing documents, and (D) other reasons.

Figure 2 in A student-based expansion of the strategies of reproduction in fish (STOREFISH) database to 288 North American freshwater and anadromous species for 14 egg and larval traits

Figure 2. – The number of species (A) and records (B) in the original (black bars) and new (white bars) data sets for egg (left of the vertical bar) and larval (right of the bar) traits. Numbers in the x-axis correspond to trait numbers in Table I. The maximum possible number of species in (A) was 80 and 288 for the original and new data, respectively. See Table I for trait units and description.

Figure 1 in Length-weight and length-length relationships of 48 Senegalese freshwater fish species based on collection specimens

Figure 1. – Caudal fin length [calculated as (TL-SL) %SL] vs SL in Yongeichthys thomasi. Upper and lower dashed line at 2 standard deviations from the regression line. TL = total length, SL = standard length.

Figure A3 in A student-based expansion of the strategies of reproduction in fish (STOREFISH) database to 288 North American freshwater and anadromous species for 14 egg and larval traits

Figure A3. – Boxplot summaries of the number of references (Q11) and traits (Q12) that the students found. See Table A1 for details.

Figure 12 in First records of nine fish species from Réunion Island observed during an inventory of the fauna of mesophotic zone

Figure 12. – Gymnothorax aff. breedeni, species not identified with certainty, several specimens were observed at the depths closed to 100 m in the Bay of Saint-Leu (zone 1), 10 Nov. and 15 Dec. 2020. Photograph by P. Plantard.

Figure 8 in First records of nine fish species from Réunion Island observed during an inventory of the fauna of mesophotic zone

Figure 8. – Halichoeres trispilus, 95 m Bay of Saint-Leu (zone 1), 15 Dec. 2020. Photograph by P. Plantard.

Figure 10 in First records of nine fish species from Réunion Island observed during an inventory of the fauna of mesophotic zone

Figure 10. – Canthigaster tyleri, 85 m Bay of Saint-Leu (zone 1), 20 Jan. 2021. Photograph by P. Plantard.

Figure 2 in First records of nine fish species from Réunion Island observed during an inventory of the fauna of mesophotic zone

Figure 2. – Dunckerocampus boylei, 95 m Bay of Saint-Leu (zone 1), 15 Dec. 2020. Photograph by P. Plantard.

Figure 1 in First records of nine fish species from Réunion Island observed during an inventory of the fauna of mesophotic zone

Figure 1. – Sampling zones (zone 1 and 2 in red) on a geomorphological map of the coast of Réunion Island (Guennoc et al., 2008).

Figure 1 in Length-weight relationships of 19 fish species from two tropical artificial reservoirs (Manantali and Selingue) in Mali, West Africa

Figure 1. – Situation map (top) and detailed map (bottom) of the two Malian lakes studied: (A) Manantali, (B) Sélingué.

Figure 2 in Effects of dams on demographic structures of amphidromous fish and crustacean species in Caribbean rivers

Figure 2. – Individual number histograms of each species broken down by size classes (mm) (left chart) and cohort extraction (right chart) downstream of the Grand Carbet River in March. Right chart: red curves are each cohort extracted by the model; green curve is the cumulative individual number in the modelled age groups.

Figure 1 in Effects of dams on demographic structures of amphidromous fish and crustacean species in Caribbean rivers

Figure 1. – Map of Guadeloupe with the three sampled rivers (bold lines) and study sites: downstream and upstream the water intakes (●) and the first riffle from the mouth of the rivers (Ì).

Figure 7 in Effects of dams on demographic structures of amphidromous fish and crustacean species in Caribbean rivers

Figure 7. – Individual number histograms of each species broken down by size classes (mm) for the three stations (top chart) and porosity chart of the Moreau River water intake (bottom chart). Bottom chart: dotted black line indicates 50% crossing; dotted grey lines indicate the mean crossing rate for these size classes. The size of the downstream and upstream populations of Macrobrachium faustinum and M. heterochirus are too small and fragmented to be presented.

Figure 4 in Effects of dams on demographic structures of amphidromous fish and crustacean species in Caribbean rivers

Figure 4. – Individual number histograms of each species broken down by size classes (mm) (left chart) and cohort extraction (right chart) downstream of the Moreau River in June. Right chart: red curves are each cohort extracted by the model; green curve is the cumulative individuals' number in the modelled age groups. No Macrobrachium heterochirus were caught.

Figure 6 in Effects of dams on demographic structures of amphidromous fish and crustacean species in Caribbean rivers

Figure 6. – Individual number histograms of each species broken down by size classes (mm) for the three stations (top chart) and porosity chart of the Pérou River water intake (bottom chart). Bottom chart: arrow indicates the optimal size at crossing; dotted black line indicates 50% crossing; dotted grey lines indicate the mean crossing rate for these size classes. The size of the downstream and upstream population of Macrobrachium faustinum is too small and fragmented to be presented.