Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 5. Strict consensus of shorter trees under equal weights (length = 2881). Clades in gray are different from the preferred tree of figure 3. (Weight for all characters = 3, except 38–40 = 1.)

Fig. 2 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 2. Sensitivity analysis for the callibration of implied weighting concavities. Homogeneous groups of means from multiple pairwise a posteriori comparisons in a KruskalWallis ANOVA (α = 0.05). A. Proportion of correct groups shared by consensus from pseudoreplicate and complete dataset. B. Proportion of wrong groups in the consensus from pseudoreplicate. C. Maximum number of groups shared by individual pseudoreplicate trees with individual optimal trees.

Fig. 1 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 1. Continuous characters: each point is a terminal in the analysis, dashed lines are the limits between states. A. Character 6, an intermediate group of terminals has ambiguous scoring. B. Character 27.

Fig. 20 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 20. Amaurobioides chilensis (Nicolet). A. Female (holotype). B. Epigyne, ventral view (holotype). C. Cleared epigyne, dorsal view (Elqui, Cruz Grande). Scale bars = A, 2 mm; B, C, 0.2 mm.

Fig. 28. Aysenoides colecole, n in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 28. Aysenoides colecole, n. sp. A. Male palp, prolateral view (holotype). B. Same, ventral view. C. Same, retrolateral view. D. Female (Osorno, Antillanca). E. Same, epigyne, ventral view. F. Same, cleared. Scale bars = D, 1 mm; all others, 0.2 mm. (C1 = primary conductor; PBE = process on base of embolus; T = tegulum.)

Fig. 13. Female left tarsus IV in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 13. Female left tarsus IV, setae and sensilla. A–D. Amaurobioides africana Hewitt, retrolateral claw tuft shaved (South Africa, Western Cape, Kommetjie). A. Tarsus, dorsal view. B. Same, distal view. C. Same, retrolateral view. D. Same, trichobothria. E–G. Gayenna americana Nicolet (Talca, Alto de Vilches). E. Tarsal organ. F. Trichobothria. G. Claw tuft.

Fig. 16 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 16. Gayenna americana Nicolet, female spinnerets (Talca, Alto de Vilches). A. Spinnerets. B. Right anterior lateral spinneret. C. Right posterior median spinneret. D. Same, internal view. E. Right posterior lateral spinneret. (Ac = aciniform gland spigot; mAmp = minor ampullate gland spigot; MAmp = major ampullate gland spigot; Pi = piriform gland spigot.)

Fig. 19 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 19. Amaurobioides chilensis (Nicolet), Elqui, Cruz Grande. A. Habitat. B. Female retreat. C. Female. (Photos MJR 1324–1326.)

Fig. 12 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 12. Gayenna americana Nicolet, left mouthparts (Talca, Alto de Vilches). A. Chelicera, posterior view, inset to cheliceral gland. B. Maxilla, inset to sieve plate. C. Palpal tarsus.

Fig. 4 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 4. Mean fit*100 in PeeWee, for character systems (character numbers in parentheses). Constant of concavity K = 6.

Fig. 26. Aysenoides colecole, n in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 26. Aysenoides colecole, n. sp., male copulatory bulb (Chiloe´, MACNAr 9810). A, B. Prolateral view. C, D. Apical view. (White arrows point to loop of sperm duct dorsal to secondary conductor, black arrows to loop dorsal to median apophysis. C1 = primary conductor; C2 = secondary conductor; E = embolus; MA = median apophysis; PBE = process on base of embolus; PMA = paramedian apophysis.)

Fig. 24. Aysenia cylindrica, n in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 24. Aysenia cylindrica, n. sp. A. Male (holotype). B. Same, palp, ventral view. C. Same, retrolateral view. D. Same, chelicera, ventral view. E. Female left leg I, ventralprolateral view: arrow points to spine v xp1 x displaced prolaterally (paratype). F. Same, epigyne, ventral view. G. Same, cleared. Scale bars = A, 1 mm; B–D, F, G, 0.2 mm; E, 0.5 mm.

Fig. 23. Aysenia segestrioides, n in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 23. Aysenia segestrioides, n. sp., male holotype, female from Valdivia (AMNH). A. Male. B. Male palp, ventral view. C. Same, detail retrolateralventral. D. Epigyne, ventral view. E. Cleared epigyne, dorsal view. F. Female. G. Female chelicera, ventral view. Scale bars = A, F, 1 mm; B–E, 0.2 mm; G, 0.5 mm. (FD = fertilization duct.)

Fig. 32 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 32. Acanthoceto spp., male copulatory bulb, detail apical, ventral view. A. A. cinerea (Tullgren). B. A. acupicta (Nicolet). (C1 = primary conductor, * = apical portion of C1 contiguous to MA; C2 = secondary conductor; E = embolus; MA = median apophysis; PMA = paramedian apophysis.)

Fig. 6 in The Spider Subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): A Phylogenetic Revision At The Generic Level

Fig. 6. Support for groups expressed as Bremer support in terms of fit (top) and SCG (bottom). Bremer support values ±1.8 are exact. SCG based on 1000 pseudoreplicates.

Fig. 361 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 361. Scanning electron micrographs of the pupa of Dioptis longipennis. A, curled setae on dorsum of A8; B, straight setae on dorsum of A9; C, close-up of curled setae on dorsum of A8; D, a single seta on A8.

Fig. 350 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 350. Genitalia of Scea cleonica (³ JSM-358, ♀ JSM-359). A, ³ genitalia; B, ³ Tg8; C, aedeagus; D, ³ St8; E, ♀ genitalia (illustration by A. Trabka).

Fig. 359 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 359. Scanning electron micrographs of final instar larvae of Polypoetes copiosa and Erbessa avara. A, segments A8–A10 of P. copiosa genitalia; B, anal proleg of P. copiosa, lateral view; C, primary seta near base of anal proleg in P. copiosa; D, mesothoracic leg of E. avara in mesal view, showing specialized setae at base of claw.

Fig. 351 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 351. Genitalia of Scea dimidiata (³ JSM-224, ♀ JSM-1350). A, ³ genitalia; B, ³ Tg8; C, ³ St8; D, aedeagus; E, ♀ genitalia (illustration by A. Trabka).

Fig. 360 in Generic Revision Of The Dioptinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuoidea: Notodontidae) Part 2: Josiini

Fig. 360. Scanning electron micrographs of dioptine pupae. A, head of Scotura leucophleps in dorsal view (distal at top), showing processes; B, curved seta on abdominal dorsum of S. leucophleps; C, terminal abdominal segments of Ephialtias draconis, anterior at left; D, cremaster of E. draconis; E, terminal segments of Dioptis longipennis; F, cremaster of D. longipennis.