Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
30,948
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
30,948 results for “Profile”
Data set: Can ocean community production and respiration be determined by measuring high-frequency oxygen profiles from autonomous floats?
<p>Relevant autonomous float data for <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4119-2020">Gordon et al. (2020)</a>. Following a similar structure to the Argo network's "synthetic" profile files, one file per float is produced with all relevant variables (temperature, salinity, chlorophyll, backscatter, dissolved oxygen) on a common depth and time grid. The Electro-Magnetic Autonomous Profiling Explorer (EM-APEX) floats were deployed in the northern Gulf of Mexico in May 2017 - see <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/CWTM43797.2019.8955168">Shay et al. (2019)</a> for more information. </p> <p>The data published here contains a timestamp for each data point. Another version of this data which contains some additional variables is hosted on <a href="https://data.gulfresearchinitiative.org/data/R5.x275.281:0001">GRIIDC</a>, but does not contain a timestamp for each data point, but rather for each profile. </p>
Developing a deep Learning network to retrieve ocean hydrographic profiles in the North Atlantic from combined satellite and in situ measurements: test datasets.
<p>We provide here the datasets used for the test and assessment of a deep learning algorithm which is presently candidate for the development of a daily 3D ocean product covering the North Atlantic at 1/10° resolution, over the 2010-2018 period, as part of the European Space Agency World Ocean Circulation project (ESA-WOC). The method is based on a stacked Long Short-Term Memory neural network, coupled to a Monte-Carlo dropout approach, and allows to project satellite-derived sea surface temperature, sea surface salinity and absolute dynamic topography data at depth after training with sparse co-located in situ vertical hydrographic profiles (Buongiorno Nardelli, 2020, doi:<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.3390%2Frs12193151?_sg%5B0%5D=0xE-347r7Hvb80klJcEo811AhUiXq-twG_E6l4yB-BfIKkVtW-lVLGcO02mTFkUczvozYYI0WCPyUBFR3kzWNGGZKg.ftvLheFrzHIJriO4qW2bdxalvR_TWt3MpwUfvto3EemhRgvDRGwJ9Mdy4Xr0IcGCfICivf4j-VqTgKxVvXRogA">10.3390/rs12193151</a>). </p> <p>The test dataset presented here includes different sets of co-located temperature and salinity vertical profiles: </p> <ul> <li>in situ observations extracted from the quality controlled Argo and CTD profiles produced by Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service CORA 5.2 (<a href="http://marine.copernicus.eu/services-portfolio/access-to-products/">http://marine.copernicus.eu/services-portfolio/access-to-products/</a>, product_id: INSITU_GLO_TS_REP_OBSERVATIONS_013_001_b, doi: 10.17882/46219TS1, Szekely et al., 2019) and interpolated through a spline on a regularly spaced vertical grid (with 10 m intervals);</li> <li>climatological profiles extracted from World Ocean Atlas 2013 optimally interpolated monthly fields (Locarnini et al., 2013; Zweng et al., 2013), interpolated through a spline on a regularly spaced vertical grid (with 10 m intervals), upsized to a 1/10° horizontal grid through a cubic spline and linearly interpolated in time between the central day of each month;</li> <li>synthetic profiles obtained through three different techniques: multivariate EOF reconstruction, a 2 layer feed-forward network (with 1000 units in each hidden layer) and a stacked LSTM network (with 2 LSTM layers and 35 hidden units)</li> </ul> <p><em>References:</em></p> <p>Buongiorno Nardelli, B.: A Deep Learning network to retrieve ocean hydrographic profiles from combined satellite and in situ measurements, 2020, <em>submitted</em>.</p> <p>Locarnini, R. A., Mishonov, A. V., Antonov, J. I., Boyer, T. P., Garcia, H. E., Baranova, O. K., Zweng, M. M., Paver, C. R., Reagan, J. R., Johnson, D. R., Hamilton, M. and Seidov, D.: World Ocean Atlas 2013. Vol. 1: Temperature., S. Levitus, Ed.; A. Mishonov, Tech. Ed.; NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 73(September), 40, doi:10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442, 2013.</p> <p>Szekely, T., Gourrion, J., Pouliquen, S. and Reverdin, G.: The CORA 5.2 dataset for global in situ temperature and salinity measurements: Data description and validation, Ocean Sci., 15(6), 1601–1614, doi:10.5194/os-15-1601-2019, 2019.</p> <p>Zweng, M. M., Reagan, J. R., Antonov, J. I., Mishonov, A. V., Boyer, T. P., Garcia, H. E., Baranova, O. K., Johnson, D. R., Seidov, D. and Bidlle, M. M.: World Ocean Atlas 2013, Volume 2: Salinity, NOAA Atlas NESDIS, 119(1), 227–237, doi:10.1182/blood-2011-06-357442, 2013.</p> <p> </p>
GIIRS RTTOV coefficient file using local training profiles
<p>GIIRS RTTOV coefficient file using local training profiles </p> <p>Reference:</p> <p>Di, D., Jun Li, Han Wei, W. Bai, C. Wu, and W. Paul Menzel, 2018: Enhancing the fast radiative transfer model for FengYun-4 GIIRS by using local training profiles, <em>Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres</em>, DOI: 10.1029/2018JD029089.</p>
RECODE_DS19.Toxicological profile of calcium carbonate nanoparticles for industrial applications
<p>The documentation will include: for the <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo </em>studies all the data acquired after the exposure of cells or zebrafish to the nano-sized CaCO3 particles.</p>
OMPS-NPP L2 LP USask Aerosol Extinction Vertical Profile swath daily V1.1
<p>The USask OMPS-LP L2 2D Aerosol v1.1 product provides stratospheric aerosol extinction retrievals performed at the University of Saskatchewan for the central slit of the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite Limb Profiler (OMPS-LP) instrument on the Suomi-NPP satellite. The two-dimensional retrieval algorithm accounts for variation in the along orbital track dimension, retrieving an entire orbit simultaneously instead of treating each image independently. Stratospheric aerosol is retrieved from approximately the thermal tropopause to 30 km on a 1 km grid with a vertical resolution of approximately 2 km, and is assumed to be sulfate aerosol following a log-normal particle size distribution.</p> <p>Each granule contains data from the daylight portion of each orbit measured for a full month. Spatial coverage is global (-82 to +82 degrees latitude), and there are about 14.5 orbits per day, each has typically 160 profiles with an along orbital track sampling of 125 km. The files are written using NetCDF4.</p>
CTD Profiles from the R/V Sanna cruise to Northwest Greenland fjords, August 11-31, 2016
<p>Greenland fjords are the gateway connecting the Greenland Ice Sheet to the coastal ocean. The rapidly increasing discharge of meltwater and ice from the Greenland Ice Sheet has complex hydrodynamic and biogeochemically impacts on the coastal marine ecosystem around Greenland, although data is still limited for most fjord systems. Therefore, six different fjord systems in Northwest Greenland were investigated in August 2016 during an interdisciplinary research cruise aboard the R/V Sanna that On aimed to describe the physical, chemical and biological variability from glaciers to the shelf. This data set consists of 55 CTD profiles that were obtained with a Seabird 19plusV2 conductivity, temperature, depth CTD) instrument. In addition to measuring pressure, conductivity, and temperature, the CTD recorded chlorophyll-a fluorescence, photosynthetically available radiation (PAR), and dissolved oxygen. The instrument was factory calibrated before the cruise. The CTD recorded all variables at 4 Hz and the raw data were processed using Seabird standard workflow to produce 0.5 m binned profiles using the downcast data only. This dataset compiles all CTD variables measured from all profiles into a single netCDF file. </p> <p>We would like to thank the captain and crew of R/V Sanna for excellent collaboration. The cruise was funded by the Danish Center for Marine Research and by the EU Horizon2020 funded project INTAROS.</p>
Longitudinal high-throughput TCR repertoire profiling reveals the dynamics of T cell memory formation after mild COVID-19 infection
<p>Processed TCRbeta and TCRalpha repertoires after mild COVID-19 (Version 2.0: day 85 timepoints added) infection, see preprint: <a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.18.100545v3">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.18.100545v3</a></p> <p>and GitHub repository: <a href="https://github.com/pogorely/Minervina_COVID">https://github.com/pogorely/Minervina_COVID</a></p> <p>Two donors (M and W), two biological replicates of PBMC (F1 and F2), CD4+, CD8+, and Memory subpopulations for each post-infection time points (day 15, 30, 37, 45, 85 post-infection), and pre-infection PBMC repertoires sampled in 2019 and 2018. </p>
Axisymmetric models for neutron star merger remnants with realistic thermal and rotational profiles: dataset
<p>Dataset containing the results of the parameter space exploration of binary neutron star merger remnants and 12 selected models:<br> * `search_results.dat` contains the parameters and properties of the successful results of the study.<br> * `model_*.log` are the logs with settings, parameters, and properties of the selected models.<br> * `model_*.out` are the profiles of the selected models in binary format.<br> * `XNS_reader.py` is a python script to read the binary format, convert it to text, and compute some derived and global quantities. EDIT 2022-05-30: the output file in binary format does contain the profiles of temperature and entropy per baryon, but those are not outputted in the converted text file. You can manually modify the python script in order to output these profiles too.<br> * `properties.csv` is a summary of the parameters and properties of the selected models.<br> <br> This dataset has been obtained with the stationary code XNS in General Relativity with the Conformal Flatness Approximation [Bucciantini and Del Zanna 2011; Pili et al. 2014; Camelio et al. 2018 and 2019].<br> The EOS is implemented as a cold piecewise polytrope [Read et al. 2009] plus a thermal gamma law.<br> The models have been selected between those obtained in the parameter space exploration.<br> For details see the companion paper [Camelio et al. 2021, PRD 103:063014].<br> <br> If you use this dataset, please cite its Zenodo DOI and the companion paper [Camelio et al. 2021, PRD 103:063014].</p> <p>EDIT 2022-05-30: an updated version of the code that has been used to produce this dataset is now on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6594069).<br> This updated version is called ASWNS code, and it does not contain the model of binary neutron star merger remnant used for this dataset, but an older version of the model of nonbarotropic neutron star (from Camelio et al. 2019).<br> You can implement any neutron star model on top of ASWNS, as shown in the examples provided with ASWNS.</p>
Soil profile, climatic, physiographic, overstory and understory data in mixed and monospecific plots of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus pinaster in Spain
<p>This dataset provides valuable environmental information about a triplets’ essay of Scots pine and Maritime pine in Spain. The data characterizes the soil profile (physicochemical parameters of organic and mineral horizons), climate, physiography, understory and overstory.</p> <p>The essay, located in North-Central Spain, consists of eighteen forest plots divided in six triplets. Each triplet includes three circular plots of 15 m-radius located less than 1 km from each other: two monospecific plots dominated by <em>P. sylvestris</em> or <em>P. pinaster</em>, and one mixed plot of both species. In each plot, one pit up to 50 cm depth, one 15 m-radius overstory features inventory and ten understory 1x1 m inventories were carried out. Additionally, physiographic and climatic variables were collected per plot.</p> <p>The file contains information about the 218 environmental variables studied in the eighteen forest plots.</p> <p>Triplet: Triplet to which the plot belongs(1: Triplet 1; 2: Triplet 2; 3: Triplet 3; 4: Triplet 4; 5: Triplet 5; 6: Triplet 6).</p> <p>Stand_type: Type of stand (PS: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L.; PP: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait.; MM: mixed stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L.and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait.).</p> <p>Plot: Plot identification (PS01: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. of triplet 1; PS02: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. of triplet 2; PS03: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. of triplet 3; PS04: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. of triplet 4; PS05: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. of triplet 5; PS06: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. of triplet 6; MM01: mixed stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L.and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 1; MM02: mixed stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris </em>L.and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 2; MM03: mixed stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L.and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 3; MM04: mixed stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L.and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 4; MM05: mixed stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris </em>L.and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 5; MM06: mixed stand of <em>Pinus sylvestris </em>L.and <em>Pinus pinaster Ait</em>. of triplet 6; PP01: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 1; PP02: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 2; PP03: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus pinaster </em>Ait. of triplet 3; PP04: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 4; PP05: monospecific stand of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. of triplet 5; PP06: monospecific stand of<em> Pinus pinaster </em>Ait. of triplet 6).</p> <p>Lat: Plot latitude in degrees.</p> <p>Long: Plot longitude in degrees.</p> <p>Province: Province to which the plot belongs (B: Province of Burgos; Sp: Province of Soria).</p> <p>Municipality: Municipality to which the plot belongs (M: Town of Mamolar; HP: Town of Hontoria del Pinar; N: Town of Navaleno; St: Town of Soria; CP: Town of Cabrejas del Pinar).</p> <p>Forest: Name of the forest where is located the plot (MB: Mata Blanca; MR: Mata Robledo; FP: Fuente del Pardo; PM: Pajar de la molinera; MP: Mojon Pardo; CM: Cueva de Matarubias).</p> <p>Alti: Plot elevation above sea level in m a.s.l.</p> <p>Slope: Slope (gradient) of the plot in percentage.</p> <p>Ori: Plot orientation in degrees.</p> <p>Clim: Climate classification according to Köppen classification (1936) (Cfb: Temperate without a dry season and temperate summer climate; Csb: Temperate with dry summer climate).</p> <p>XR: Accumulated rainfall in one year according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>JR: January rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ mm</p> <p>FR: February rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>MR: March rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>AR: April rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>MyR: May rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>JnR: June rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>JlR: July rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>AgR: August rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>SR: September rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>OR: October rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>NR: November rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>DR: December rainfall according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in mm.</p> <p>XT: Anual mean temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>JT: January temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>FT: February temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>MT: March temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>AT: April temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>MyT: May temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>JnT: June temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>JlT: July temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>AgT: August temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>ST: September temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>OT: October temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>NT: November temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>DT: December temperature according to ‘Atlas Agroclimático de Castilla y León-ITACYL-AEMET’ in ºC.</p> <p>Par_mat: Soil parental material according to Spanish Geological Map on a 1M scale. (IGME , 2015) (SM: Sandstones and Marls).</p> <p>Geo_age: Geological age of plot according to Spanish Geological Map on a 1M scale. (IGME, 2015) (Mz: Mesozoic age).</p> <p>Soil: Soil type according to Soil-Survey-Staff (2014) (TpDx: Typic Dystroxerept; TpHx:: Typic Humixerept; AqHx:: Aquic humixerept)</p> <p>Litter_B: Total Leaf Litter Biomass in Mg/ha.</p> <p>FF_Th: Forest floor Thickness in cm.</p> <p>Fs: Percentage of Fresh to Total Leaf Litter in %.</p> <p>Fr: Percentage of Fragmented to Total Leaf Litter in %.</p> <p>Hm: Percentage of Humified to Total Leaf Litter in %.</p> <p>GH1: Fist genetic soil horizon according to Soil Survey-Staff (2014) (Ah: Mineral horizon with accumulation of organic matter. This horizon is formed at the soil surface or below an O horizon).</p> <p>GH2: Second genetic soil horizon according to Soil Survey-Staff (2014) (AB: Transition horizon between A and B. A is a mineral horizon formed at the surface or below an O horizon, B is a subsurface horizon in which the structure of the rock is obliterated; AC: Transition horizon between A and C. A is a mineral horizon formed at the surface or below an O horizon; C is a mineral horizon, excluding hard bedrock, that is little affected by pedogenetic processes; Bw: Mineral B horizon where the development of color or structure are its more important diagnostic characteristics).</p> <p>GH3: Third genetic soil horizon according to Soil Survey-Staff (2014) (Bw: Mineral B horizon where the development of color or structure are its more important diagnostic characteristics; C: Mineral horizon, excluding hard bedrock, that is little affected by pedogenetic processes; Cg: Mineral horizon in which a distinct pattern of mottling occurs that reflects alternating conditions of oxidation and reduction of sesquioxides, caused by seasonal surface waterlogging).</p> <p>Th_H1: Thickness of the first soil horizon in cm.</p> <p>Th_H2: Thickness of the second soil horizon in cm.</p> <p>Th_H3: Thickness of the third soil horizon in cm.</p> <p>moistCol_H1: Wet matrix color (Hue Value/Chroma) of the first soil horizon according to Munsell soil color chards (10YR2/1: black; 10YR2/2: very dark brown; 10YR3/1: very dark grey; 10YR3/2: very dark greyish brown; 10YR4/1: dark grey; 10YR6/3: pale brown).</p> <p>moistCol_H2: Wet matrix colour (Hue Value/Chroma) of the second soil horizon according to Munsell soil color chards (5YR5/8: yellowish red; 7.5YR4/6: strong brown; 10YR3/2: very dark greyish brown; 10YR4/1: dark grey; 10YR4/2: dark greyish brown; 10YR4/4: dark yellowish brown with chroma 4; 10YR4/6: dark yellowish brown with chroma 6; 10YR5/3: brown; 10YR5/4: yellowish brown with chroma 4; 10YR5/6: yellowish brown with chroma 6; 10YR5/8: yellowish brown with chroma 8; 10YR6/4: light yellowish brown; 10YR6/6: brownish yellow).</p> <p>moistCol_H3: Wet matrix colour (Hue Value/Chroma) of the third soil horizon according to Munsell soil color chards (5YR4/6: yellowish red; 10YR4/4: dark yellowish brown with chroma 4; 10YR4/6: dark yellowish brown with chroma 6; 10YR5/8: yellowish brown; 10YR6/1: grey).</p> <p>dryCol_H1:Dry matrix color (Hue Value/Chroma) of the first soil horizon according to Munsell soil color chards (10YR4/1: dark grey; 10YR4/2: dark greyish brown; 10YR5/1: grey with value 5; 10YR5/2: greyish brown; 10YR5/3: brown; 10YR6/1: grey with value 6; 10YR6/2: light yellowish brown; 10YR7/2: light grey).</p> <p>dryCol_H2: Dry matrix color (Hue Value/Chroma) of the second soil horizon according to Munsell soil color chards (7.5YR6/6: redish brown; 10YR4/1: dark grey; 10YR6/1: grey with value 6; 10YR6/2: light yellowish brown with chroma 2; 10YR6/3: pale brown; 10YR6/4: light yellowish brown with chroma 4; 10YR6/6: brownish yellow; 10YR7/3: very pale brown with value 7 and choma 3; 10YR7/4: very pale brown withvalue 7 and choma 4; 10YR8/4: very pale brown with value 8 and choma 4).</p> <p>dryCol_H3: Dry matrix color (Hue Value/Chroma) of the third soil horizon according to Munsell soil color chards (5YR5/6: yellowish red; 7.5YR5/6: strong brown; 10YR6/4: light yellowish brown; 10YR6/6: brownish yellow; 10YR7/4: very pale brown; 10YR8/1: white).</p> <p>Sand_H1: Percentage of sand of the first soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Sand_H2: Percentage of sand of the second soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Sand_H3: Percentage of sand of the third soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Silt_H1: Percentage of silt of the first soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Silt_H2: Percentage of silt of the second soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Silt_H3: Percentage of silt of the third soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Clay_H1: Percentage of clay of the first soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Clay_H2: Percentage of clay of the second soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Clay_H3: Percentage of clay of the third soil horizon determined by the pipette method (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Tex_H1: Textural class of the first soil horizon according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) (SL: Sandy Loam; L: Loam).</p> <p>Tex_H2: Textural class of the second soil horizon according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) (SL: Sandy Loam; L: Loam).</p> <p>Tex_H3: Textural class of the third soil horizon according to Soil Survey Staff (2014) (SL: Sandy Loam; L: Loam; CL: Clay loam; C: Clay).</p> <p>Stones_H1: Coarse soil material (> 2 mm) of the first soil horizon in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Stones_H2: Coarse soil material (> 2 mm) of the second soil horizon in % weight/weight.</p> <p>Stones_H3: Coarse soil material (> 2 mm) of the third soil horizon in % weight/weight.</p> <p>bD_H1: Bulk density of the first soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in g/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p> <p>bD_H2: Bulk density of the second soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in g/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p> <p>bD_H3: Bulk density of the third soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in g/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p> <p>pD_H1: Particle density of the first soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in g/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p> <p>pD_H2: Particle density of the second soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in g/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p> <p>pD_H3: Particle density of the third soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in g/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p> <p>Poro_H1: Porosity of the first soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in % vol/vol.</p> <p>Poro_H2: Porosity of the second soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in % vol/vol.</p> <p>Poro_H3: Porosity of the third soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in % vol/vol.</p> <p>pH_H1: pH (1:2.5 H2O) of the first soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002)</p> <p>pH_H2: pH (1:2.5 H2O) of the second soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002)</p> <p>pH_H3: pH (1:2.5 H2O) of the third soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002)</p> <p>EC_H1: Electrical conductivity of the first soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in dS/m.</p> <p>EC_H2: Electrical conductivity of the second soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in dS/m.</p> <p>EC_H3: Electrical conductivity of the third soil horizon according to (Van-Reeuwijk 2002) in dS/m.</p> <p>avP_H1: Available phosphorus of the first soil horizon according to Olsen and Sommers (1982) in mg/kg.</p> <p>avP_H2: Available phosphorus of the second soil horizon according to Olsen and Sommers (1982) in mg/kg.</p> <p>avP_H3: Available phosphorus of the third soil horizon according to Olsen and Sommers (1982) in mg/kg.</p> <p>avPstock_H1: Available phosphorus stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>avPstock_H2: Available phosphorus stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>avPstock_H3: Available phosphorus stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>avPstock_50: Available phosphorus stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>TN_Fs: Total nitrogen of the fresh forest floor analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg</p> <p>TN_Fg: Total nitrogen of the fragmented forest floor analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg</p> <p>TN_Hm: Total nitrogen of the humified forest floor analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg</p> <p>TN_H1: Total nitrogen of the first soil horizon analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg.</p> <p>TN_H2: Total nitrogen of the second soil horizon analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg.</p> <p>TN_H3: Total nitrogen of the third soil horizon analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg.</p> <p>TNstock_H1: Total nitrogen stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>TNstock_H2: Total nitrogen stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>TNstock_H3: Total nitrogen stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>TNstock_50: Total nitrogen stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>TOC_Fs: Total organic carbon of the fresh forest floor analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg</p> <p>TOC_Fg: Total organic carbon of the fragmented forest floor analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg</p> <p>TOC_Hm: Total organic carbon of the humified forest floor analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg</p> <p>TOC_H1: Total organic carbon of the first soil horizon analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg.</p> <p>TOC_H2: Total organic carbon of the second soil horizon analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg.</p> <p>TOC_H3: Total organic carbon of the third soil horizon analyzed with a LECO-CHN 2000 elemental analyzer in g/kg.</p> <p>TOCstock_H1:Total organic carbon stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>TOCstock_H2: Total organic carbon stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>TOCstock_H3: Total organic carbon stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>TOCstock_50: Total organic carbon stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>C/N_Fs: Ratio of total organic carbon to total nitrogen of the fresh forest floor </p> <p>C/N_Fg: Ratio of total organic carbon to total nitrogen of the fragmented forest floor </p> <p>C/N_Hm: Ratio of total organic carbon to total nitrogen of the humified forest floor </p> <p>C/N_H1: Ratio of total organic carbon to total nitrogen of the first soil horizon</p> <p>C/N_H2: Ratio of total organic carbon to total nitrogen of the second soil horizon</p> <p>C/N_H3: Ratio of total organic carbon to total nitrogen of the third soil horizon</p> <p>OxC_H1: Easily oxidizable carbon of the first soil horizon according to Walkley (1947) in mg/kg.</p> <p>OxC_H2: Easily oxidizable carbon of the second soil horizon according to Walkley (1947) in mg/kg.</p> <p>OxC_H3: Easily oxidizable carbon of the third soil horizon according to Walkley (1947) in mg/kg.</p> <p>OxCstock_H1: Easily oxidizable carbon stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>OxCstock_H2: Easily oxidizable carbon stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>OxCstock_H3: Easily oxidizable carbon stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>OxCstock_50: Easily oxidizable carbon stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>CEC_H1: Cation exchange capacity of the first soil horizon according to Mehlich (1953) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>CEC_H2: Cation exchange capacity of the second soil horizon according to Mehlich (1953) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>CEC_H3: Cation exchange capacity of the third soil horizon according to Mehlich (1953) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Na<sup>+</sup>_H1: Exchangeable sodium of the first soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Na<sup>+</sup>_H2: Exchangeable sodium of the second soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Na<sup>+</sup>_H3: Exchangeable sodium of the third soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Na<sup>+</sup>stock_H1: Exchangeable sodium stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Na<sup>+</sup>stock_H2: Exchangeable sodium stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Na<sup>+</sup>stock_H3: Exchangeable sodium stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Na<sup>+</sup>stock_50: Exchangeable sodium stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>K<sup>+</sup>_H1: Exchangeable potassium of the first soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>K<sup>+</sup>_H2: Exchangeable potassium of the second soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>K<sup>+</sup>_H3: Exchangeable potassium of the third soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>K<sup>+</sup>stock_H1: Exchangeable potassium stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>K<sup>+</sup>stock_H2: Exchangeable potassium stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>K<sup>+</sup>stock_H3: Exchangeable potassium stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>K<sup>+</sup>stock_50: Exchangeable potassium stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Ca<sup>+2</sup>_H1: Exchangeable calcium of the first soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Ca<sup>+2</sup>_H2: Exchangeable calcium of the second soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Ca<sup>+2</sup>_H3: Exchangeable calcium of the third soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Ca<sup>+2</sup>stock_H1: Exchangeable calcium stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Ca<sup>+2</sup>stock_H2: Exchangeable calcium stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Ca<sup>+2</sup>stock_H3: Exchangeable calcium stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Ca<sup>+2</sup>stock_50: Exchangeable calcium stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Mg<sup>+2</sup>_H1: Exchangeable magnesium of the first soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Mg<sup>+2</sup>_H2: Exchangeable magnesium of the second soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Mg<sup>+2</sup>_H3: Exchangeable magnesium of the third soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>Mg<sup>+2</sup>stock_H1: Exchangeable magnesium stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Mg<sup>+2</sup>stock_H2: Exchangeable magnesium stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Mg<sup>+2</sup>stock_H3: Exchangeable magnesium stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>Mg<sup>+2</sup>stock_50: Exchangeable magnesium stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>SB_H1: Sum of bases of the first soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>SB_H2: Sum of bases of the second soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>SB_H3: Sum of bases of the third soil horizon by means of extracting with 1N ammonium acetate (pH=7) (Schollenberger and Simon 1945) in cmol<sub>+</sub>/kg.</p> <p>SBstock_H1: Sum of bases stock of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>SBstock_H2: Sum of bases stock of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>SBstock_H3: Sum of bases stock of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>SBstock_50: Sum of bases stock of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in Mg/ha.</p> <p>FC_H1: Field capacity of the first soil horizon according to Van-Reeuwijk (2002) in %.</p> <p>FC_H2: Field capacity of the second soil horizon according to Van-Reeuwijk (2002) in %.</p> <p>FC_H3: Field capacity of the third soil horizon according to Van-Reeuwijk (2002)) in %.</p> <p>PWP_H1: Permanent wilting point of the first soil horizon according to Van-Reeuwijk (2002) in %.</p> <p>PWP_H2: Permanent wilting point of the second soil horizon according to Van-Reeuwijk (2002) in %. </p> <p>PWP_H3: Permanent wilting point of the third soil horizon according to Van-Reeuwijk (2002) in %.</p> <p>AW_H1: Available water of the first soil horizon according to Van-Reeuwijk (2002) in %.</p> <p>AW_H2: Available water of the second soil horizon according to MAPA (1994) in %.</p> <p>AW_H3: Available water of the third soil horizon according to Van-Reeuwijk (2002) in %.</p> <p>WHC_H1: Water holding capacity of the first soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in g/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p> <p>WHC_H2: Water holding capacity of the second soil horizon according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in g/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p> <p>WHC_H3: Water holding capacity of the third soil horizon up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in g/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p> <p>WHC_50: Water holding capacity of whole soil profile up to 50 cm depth according to López-Marcos et al. (2019) in g/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p> <p>Pot_veg: Potential vegetation according to Rivas-Martínez (1987) (LfQp: <em>Luzulo forsteri-Querceto pyrenaicae </em>S.; FhQp: <em>Festuco heterophyllae-Querceto pyrenaicae</em> S.; Jht: <em>Junipereto hemisphaerico-thuriferae</em> S.).</p> <p>Cur_veg: Current vegetation according to WMS service of MAPAMA(<a href="http://wms.mapama.es/sig/Biodiversidad">http://wms.mapama.es/sig/Biodiversidad</a>) (ps: <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L.; pp: <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait.; pi: <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait.).</p> <p>NT: Stems per hectare of both <em>Pinus </em>species (<em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait.) in trees/ha.</p> <p>NPs: Stems per hectare of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. in trees/ha.</p> <p>NPp: Stems per hectare of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. in trees/ha.</p> <p>GT: Basal area per hectare of both <em>Pinus</em> species (<em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait.) in m<sup>2</sup>/ha.</p> <p>GPs: Basal area per hectare of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. in m<sup>2</sup>/ha.</p> <p>GPp: Basal area per hectare of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. in m<sup>2</sup>/ha.</p> <p>%PS: Percentage of basal area of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. from total basal area</p> <p>%PP: Percentage of basal area of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. from total basal area</p> <p>dgT: Quadratic mean diameter of both <em>Pinus </em>species (<em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait.) in cm.</p> <p>dgPs: Quadratic mean diameter of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. in cm.</p> <p>dgPp: Quadratic mean diameter of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. in cm.</p> <p>HoT: Dominant height of both <em>Pinus</em> species (<em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. and <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait.) in cm.</p> <p>HoPs: Dominant height of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. in m.</p> <p>HoPp: Dominant height of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. in m.</p> <p>AgePs: Normal age of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. in years.</p> <p>AgePp: Normal age of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. In years.</p> <p>SIPs: Site index of <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. related at age 100 for total plot according to Rojo and Montero (1999)</p> <p>SIPp: Site index of <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Ait. related at age 100 for total plot according to Bravo-Oviedo et al. (2007)</p> <p>Litter_cov: Cover of leaf litter in %.</p> <p>Vasc: Cover of understory vascular plants in %.</p> <p>Bryo: Cover of understory bryophytes in %.</p> <p>Under_sp: More abundant specie of understory vegetation (Aica: <em>Aira caryophyllea</em> L.; Aruv: <em>Arctostaphylos uva-ursi</em> (L.) Spreng.; Cavu: <em>Calluna vulgaris</em> (L.) Hull; Erar: <em>Erica arborea </em>L.; Erau: <em>Erica australis</em> L.; Pipi: <em>Pinus pinaster</em> Aiton. (seedlings/saplings); Pisy: <em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L. (seedlings/saplings; Ptaq: <em>Pteridium aquilinum</em> (L.) Kuhn)</p> <p>Aqu: Understory cover of family Aquifoliaceae in %.</p> <p>Aste: Understory cover of family Asteraceae in %.</p> <p>Cari: Understory cover of family Cariophyllaceae in %.</p> <p>Cist: Understory cover of family Cistaceae in %.</p> <p>Cupr: Understory cover of family Cupresaceae in %.</p> <p>Eric: Understory cover of family Ericaceae in %.</p> <p>Faba: Understory cover of family Fabaceae in %.</p> <p>Faga: Understory cover of family Fagaceae in %.</p> <p>Junc: Understory cover of family Juncaceae in %.</p> <p>Lili: Understory cover of family Liliaceae in %.</p> <p>Pina: Understory cover of family Pinaceae in %.</p> <p>Poac: Understory cover of family Poaceae in %.</p> <p>Poli: Understory cover of family Poligalaceae in %.</p> <p>Rosa: Understory cover of family Rosaceae in %.</p> <p>Rubi: Understory cover of family Rubiaceae in %.</p> <p>Scro: Understory cover of family Scrofulariaceae in %.</p> <p>Viol: Understory cover of family Violaceae in %.</p> <p>Xant: Understory cover of family Xanthorrhoeaceae in %.</p>
Data and materials from: "Towards Auditory Profile-based Hearing-aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation"
<p>This repository contains materials and data used and described in:</p> <p><strong>Sanchez-Lopez, R., Fereczkowski, M., Santurette, S., Dau, T., Neher, T. (2021). Towards Auditory Profile-based Hearing-aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation. <em>Audiol. Res.</em> 11, no. 1: 10-21. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11010002 ">https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11010002 </a></strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Abstract</strong></p> <p><strong>Background</strong> - The clinical characterization of hearing deficits for hearing-aid fitting purposes is typically based on the pure-tone audiogram only. In a previous study, a group of hearing-impaired listeners completed a comprehensive test battery designed to tap into different dimensions of hearing abilities. A data-driven analysis of the data yielded four clinically relevant patient subpopulations or “auditory profiles”. The purpose of the current study was to propose and pilot-test profile-based hearing-aid settings to explore their potential for providing more targeted hearing-aid treatment.<br> <strong>Methods </strong>- Four candidate hearing-aid settings were developed and evaluated by a subset of the participants tested previously. The evaluation consisted of multi-comparison preference ratings carried out in realistic sound scenarios.<br> <strong>Results </strong>- Listeners belonging to the different auditory profiles showed different patterns of preference for the tested hearing-aid settings that were largely consistent with the expectations.<br> <strong>Conclusion</strong> - The results of this pilot evaluation support further investigations into stratified, profile-based hearing-aid fitting with wearable hearing aids.</p> <p>Please cite this article when using the data</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Description of the files:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>APBHAF_Audiofiles.zip: </strong>Audio files used in the SenseLabOnline environment. Each folder corresponds to one participant.</li> <li><strong>APBHAF_MUSHA.xlsx: </strong>Raw Data of the MUSHA experiment.</li> <li><strong>APBHAF_MUSHA_Analysis.R: </strong>R code for the data analysis.</li> <li><strong>MUS_SoundScenes.mat</strong>: Mat file with a structure 1x9 MUS with the raw acoustic signals before processing with the hearing-aid simulator. <ul> <li>CurrentMixture: matrix consisting of the simulated acoustic signal recorded by the 4 microphones of the hearing-aid satellites: 1) front-left, 2) back-left, 3) front-right, 4) back-right.</li> <li>CurrentAnchor: matrix consisting of the simulated acoustic signal recorded by the 4 microphones of the hearing-aid satellites: 1) front-left, 2) back-left, 3) front-right, 4) back-right. The Anchor is -6 dB SNR.</li> <li>SampleLabel: Either "Kantine", "Traffic" or "Quiet"</li> <li>ConditionLabel: Either "Cond1", "Cond2" or "Cond3"</li> <li>fsmix: sampling frequency. For all signals must be 32000Hz</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>MUSHA_Instruction: </strong>Instructions used for explaining the task and the environment.</li> </ul> <p>* The participant IDs in each of the files has been assigned randomly to ensure the anonymization of the data. The pseudo-anonymized data might be shared under request by direct correspondence with the authors.</p>
Modeling the metabolic profile of Mytilus edulis reveals molecular signatures linked to gonadal development, sex and environmental site
<p>Metabolomics dataset used in the publication "Modeling the metabolic profile of Mytilus edulis reveals molecular signatures linked to gonadal development, sex and environmental site"</p> <p>Jaanika Kronberg, Jonathan J. Byrne, Jeroen Jansen, Philipp Antczak, Adam Hines, John Bignell, Ioanna Katsiadaki, Mark R. Viant and Francesco Falciani </p> <p>Metabolomics dataset for metabolic bins 1 to 1045 for 376 mussels as used in the publication.</p> <p>Mussel metadata are described in a separate file (spectrum number, sample label, sex, site, species, month, temperature of water, salinity of water, ADG rate, gonadal stage, parasite load)</p> <p>Species 1: Mytilus edulis, species 2: hybrid, species 3: Mytilus galloprovincialis</p>
Grain-size data from the loess profiles Ostrau and Gleina in Saxony (Germany)
<p><strong>Grain-size data from the loess profiles Ostrau and Gleina in Saxony (Germany)</strong></p> <p>The samples were taken between 2009 and 2010 in the framework of the DFG project <a href="https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/46526743"><em>"Rekonstruktion der Umweltbedingungen des Spätpleistozäns in Mittelsachsen anhand von Löss-Paläobodensequenze</em>n" (DFG FU 417/7-1 and FA 239/13-1</a>) from the loess records Ostrau and Gleina. Both located in the Saxonian-Loess-Region in Germany. For further details on the project profiles (with further references therein), we refer to Meszner et al. (2011,2013), Kreutzer et al. (2012), Meszner (2015) and Zech et al. (2017). </p> <p>Samples for the data reported here were selected in 2015. 212 samples were taken from the loess profile Ostrau and 269 samples from the loess profile Gleina. Full details on sampling and sample preparation can be found in the Grassl (2016) (unpublished master thesis in Germany, available upon request). The most relevant details are extracted below. </p> <p><strong>Preparation and measurements</strong></p> <p>Sample preparation and measurements were carried out at the GFZ in Potsdam (Germany). Thirty-nine samples from the profile Ostrau were separated into eight equal parts to obtain representative samples. The samples were labeled with "G" for Gleina and "O" for Ostrau. All other samples were sampled without applying this separation method. <br> For samples from the profile Ostrau, the suffix "mT" (with separation) and "oT" (without separation) indicates whether this <br> separation method was used. </p> <p>The samples were treated with HCl (10 %, 12 h to 20 h) and rinsed in the demineralized water. To suspend the samples, NO<sub>3</sub>P0<sub>4</sub> was used on twelve pars of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. </p> <p>A <em>Retch Laser Scattering Particle Size Distribution Analyzer (HORIBA LA- 950)</em> was used for the grain-size measurements. Details <br> on the settings are reported separately in each file.</p> <p><br> <strong>The data in the repository </strong></p> <p>Grainsize_data.zip This folder contains 4,853 ASCII TXT-files with the raw granulometric data. Filenames are unique timestamps (measurement date and time in the format <em>YYYYMMDDHHMMSS</em> CET). Each file comes with a header with relevant metadata and the measurement data. The metadata also contains the sample name, e.g., <em>O_55_oT</em> reads "O" for Ostrau, "55" sampling depth in cm, and "oT" for "ohne Teiler" (without separator, while "mT", "mit Teiler" would stand for with separator). For files for the profile Gleina, a "G" is used followed by the sampling depth range (two numbers, e.g., <em>G_380_382</em>) in cm. </p> <p>The files <em>Gleina_depth.txt</em>, <em>Ostrau02_depth.txt</em>, and <em>Ostrau03_depth.txt</em> allow a correlation with the profiles graphs published in Meszner (2015). </p> <p><br> <strong>References</strong></p> <p>Grassl, W., 2016. End-Member-Modellierungsanalyse an hochauflösenden Korngrößen der Lössprofile Ostrau und Gleina, Lommatzscher Pflege, Sachsen. unpublished Master thesis, TU Dresden.</p> <p>Kreutzer, S., Fuchs, M., Meszner, S., Faust, D., 2012. OSL chronostratigraphy of a loess-palaeosol sequence in Saxony/Germany using quartz of different grain sizes. Quaternary Geochronology 10, 102–109. doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2012.01.004</p> <p>Meszner, S., Fuchs, M., Faust, D., 2011. Loess-Paleosol-Sequences from the loess area of Saxony (Germany). E & G, Quaternary Science Journal 60, 47–65.</p> <p>Meszner, S., 2015. Loess from Saxony. A reconstruction of the Late Pleistocene landscape evolution and palaeoenvironment based on loess-palaeosol sequences from Saxony (Germany). Dresden. PhD thesis. TU Dresden. </p> <p>Meszner, S., Kreutzer, S., Fuchs, M., Faust, D., 2013. Late Pleistocene landscape dynamics in Saxony, Germany: Paleoenvironmental reconstruction using loess-paleosol sequences. Quaternary International 296, 95–107. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.12.040</p> <p>Zech, M., Kreutzer, S., Zech, R., Goslar, T., Meszner, S., McIntyre, C., Häggi, C., Eglinton, T., Faust, D., Fuchs, M., 2017. Comparative 14C and OSL dating of loess-paleosol sequences to evaluate post-depositional contamination of n-alkane biomarkers. Quaternary Research 87, 180–189. doi:10.1017/qua.2016.7</p>
Fiber-optic Distributed Temperature Sensing and Wind Profiler Data during the Shallow Cold Pool Experiment
<p>The <a href="https://www.eol.ucar.edu/field_projects/scp">Shallow Cold Pool (SCP) experiment</a> was an <a href="https://www.eol.ucar.edu/observing_facilities/isfs">Integrated Surface Flux System (ISFS)</a> deployment conducted by the <a href="https://ncar.ucar.edu/">National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)</a>, the <a href="https://ceoas.oregonstate.edu/">College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheres (CEOAS)</a>, the <a href="https://bee.oregonstate.edu/">Department of Biological & Ecological Engineering (BEE)</a>, and the <a href="https://ctemps.org/">Center for Transformative Environmental Monitoring Programs (CTEMPS)</a> of <a href="https://oregonstate.edu/">Oregon State University</a>, in a shallow gully within the Pawnee Grasslands, Coloradp, USA. The primary goal of SCP was to examine the formation and maintenance of common shallow cold pools. These cold pools had not been previously examined with turbulence measurements and very little was known about their dynamics and interaction with gravity waves and other submesoscale motions.</p> <p>SCP consisted of a dense network of ultrasonic anemometers with 19 units being installed at 1m above ground level (agl) and 8 being mounted at different heights on a 20m high tower. In addition, air temperature, humidity, and carbon dioxide concentrations measurements were taken. This data can be found on <a href="https://data.eol.ucar.edu/project/SCP">https://data.eol.ucar.edu/project/SCP</a>.</p> <p>The unique observational technique featured in SCP was a cross-valley transect of the innovative active and passive fiber-optic distributed sensing technique (FODS) using a Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) unit (Model Ultima SR, Silixa, London, UK) as well as a ground-based acoustic wind profiler (SODAR, PCS2000-24, Metek GmbH, Elmshorn, Germany) in addition to the classical sonic anemometer network. The data archived in this submission publishes the FODS data and contains data for nine (9) nights between 16th November until 27th November between the hours of 19:00 and 05:00 MST (Local time). Details of the FODS setup are contained in <a href="https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/qj.3508?af=R">Pfister et al. (2019)</a> and <a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL066729">Sayde et al. (2015</a>).<br> The fiber-optic cross-valley transect was 240m long and stretched from the North to the South shoulder of the gully and contained FODS observations at three heights (0.5m, 1m, 2m agl). By combining passive and active FODS, air temperatures and wind speeds were measured spatially continuously with a temporal and spatial resolution of 5s and 25cm, respectively. Air temperatures were measured with an unheated white-PVC jacketed optical glass fiber cable with an outer diameter of 0.9mm, while for the wind speed measurements an additional actively heated stainless-steel uncoated fiber-optic cable (1.3mm outer diameter) was deployed. Wind speeds were derived from the difference between the heated and unheated fiber-optic pair similar to a hotwire anemometer (<a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2015GL066729">Sayde et al. 2015</a>).<br> The acoustic wind profiler (Sound Detection and Ranging, SODAR) was installed at the gully bottom about 200m down the gully from the fiber-optic transect (between station A18 and A19) and measured with a 5-min resolution, a 10-m gate range, and 17000 Hz, see map in <a href="https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/qj.3508?af=R">Pfister et al. (2019)</a>. The observational range was between 10m to 320m agl. The data provided is the cluster data output of the wind profiler, which is quality-controlled by the internal data processing software. The published data include horizontal wind speed (speed), wind direction (direction), unrotated along-wind component (u_unrot), unrotated cross-wind component (v_unrot), and unrotated vertical-wind component (w_unrot).</p> <p>By combining the fiber-optic distributed sensing, the sensor network, and the wind profiler, we were able to investigate specific class of submeso-scale motions in detail. The submeso-scale motion occurred frequently during SCP, significantly impacted air temperature, wind speed and direction, as well as the near-surface turbulence within less than a few minutes. These motions are not described or categorized by existing boundary layer regimes or concepts. Consequently, further research on submeso-scale motions using continuous FODS measurements is necessary to better understand the stable boundary layer.</p> <p> </p> <p>Pfister, L., Sayde, C., Selker, J., Mahrt, L., & Thomas, C. K. (2019). Classifying the Nocturnal Atmospheric Boundary Layer into Temperature and Flow Regimes. <em>Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc.</em>, <em>145</em>(721), 1515–1534. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3508">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3508</a></p> <p> </p> <p>Sayde, C., Thomas, C. K., Wagner, J., & Selker, J. S. (2015). High-resolution wind speed measurements using actively heated fiber optics. <em>Geophys. Res. Lett.</em>, <em>42</em>(22), 10,064–10,073. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066729">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066729</a></p>
Optimised household consumption profiles through a smart building energy mangement system TABEDE
<p>In the context of the TABEDE project (<a href="https://www.tabede.eu/">https://www.tabede.eu/</a>) several synthetic profiles simulating the consumption and generation of residential buildings, whose appliances were controlled by our proposed Energy Management System (i.e., the TABEDE solution), were simulated. Their construction process was characterised by the following:</p> <ul> <li>Consumption profiles were generated via a bottom-up approach capable of emulating the consumption of individual household appliances. These last ones correspond to the most used appliances in the UK, which were randomly distributed among the buildings based on their average utilisation rate and ownership observed in residential buildings in the country.</li> <li>The physics in terms of heat exchange between neighbouring buildings and the environment were considered, together with the size of the buildings and their physical characteristics. A total of 66 houses and apartments, according to 8 type or building archetypes were created.</li> <li>PV generation profiles were generated according to the meteorological condition of the simulated day.</li> </ul> <p>Together with this, the profiles feature how the TABEDE solution optimised the flexible part of the consumption (i.e., appliances that were controllable by the solution and whose consumption could be shifted in time without sacrificing user comfort) to minimize the electricity bill of the buildings.</p> <p>The information contained in the actual database features the following variables:</p> <ul> <li>TABEDE penetration: percentage of buildings owning the TABEDE solution. Buildings with TABEDE will observe their flexible consumption being optimised.</li> <li>PV penetration: percentage of buildings with a PV system installed on them.</li> <li>Simulation day: one day in summer (19/06/2019) featuring the highest solar radiation of the year, and a day in winter (19/12/2019) with the lowest.</li> <li>Batteries: whether the PV systems is installed alongside household batteries.</li> </ul> <p>Details on the formulation can be found in: <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.energy-proceedings.org/an-intelligent-infrastructure-for-enabling-demand-response-ready-buildings/__;!!La4veWw!khYBEaeJY85mX5yQUrp0PwoXcg5U10dEdgZ296hONYGyBS5xg91Z8MoDUQy34a4f9Lo$">https://www.energy-proceedings.org/an-intelligent-infrastructure-for-enabling-demand-response-ready-buildings/</a></p>
Normalized community CHP profiles
<p>Normalized community CHP profiles for Austria, France, Italy, Spain and Sweden for year 2018/2019.</p>
Vertical Profiles of Convection-Permitting Simulations for Predicting Thunderstorm Occurrence
<p>This repository contains datasets for training and evaluation of the machine learning (ML) models in K. Vahid Yousefnia et al., <em>Inferring Thunderstorm Occurrence from Vertical Profiles of Convection-Permitting Simulations: Physical Insights from a Physical Deep Learning Model</em>, 2024 (submitted to <em>Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems,</em> preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20087).</p>
TCOM-HCl : Daily global gap-free stratospheric hydrogen chloride profile data set based on TOMCAT CTM and Occultation Measurements
<p>Methodology: </p> <p><span>The </span><strong><span>TOMCAT simulation</span></strong><span> was conducted at a T64L32 resolution, consistent with previous work by Dhomse et al. (2021, 2022), covering the period from 2000 to 2024. These simulations utilized </span><strong><span>ERA-5 reanalysis data</span></strong><span>.</span></p> <h3><span>HCl Profile Processing and Bias Correction</span></h3> <p><strong><span>Collocated HCl profiles</span></strong><span> are organized into five distinct latitude bins:</span></p> <ul> <li> <p><strong><span>NH polar</span></strong><span>: </span><span><span><span><span><span>9</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>N - </span><span><span><span><span><span>5</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>N</span></p> </li> <li> <p><strong><span>NH mid-lat</span></strong><span>: </span><span><span><span><span><span>2</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>N - </span><span><span><span><span><span>7</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>N</span></p> </li> <li> <p><strong><span>Tropics</span></strong><span>: </span><span><span><span><span><span>4</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>S - </span><span><span><span><span><span>4</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>N</span></p> </li> <li> <p><strong><span>SH mid-lat</span></strong><span>: </span><span><span><span><span><span>7</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>S - </span><span><span><span><span><span>2</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>S</span></p> </li> <li> <p><strong><span>SH polar</span></strong><span>: </span><span><span><span><span><span>9</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>S - </span><span><span><span><span><span>5</span><span>0<span><span><span><span><span><span><span>∘</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><span>S</span></p> </li> </ul> <p><span>Initially, </span><strong><span>differences between TOMCAT and satellite measurements</span></strong><span> (primarily ACE-FTS data) are calculated for each zonal bin across 51 height levels (ranging from </span><span><span><span><span><span>10</span><span>,</span><span><span>km</span></span></span></span></span></span><span> to </span><span><span><span><span><span>60</span><span>,</span><span><span>km</span></span></span></span></span></span><span>).</span></p> <p><strong><span>Separate XGBoost regression models</span></strong><span> are then trained for these HCl differences at each height level within a given latitude bin. These trained models are subsequently used to estimate </span><strong><span>HCl bias corrections</span></strong><span> for all daytime TOMCAT grids (9132 days), specifically sampled at 1:30 PM local time at the equator. This yields grid-specific bias corrections that are applied to the original TOMCAT profiles.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Height-resolved HCl profile data</span></strong><span> are then interpolated onto 28 standard pressure levels (from </span><span><span><span><span><span>300</span><span>,</span><span><span>hPa</span></span></span></span></span></span><span> to </span><span><span><span><span><span>0.1</span><span>,</span><span><span>hPa</span></span></span></span></span></span><span>), using pressure levels directly from the TOMCAT grids. For overlapping latitude bins, values are averaged to ensure smoother fields near boundary regions.</span></p> <h3><span>Data Files</span></h3> <p><span>The dataset includes two files containing daily mean zonal mean HCl profiles:</span></p> <ul> <li> <p><code><span>zmhcl_TCOM_hlev_T2Dz_2000-2024_V1.1.nc</span></code><span>: Contains </span><strong><span>height level data</span></strong><span> (</span><span><span><span><span><span>10</span><span>,</span><span><span>km</span></span></span></span></span></span><span> to </span><span><span><span><span><span>60</span><span>,</span><span><span>km</span></span></span></span></span></span><span>).</span></p> </li> <li> <p><code><span>zmhcl_TCOM_plev_T2Dz_2000-2024_V1.1.nc</span></code><span>: Contains </span><strong><span>pressure level data</span></strong><span> (</span><span><span><span><span><span>300</span><span>,</span><span><span>hPa</span></span></span></span></span></span><span> to </span><span><span><span><span><span>0.1</span><span>,</span><span><span>hPa</span></span></span></span></span></span><span>).</span></p> </li> </ul> <h3><span>Reference Publication</span></h3> <p><span>This methodology, incorporating only ACE-FTS data and various minor algorithmic developments, is based on the following publication:</span></p> <p><span>Dhomse, S. S. and Chipperfield, M. P.: Using machine learning to construct TOMCAT model and occultation measurement-based stratospheric methane (TCOM-CH4) and nitrous oxide (TCOM-N2O) profile data sets, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5105–5120, </span><a title="null" href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5105-2023"><span>https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5105-2023</span></a><span>, 2023</span></p>
TCOM-H2O: TOMCAT CTM and Occultation Measurements based daily zonal stratospheric H2O profile dataset [1991-2021] constructed using machine-learning.
<p>Methodology: </p> <p>The <strong>TOMCAT simulation</strong> was conducted at a T64L32 resolution, consistent with previous work by Dhomse et al. (2021, 2022), covering the period from 2000 to 2024. These simulations utilized <strong>ERA-5 reanalysis data</strong>.</p> <h3>H2O Profile Processing and Bias Correction</h3> <p><strong>Collocated H2O profiles</strong> are organized into five distinct latitude bins:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>NH polar</strong>: 90∘N - 50∘N</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>NH mid-lat</strong>: 20∘N - 70∘N</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Tropics</strong>: 40∘S - 40∘N</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>SH mid-lat</strong>: 70∘S - 20∘S</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>SH polar</strong>: 90∘S - 50∘S</p> </li> </ul> <p>Initially, <strong>differences between TOMCAT and satellite measurements</strong> (primarily ACE-FTS data) are calculated for each zonal bin across 51 height levels (ranging from 10,km to 60,km). Note that TOMCAT may not accurately capture H2O evolution post-HTHH eruption due to the sparse spatial coverage of ACE measurements, which limits training data.</p> <p><strong>Separate XGBoost regression models</strong> are then trained for these H2O differences at each height level within a given latitude bin. These trained models are subsequently used to estimate <strong>H2O bias corrections</strong> for all daytime TOMCAT grids (9132 days), specifically sampled at 1:30 PM local time at the equator. This yields grid-specific bias corrections that are applied to the original TOMCAT profiles.</p> <p><strong>Height-resolved H2O profile data</strong> are then interpolated onto 28 standard pressure levels (from 300,hPa to 0.1,hPa), using pressure levels directly from the TOMCAT grids. For overlapping latitude bins, values are averaged to ensure smoother fields near boundary regions.</p> <p>We acknowledge the inherent <strong>dry biases in the original TOMCAT H2O profiles</strong>, largely because the TTL entry mixing ratios are based on a simplistic sinusoidal seasonal cycle, which omits the H2O enhancement contributed by tropical convective clouds.</p> <h3>Data Files</h3> <p>The dataset includes two files containing daily mean zonal mean H2O profiles:</p> <ul> <li> <p><code>zmh2o_TCOM_hlev_T2Dz_2000-2024_V1.1.nc</code>: Contains <strong>height level data</strong> (10,km to 60,km).</p> </li> <li> <p><code>zmh2o_TCOM_plev_T2Dz_2000-2024_V1.1.nc</code>: Contains <strong>pressure level data</strong> (300,hPa to 0.1,hPa).</p> </li> </ul> <h3>Reference Publication</h3> <p>This methodology, incorporating only ACE-FTS data and various minor algorithmic developments, is based on the following publication:</p> <p>Dhomse, S. S. and Chipperfield, M. P.: Using machine learning to construct TOMCAT model and occultation measurement-based stratospheric methane (TCOM-CH4) and nitrous oxide (TCOM-N2O) profile data sets, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5105–5120, <a title="null" href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5105-2023">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5105-2023</a>, 2023.</p>
TCOM-O3: TOMCAT CTM and Occultation Measurements based daily zonal stratospheric ozone profile dataset [1991-2021] constructed using machine-learning
<p>Methodology: TOMCAT simulation is performed at T64L32 resolution for the 2000-2024 time period. Collocated Ozone (O3) profiles are divided in five latitude bins: SH polar (90S-50S), SH mid-lat (70S-20S), tropics (40S-40N), NH mid-lat (20N-70N) and NH polar (50N-90N). Initially, model-measurement differences are calculated for each zonal bins (51 height levels, 10km to 60km). Note that if enough ACE measurements are not avaliable for a particular level then data is purely based on TOMCAT simulated output field. Separate XGBoost regression models are trained for the differences between TOMCAT and measurements at each level for a given latitude bin. XGBoost model is then used to estimate error corrections for all the TOMCAT grids. TOMCAT output sampled at 1.30 pm local time at the equator. Estimated corrections for a given model grid that are added to the original TOMCAT simulated day and night time ozone profiles. Height resolved data are then interpolated on 28-pressure levels (300 - 0.1hPa). For overlapping latitude bins, we use averages and then calculate daily zonal mean values. For more details see attached presentation. Previous version use both HALOE and ACE data. Here only ACE data is used (hence starting date is 01 January 2000). PDF file shows comparison between v1.0 and v1.1 as well as TOMCAT data.</p> <p>Dataset also includes two files containing daily mean zonal mean hydrogen fluoride profiles on height (10-60 km) and pressure (300-0.1 hPa) levels:</p> <p>zmo3_TCOM_hlev_T2Dz_2000_2024.nc – height level data (10 to 60 km)</p> <p>zmo3_TCOM_plev_T2Dz_2000_2024.nc – pressure level data (300 to 0.1 hPa)</p> <p>Daily 3D profiles on height and pressure levels would be made available on request.</p>
TOMCAT CTM and Occultation measurement-based Stratospheric CFC12 (TCOM-CFC12) profile data set
<p>TOMCAT CTM and Occultation measurement-based Stratospheric CFC12 (TCOM-CFC12) profile data set </p> <p>Sandip S. Dhomse </p> <p>School of Earth and Enviro, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK</p> <p>National Centre for Earth Observations, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK</p> <p> email: s.s.dhomse@leeds.ac.uk</p> <p> Methodology: TOMCAT simulation is performed at T64L32 resolution for the 2000-2024 time period. Collocated CFC12 (CF2Cl2) profiles are divided in five latitude bins: SH polar (90S-50S), SH mid-lat (70S-20S), tropics (40S-40N), NH mid-lat (20N-70N) and NH polar (50N-90N). Initially, model-measurement differences are calculated for each zonal bins (51 height levels, 10km to 60km). Separate XGBoost regression models are trained for the differences between TOMCAT and measurements at each level for a given latitude bin. XGBoost model is then used to estimate error corrections for all the TOMCAT grids. Estimated corrections for a given model grid that are added to the original TOMCAT simulated daily (at 1.30 local time) CFC-12 profiles. Height resolved data are then interpolated on 28-pressure levels (300 - 0.1hPa). For overlapping latitude bins, we use averages and then calculate daily zonal mean values. For more details see attached presentation.</p> <p>Dataset also includes two files containing daily mean zonal mean CFC-12 profiles on height (10-60 km) and pressure (300-0.1 hPa) levels (9132 days/64 latitudes):</p> <p>zmcfc12_TCOM_hlev_T2Dz_2000-2024_V1.1.nc – height level data (10 to 60 km)</p> <p>zmcfc12_TCOM_plev_T2Dz_2000-2024_V1.1.nc – pressure level data (300 to 0.1 hPa)</p> <p>Daily 3D profiles on height and pressure levels would be made available on request. Xarrays “resample” can be used to get monthly means.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.