Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
335
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
335 results for “carabid beetles”
Figure 1 from: Bonacci T, Brandmayr P, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Predator feeding choice on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles: first results. ZooKeys 100: 171-179. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1525
Figure 1 - a Consumption of Amara anthobia by the lizard Podarcis sicula b attack on Calathus fuscipes by the staphylinid Ocypus olens c consumption of Campalita maderae by the shrew Crocidura leucodon.
Figure 2 from: Bonacci T, Brandmayr P, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Predator feeding choice on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles: first results. ZooKeys 100: 171-179. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1525
Figure 2 - Percentage of attacks by Crocidura leucodon (Insectivora: Soricidae) on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles. Black bars represent conspicuous species; grey bars represent non-conspicuous species.
Figure 2 from: Wizen G, Gasith A (2011) Predation of amphibians by carabid beetles of the genus Epomis found in the central coastal plain of Israel. ZooKeys 100: 181-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1526
Figure 2 - Predation of amphibians by adult Epomis: a Bufo viridis juvenile by Epomis circumscriptus b Hyla savignyi juvenileby Epomis circumscriptus c Bufo viridis juvenile by Epomis circumscriptus d Salamandra salamandra infraimmaculata metamorph by Epomis dejeani e Hyla savignyi juvenile by Epomis circumscriptus f Triturus vittatus metamorph by Epomis dejeani (photographs by Gil Wizen).
Figure 3 from: Bonacci T, Brandmayr P, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Predator feeding choice on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles: first results. ZooKeys 100: 171-179. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1525
Figure 3 - Interspecific aggregation of Brachinus sclopeta a Anchomenus dorsalis b and individuals of Poecilus cupreus c. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 2 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 2 - IndVals at different levels in the UPGMA tree. Result for a single species, Dicheirotrichus gustavii, calculated by the original IndVal program. Eight values of the nine levels are significant. Data: abundance/frequency data. 7/4: a total of seven specimens were found in four of the five traps. Sites 102 and 103 are omitted.
Figure 1 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 1 - Result of a cluster analysis using Relative Euclidean distances and Ward's method. Most traps of the site at the lowest elevation (-20 cm below MHW) cluster with those of 100 cm above MHW. Arrow: One trap of -20 behaves differently.
Figure 3 from: Schwerk A, Szyszko J (2011) Model of succession in degraded areas based on carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 319-332. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1534
Figure 3 - Model graphs based on the parameters in Table 1 for the relationship between MIB values (mg) and age of stands for the first 60 years in A planted stands on forest soil, B naturally regenerated stands on post-agricultural soil, C planted stands on post-agricultural soil, D stands on ash heap, and E stands on mining heap (Open circles indicate that MIB was calculated from less than 25 individuals; broken lines indicate that the respective part of the graph cannot be verified due to a lack of data).
Figure 2 from: Schwerk A, Szyszko J (2011) Model of succession in degraded areas based on carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 319-332. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1534
Figure 2 - Schematic illustration of the model. Succession starts from an 'initial degradation level', followed by a facultative 'delay phase' (characterized by the time of 'delay'). The optional 'delay phase' is followed by an 'increase phase' (characterized by the 'increase rate'), and a 'stagnation phase' in which the succession process runs towards a 'recovery level'. The type of area, origin of vegetation, and landscape-related aspects are assumed to influence the trajectory of succession.
Figure 3 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 3 - Results of the IndVal procedure depend on the tree used. Data: abundance/frequency of Cillenus lateralis along the elevation gradient. 3/3: a total of three specimens was found in three of the five traps. Sites 102 and 103 are omitted.
Figure 1 from: Schwerk A, Szyszko J (2011) Model of succession in degraded areas based on carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 319-332. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1534
Figure 1 - Relationship between MIB values (mg) and age of stands in A planted stands on forest soil (r = 0.343, p <0.05), B naturally regenerated stands on post-agricultural soil (r = 0.677, p <0.001), C planted stands on post-agricultural soil (r = 0.238, p <0.001), D stands on ash heap (r = 0.025, n.s.) and E stands on mining heap (r = 0.839, p <0.001) (Open circles indicate that MIB was calculated from less than 25 individuals).
Figure 3 from: Šerić Jelaska L, Dumbovich V, Kucinic M (2011) Carabid beetle diversity and mean individual biomass in beech forests of various ages. ZooKeys 100: 393-405. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1536
Figure 3 - Proportion of species according to their hibernation strategies (larvae – black columns, adults – white columns) in relation to forest age (years).
Figure 4 from: Lessel T, Marx M, Eisenbeis G (2011) Effects of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. ZooKeys 100: 421-446. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1538
Figure 4 - Mean number of individuals of hygrophilic (A/B) and xerophilic/mesophilic (C/D) carabid beetle species at the fallow (A/C) and ruderal area (B/D) during different moisture conditions. Abbreviations: ef = ecological flooding (higher Rhine water levels); spe = flood caused by a strong precipitation event; dc = drought conditions; ° outliers. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney U-test).
Figure 3 from: Lessel T, Marx M, Eisenbeis G (2011) Effects of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. ZooKeys 100: 421-446. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1538
Figure 3 - Mean number of individuals per trap and day (± SE) and total carabid beetle species number at location 1 (fallow area) and location 6 (ruderal area) (n=3) during the vegetation period of 2008. Hygrophilic species (black bars) and xerophilic as well as mesophilic species (grey bars) are shown. Abbreviations: ef = ecological flooding; spe = strong precipitation event.
Figure 1 from: Lessel T, Marx M, Eisenbeis G (2011) Effects of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. ZooKeys 100: 421-446. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1538
Figure 1 - Location of the polder "Ingelheim" in Germany and location of the different areas and pitfall trap localities (L1–L6) within this polder (A). Abbreviations: LA 0: ruderal area; HB 0: fallow area; LA 0 + HB 0: transition area between LA 0 and HB 0; HA 0: agricultural fields; L1–6: locations of the six pitfall trap groups (three pitfall traps per locality). The pictures show the main flood gate (left) and the ecological flood gate (right), and an ecological flooding in March 2007 (B) and the fast drying event in the ruderal area after ecological flooding in April 2007 (C).
Figure 6 from: Lessel T, Marx M, Eisenbeis G (2011) Effects of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. ZooKeys 100: 421-446. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1538
Figure 6 - PCA of springtail communities in the fallow area (location 1) and the ruderal area (location 6) during ecological flooding, the flood caused by a strong precipitation event and drought conditions. Only species with more than 1% dominance value in at least one area are included. Abbreviations of the species: I.pal=Isotomurus palustris; I.vir=Isotoma viridis; L.cya=Lepidocyrtus cyaneus; O.vil=Orchesella villosa; P.aqu=Podura aquatica; S.aqu=Sminthurides aquaticus. Percentage variation explained by the two PCA axes are included.
Figure 2 from: Lessel T, Marx M, Eisenbeis G (2011) Effects of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. ZooKeys 100: 421-446. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1538
Figure 2 - PCA of carabid beetle communities in the fallow area (location 1) and the ruderal area (location 6) during ecological flooding, the flood caused by a strong precipitation event and drought conditions. Only species with more than 1% dominance value in at least one area are included. Abbreviations of the species: A.mar=Agonum marginatum; A.bif=Amara bifrons; A.sim=Amara similata; B.lam=Bembidion lampros; B.pro=Bembidion properans; B.qua=Bembidion quadrimaculatum; C.pur=Carabus purpurascens; H.aff=Harpalus affinis; H.ruf=Harpalus rufipes; H.sma=Harpalus smaragdinus; N.bre=Nebria brevicollis; O.ard=Ophonus ardosiacus; P.cup=Poecilus cupreus; P.ant=Pterostichus anthracinus; P.mel=Pterostichus melanarius; P.nig=Pterostichus nigrita. Percentage variation explained by the two PCA axes is included.
Figure 2 from: Kwiatkowski A (2011) Assemblages of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in humid forest habitats of different stages of succession in the Puszcza Knyszyńska Forest (northeastern Poland). ZooKeys 100: 447-459. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1539
Figure 2 - Relationship between the contribution of forest species and the age of sampled forest stands (Spearman rank correlation coefficient rs=0.696; p=0.001)
Figure 1 from: Kwiatkowski A (2011) Assemblages of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in humid forest habitats of different stages of succession in the Puszcza Knyszyńska Forest (northeastern Poland). ZooKeys 100: 447-459. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1539
Figure 1 - Location of the sampling plots in the Puszcza Knyszyńska forest. For specifications, see Table 1.
Figure 3 from: Kwiatkowski A (2011) Assemblages of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in humid forest habitats of different stages of succession in the Puszcza Knyszyńska Forest (northeastern Poland). ZooKeys 100: 447-459. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1539
Figure 3 - Relationship between the contribution of large zoophages and age of the sampled forest stands (Spearman rank correlation coefficient rs=0.485; p<0.05)
Figure 4 from: Kwiatkowski A (2011) Assemblages of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in humid forest habitats of different stages of succession in the Puszcza Knyszyńska Forest (northeastern Poland). ZooKeys 100: 447-459. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1539
Figure 4 - Multivariate analysis (RDA) carried out with the dataset (number of the sampling plots as in Table 1). See text for explanations.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.