Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
695
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
695 results for “model output”
Coupled PPE model output - land parameter impacts on the mean climate state
<p>Terrestrial processes influence the atmosphere by controlling land-to-atmosphere fluxes of energy, water, and carbon. Prior research has demonstrated that parameter uncertainty drives uncertainty in land surface fluxes. However, the influence of land process uncertainty on the climate system remains underexplored. Here, we quantify how assumptions about land processes impact climate using a perturbed parameter ensemble for 18 land parameters in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) under preindustrial conditions. We find that an observationally-informed range of land parameters generate biogeophysical feedbacks that significantly influence the mean climate state, largely by modifying evapotranspiration. Global mean land surface temperature ranges by 2.2°C across our ensemble (standard deviation = 0.5°C) and precipitation changes were significant and spatially variable. Our analysis demonstrates that the impacts of land parameter uncertainty on surface fluxes propagates to the entire Earth system, and provides insights into where and how land process uncertainty influences climate.</p>
A regional high-resolution (1/12 degree) coupled ocean-ecosystem model (INCOIS-BIO-ROMS) output for Indian Ocean
<p>The dataset contains sea-surface temperature, sea-surface salinity, sea-surface dissolved inorganic carbon, sea-surface total alkalinity, sea-surface pH, and sea-surface partial pressure of CO2 for the Indian Ocean region. The data is available from 1980 to 2019 on a monthly time scale. Each of these data has a spatial resolution of 1/12º.</p>
The output data of the 1D Venusian chemistry-diffusion model of Dai et al. (2024) and the adopted chemical network
<p>To use these data, please cite the paper: Dai et al. (2024, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450552) </p> <p>Supplemental_Tables_for_Dai_et_al_2024.pdf: the chemical network adopted in the model</p> <p>Nominal.txt: the chemical network adopted in the model</p> <p>modify_chem.py: the additional adjustments of the reactions</p> <p>Nominal_Bkzz_SO2.vul and A_Dkzz_SO2.vul: the output data of the nominal model and model A, respectively</p> <p>reading_data.py: the methods to read the output files</p> <p> </p> <p>*Errata: </p> <p>1) R296 in Supplemental Table: "1×10^7+0.05n_atm" should have been "1×10^17+0.05n_atm"</p> <p>2) R329 in Supplemental Table: should have been removed</p> <p>The errata do not affect the results of this study.</p>
Results outputs for "Beyond the Hype: Identifying and Analyzing Math Word Problem-Solving Challenges for Large Language Models"
<p>The provided files contain outputs generated by various Large Language Models (LLMs) for solving problems in the SVAMP dataset. Additionally, they include tagged statements of problems that LLMs incorrectly resolved.</p> <p>This repository includes the following two files:</p> <ul> <li>all_data.json --> Contains the generated samples for the SVAMP dataset.</li> <li>df_combined.pkl --> Contains the tagged SVAMP statements of problems that CodeLlama failed to resolve.</li> </ul>
WRF Model Output for the 3 km grid of the Hurricane Nature Run, days 08-07-2005 through 08-09-2005
<p>This is WRF model output for the Hurricane Nature Run presented in Nolan et al. (2013). The tar file contains gzipped netcdf files each with 6 model outputs at 30 minute intervals.</p>
WRF Model Output for the 3 km grid of the Hurricane Nature Run, days 08-04-2005 to 08-06-2005
<p>This is WRF model output for the Hurricane Nature Run presented in Nolan et al. (2013). The tar file contains gzipped netcdf files each with 6 model outputs at 30 minute intervals.</p>
Basic layercake GeoModeller model and relevant drillhole MCUE outputs
<p>Companion dataset to the paper:</p> <p><strong>Drillhole Uncertainty Propagation for three-dimensional Geological Modeling using Monte Carlo</strong><em>, </em>Evren Pakyuz-Charrier, Mark Lindsay, Vitaliy Ogarko, Jeremie Giraud, Mark Jessell</p> <p>This dataset contains three archives pertaining to Monte Carlo Uncertainty Estimation (MCUE) in implicit 3D geological models:</p> <ol> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/a19a51eb-8868-445c-ae70-1ceede70be03/HorizontalLayercakeDrillhole_base.zip?versionId=3b7ab62b-67d3-46f8-ac36-87bd056d6db6">HorizontalLayercakeDrillhole_base.zip </a>is a GeoModeller three dimensional model of a 4 units layercake model.</li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/a19a51eb-8868-445c-ae70-1ceede70be03/SingleDH_MCUE.zip?versionId=0ed91bf9-1e06-47ca-9a5c-da050db18897">SingleDH_MCUE.zip </a>contains all MCUE output for the single drillhole uncertainty propagation case studies.</li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/a19a51eb-8868-445c-ae70-1ceede70be03/TripleDH_MCUE.zip?versionId=0c5f8f45-938a-4701-b871-99d1349d8278">TripleDH_MCUE.zip </a>contains all MCUE output for the three drillholes uncertainty propagation case studies.</li> </ol> <p>In the output archive files:</p> <ul> <li>xml files are the GeoModeller project saves, these can be opened with Intrepid's free viewer for GeoModeller 4.0 (available @: http://www.intrepid-geophysics.com/ig/index.php?page=geomodeller-update)</li> <li>.vo, .isi and .vop1 files are the lithological voxet exports in binary GOCAD format, these can be opened with the aforementionned viewer or Geocando (available @: https://sourceforge.net/projects/geocando)</li> <li>.vtk files are the MCUE uncertainty indexes outputs, these can be opened with Paraview (available @: https://www.paraview.org/download)</li> <li>the frequency.csv file is the MCUE probabilistic model output, it can be opened with any text editor /spreadsheet</li> <li>other .csv files are standard collar, survey, geology drillhole data files</li> </ul>
Mansfield (Victoria, Australia) area original GeoModeller model and relevant drillhole MCUE outputs
<p>Companion dataset to the paper:</p> <p><em>Disturbance Distribution Selection and Parameterization in Monte Carlo Simulations for Uncertainty Estimation in Implicit three-dimensional Modeling, </em>Evren Pakyuz-Charrier, Mark Lindsay, Vitaliy Ogarko, Jeremie Giraud, Mark Jessell</p> <p>This dataset contains three archives pertaining to Monte Carlo Uncertainty Estimation (MCUE) in implicit 3D geological models:</p> <ol> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/dc9002e8-b1d1-4947-bef0-02771811935f/Mansfield_vertical_drillhole.zip?versionId=6111377a-c959-4a04-aa4d-869166bfc2bb">Mansfield_vertical_drillhole.zip </a>contains a GeoModeller three dimensional model of the Mansfield syncline area (Victoria, Australia) with one vertical drillhole along with drillhole MCUE outputs. This model is modified from the Mansfield_Base model @ <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/848225">https://zenodo.org/record/848225</a> </li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/dc9002e8-b1d1-4947-bef0-02771811935f/Mansfield_inclined_drillhole.zip?versionId=0b849001-0bf3-4edb-8ce4-1ccf4312a88f">Mansfield_inclined_drillhole.zip </a>contains a GeoModeller three dimensional model of the Mansfield syncline area (Victoria, Australia) with one inclined drillhole along with drillhole MCUE outputs. This model is modified from the Mansfield_Base model @ <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/848225">https://zenodo.org/record/848225</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/dc9002e8-b1d1-4947-bef0-02771811935f/Mansfield_vertical_drillhole.zip?versionId=6111377a-c959-4a04-aa4d-869166bfc2bb">Mansfield_vertical_drillhole.zip </a>contains a GeoModeller three dimensional model of the Mansfield syncline area (Victoria, Australia) with both vertical and inclined drillholes along with drillhole MCUE outputs. This model is modified from the Mansfield_Base model @ <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/848225">https://zenodo.org/record/848225</a></li> </ol> <p>In the output archive files:</p> <ul> <li>xml files are the GeoModeller project saves, these can be opened with Intrepid's free viewer for GeoModeller 3.3 3.4 (available @: http://www.intrepid-geophysics.com/ig/index.php?page=geomodeller-update)</li> <li>.vo, .isi and .vop1 files are the lithological voxet exports in binary GOCAD format, these can be opened with the aforementionned viewer or Geocando (available @: https://sourceforge.net/projects/geocando)</li> <li>.vtk files are the MCUE uncertainty indexes outputs, these can be opened with Paraview (available @:https://www.paraview.org/download)</li> <li>the frequency.csv file is the MCUE probabilistic model output, it can be opened with any text editor /spreadsheet</li> <li>other .csv files are standard collar, survey, geology drillhole data files</li> </ul>
Model output: NEMO-CICE with an emergent sea ice floe size distribution
<p>NEMO-CICE model output from experiments with and without an emergent sea ice floe size distribution.</p> <p>See README for further details</p>
G³M 1.0 steady-state model output
<p>Steady-state model output of the global gradient-based groundwater model G³M 1.0. Related to the publication in GMD "Beyond the bucket - Developing a global gradient-based groundwater model (G³M v1.0) for a global hydrological model from scratch"</p> <p>Contains the following global outputs:</p> <p>* hydraulic head</p> <p>* surface water body to/from groundwater flows</p> <p>* conductance values for surface water bodies</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: LPJ-GUESS potato
<p>This is model output from LPJ-GUESS for potato as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: CLM-Crop cotton
<p>This is model output from CLM-Crop for cotton as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: CLM-Crop soy
<p>This is model output from CLM-Crop for soy as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: LPJ-GUESS barley
<p>This is model output from LPJ-GUESS for barley as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: LPJ-GUESS rapeseed
<p>This is model output from LPJ-GUESS for rapeseed as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: LPJ-GUESS groundnut
<p>This is model output from LPJ-GUESS for groundnut as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: CLM-Crop sugar cane
<p>This is model output from CLM-Crop for sugar cane as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: LPJ-GUESS rye
<p>This is model output from LPJ-GUESS for rye as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: LPJ-GUESS wheat
<p>This is model output from LPJ-GUESS for wheat as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set: EPIC-TAMU maize
<p>This is model output from EPIC-TAMU for maize as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 output data set.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Elliott et al. (2015) and has been used to evaluate the models (Müller et al., 2017). A data description paper has been published in Scientific Data (Müller et al. 2019).</p> <p>References:</p> <p>Elliott J, Müller C, Deryng D, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Boote KJ, Büchner M, Foster I, Glotter M, Heinke J, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Mueller ND, Ray DK, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, and Sheffield J. 2015, The Global Gridded Crop Model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261-277, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Chryssanthacopoulos J, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Glotter M, Hoek S, Iizumi T, Izaurralde RC, Jones C, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Ray DK, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Song CX, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2017, Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1403-1422, doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017</p> <p>Müller C, Elliott J, Kelly D, Arneth A, Balkovic J, Ciais P, Deryng D, Folberth C, Hoek S, Izaurralde RC, Jones CD, Khabarov N, Lawrence P, Liu W, Olin S, Pugh TAM, Reddy A, Rosenzweig C, Ruane AC, Sakurai G, Schmid E, Skalsky R, Wang X, de Wit A, and Yang H. 2019, The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset, Scientific Data, 6, 50, doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0023-8</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.