Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,766
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
6,766 results for “project”
Projected Global Area Equipped for Irrigation Datasets during 2020-2100 under SSP scenarios
<h1><strong>1. Background</strong></h1> <p>Accurately predicting the global area equipped for irrigation in the future is crucial for providing essential datasets relevant to fields such as earth system simulation, agricultural water resource management, climate change adaptation, and environmental conservation. However, the predictive datasets of the area equipped for irrigation are still lacking. To address this gap, we provide the <strong>Projected Global Area Equipped for Irrigation Datasets (PGAEID)</strong>, which provide spatially explicit estimates of Area Equipped for Irrigation (AEI) from 2020 to 2100 under three Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios: <strong>SSP1</strong> (sustainable development), <strong>SSP2</strong> (intermediate development), and <strong>SSP3</strong> (regional rivalry), <strong>SSP4</strong> (unequal development), and <strong>SSP5</strong> (fossil-fueled development).</p> <h1><strong>2. Methodology</strong></h1> <h3><strong>2.1 Ensemble Machine Learning (EML) Framework</strong></h3> <ul> <li><strong>Algorithms</strong>: Integrated six machine learning models: <ul> <li>Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)</li> <li>Decision Trees (DT)</li> <li>Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA)</li> <li>Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)</li> <li>Radial Basis Function (RBF)</li> <li>Random Forests (RF)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Training Data</strong>: Historical national irrigation records (FAO AQUASTAT, 1961–2015).</li> <li><strong>Validation Metrics</strong>: <ul> <li>Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE): <strong>0.9</strong><strong>8</strong></li> <li>Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE): <strong>0.</strong><strong>97</strong></li> <li>Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): <strong>1</strong><strong>.</strong><strong>7%</strong></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h3><strong>2.2 Spatial Downscaling</strong></h3> <ul> <li><strong>Baseline</strong>: FAO 2005 irrigation data combined with GMIA2005 gridded agricultural intensity maps.</li> <li><strong>Dynamic Projection</strong>: Annual change rates applied to 5′ × 5′ grids under SSP-specific socioeconomic drivers.</li> </ul> <h1><strong>3. Dataset Overview</strong></h1> <h3><strong>3.1 Key Features</strong></h3> <ul> <li><strong>Temporal Coverage</strong>: 2020–2100 (10-year intervals).</li> <li><strong>Spatial Resolution</strong>: 5-arcminute (≈10 km at the equator).</li> <li><strong>Scenarios</strong>: SSP1, SSP2, SSP3, SSP4, SSP5.</li> <li><strong>Variables</strong>: area equipped for irrigation (10<sup>3</sup> ha/year).</li> </ul> <h3><strong>3.2 Dataset Structure</strong></h3> <p>The dataset is provided as a compressed archive (PGAEID_Ver3.0.rar), containing:</p> <p>1.<strong>Global_Area_Equipped_for_Irrigation_GeoTiff</strong><strong>/</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Subfolders</strong>: <ul> <li>SSP1</li> <li>SSP2</li> <li>SSP3</li> <li>SSP4</li> <li>SSP5</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>File Format</strong>: GeoTIFF (45 files total).</li> <li><strong>Naming Convention</strong>:<br>AEI_[SSP]_[Year].tif <ul> <li>Example: AEI_SSP1_2020.tif</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>2. <strong>National & Regional_AEI</strong><strong>/</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Shapefiles</strong>: National/regional area equipped for irrigation for 26 prediction units (2020–2100).</li> <li><strong>Excel File</strong>: Global Area Equipped for Irrigation (2020-2100).xlsx.</li> </ul> <p>3. <strong>Technical Annex.docx</strong></p> <ul> <li>Detailed methodology, validation, and workflow documentation.</li> </ul> <h1><strong>4. Applications</strong></h1> <p>This dataset supports:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Earth System Simulation: </strong>Supporting irrigation parameterization in global climate and hydrological models.</li> <li><strong>Water Resource Management: </strong>Assisting decision-makers in sustainable irrigation planning.</li> <li><strong>Climate Change Adaptation: </strong>Providing insights into how irrigation practices evolve under different socioeconomic pathways.</li> <li><strong>Environmental Conservation: </strong>Assessing the impact of irrigation on regional ecosystems.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Note:</strong></p> <p>Global aggregated totals of area equipped for irrigation derived from the 26 prediction units (country/regional scale) may exhibit minor discrepancies compared to sums calculated from the 5-arcminute gridded data (≈10 km resolution). Such differences stem from variations in spatial aggregation methods, file formats (vector vs. raster), and underlying data processing frameworks. Users may select the dataset best aligned with their analytical objectives:</p> <ul> <li>The <strong>country/region-based data (26 units)</strong> is recommended for national-scale analyses or policy evaluations requiring administrative boundaries.</li> <li>The <strong>5-arcminute gridded data</strong> is preferable for spatially explicit modeling or subnational assessments.</li> </ul> <p>Both datasets maintain equivalent quality and methodological rigor; the choice depends on the desired spatial granularity and application context.</p>
Projected Global Fertilizers Consumption Datasets during 2020-2100 under SSP scenarios
<h1><strong>1. Background</strong></h1> <p>Accurate projections of future global fertilizer consumption are critical for advancing research in earth system modeling, agricultural sustainability, and fertilizer industry planning. However, existing datasets often lack long-term temporal coverage and high spatial resolution. To address this gap, we present the <strong>Projected Global Fertilizers Consumption Datasets (PGFCD)</strong>, which provide spatially explicit estimates of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilizer consumption from 2020 to 2100 under three Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios: <strong>SSP1</strong> (sustainable development), <strong>SSP2</strong> (intermediate development), and <strong>SSP3</strong> (regional rivalry), <strong>SSP4</strong> (unequal development), and <strong>SSP5</strong> (fossil-fueled development).</p> <p> </p> <h1><strong>2. Methodology</strong></h1> <h2><strong>2.1 Ensemble Machine Learning (EML) Framework</strong></h2> <ul> <li><strong>Algorithms</strong>: Integrated six machine learning models: <ul> <li>Multiple Linear Regression (MLR)</li> <li>Decision Trees (DT)</li> <li>Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA)</li> <li>Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)</li> <li>Radial Basis Function (RBF)</li> <li>Random Forests (RF)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Training Data</strong>: Historical national/regional fertilizer consumption (FAOSTAT, 1961–2015).</li> <li><strong>Validation Metrics</strong>: <ul> <li>Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE): <strong>0.93</strong></li> <li>Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE): <strong>0.89</strong></li> <li>Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE): <strong>10.97%</strong></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h2><strong>2.2 Spatial Downscaling</strong></h2> <ul> <li><strong>Baseline</strong>: FAO 2000 fertilizer data combined with gridded nutrient application maps for major crops in 2000.</li> <li><strong>Dynamic Projection</strong>: Annual change rates applied to 5′ × 5′ grids under SSP-specific socioeconomic drivers.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <h1><strong>3. Dataset Overview</strong></h1> <h2><strong>3.1 Key Features</strong></h2> <ul> <li><strong>Temporal Coverage</strong>: 2020–2100 (10-year intervals).</li> <li><strong>Spatial Resolution</strong>: 5-arcminute (≈10 km at the equator).</li> <li><strong>Scenarios</strong>: SSP1, SSP2, SSP3, SSP4, SSP5. </li> <li><strong>Variables</strong>: N, P, and K fertilizer consumption (tonnes/year).</li> </ul> <h2><strong>3.2 Dataset Structure</strong></h2> <p>The dataset is provided as a compressed archive (PGFCD_Ver6.0.rar), containing:</p> <p><strong>1. Fertilization_Consumption_GeoTiff</strong><strong>/</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Subfolders</strong>: <ul> <li>N_fer/: Nitrogen fertilizer projections</li> <li>P_fer/: Phosphorus fertilizer projections</li> <li>K_fer/: Potassium fertilizer projections</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>File Format</strong>: GeoTIFF (135 files total). <ul> <li><strong>Naming Convention</strong>:<br>[FertilizerType]_fer_con_[SSP]_[Year].tif <ul> <li>Example: K_fer_con_SSP1_2020.tif</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>2. Country_region_based/</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Shapefiles</strong>: National/regional fertilizer consumption for 26 prediction units (2020–2100).</li> <li><strong>Excel File</strong>: Global Fertilizer Consumption (2020-2100).xlsx.</li> </ul> <p><strong>3. Technical Annex.docx</strong></p> <ul> <li>Detailed methodology, validation, and workflow documentation.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <h1><strong>4. Applications</strong></h1> <p>This dataset supports:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Earth System Modeling</strong>: Improved parameterization of fertilization impacts on biogeochemical cycles.</li> <li><strong>Agricultural Policy</strong>: Scenario-based planning for sustainable fertilizer use.</li> <li><strong>Industry Strategy</strong>: Long-term market analysis under diverse socioeconomic pathways.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <h1><strong>Note:</strong></h1> <p>Global aggregated totals of fertilizer consumption derived from the 26 prediction units (country/regional scale) may exhibit minor discrepancies compared to sums calculated from the 5-arcminute gridded data (≈10 km resolution). Such differences stem from variations in spatial aggregation methods, file formats (vector vs. raster), and underlying data processing frameworks. Users may select the dataset best aligned with their analytical objectives:</p> <ul> <li>The <strong>country/region-based data (26 units)</strong> is recommended for national-scale analyses or policy evaluations requiring administrative boundaries.</li> <li>The <strong>5-arcminute gridded data</strong> is preferable for spatially explicit modeling or subnational assessments.</li> </ul> <p>Both datasets maintain equivalent quality and methodological rigor; the choice depends on the desired spatial granularity and application context.</p> <p>We are profoundly indebted to <strong>Dr. Andreas Gericke</strong> at Section II 2.3 Protection of the Seas and Polar Regions, German Environment Agency, and <strong>Dr. Veronika Schlosser</strong> at Chair of Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agricultural Systems, Technical University of Munich for their diligent review and insightful feedback on the previously submitted data. Their expertise has enabled us to thoroughly correct the identified inaccuracies, strengthening the integrity of our research.</p> <p>We hold <strong>Dr. Andreas Gericke</strong> and <strong>Dr. Veronika Schlosser</strong> in the highest esteem and sincerely apologize for any oversights that may have marred our work.</p>
Dataset for the paper "Historical model biases in monthly high temperature anomalies indicate under-projection of future temperature extremes"
<div> <div>This repository holds data and scripts related to the revision of the paper entitled: <span>"Historical model biases in monthly high temperature anomalies indicate under-projection of future temperature extremes" </span>by Lei Duan, Lyssa M. Freese, Govindasamy Bala, and Ken Caldeira. <span>The paper is currently submitted for peer review. </span>Any questions regarding the data and paper could be sent to the corresponding author: Lei Duan (leiduan@carnegiescience.edu). </div> </div>
Anthropogenic emissions of CH4, N2O, F-gases and BC from GAINS, for EU-countries plus CH, NO, UK developed under the EYE-CLIMA project - March 2025 update
<p><span>As part of the EYE-CLIMA project, GAINS emission data for CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, BC and selected F-gases (HFC-125, HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-23, HFC-32 and SF<sub>6</sub></span>) were released for all EU-27 countries plus UK, Switzerland, and Norway for the period 1990 to 2020 (with exception of F-gases, from 2005 only, and BC/CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from agricultural waste burning, from 2000). Results have been documented in EYE-CLIMA deliverable D2.8 (<a href="http://folk.nilu.no/~rthompson/eyeclima_reports/EYECLIMA_D2.8.pdf">http://folk.nilu.no/~rthompson/eyeclima_reports/EYECLIMA_D2.8.pdf</a>), and they are publicly available at the Zenodo repository under <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11032177">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11032177</a>. All data is available on a 0.1°x0.1° grid and in monthly resolution. Emissions are attributed to the respective source categories according to GNFR.</p> <p>The motivation of an update resulted from the need to extending the emission data time series to 2023. With underlying statistics and national emission data currently available till 2022 only (the latter submitted to UNFCCC only by December 2024), the historical data series also could only be established for 2022. Here we use the GAINS scenario feature to extrapolate between 2022 historical data and the first scenario point, 2025 which is based on IEA’s Word Energy Outlook 2023 (https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023). Obviously, this also means that emission results for 2023 are not any more based on robust statistics but represent an extrapolation.</p> <p>Extrapolation of spatially explicit data is only possible when the spatial resolution conveys a realistic signal. For the sector “agricultural waste burning” (files with “AWB” as sector, see notation below) spatial allocation is based on actual observation from satellites. As such data products on agricultural fires have been made available until 2022 only, no spatial or temporal signal exists for 2023. The time series provided thus has to end in 2022. No recommendation can be given to modellers, other than to either use 2022 also for 2023 (understanding that the pattern will be strikingly different) or to use a five-year average (which will remove a lot of spatial specificity).</p> <p>The updated dataset covers files as follows (internally, all files now carry version number V05):</p> <p>ALL_FLUX_ALL_EUR_MOD_MONTH_19900101_20231231_GAINS_IIASA_V05.csv</p> <p>BC_FLUX_ALL_EUR_MOD_MONTH_19900101_20231231_GAINS_IIASA_V05.nc</p> <p>BC_FLUX_AWB_EUR_MOD_MONTH_20000101_20221231_GAINS_IIASA_V05.nc</p> <p>CH4_FLUX_ALL_EUR_MOD_MONTH_19900101_20231231_GAINS_IIASA_V05.nc</p> <p>CH4_FLUX_AWB_EUR_MOD_MONTH_20000101_20221231_GAINS_IIASA_V05.nc</p> <p>HFC_FLUX_ALL_EUR_MOD_YEAR_20050101_20231231_GAINS_IIASA_V05.nc</p> <p>N2O_FLUX_ALL_EUR_MOD_MONTH_19900101_20231231_GAINS_IIASA_V05.nc</p> <p>SF6_FLUX_ALL_EUR_MOD_YEAR_20050101_20231231_GAINS_IIASA_V05.nc</p> <p>This is version 2.0 of the dataset. It extends from version 1.0 by covering into the year 2023, but also benefits from a number of additional GAINS improvements. Emissions of emitted compounds are provided as kg/m²/s. File names follow the notation developed for the H-Europe project EYE-CLIMA, i.e. species _ variable-type _ sector _ region _ method (MOD=model) _ timestep _ fromTime _ toTime _ model _ institute _ version . filetype.</p> <p>This version is available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15536170">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15536170</a>. The generic address of the dataset is <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10886780">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10886780</a>, resolving to the latest update available at Zenodo. No further updates are planned in EYE-CLIMA, so this version is expected to also reflect the final update within the project.</p> <p>Compared to version 1.0, GAINS benefitted from a number of new developments such as the following:</p> <p>*) Previously, GAINS has been available in five-year timesteps only (with the aim of allowing for scenarios at that resolution). For data version 1.0, a makeshift solution was found to convert into annual data. A recent update now allows, for historic data, to store and retrieve information on an annual basis (from 1990).</p> <p>*) The energy data were obtained from IEA’s world energy balances 2024 (July version, https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/world-energy-balances#documentation), extending into 2022 and extrapolated towards 2025, downscaled from IEA to GAINS sectors and sub-sectors. Additionally, the annual activity of industrial production is estimated using a linear approach, based on five-year timestep data.</p> <p>*) Agricultural statistics were retrieved from Eurostat (and from FAO globally) and extended to 2022, extrapolated towards 2025.</p> <p>*) Interpretation of GAINS data was reconfirmed and updated in consultations with national experts of multiple EU countries. While the process resulted in revised emission projections to be used in the Clean Air Outlook 4 (see <a title="Protected by Check Point: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/air/clean-air-outlook_en" href="https://protect.checkpoint.com/v2/r02/___https:/environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/air/clean-air-outlook_en___.YzJlOmlpYXNhOmM6bzoyYzdiNDRhNDI4Njc3ZjI5MGFjMTU1N2I2OWVmNzM2ZTo3OjE5OTM6ZTFiY2IzMDMxZGViNGE0MjI0ODRmNWQ4NzA3ZDY3Njc4M2U2NzUxNmEwNzQ0ODViNDBhODc1NmNhZmMzY2FlMjpoOkY6Tg"><span lang="EN-GB">https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/air/clean-air-outlook_en</span></a><span lang="EN-GB">). While the details of improvements on the individual aspects cannot be disclosed, they are useful to describe historic data most adequately, and have been integrated also in this assessment. That not only leads to changes in absolute emissions for a given year, but also affects trends that now are more plausible and confirmed through the exchange with the national experts.</span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">*) Technical adjustments have improved the precision of temporal allocation of emissions and the conversion of grid sizes to actual area.</span></p>
Circularity3 DDOMP - Project tracksheets: scholarly publications, non-peer-reviewed digital outputs, dataset log, and software log.
<p>Project tracking sheets for the Circularity3 project. </p> <p>The following tracking sheets are provided:</p> <ol> <li>Scholarly Publications </li> <li>Non-peer-reviewed digital outputs</li> <li>Dataset log </li> <li>Software log </li> </ol> <p>For further specifications and explanations of the tracking sheets refer to the Circularity3 DDOMP here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11047951</p> <p> </p> <p>This tracking sheets reference widely the PARSEC research teams tracking sheets, to whom we are very grateful for their transparent and insightful documentation.</p> <p>Stall, Shelley, Specht, Alison, Corrêa, Pedro Luiz Pizzigatti, David, Romain, Edmunds, Rorie, Mabile, Laurence, Machicao, Jeaneth, Miyairi, Nobuko, Murayama, Yasuhiro, O'Brien, Margaret, Wyborn, Lesley, & Vellenich, Danton Ferreira. (2023). PARSEC Data and Digital Output Management Plan and Workbook. Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3891426">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3891426</a></p>
Dataset for the project "Evaluation of the effects of trace elements from street dust under urban – industrial conditions on the ecophysiology of Acer platanoides L. and Tilia cordata Mill.
<p>Description of the project: The rapid growth of cities, industry and transport has significantly deteriorated environmental quality, especially in areas with the highest population densities. It applies to water, soil, and air, especially in urban areas. Air pollutants include particulate matter (PM), which harms human health. According to WHO reports (2021), PM pollution is the cause of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, leading to 4.2 million premature deaths worldwide in 2016. Although improving every year, the situation in Poland is still worse than in many European countries. The particulate matter also includes heavy metals, which have a toxic effect on plants. Plants in urban areas are particularly vulnerable, especially trees, which perform several vital functions, including mitigating climate change, filtering pollutants, and improving air quality. The aim of the project was to determine and compare the morphological and physiological responses of selected tree species to particulate pollution stress under urban conditions. Tree leaves are an essential barrier to atmospheric dust by trapping it on their surface. However, this may come at the cost of reduced light absorption, increased leaf temperature, damage to leaf blades and consequently impaired photosynthesis and plant productivity. However, the ability to absorb dust varies between tree species. It depends on the leaf surface structure, and the response may be due to the species' sensitivity to pollutants. Investigations were conducted in the Upper Silesian Industrial Area around various emission sources, such as heavy metal smelters, combined heat and power plants, and busy streets. The research focused on two tree species common in urban areas, the Norway maple (<i>Acer platanoides</i>) and the small-leaved lime (<i>Tilia cordata</i>). It included measurement of heavy metal concentrations in leaf blades and dust collected on their surface, analysis of concentrations of selected pigments and ascorbic acid as markers of environmental stress. The study provided a preliminary assessment of the impact of particulate pollution on tree function under harsh urban conditions and determined the potential of the studied species to reduce atmospheric dust.</p>
Antarctic Ice-Ocean Coupled Projections
<p>UKESM1-Ice Antarctic Ocean-Ice sheet coupled projections associated with the SSP1-1.9 and SSP5-8.5 climate change scenarios for the 2015-2100 period. Each scenario is composed by four ensemble members. The <strong>README.txt</strong> file includes a general description of the dataset. Details about the projections and the model implementation can be found in <a href="https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4053/2022/">https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4053/2022/</a>. </p>
Deep learning segmentation projects of FIB-SEM dataset of U2-OS cell
<p>This submission includes ground truth datasets that were used to segment the nuclear envelope (NE), mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi from a human bone osteosarcoma epithelial cell (U2-OS) imaged using focused-ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM).</p><p>The full FIB-SEM dataset is deposited to EMPIAR (<a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/empiar">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/empiar</a>, EMPIAR-11746). </p>
Every Walk You Take Project - Images
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
University Learning Management System xAPI data for the ILEDA project
<p>Anonymized data in xAPI format collected from learning management systems (Moodle and LAMS) for the ILEDA (2021-1-BG01-KA220-HED-000031121) project https://ileda.eu/ileda-project. The dataset contains 306,741 records of 829 individuals participating in eight different blended learning courses following either a flipped classroom methodology or a project-based learning methodology from four universities: University of Eastern Finland (Finland), University of León (Spain), Belgrade Metropolitan University (Serbia) and Sofia University (Bulgaria).</p>
Stiffness Moduli Modelling and Prediction in Four-Point Bending of Asphalt Mixtures: A Machine Learning-Based Framework within Weave-UNISONO 2021 project, NCN project No 2021/03/Y/ST8/00079, and GACR project GA22-04047K
<div><strong>Summary:</strong></div> <div>Two selected mixtures were thoroughly investigated in an experimental trial carried out by means of a four-point bending test (4PBT) apparatus. The mixtures were prepared using spilite aggregate, a conventional 50/70 penetration grade bitumen, and limestone filler. Their stiffness moduli (SM) were determined while samples were exposed to 11 loading frequencies (from 0.1 to 50 Hz) and 4 testing temperatures (from 0 to 30 °C). Observations were recorded and used to develop a machine learning (ML) model. The main scope was the prediction of the stiffness moduli based on the volumetric properties and testing conditions of the corresponding mixtures, which would provide the advantage of reducing the laboratory efforts required to determine them.</div> <div> </div> <div><strong>The dataset includes:</strong></div> <div>Characteristics of bituminous binder, CSV raw data</div> <div> <ul> <li>bituminous binder.csv</li> </ul> </div> <div>Grading curves of tested asphalt mixtures</div> <ul> <li>AML16 Grading curves.csv</li> <li>AMP22 Grading curves.csv</li> </ul> <div>Volumetric characterizations of AML16 and AMP22 mixtures</div> <ul> <li>AML16 Volumetric characterizations.csv</li> <li>AMP22 Volumetric characterizations.csv</li> </ul> <div>Outcomes of the 4PBT experimental trial carried out on AML16 and AMP22 mixtures</div> <ul> <li>AML16 Stiffness Modulus 4PB.csv</li> <li>AMP22 Stiffness Modulus 4PB.csv</li> </ul>
CONUS-wide Balancing Authority Scale Hydropower Projections derived from 9505 Third Assessment
<p>This dataset provides historical and climate projection monthly hydropower generation timeseries for balancing authorities within the contiguous U.S. (CONUS). These data were developed as an extension to the Department of Energy Water Power Technologies Office's SECURE Water Act Section 9505 Third Assessment (9505) and include both federal and non-federal hydropower facilities. Additional modeling detail can be found in <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ad6ceb" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Broman et al., 2024</a> and in the article's <a href="https://github.com/9505-PNNL/broman-etal_2024_erl">metarepository</a>. </p> <p>The dataset is provided in three separate formats to facilitate ease of use:</p> <p>1) Machine-readable csv in 'tidy' data format:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Short Name</strong></td> <td><strong>Unit</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>class</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>simulation type; control: historical, cc: climate scenario</td> </tr> <tr> <td>forcing</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>meteorological forcing used to drive hydrology model</td> </tr> <tr> <td>model</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>hydrology model</td> </tr> <tr> <td>hp</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>hydropower model</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gcm*</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>global climate model name</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ds*</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>downscaling method; DBCCA (statistical), RegCM (dynamical)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>balancing_authority</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>balancing authority code</td> </tr> <tr> <td>year</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>month</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>month</td> </tr> <tr> <td>modeled_generation_MWh</td> <td>MWh per month</td> <td>simulated generation</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>* only present in the climate projection (cc) files</p> <p>2) xlsx with balancing authority data by tab</p> <p>3) csv by balancing authority:</p> <p>for historical data: year, <em>month</em>, and <em>HUC4_group</em> columns are the same as above. Data column headers are <em>class</em>_<em>forcing</em>_<em>model</em>_<em>hp</em> and with the units <em>MWh per month</em>.</p> <p>for climate projection (cc) data: year, <em>month</em>, and <em>HUC4_group</em> columns are the same as above. Data column headers are <em>class</em>_<em>forcing</em>_<em>model</em>_<em>hp_gcm_ds</em> and with the units <em>MWh per month</em>.</p>
The Tsez Annotated Corpus Project
<p>Cite the source of the dataset as:</p> <blockquote> <p>Abdulaev, A.K. & I. K. Abdullaev. 2010. Cezyas folklor/Dido (Tsez) folklore/Didojskij (cezskij) fol´klor. Leipzig–Makhachkala: "Lotos".</p> </blockquote>
methal-project/alsatian-character-speech: v1.0
<p>Extraction of character speech and associated metadata from the Methal project corpus and its character prosopography.</p> <p>Initial version.</p>
The Femern-project: a large-scale excavation of a Stone Age landscape - supplementary data
<p>This dataset contains all radiocarbon dates from the Femern project.</p> <p>Please cite the dataset as: </p> <p>Måge, B.T., Groß, D., Kanstrup, M. 2023. The Femern-project: a large-scale excavation of a Stone Age landscape. In: Groß, D. and Rothstein, M.: Changing Identity in a Changing World. Archaeological Studies on Human Interaction in Northern Europe around 4000 cal BC. Leiden: Sidestone, supplementary material.</p> <p>19.02.2024: Dataset updated: Wrong species ID in original dataset for AAR-27426</p>
Demo bids for to demonstration areas in OneNet project of the Hungarian demonstration
<p>Bid auction data of a DSO flexibility market simulation data in two demo areas based on past real measurement, power gas exchange data.</p> <p>The two .csv files contain the bid data for all FSP assets in two demonstration areas, both are a given snippet of DSO networks used for congestion simulations, Demo Area 1 and Demo Area 2, respectively. The bids are simulated and based on post hoc day-ahead market data and measurements. All FSP assets are photovoltaic generators. For a given day every asset submits stepwise hourly bids for every hour of the day.</p> <p>The two .CSV files consist of the following columns:</p> <p>Date: the date that the bid is submitted to (YYYY-MM-DD)</p> <p>Time: the hour that the bid is submitted to (HH)</p> <p>AssetId: ID of the bidding asset (photovoltaic generator)</p> <p>quantity: quantity of a bid step for an hour of a day in MW</p> <p>price: the price of the bid step for an hour of a day in EUR</p> <p> </p> <p>More information on the demo areas can be found in the <a href="https://www.onenet-project.eu//wp-content/uploads/2023/10/OneNet_D10.4_V1.0.pdf">D10.4 Report on demonstration</a> deliverable of the OneNet project.</p> <p>public_demo_area_1.csv file represents the bids in the E.On demo area and the public_demo_area_2.csv file in the MVM demo area, respectively. </p> <p> </p>
The Ashwell Project - data
<p>This dataset contains the stories captured through The Ashwell Project. These stories were collated before being disseminated through the Progressive Web App. </p>
An ensemble of trend preserving statistically downscaled projections for key marine variables under three different future scenarios for the region of the Yucatán Peninsula
<p>The ensemble provides future projections of key marine variables under climate change for the region of the Yucatán Peninsula. The datasets were produced for three different future scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5) and five different variables (potential temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH and chlorophyll) at three different depth levels (5m, 25m and seafloor with the exception of chlorophyll) at monthly frequency for the years 1993 - 2099. The statistical metrics provided are the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum median, 2.5 and 97.5 percentile. The ensemble is computed over 3-7 different CMIP6 model realisations (depending on variable), the bias corrections and statistical downscaling was trained on the GLORYS12V1 reanalysis provided by the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS).<br> <br>Analogue datasets are provided in separate zenodo entries for the regions of the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Bay of Biscay and the Chilean coast, see “Related identifiers”.</p> <p>The following Earth System Models were used in building the ensemble:</p> <ul> <li>CMCC-ESM2 (Lovato et al. 2022)</li> <li>CMCC-CM2-SR5 (Cherchi et al. 2019)</li> <li>GFDL-ESM4 (Dunne et al., 2020)</li> <li>MPI-ESM1-2-LR (Mauritsen et al., 2020)</li> <li>IPSL-CM6A-LR (Boucher et al. 2020)</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP. Generated using E.U. Copernicus Marine Service Information; <a href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00021">https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00021</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00019">https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00019</a>.</p> <p>A description of the downscaling approach and evaluation of the datasets over the European regions is published in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51160-1">Kristiansen et al. 2024</a>.</p> <p><strong>This data is distributed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License</a>.</strong></p>
An ensemble of trend preserving statistically downscaled projections for key marine variables under three different future scenarios for the Chilean coast
<p>The ensemble provides future projections of key marine variables under climate change for the Chilean coast. The datasets were produced for three different future scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5) and three different variables (potential temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH) at three different depth levels (5m, 25m and seafloor with the exception of chlorophyll) at monthly frequency for the years 1993 - 2099. The statistical metrics provided are the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum median, 2.5 and 97.5 percentile. The ensemble is computed over 3-7 different CMIP6 model realisations (depending on variable), the bias corrections and statistical downscaling was trained on the GLORYS12V1 reanalysis provided by the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS).</p> <p>The following Earth System Models were used in building the ensemble:</p> <ul> <li>CMCC-ESM2 (Lovato et al. 2022)</li> <li>CMCC-CM2-SR5 (Cherchi et al. 2019)</li> <li>GFDL-ESM4 (Dunne et al., 2020)</li> <li>MPI-ESM1-2-LR (Mauritsen et al., 2020)</li> <li>IPSL-CM6A-LR (Boucher et al. 2020)</li> </ul> <p> <br>Analogue datasets are provided in separate zenodo entries for the regions of the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Bay of Biscay and the area around the Yucatán Peninsula, see “Related identifiers”.</p> <p>A description of the downscaling approach and evaluation of the datasets over the European regions is published in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51160-1">Kristiansen et al. 2024</a>.</p> <p>We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP. Generated using E.U. Copernicus Marine Service Information; <a href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00021">https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00021</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00019">https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00019</a>.</p> <p><br><strong>This data is distributed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License</a>.</strong></p>
An ensemble of trend preserving statistically downscaled projections for key marine variables under three different future scenarios for the Bay of Biscay
<p>The ensemble provides future projections of key marine variables under climate change for the Bay of Biscay region. The datasets were produced for three different future scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5) and five different variables (potential temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH and chlorophyll) at three different depth levels (5m, 25m and seafloor with the exception of chlorophyll) at monthly frequency for the years 1993 - 2099. The statistical metrics provided are the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum median, 2.5 and 97.5 percentile. The ensemble is computed over 3-7 different CMIP6 model realisations (depending on variable), the bias corrections and statistical downscaling was trained on the GLORYS12V1 reanalysis provided by the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS).</p> <p>The following Earth System Models were used in building the ensemble:</p> <ul> <li>CMCC-ESM2 (Lovato et al. 2022)</li> <li>CMCC-CM2-SR5 (Cherchi et al. 2019)</li> <li>GFDL-ESM4 (Dunne et al., 2020)</li> <li>MPI-ESM1-2-LR (Mauritsen et al., 2020)</li> <li>IPSL-CM6A-LR (Boucher et al. 2020)</li> </ul> <p>A description of the downscaling approach and evaluation of the datasets over the European regions is published in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51160-1">Kristiansen et al. 2024</a>.</p> <p>Analogue datasets are provided in separate zenodo entries for the regions of the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Chilean coast and the area around the Yucatán Peninsula, see “Related identifiers”.</p> <p> </p> <p>We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP. Generated using E.U. Copernicus Marine Service Information; <a href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00021">https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00021</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00019">https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00019</a>.</p> <p><br><strong>This data is distributed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License</a>.</strong></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.