Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
19,293
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
19,293 results for “western”
FIGURE 7. Claiborne Fabaceae Floral Type 1 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 7. Claiborne Fabaceae Floral Type 1: UF15820-061142, a laterally compressed flower with three perianth parts and pedicel. Scale bar equals 2 mm.
FIGURE 14 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 14. "Short, broad winged fruit" 1) UF15820- 007696, fruit showing acuminate apex (a), wing (w) along placental suture, and valve venation (v); 2) UF15820-007679, fruit showing stipe (s), wing (w) along placental suture, and valve venation (v); 3) UF15820- 005834, fruit showing stipe (s) and wing (w) along placental suture; 4) UF15820-007082, fruit showing wing (w) along placental suture and valve venation (v). All scale bars equal 5 mm.
FIGURE 2 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 2. Simplified stratigraphic column of the middle Eocene Claiborne Group in northern Mississippi and western Tennessee (after Dockery, 1996). Specimens examined in this paper were collected from the Cockfield Formation at the Puryear locality (P), Tennessee. Specimens from other localities used for comparison were collected from the Tallahatta Formation at the Bovay and Bolden localities (BB), Mississippi and the Cockfield Formation at the Warman clay pit (W; stratigraphically lower than the Puryear locality), Tennessee.
FIGURE 11 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 11. cf. Caesalpinia sp.: 1) UF15820-005862, fruit showing at least seven seed chambers, one seed impression in valve (indicated by arrow), and angular apex on the right. Scale bar equals 4 mm; 2) UF15820-008961, fruit showing seven seed chambers, oblique striations (os), and obtuse apex on the right. Scale bar equals 4 mm.
FIGURE 16. Claiborne Fabaceae Fruit Type 1 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 16. Claiborne Fabaceae Fruit Type 1: 1) UF15820-061134, showing nutlet in the middle, large wing at the top and small wing at the bottom. Arrows a and b indicate areas to be enlarged to show spines on the nutlet. The other two arrows on the right indicate that the two wings are on different levels with clay infilling between them. Scale bar equals 3 mm; 2) Enlargement of a in Figure 16.1 to show spines. Scale bar equals 1 mm; 3) Enlargement of b in Figure 16.1 to show spines going underneath the small wing. Scale bar equals 1 mm; 4) UF15820-059396, showing a pedicel (p) – or gynophore and spines (s). Scale bar equals 3 mm.
FIGURE 28. Claiborne Altingiaceae Infructescence Type 1 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 28. Claiborne Altingiaceae Infructescence Type 1: 1) UF15820-43600, infructescence with cluster of fruits. Scale bar equals 3 mm; 2) UF15820-059407, infructescence with cluster of fruits and peduncle. Scale bar equals 2 mm.
FIGURE 13 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 13. "Fruits similar to the Sophoreae" 1) UF15820-005847, fruit showing obtuse apex on the right and rounded base with stipe (s) on the left, and funiculus (f); 2) UF15820-000025a, fruit showing outlines of ovules (indicated by arrows), and rounded base with stipe on the right. All scale bars equal 2 mm.
FIGURE 19 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 19. Eoceltis dilcheri Zavada and Crepet, 1981: 1) 15816-001356, specimen showing two flowers each with three tepals. Note filaments (f) and dense, simple trichomes (t). Scale bar equals 1 mm; 2) UF15816- 000455, showing a flower with four tepals covered with dense, simple trichomes (t). Scale bar equals 1 mm.
FIGURE 17. Claiborne Fabaceae Fruit Type 1 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 17. Claiborne Fabaceae Fruit Type 1: CONN- R03-01, compressed fruit showing a long pedicel and spines (indicated by arrow). Scale bar equals 3 mm.
FIGURE 5 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 5. Ceratophyllum muricatum Chamisso subspecies incertum (Berry) Herendeen, Les and Dilcher, 1990: 1) CONN-Q12-03, specimen showing fruit body and lateral spines; 2) CONN-Q12-04, an incomplete fruit showing lateral spines. All scale bars equal 2 mm.
FIGURE 29 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 29. Liquidambar? sp.: CONN-Q12-01, laterally compressed infructescence with persistent styles. Scale bar equals 4 mm.
FIGURE 10 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 10. Caesalpinia claibornensis Herendeen and Dilcher, 1991: 1) UF15820-005854, incomplete fruit showing both valve and wing venation; 2) UF15820-005855, incomplete fruit showing both valve and wing venation. All scale bars equal 5 mm.
FIGURE 4. Claiborne Arecaceae Fruit Type 1 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA
FIGURE 4. Claiborne Arecaceae Fruit Type 1: UF15820-059477, laterally compressed fruit with fibers. Note that curved fibers (indicated by arrows) extend from the base to beyond the apex of the fruit. Scale bar equals 2 mm.
Figure 5 in Management of the invasive Nuttall's pondweed (Elodea nuttallii) in Lough Arrow, a Natura 2000 designated lake in Western Ireland
Figure 5. Boxplot of Chara spp. % cover from control, single and double jute matting treatments pre and post application.
Table 1 in First Cretaceous teleostean otolith assemblage (Arkadelphia Formation, upper Maastrichtian) from Arkansas, USA, early Gadiformes, and the Western Interior Seaway
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Taxa from the Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas, USA) with number of specimens, percentage of total, and occurrences in the Cretaceous and Paleocene of North America. Letters in third and fourth columns refer to the following references: <b>A</b> =Stringer et al. (2020); <b>B</b> = Schwarzhans and Stringer (2020a); <b>C</b> = Schwarzhans et al. (2018b); <b>D</b> = Hoganson et al. (2019); <b>E</b> =Stringer et al. (2018); <b>F</b> = Schwarzhans (1985); <b>G</b> = Frizzell (1965a). References are not inclusive but provide evidence of the range of the species in North America. <b>Order=FORMES, Family=idae</b></p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Taxa</b></th><th><b>No. of specimens</b></th><th><b>% of total</b></th><th><b>Known N. Am Cretaceous</b></th><th><b>Known N. Am Paleocene</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>ELOPIFORMES Elopidae</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Elops</i> sp.</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>C</td><td>F</td></tr><tr><th><b>ALBULIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Albulidae</b></th></tr><tr><th>Albuliformes indeterminate</th><td>4</td><td>0.19</td><td>E</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><i>Elopothrissus</i> sp.</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>A</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>ORDER INDETERMINATE Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Genartina</i> sp.</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>B</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Osmeroididae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Osmeroides</i> sp.</th><td>3</td><td>0.14</td><td>A</td><td>G</td></tr><tr><th><b>ANGUILLIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Anguillidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Anguilla</i>? <i>chickasawae</i></th><td>6</td><td>0.28</td><td>A</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Ophichthidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Echiophis</i> aff. <i>E. semisphaeroides</i></th><td>11</td><td>0.52</td><td>B</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Family Indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Muraenanguilla</i>? sp.</th><td>2</td><td>0.09</td><td>A</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>OSTEOGLOSSIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Kokenichthys navis</i></th><td>2</td><td>0.09</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>CLUPEIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th>Clupeiform? indeterminate</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th><b>SILURIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Ariidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Arius</i>? <i>subtilis</i></th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>A</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Vorhisia vulpes</i></th><td>1,537</td><td>72.88</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>AULOPIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Ichthyotringidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Apateodus crenellatus</i>?</th><td>3</td><td>0.14</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>GADIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Merlucciidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Palaeogadus</i>? <i>belli</i> sp. nov.</th><td>148</td><td>7.02</td><td>No</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><i>Palaeogadus</i> cf. <i>P. weltoni</i></th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>B</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>GADIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th>Gadiformes indeterminate</th><td>11</td><td>0.52</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><th><b>HOLOCENTRIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Tippaha mythica</i></th><td>8</td><td>0.38</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>BERYCIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family indeterminate</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Eutawichthys maastrichtiensis</i></th><td>21</td><td>1.00</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><i>Eutawichthys zideki</i></th><td>287</td><td>13.61</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><i>Eutawichthys</i> cf. <i>E. stringeri</i></th><td>48</td><td>2.28</td><td>C</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>OPHIDIIFORMES</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Ophidiidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Ampheristus</i> cf. <i>A. americanus</i></th><td>6</td><td>0.28</td><td>B</td><td>B</td></tr><tr><th><b>Bythitidae</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>Protobythites brzobohatyi</i></th><td>4</td><td>0.19</td><td>B</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>ORDER UNKNOWN</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Family unknown</b></th></tr><tr><th>Lapillus type 1</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>A</td><td>No</td></tr><tr><th><b>Family unknown</b></th></tr><tr><th>Unknown sagitta</th><td>1</td><td>0.05</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><th><b>Total</b></th><td>2,109</td><td>~100</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 3 in First Cretaceous teleostean otolith assemblage (Arkadelphia Formation, upper Maastrichtian) from Arkansas, USA, early Gadiformes, and the Western Interior Seaway
<p><b>Table 3.</b> Percentage similarity measurements for the otolith assemblages from the Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas, USA), Fox Hills Formation (NDGS 5597, North Dakota, USA), Kemp Clay (South Sulphur River locality, Texas, USA), Ripley Formation (Blue Springs locality, Mississippi, USA, and Severn Formation (five sites, Maryland, USA). Data for calculations were obtained from this study (Table 1) for the Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality), from Hoganson et al. (2019) for the Fox Hills Formation (NDGS 5597 locality), from Schwarzhans and Stringer (2020a) for the Kemp Clay (South Sulphur River locality), from Stringer et al. (2020, table 2) for the Ripley Formation (Blue Springs locality; bulk samples only), and from Stringer and Schwarzhans (2021; table 3) for the Severn Formation (four sites).</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Localities compared</b></th><th><b>Percent</b> <b>similarity</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas) and Fox Hills Formation (NDGS 5597, North Dakota)</th><td>30.32%</td></tr><tr><th>Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas) and Kemp Clay (South Sulphur River locality Texas)</th><td>35.73 %</td></tr><tr><th>Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas) and Ripley Formation (Blue Springs locality, Mississippi)</th><td>5.46%</td></tr><tr><th>Arkadelphia Formation (Cabot locality, Arkansas) and Severn Formation (four sites in Maryland)</th><td>57.68%</td></tr><tr><th>Kemp Clay (South Sulphur River locality, Texas) and Ripley Formation (Blue Springs locality, Mississippi)</th><td>3.33%</td></tr></tbody></table>
Figure 1 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
Figure 1. Lateral view of SMF 58282, the only surviving syntype of Sphenopsis ochracea (von Berlepsch & Taczanowski, 1884), collected by Siemiradzki at Chaguarpata, Chimborazo, Ecuador, on 5 March 1883. The original field label reads: 'Hemispingus? / ♀? / Chaguarpata (5700') [= 1,737 m] / 5/III 83 / Siemiradzki'. The identification on the secondary (Berlepsch) label reads: 'Chlorospingus [in black ink] ochraceus, Berl. & Tacz. [in pencil]', with 'Chloro' crossed out and replaced by 'Hemi' in pencil, and 'melanotis' in pencil (© Gerald Mayr)
TABLE 1 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
<p>TABLE 1 Five alternative taxonomies of the genus <i>Sphenopsis</i> as presented in (from left to right) the present study; eBird/Clements checklist v.2021 (Clements <i>et al</i>. 2021); IOC world bird list v.12.1 (Gill <i>et al</i>. 2021); Howard & Moore v.4 (Dickinson & Christidis 2014); HBW/Birdlife International digital checklist v.6 (HBW & BirdLife International 2021). The South American Checklist Committee (SACC) of the American Ornithological Society (AOS) currently recognises two species (<i>S. melanotis</i>, <i>S. frontalis</i>) in line with eBird/ Clements and Howard & Moore. The ‘linearised’ taxonomic sequence used in this study (see Appendix) was based on Price-Waldman (2019), wherein <i>S. melanotis</i> (<i>sensu lato</i>, as treated by eBird/Clements and Howard & Moore) was reconstructed as paraphyletic. Taxa recognised at species rank within each taxonomy are shown in boldface. Taxa for which study skins were not personally examined in the present study are denoted thus (—).</p><table><thead><tr><th>Present study</th><th>eBird/Clements</th><th>IOC</th><th>Howard & Moore</th><th>HBW/Birdlife</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>S. melanotis melanotis</th><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td></tr><tr><th>S. m. castaneicollis</th><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td></tr><tr><th>S. frontalis frontalis</th><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td></tr><tr><th>S. f. hanieli</th><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. piurae</i></th><td>S. m. piurae</td><td><i>S. p. piurae</i></td><td>S. m. piurae</td><td>S. p. piurae</td></tr><tr><th>S. ochracea</th><td>S. m. ochracea</td><td><i>S. ochracea</i></td><td>S. m. ochracea</td><td><i>S. ochracea</i></td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. m. macrophrys</td><td>S. p. macrophrys</td><td>S. m. macrophrys</td><td>S. p. macrophrys</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 2 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
<p>TABLE 2 Plumage colour of species in the genus <i>Sphenopsis</i>, scored using study skins (<i>n</i> = 43) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia (ANSP) and Delaware Museum of Nature & Science, Greenville (DMNH) collections (see Appendix for lists of specimens examined). The codes ‘tail-D’ and ‘tail-V’ denote the dorsal and ventral surface of the tail, respectively. Numbers are taken from Smithe (1975): (18) Orange Yellow; (23) Raw Umber; (28) Olive-Brown; (49) Greenish Olive; (51) Citrine; (82) Blackish Neutral Gray; (83) Dark Neutral Gray; (89) Jet Black; (119A) Hair Brown; (121) Vandyke Brown; (121A) Prout’s Brown; (123A) Cinnamon; (123B) Clay Color; (123C) Yellow Ocher; (124) Buff; (129) Dark Brownish Olive; (136) Raw Sienna; (223D) Tawny Olive.</p><table><thead><tr><th>Species</th><th>Crown</th><th>Back</th><th>Tail-D</th><th>Tail-V</th><th>Throat</th><th>Breast</th><th>Belly</th><th>Vent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><i>S. melanotis melanotis</i></th><td>833</td><td>837</td><td>283</td><td>23</td><td>123A</td><td>123A</td><td>124</td><td>123A</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. m. castaneicollis</i></th><td>82</td><td>837</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>893</td><td>136</td><td>124</td><td>1364</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. frontalis frontalis</i></th><td>491,3,5</td><td>493</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>186</td><td>515</td><td>515</td><td>515</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. f. hanieli</i></th><td>493</td><td>491,3</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>123C 4</td><td>123B</td><td>123B</td><td>123A</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. piurae</i></th><td>893</td><td>119A</td><td>283</td><td>284</td><td>893</td><td>136</td><td>1364</td><td>1364</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. ochracea</i></th><td>831</td><td>1292</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>223D</td><td>123B 3</td><td>223D</td><td>123A</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>1</sup> slightly browner <sup>5</sup> slightly more yellow <sup>2</sup> slightly lighter and more olive <sup>6</sup> slightly duller, less bright <sup>3</sup> slightly darker <sup>7</sup> slightly more olive <sup>4</sup> slightly lighter</p>
Table 2 in New observations of Papulifères, putative ciliate cysts, from the plankton of the Chukchi Sea (Western Arctic Ocean) in August of 2023
<p><b>Table 2</b>. The morphological characteristics and sample data (stations and nominal concentrations) of the apparently new Papulifère forms found in the samples taken in 2023. LD refers to longest dimension of the main body (excluding filaments if present). In Morphology Notes, ‘Differs from fig. x.x’ refer to the figures in Dolan et al. 2023; figures are also given in the Supplementary File.</p><table><thead><tr><th>Cyst type</th><th>Morphology Notes</th><th><b>Station</b> (s) found [conc. #L-1] <i># specimens</i></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>2A</th><td><i>Fusopsis sp.,</i> spindle smooth surface/LD 115 µm Differs from fig 6j in larger size and absence of a posterior knob</td><td><b>37</b> [0.01] <i>2</i></td></tr><tr><th>2B</th><td><i>Fusopsis sp</i>., spindle smooth surface/LD 75–85/µm short (3–5µm) filaments Differs from figs 6 f,g,l in larger size and spine lengths & numbers</td><td><b>40</b> [.007] <i>1</i></td></tr><tr><th>2C</th><td><i>Fusopsis sp</i>., spindle smooth surface/LD 50µm/5 long, 25 µm filaments Differs from fig 6c in overall shape small size</td><td><b>54</b> [0.016] <i>1</i></td></tr><tr><th>2D</th><td><i>Fusopsis sp</i>., spindle smooth surface/LD 50 µm/ 3 pairs 30 µm filaments Differs from fig 6g,1 in larger size and filaments in pairs</td><td><b>59</b> [0.007] <i>1</i></td></tr><tr><th>2E</th><td><i>Sphaeropsis sp</i>., oblong smooth surface/ LD 35µm/ 3 10 µm filaments Differs from fig 7f in smaller size and smooth surface</td><td><b>10</b> [0.04] <i>1</i></td></tr><tr><th>2F</th><td><i>Sphaeropsis sp.,</i> oblong smooth surface/LD 70 µm Differs from fig 7h in smaller size and ovoid shape</td><td><b>10</b> [0.01] <i>4</i></td></tr><tr><th>2G</th><td><i>Sphaeropsis sp.,</i> spherical smooth surface/LD 80 µm Differs from fig 7h in smaller size</td><td><b>39</b> [0.08] <i>2</i>, <b>60</b> [0.08] <i>1</i></td></tr><tr><th>2H</th><td><i>Sphaeropsis sp.,</i> oblong smooth surface/LD 105 µm Differs in overall size and shape from other Sphaeropsis in fig7</td><td><b>40</b> [0.004] 1</td></tr></tbody></table>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.