Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 3 in Three new species of horned frogs, Megophrys (Amphibia: Megophryidae), from northeast India, with a resolution to the identity of Megophrys boettgeri populations reported from the region

FIGURE 3. Map of northeastern India (shaded grey) and adjoining countries (white) showing the collection localities of the three new species. Blue spots—Megophrys ancrae sp. nov., orange spots— Megophrys oropedion sp. nov., green spot— Megophrys vegrandis sp. nov.

FIGURE 7 in Three new species of horned frogs, Megophrys (Amphibia: Megophryidae), from northeast India, with a resolution to the identity of Megophrys boettgeri populations reported from the region

FIGURE 7. Megophrys oropedion sp. nov. advertisement call of a single uncollected male from the type locality, ambient air temperature during recording 18°C. A. sonogram and wave form showing a single note. B. sonogram and waveform showing a seven note portion of a call.

FIGURE 4. A–D in Three new species of horned frogs, Megophrys (Amphibia: Megophryidae), from northeast India, with a resolution to the identity of Megophrys boettgeri populations reported from the region

FIGURE 4. A–D. Habitat images at the collection localities of the three new species: A. for Megophrys vegrandis sp. nov. showing the point where the side stream meets the Sessa river (dark opening in vegetation, centre frame on the bank of the river), B. for Megophrys oropedion sp. nov. showing the type locality showing Um Risa stream, in Malki Forest, C. for Megophrys oropedion sp. nov. showing a collection stream in Mawphlang Sacred Forest, D. for Megophrys ancrae sp. nov. showing the stream at the type locality in Deban, Namdapha National Park and Tiger Reserve.

FIGURE 5. A–E in Three new species of horned frogs, Megophrys (Amphibia: Megophryidae), from northeast India, with a resolution to the identity of Megophrys boettgeri populations reported from the region

FIGURE 5. A–E. Holotype of Megophrys oropedion sp. nov. (ZSI A 11601, adult male) in preservation. A. dorsal view, B. ventral view, C. profile view of head, D. ventral view of left hand, E. ventral view of left foot.

FIGURE 2. A–D in Three new species of horned frogs, Megophrys (Amphibia: Megophryidae), from northeast India, with a resolution to the identity of Megophrys boettgeri populations reported from the region

FIGURE 2. A–D. Megophrys ancrae sp. nov. in life. A. holotype (ZSI A 11606, adult male), dorsolateral view, B. paratype (BNHS 5599, adult female), lateral view, C–D. referred specimen (SDB.DU 2009.727, adult male): C. lateral view, D. anterior view.

FIGURE 13. Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853. A in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 13. Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853. A—Anterior adhesive tubes, B—Lateral adhesive tubes, C—Dorso-lateral adhesive tubes, D—Dorsal view of caudum, E—Internal view of caudum, F—Ventral view of caudum.

FIGURE 10 in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 10. Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011. A—Dorsal view of scales in head region, B—Dorsal view of scales in posterior trunk region and in furcal base, C—Pharynx with cuticular reinforcements, D—Dorsal view of scales in trunk region, E—Ventral view of scales of interciliary field.

FIGURE 7 in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 7. Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011. Specimen with mature egg. A—Dorsal view, B—View of internal morphology, C—Ventral view.

FIGURE 8 in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 8. Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011. Juvenile specimen—habitus. A—Dorsal view, B—View of internal morphology.

FIGURE 5 in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 5. Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011. Adult specimen. A—Dorsal view, B—View of internal morphology, C—Ventral view.

FIGURE 2 in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 2. Baltic Sea with points marking stations where Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011 was found. 1—locus typicus, island Skarvesäter; 2—Puck Bay.

FIGURE 1 in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 1. Selected areas of the Polish Baltic Sea with localisation of the sampling sites (1–41). Kisielewski 1975—Sites: 1–5, 7–14, 16, 17, 22, 26, 30, 31. Hummon 2008—Site 2. Kolicka & Zawierucha 2012—Site 6. Present study—Sites: 10, 11, 18–20, 25, 27–29. Roszczak 1939 - Sites: 12, 13, 15–17, 21–25. Radziejewska unpublished data - Sites: 32–41.

FIGURE 12. Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853. A in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 12. Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853. A—Juvenile specimen, B—Subadult specimen, C—Adult specimen.

FIGURE 9 in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 9. Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011. Juvenile specimen. A—Dorsal view, B—View of internal morphology, C—Ventral view.

FIGURE 6 in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 6. Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011. Specimen with mature egg—habitus. A—Dorsal view, B—View of internal morphology.

FIGURE 14. Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853. A in Checklist of Gastrotricha of the Polish Baltic Sea with the first reports of Heterolepidoderma joermungandri Kånneby, 2011, and Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853

FIGURE 14. Turbanella hyalina Schultze, 1853. A—Pharynx, B, C—Posterior body region with visible epidermal glands.

FIGURE 1 in First report of Amynthas carnosus (Goto & Hatai, 1899) (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) in the Western Hemisphere

FIGURE 1. Diagram of pores and genital markings in a ventral view of A) Amynthas corticis, B) A. carnosus, and C) A. gracilis. ♂ = male pores, ♀ = female pores, ⚥ = spermathecal pores.

FIGURES 1–2 in Occurrence of Epistylis anastatica (Linnaeus, 1767) (Ciliophora: Peritrichia) on Mesocyclops isabellae Dussart & Fernando (Crustacea: Copepoda: Cyclopoida) in India, with an annotated checklist of species of Epistylis reported as Epibionts of Cyclopoid Copepods and resources for their identification

FIGURES 1–2. Colonies of Epistylis anastatica attached to the metasome and urosome of Mesocyclops isabellae. Scale bar = 250 µm in 1 and 50 µm in 2.

FIGURE 10 in Occurrence of Epistylis anastatica (Linnaeus, 1767) (Ciliophora: Peritrichia) on Mesocyclops isabellae Dussart & Fernando (Crustacea: Copepoda: Cyclopoida) in India, with an annotated checklist of species of Epistylis reported as Epibionts of Cyclopoid Copepods and resources for their identification

FIGURE 10. Diagrams that illustrate the possible forms and branching patterns of colonies of Epistylis spp. given in Table 2. Colony forms: a, simple cluster; b–c, e–h, arborescent; d, cuneate (wedge-shaped, with all stalks terminating at the same level); branching patterns: a, irregular (no discernible pattern); b–d, symmetrically dichotomous; c, asymmetrically dichotomous; e symmetrically alternating; f, asymmetrically alternating; g, pinnate; h, umbellate. Notes: colonies such as 'b' and 'c' are sometimes described as fan-shaped (flabellate); cuneate colonies (d) are sometimes incorrectly described as umbellate, a term that can be used properly only to describe a pattern in which all of the 2o branches radiate in different planes from a single point (compare 'd' and 'h' to see the difference); pinnate colonies like those illustrated in 'g' are an extreme variant of the alternating pattern in which pairs of 2o branches arise from points so close together that they seem to be opposite one another.

FIGURES 3–9 in Occurrence of Epistylis anastatica (Linnaeus, 1767) (Ciliophora: Peritrichia) on Mesocyclops isabellae Dussart & Fernando (Crustacea: Copepoda: Cyclopoida) in India, with an annotated checklist of species of Epistylis reported as Epibionts of Cyclopoid Copepods and resources for their identification

FIGURES 3–9. Epistylis anastatica attached to the exoskeleton of Mesocyclops isabellae. 3–5: views of the stalk, showing the dichotomous branching pattern and long primary stalk; arrowheads in fig. 3 indicate the branching points in an asymmetrically dichotomous colony and to its right are the abandoned stalks of a symmetrically dichotomous colony (region encircled); 4, immature colony; note the elongate primary stalk; 5, stalks of two symmetrically dichotomous colonies (one is lying over the other, which is slightly out of focus). 6–9: characteristics of zooids; 6, the upper arrowhead indicates the edge of the peristomial lip, and the lower arrowhead indicates the scopula (circular, aboral region that secretes the stalk and attaches the zooid to it); 7, arrow indicates the projecting tube formed by constriction of the peristomial lip when cell contracts ("schnauzenformigen"); MaN, longitudinally oriented macronucleus; 8–9, zooids that remained expanded when fixed; arrow indicates the peristomial lip in both figures. Scale bar = 100 µm in 3–4 and 25 µm in 5–9.