Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 5 in A new species of bat of the Hipposideros bicolor group (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae) from Central Laos, with evidence of convergent evolution with Sundaic taxa

FIG. 5. Schematic drawing of rostral chambers in dorsal view, mouth above. Dotted areas correspond to dense bone and bone walls, while white areas indicate cavities. A — H. khaokhouayensis ROM 116793; B — H. rotalis IEX-M0095, ♀; C — H. orbiculus SMF 57092; D — H. ridleyi SMF 69291. a) Anterior rostral chamber, b) Postero-lateral rostral chamber, c) and c') postero-median rostral chamber. Notice that in A and B the posterior chambers are not separated by the intermediate wall, and that in D, the posterior median chamber is split in two, c and c'

opennotspecifiedNov 2008View details →

FIG. 3 in A new species of tube-nosed bat Murina (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera) from Vietnam

FIG. 3. Comparison of rostra of selected Murininae in lateral view: A — M. harpioloides sp. nov., holotype; B — M. aurata, ROM MAM-111386; C — M. tubinaris, ROM MAM-111302; D — M. rozendaali, ROM MAM-112312; E — M. aenea, ROM

opennotspecifiedNov 2008View details →

FIG. 2 in A new species of tube-nosed bat Murina (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera) from Vietnam

FIG. 2. Skull and teeth of M. harpioloides sp. nov.: A — skull and mandible lateral view; B — occlusal view of upper and lower tooth rows; C — lingual view of the lower canine; D — occlusal view of the second lower molar

opennotspecifiedNov 2008View details →

FIG. 1 in A new species of tube-nosed bat Murina (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera) from Vietnam

FIG. 1. Scatterplot of six small tube-nosed bat species from principal components I (eigenvalue = 9.25, total variance explained = 48.70%) and III (eigenvalue = 1.74, total variance explained = 9.18%) of a PCA

FIG. 3 in A new species of bat of the Hipposideros bicolor group (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae) from Central Laos, with evidence of convergent evolution with Sundaic taxa

FIG. 3. Frontal view of the noseleaf of one of the paratypes of H. khaokhouayensis alive (IEX-M0106)

FIG. 7 in A new species of bat of the Hipposideros bicolor group (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae) from Central Laos, with evidence of convergent evolution with Sundaic taxa

FIG. 7. Topology of the best phylogenetic hypothesis found under all optimization criteria used, with bootstrap values for maximum and transversion weighted parsimony analyses (100,000 replicates, numbers below branches), and Bayesian posterior probabilities for the nodes (numbers above branches). Letters after species name indicate region of origin of the sample, as in Table 2

FIG. 6 in A new species of bat of the Hipposideros bicolor group (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae) from Central Laos, with evidence of convergent evolution with Sundaic taxa

FIG. 6. Schematic drawing of rostral chambers in lateral view, mouth to the left. Conventions as in Fig. 3. A — H. khaokhouayensis ROM 116793; B — H. rotalis IEX-M0095, ♀; C — H. orbiculus Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt am Mein, Germany (SMF) 57092; D — H. ridleyi SMF 69291. a) Anterior rostral chamber, b) Postero-lateral rostral chamber, c) Postero-median rostral chamber, d) Posterior lacrymal chamber

opennotspecifiedMay 2018View details →

FIG. 1 in Parasitism by bat flies on an urban population of Cynopterus brachyotis in Singapore

FIG. 1. Map of Singapore with the study area enlarged, showing the approximate areas covered by secondary forest in Kent Ridge Road and Kent Ridge Park

opennotspecifiedMay 2018View details →

FIG. 3 in Parasitism by bat flies on an urban population of Cynopterus brachyotis in Singapore

FIG. 3. Scatter-plot of number of bat flies versus an index of bat body condition (quotient of body mass over forearm length). Circles indicate adult individuals and triangles indicate juveniles

opennotspecifiedMay 2018View details →

FIG. 2 in Parasitism by bat flies on an urban population of Cynopterus brachyotis in Singapore

FIG. 2. Histograms showing frequency of L. f. ferrarii counts on parasitized C. brachyotis individuals by host (A) sex, (B) age, and (C) reproductive status

opennotspecifiedNov 2006View details →

FIG. 2. A in A review of bat research in Thailand with eight new species records for the country

FIG. 2. A general view of part of Hala Forest and six bat species new to the fauna of Thailand: A — Hipposideros ridleyi, B — Myotis hermani, C — Murina suilla, D — Murina aenea, E — Kerivoula pellucida, F — Mops mops

opennotspecifiedNov 2010View details →

FIG. 1 in A recent inventory of the bats of Mozambique with documentation of seven new species for the country

FIG. 1. Map of Mozambique showing the sites at which bats were captured during this study (2005–2009). The sampling sites are overlaid on a digital elevation model (altitude in metres). The boundaries of the three biogeographic zones (following Parker, 1999) are represented by the two black lines. The southern line follows the Save River, whereas the northern line follows the Zambezi River. The numbers refer to sites and correspond to the site numbers presented in Appendix I

FIG. 6 in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)

FIG. 6. Archaeonycteris relicta sp. nov., Creechbarrow M35710/12. Left M1/2 trigonid and talonid fragments in A — buccal, B — lingual and C — occlusal views. HZM 5.38291. Left M3 (holotype) in D — buccal, E — lingual and F — occlusal views. HZM 4.37495. Right P in G — buccal, H — lingual and I — occlusal views. HZM 1.31799. Right M1/2 in J — occlusal view. HZM

trigonid of lower molar in I — buccal, J — distal, K — lingual and L — occlusal views. Scale = 0.5 mm in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)

trigonid of lower molar in I — buccal, J — distal, K — lingual and L — occlusal views. Scale = 0.5 mm

7.38324. Left M1 in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)

7.38324. Left M1/2 in K — buccal, L — occlusal views. SEM images of gold palladium coated epoxy casts. Scale = 0.75 mm

FIG. 2 in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)

FIG. 2. Archaeonycteris relicta sp. nov., Creechbarrow, maxillary cheek teeth. HZM 1.31799. Right M1/2: A — occlusal, B — lingual, C — mesial and D — buccal views. HZM 7.38324. Left M1/2: E — occlusal, F — buccal, G — mesial and H — lingual views. HZM 16.31548. Part protocone lobe right M3: I — occlusal and J — mesial views. HZM 3.35865. Protocone lobe right M1/2: K — mesial and L — oblique views. Scale = 1 mm

views. BMNH M35710 in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)

views. BMNH M35710/12. Trigonid and talonid left M1/2 H — lingual, I — buccal and J — occlusal views. Scale = 1 mm

opennotspecifiedNov 2006View details →

FIG. 1 in A review of bat research in Thailand with eight new species records for the country

FIG. 1. Locations of some of the bat field surveys in Thailand. 1 — Miller (1898); 2a and 2b — Bonhote (1900a, 1901, 1902); 3 — Bonhote (1900b); 4a and 4b — Bonhote (1903); 5 — Gyldenstolpe (1917); 6 — Robinson and Kloss (1914); 7 — Kloss (1916a); 8 — Chasen and Kloss (1930); 9 — Allen and Coolidge (1940); 10a and 10b — Sanborn (1952); 11a and 11b — Thonglongya (1973); 12 — Thonglongya and Hill (1974); 13 — Hill (1974); 14 — Marshall and Nongngork (1970); 15 — Wathanakul (1976); 16 — Ardseungnoen (1979); 17 — Melville (1983) and Hill (1983); 18 — Yenbutra and Felten (1983); 19 — Hill and Yenbutra (1984); 20a and 20b — Harada et al. (1982, 1985a, 1985b); 21a and 21b — Hood and Baker (1986), McBee et al. (1986), Bickham et al. (1986), Hood et al. (1988); 22 — McFarlane and Blood (1986), Blood and McFarlane (1988); 23 — Miller et al. (1988); 24a, 24b, 24c, 24d and 24e — Yoshiyuki (1990); 25 — Duangkhae (1990, 1991); 26 — Robinson et al. (1995, 1996); 27 — TISTR (1995); 28 — Kanchanasaka (1995); 29 — Kock and Storch (1996); 30 — Robinson and Smith (1997); 31a and 31b — Bumrungsri (1997); 32 — Mein and Ginsburg (1997); 33 — Hillman (1999); 34 — Kock and Kovac (2000); 35 — Boonkird and Wanghongsa (2000a); 36 — Boonkird and Wanghongsa (2000b); 37 — Bumrungsri (2002); 38a, 38b, 38c, 38d, 38e, 38f and 38g — Lumlertdacha et al. (2005); 39 — Leelapaibul et al. (2005); 40 — Thong et al. (2006); 41a, 41b and 41c — current study

F. 9 in Late Middle Eocene bats from the Creechbarrow Limestone Formation, Dorset, southern England with description of a new species of Archaeonycteris (Chiroptera: Archaeonycteridae)

F. 9. Canines of Creechbarrow bats.?Pseudorhinolophus schlosseri BMNH M36790. Basal part of left C1 in A — occlusal, IG B — buccal and C — lingual views. Stehlinia quercyi HZM 4.36362. Right C1 in D — occlusal, E — lingual and F — buccal views.