Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,144
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,144 results for “ITS barcode”
FIGURE 16 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 16. Molecular phylogeny tree based on mtDNA COI gene.
FIGURE 15 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 15. Furca of C. gracilimucronata sp. nov.
FIGURE 12 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 12. Chaetotaxy of head of C. gracilimucronata sp. nov.
FIGURE 14 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 14. Chaetotaxy of Abd. I–V of C. gracilimucronata sp. nov.
FIGURE 13 in Morphological description and DNA barcoding of Ceratophysella gracilimucronata sp. nov. (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from China, with a key to species of the C. armata group of the Sino-Japanese Region
FIGURE 13. Chaetotaxy of Th. I–III of C. gracilimucronata sp. nov.
TABLE 1 in Connecting the dots: DNA barcoding and lectotype designation shedding light on Labrundinia longipalpis (Goetghebuer, 1921), an intriguing non-biting midge (Chironomidae, Tanypodinae)
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> List of analyzed specimens, including their sample localities, life stage, and voucher reference and GenBank accession numbers.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Taxon</b></th><th><b>Country</b></th><th><b>Stage</b></th><th><b>Voucher number</b></th><th><b>Accession number</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Labrundinia amandae</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Immature</td><td>NEOTA044-12</td><td>JX887502.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia fiorelinii</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Immature</td><td>MPCB005-09</td><td>HM379514.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia jasoni</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Immature</td><td>NEOTA059-12</td><td>JX887518.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia longipalpis</i></th><td>Finland</td><td>Adult</td><td>ZMUO.025300</td><td>MZ660598.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia longipalpis</i></th><td>Finland</td><td>Adult</td><td>ZMUO.025299</td><td>MZ658837.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia maculata</i></th><td>USA</td><td>Immature</td><td>CATP8. 8</td><td>MW283530.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia mayaca</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Immature</td><td>NEOTA029-12</td><td>JX887525.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia parafittkaui</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Adult</td><td>NEOTA073-12</td><td>JX887508.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia parareniformis</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Immature</td><td>NEOTA035-12</td><td>JX887496.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia paravirescens</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Adult</td><td>NEOTA041-12</td><td>JX887527.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia reniformis</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Adult</td><td>NEOTA033-12</td><td>JX887489.1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Labrundinia sofiae</i></th><td>Brazil</td><td>Adult</td><td>NEOTA076-12</td><td>JX887517.1</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1 in Morphological description of a new species of Capnia (Plecoptera: Capniidae) with DNA barcoding of genus members from the Russian Far East
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> List of taxa, isolate numbers, sex, locations and GenBank accessions.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>Isolate</th><th>Sex</th><th>Country</th><th>Coordinates</th><th>Accession number</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Capnia khingana</i></th><td>TVA62</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Amurskaya Oblast, Amur River Basin, Eracta River</td><td>49.09285 N 130.591083 E</td><td>OL343052</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. khingana</i></th><td>TVA95</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Amurskaya Oblast, Amur River Basin, Eracta River</td><td>49.09285 N 130.591083 E</td><td>OL343053</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. khingana</i></th><td>TVA160</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Khankuka stream</td><td>50.757554 N 137.413548 E</td><td>OL343054</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. yavorskayae</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></th><td>TVA163</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Khankuka Stream</td><td>50.756951 N 137.412730 E</td><td>OL343055</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. yavorskayae</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></th><td>TVA184</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Khankuka Stream</td><td>50.768183 N 137.421572 E</td><td>OL343062</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. nigra</i></th><td>TVA166</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Gorin River</td><td>50.890137 N 137.457746 E</td><td>OL343056</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. nearctica</i></th><td>TVA167</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River</td><td>59.576183 N 151.270017 E</td><td>OL343057</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. bargusinica</i></th><td>TVA168</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River Basin, Donyshko River</td><td>60.385667 N 151.475 E</td><td>OL343058</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. kurnakovi</i></th><td>TVA170</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River</td><td>59.576183 N 151.270017 E</td><td>OL343059</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. rara</i></th><td>TVA171</td><td>Female</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River</td><td>59.576183 N 151.270017 E</td><td>OL343060</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. rara</i></th><td>TVA172</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Magadan Oblast, Ola River</td><td>59.576183 N 151.270017 E</td><td>OL343061</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. aligera</i></th><td>TVA186</td><td>Male</td><td>Russia: Khabarovskiy Kray, Amur River Basin, Gorin River</td><td>50.929194 N 137.754936 E</td><td>OL343063</td></tr></tbody></table>
Fig. 2 in COI mtDNA barcoding and morphology for the description of a new species of ricinuleid of the genus Pseudocellus (Arachnida: Ricinulei: Ricinoididae) from El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico
Fig. 2. Maximum Likelihood gene tree (highest log: -3134.13), constructed with COI barcode sequences of Pseudocellus Platnick, 1980. Colors of the branches indicate species; same colors are in the bars, which represent the different species delimitation methods used for their validation. Red branches + red circle indicate the new species described herein. Numbers below the bars represent the number of species recovered under each species delimitation method (not considering the outgroup: Ricinoides feae (Hansen, 1921)): 1: morphology (M). 2: GMYC. 3: ABGD with recursive partitions (RP). 4: ABGD with initial partitions (IP). 5: bPTP with IB. 6: bPTP with ML. 7: ASAP. Numbers on the branches are Bootstrap support values (>50% significant).
Figs 27–31 in COI mtDNA barcoding and morphology for the description of a new species of ricinuleid of the genus Pseudocellus (Arachnida: Ricinulei: Ricinoididae) from El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico
Figs 27–31. Pseudocellus giribeti sp. nov. Paratype, ♀ (MCZ 80010). 27–28. Habitus, dorsal and ventral views. 29–31. Spermathecae, anterior, posterior and lateral views, respectively. Scale bars: 27–28 = 2 mm; 29–31 = 0.2 mm.
Figs 11–19 in COI mtDNA barcoding and morphology for the description of a new species of ricinuleid of the genus Pseudocellus (Arachnida: Ricinulei: Ricinoididae) from El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico
Figs 11–19. Pseudocellus giribeti sp. nov. Holotype, ♂ (MCZ 80010). 11. Cucullus, dorsal view. 12. Left chelicera, dorsal view. 13–14. Right tibia II, prolateral and proventral views. 15–16. Right metatarsus II, prolateral and proventral views. 17. Right femur II, prolateral view. 18. Detail of the movable and fixed claws of the right pedipalp, retrolateral view. 19. Right pedipalp tibia, retrolateral view. Scale bars: 11, 13–17, 19 = 0.5 mm; 12 = 0.2 mm; 18 = 0.1 mm.
Fig. 2 in Occurrence and Molecular Barcode of the Freshwater Heteronemertean Apatronemertes albimaculosa (Nemertea: Pilidiophora) from Japan
Fig. 2. Apatronemertes albimaculosa Wilfert and Gibson, 1974, ICHUM 5112, photomicrographs of transverse sections. A, Precerebral region, showing outer vessel (inner vessels ventrally anastomosed here); B, proboscis musculature, showing muscle-cross fibre (indicated by arrowheads) connecting outer circular muscle layer and inner myoepithelium; C, testis containing sperm; D, intestinal region, showing oocytes and amorphous excretory tissue (indicated by asterisks) discharging into intestine via specialized cells (indicated by arrowheads).
Fig. 9 in Cestode fauna of murid and cricetid rodents in Hokkaido, Japan, with assignment of DNA barcodes
Fig. 9. Larvae of the family Taeniidae. A, The proliferated cysticerci of Taenia crassiceps in the subcutaneous tissue of Myodes rufocanus; B, the strobilocercus of Hydatigera taeniaeformis from the liver of Rattus norvegicus; C, the disseminated alveolar hydatid of Echinococcus multilocularis in peritoneal organs of My. rufocanus. Scale bars: 20 mm.
Fig. 7. A in Cestode fauna of murid and cricetid rodents in Hokkaido, Japan, with assignment of DNA barcodes
Fig. 7. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the genus Paranoplocephala. The tree was made with mitochondrial cox1 sequences (546 nucleotide sites) under the substitutional model GTR+G+I. The isolates of this study (19AK378, 19AK412, 19AK419, 19AK436, 19AK454-2, and 19AK454-3) are shown in bold face. The DNA accession number of each taxon is shown in parenthesis. Hymenolepis diminuta (accession no. AF314223) was used as an outgroup taxon.
Supplementary material 4 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S4. Vegetative and floral characters
Supplementary material 3 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S3. List of Ficus sequences retrieved from GenBank
Supplementary material 2 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Table S2. List of Ficus species collected from different parts of India
Figure 2 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 2 Maximum Clade Credibility (MCC) tree from Bayesian analysis using two DNA barcode markers (ITS2+trnH-psbA) with posterior probabilities values in percentage that are shown at nodes.
Figure 1 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 1 Typical morphology of Ficus benghalensis and Ficus krishnae. A1, A2Ficus benghalensis twig and figs (PC: Jana Venkata Sudhakar) B1, B2Ficus krishnae twig and figs (PC: Jana Venkata Sudhakar)
Supplementary material 7 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure S2. Multiple sequence alignment of trnH-psbA in Ficus krishnae and Ficus benghalensis
Figure 3 from: Mahima K, Umapathy S, Sudhakar JV, Sathishkumar R (2021) Systematic reinstatement of highly sacred Ficus krishnae based on differences in morphology and DNA barcoding from Ficus benghalensis (Moraceae). PhytoKeys 186: 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.186.74086
Figure 3 Total evidence MCC tree from Bayesian analysis of the two DNA markers and morphology. The Posterior Probabilities values in percentage are shown at the nodes.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.