Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedNov 2006View details →

FIG. 2 in The Iberian contribution to cryptic diversity in European bats

FIG. 2. Phylogenetic relationships among haplotypes of the cytb and ND1 genes for European bats of the species complexes: a) Myotis nattereri, b) Eptesicus serotinus, c) Plecotus auritus d) Hypsugo savii, e) Pipistrellus kuhlii. Localities of the haplotypes are shown in bold in the trees (NI, Northern Iberia; CI, Central Iberia; SI, Southern Iberia; AU, Austria; CR, Croatia; DK, Denmark; GE, Germany; GR, Greece; HN, Hungary; SW, Switzerland; TK, Turkey). Reconstructions are NJ trees based on corrected genetic distances (see Table 2 for details of each model). Bootstrap values for NJ and ML trees are indicated above and below nodes, respectively. The geographic locations of the haplotypes are shown in an approximate distribution map for each species complex in the western Palaearctic (shadow area). See Appendix II for haplotype codes. Distance units correspond to 0.02 substitutions/site. Nodes in bold are also supported by phylogenetic reconstructions using RAG2 sequences and based on NJ algorithm and ML search with corrected genetic distances (see Table 2 for details of each model)

opennotspecifiedNov 2006View details →

FIG. 3 in The Iberian contribution to cryptic diversity in European bats

FIG. 3. Phylogenetic relationships based on unrooted median-joining networks among haplotypes of the RAG2 gene for European bats of the species complexes: a) M. nattereri, b) E. serotinus, c) P. auritus d) H. savii, e) P. kuhlii. Little black dots represent reconstructed missing haplotypes (median vectors) in the sampling. Colours and lineages codes follow Fig. 2 and Tables 3–7. For each representation, distances between haplotypes are proportional to the number of mutated positions. The geographic locations of the haplotypes (NI, Northern Iberia; CI, Central Iberia; SI, Southern Iberia; GR, Greece; SW, Switzerland) are shown in an approximate distribution map for each species complex in the western Palaearctic (shadow area) in Fig. 2. See Appendix II for haplotype codes

FIGURE 3 in Resurrection of an East African house bat species Scotophilus altilis Allen, 1914 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

FIGURE 3. (A) Bayesian cytb tree based on 920-bp alignment showing phylogenetic position of Scotophilus cf. leucogaster within the genus Scotophilus. Posterior probability ≥ 0.95 is indicated with a star at the respective nodes. Branches of outgroup taxa are shortened for representational purpose. (B) MP cytb tree section based on 291-bp alignment showing relationship of S. cf. leucogaster and the paratype specimen of S. altilis. MP bootstrap support is indicated for the target clade. Color scheme introduced for easier visual identification of relevant species in this and all subsequent figures.

FIGURE 2 in Resurrection of an East African house bat species Scotophilus altilis Allen, 1914 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

FIGURE 2. Distribution of localities of origin of the newly sampled and/or analyzed Scotophilus cf. leucogaster and known specimens of S. altilis based on Allen (1914) and Allen et al. (1917). The paratype specimen of S. altilis from Bados was included in the molecular and morphometric comparisons.

FIGURE 6 in Resurrection of an East African house bat species Scotophilus altilis Allen, 1914 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

FIGURE 6. Plot of the first and the second principal component of the principal component analysis based on 15 skull dimensions of the examined Scotophilus specimens. PT—paratype specimen of Scotophilus altilis, HT—holotype specimen of Scotophilus nigritellus. Color scheme as in previous figures.

FIGURE 5 in Resurrection of an East African house bat species Scotophilus altilis Allen, 1914 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

FIGURE 5. Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of examined Scotophilus specimens, using two specific measures: condylo-basal length of skull (LCb) and rostral width between foramina infraorbitalia (LaInf). PT—paratype specimen of Scotophilus altilis, HT—holotype specimen of Scotophilus nigritellus. Color scheme as in previous figures.

FIGURE 1 in Resurrection of an East African house bat species Scotophilus altilis Allen, 1914 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

FIGURE 1. (A) External appearance of Scotophilus cf. leucogaster from SW Ethiopia; (B) dorsal view of skull and jaw, and (C) dorsal and (D) ventral view of the skin of the paratype specimen of S. altilis (FMNH 34161) from Bados, Kordofan, Sudan; (E) dorsal and (F) ventral view of Scotophilus cf. leucogaster (USNM 587028) from Kajo Keji, South Sudan. Photograph by A: P. Kaňuch, B–F: D.A.Reeder.

FIGURE 4 in Resurrection of an East African house bat species Scotophilus altilis Allen, 1914 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae)

FIGURE 4. (A) Fgb7 and (B) zfy median-joining networks showing alternative relationships of Scotophilus cf. leucogaster to other species of the genus Scotophilus. Haplotype frequencies are considered only in B, where identity of several sequences of S. dinganii morphospecies and S. cf leucogaster (section not proportional) was thus indicated. Color scheme as in previous figures.

FIGURE S3 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE S3. Tree obtained from the maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of Chiroderma using three concatenated genes. COI = cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1, RAG2 = recombination activating gene 2, DBY = DEAD box RNA helicase Y. Pie charts on the nodes indicate branch support values (UltraFast Bootstrap), where the completely gray circle indicates 100%. Support.

FIGURE 33 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 33. Haplotype network of Chiroderma villosum and C. improvisum, built using the "Median Joining" algorithm (epsilon = 0; 2,000 iterations).

FIGURE 34 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 34. Predefined groups of C. villosum used in the geographic variation analysis (above). Boxplot of the first principal component (PC1), extracted from the variance-covariance matrix of a principal component analysis of 13 cranio-dental measurements (below). A = México/Central America/trans-Andean South America; B = northern Venezuela; C = Trinidad and Tobago; D =northern Amazonia and the Guianas; E = Southern Amazonia; F = Chaco and Cerrado; G = Atlantic coast.

FIGURE S4 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE S4. Chiroderma phylogeny obtained from the Bayesian inference analysis of partial sequences of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1, cytochrome b, recombination-activating gene 2, and DEAD box RNA helicase Y. The MCC (Maximum Clade Credibility) tree summarizes 15,002 molecular phylogenies. The pie charts at the nodes show the posterior probability (PP), with the full circle indicating PP = 1.

FIGURE 27 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 27. Right dentary of A) Chiroderma trinitatum (USNM 460124—Brazil, Pará) and B) C. gorgasi (USNM 335294— Panamá, San Blas).

FIGURE 32 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 32. Individual variation in the disposition of the inner upper incisors in Chiroderma villosum. A) parallel (USNM 520558, Panamá); B) convergent (USNM 520557, Panamá); C) divergent tips (USNM 540676, Trinidad); and D) base and tips divergent (USNM 499481, Colombia).

FIGURE 20 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 20. Skull and mandible, in lateral view, of A) Chiroderma doriae doriae (TTU 99569—Paraguay, La Cordillera); B) C. doriae vizottoi (ALP 10421—Brazil, Ceará).

FIGURE 24 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 24. Dorsal view of the pelage of Chiroderma trinitatum. A) USNM 361723 from Brazil, Pará; B) USNM 393709 from Brazil, Mato Grosso.

FIGURE 22 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 22. Dispersion of the two first principal components (PC1) of 20 climatic variables, and 13 morphometric variables of Chiroderma doriae. Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.744.

FIGURE 18 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 18. Dorsal view of the skin of A) Chiroderma doriae doriae (ALP 6121—Brazil, Rio de Janeiro) and B) C. d. vizottoi (ALP 10421—Brazil, Ceará).

FIGURE 16 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 16. Phylogenetic relationships of Chiroderma salvini and C. scopaeum based on 24 sequences of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene. Localities in parentheses are detailed in the gazetteer (Appendix 1). This subtree is a detailed version of the clades named "salvini" and "scopaeum" in figure 4.

FIGURE 14 in Systematics of big-eyed bats, genus Chiroderma Peters, 1860 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

FIGURE 14. Frontal view of skull and mandible in occlusion for A) Chiroderma salvini (ROM 99703), B) Chiroderma scopaeum (TTU 110649), C) Chiroderma d. doriae (TTU 99569), D) Chiroderma villosum (USNM 560607), E) Chiroderma improvisum (ROM 126002).