Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2019View details →

Figures 1–4 in Halictus hedini hedini (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) newly recorded from Japan, revealed by DNA barcoding and morphology

Figures 1–4. Photographs of Halictus hedini hedini Blüthgen and H. rubicundus (Christ). 1–2. Lateral habitus of H. hedini hedini (1 female, 2 male). 3–4. 1st metasomal tergum of female (3 H. hedini hedini, 4 H. rubicundus).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Chloroplast genome of white wild chrysanthemum, Dendranthema sp. K247003, as genetic barcode

Fig. 2. Comparison of chloroplast genomes of Dendranthema sp. K247003 and D. boreale IT121002 using mVISTA program. Grey arrows and thick black lines above the alignment indicate genes with their orientation and the position of the IRs, respectively. The Yscale represents the percent identity between 50-100%. Genome regions are color-coded: Coding regions in blue; noncoding sequences (CNS) in red.

Fig. 4. A in Survey of Busan Oligochaeta earthworms supported by DNA barcodes

Fig. 4. A. Amynthas masatakae (Beddard, 1892) Busan specimen showing spermathecal and male regions. B. Metaphire ryunome Blakemore, 2012 Busan specimen [boxed is X2 enlargement of its18rhs male pore that appears elevated, non-superficial, i.e.,=Metaphire].

Fig. 2. A. Drawida songae yeongdo subsp. n in Survey of Busan Oligochaeta earthworms supported by DNA barcodes

Fig. 2. A. Drawida songae yeongdo subsp. n. holotype (H, DNA H1) showing prostomium, gizzards, pygidium, habitus with reproductive organs in situ and all four genital marking glands in 8-11lhs plus a nephridium from 15rhs. B. D. songae songae after Hong (2002: fig. 1) with GMs in 7, 10-11 (but not 12?) for fair use comparison.

Fig. 1. MEGA5 in Survey of Busan Oligochaeta earthworms supported by DNA barcodes

Fig. 1. MEGA5 Maximum Likelihood phylogram of DNA code results for Busan specimens compared to similar taxa. Solid squares (■) are Busan samples; open circles (○) are unconfirmed GenBank names (from China, Korea or Japan); closed circles (●) are from the author's Japanese studies. (Sample codes and provisional or new species names are explained in the Appendix legend).

Fig. 5. A in Survey of Busan Oligochaeta earthworms supported by DNA barcodes

Fig. 5. A. Eisenia japonica vaga sub-sp. n. Busan holotype (H, DNA H5). B. Eisenia j. japonica (Michaelsen, 1892) Berlin syntype Nr. 2117 (as anticipated, DNA was not extractable from this older material), author's sketch after Blakemore and Grygier (2011, fig. 2) that compares to Hamburg syntypes V119-V121 (see Blakemore and Grygier, 2011, fig. 3).

Fig. 14 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 14 Phorcus turbinatus (Born, 1778). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 for genus Phorcus. Phorcus turbinatus (petrol) separates from all other species. b Representative specimen of Ph. turbinatus from this study. c One syntype of Ph. turbinatus (NHMW 14002). Scale bars 5 mm

Fig. 12 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 12 Phorcus richardi (Payraudeau 1826). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 of genus Phorcus. Phorcus richardi (maroon) is the most abundant species in the current sample. It separates well from Ph. articulatus and Ph. turbinatus. One group of Ph. mutabilis is not distinguishable from Ph.

Fig. 11 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 11 Steromphala divaricata (Linnaeus, 1758). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 from genus Steromphala. Steromphala divaricata (pink) cannot be recovered as a completely separated group as it shows a small overlap with St. varia. Type material and material from this study do not overlap. Three individuals (Linné 41–43) of the type material (pink group on the

Fig. 10 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 10 Steromphala varia (Linnaeus, 1758). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC3 of genus Steromphala. Steromphala varia (blue) separates from all other species. Specimens from this study overlap with the type material. b

Fig. 4 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 4 Plot of first and third principal component of combined lateral and ventral landmark data from Phorcus and Steromphala individuals. A morphological separation of the two genera becomes apparent

Fig. 5 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 5 Lectotype of Steromphala cineraria (Linnaeus, 1758). Located at LSL (LSL.502). Scale bar 5 mm

Fig. 2 Landmark templates for representative a lateral and b in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 2 Landmark templates for representative a lateral and b ventral standardised views. Filled circles show fixed landmarks. Empty circles show semilandmarks, processed as sliding landmarks

Fig. 6 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 6. Phortica (Phortica) yena sp. nov., ♂. A. Epandrium and cercus; B. Surstylus; C. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 5. Phortica (Phortica) wongding sp. nov., ♂. A. Epandrium and cercus; B. Surstylus; C. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 1 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 1. Bayesian tree based on the combined data of COI gene. Numbers around the node indicate the Bayesian posterior probability; results lower than 0.5 are not shown.

Fig. 4 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 4. Phortica (Phortica) mengda sp. nov., ♂. A. Epandrium and cercus. B. Surstylus. C. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 3. Phortica (Phortica) kava sp. nov., ♂. A. Arista. B. Epandrium and cercus. C. Surstylus. D. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 2. Phortica (Phortica) jadete sp. nov., ♂. A. Arista. B. Epandrium and cercus (lateral view). C. Surstylus (frontal view). D. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme (lateral views). E. Paramere (frontal view). F. Tip of aedeagal median rod (ventral view). Scale bars = 0.1 mm.