Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
47,155
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
47,155 results for “evaluations”
Checkbot API raw results from Libraries, Archives and Museums websites for evaluating a data-driven Search Engine Optimization methodology
<p>Results from Checkbot API to measure and collect 341 websites compatibility on multiple SEO variables (34 variables). Checkbot API indexes the website's code to find features capable of impacting SEO performance. Each website has been tested with the maximum number of links allowed to be crawled equally to 10.000 per test. In this way, we retrieved data about the overall websites performance including their sub-pages, and not only the main domain names. A scale from 0 (lowest rate) to 100 (highest rate) was adopted for each examined variable. This constitutes a useful managerial indicator of dealing with the quantification of websites performance while avoiding complex measurement systems that are difficult to be adopted by administrators. Websites tested were also categorized by the CMS type used. More information about the variables and the meaning of the results can be found at https://www.checkbot.io/ </p>
OWL Reasoner Evaluation Results
<p>Correctness, performance and energy impact evaluation results produced with <a href="http://swot.sisinflab.poliba.it/evowluator">evOWLuator</a> for the following OWL reasoners:</p><ul><li><a href="https://bitbucket.org/dtsarkov/factplusplus">Fact++</a> (version 1.6.5);</li><li><a href="http://www.hermit-reasoner.com">HermiT</a> (version 1.3.8);</li><li><a href="http://jfact.sourceforge.net">JFact</a> (version 1.2.1);</li><li><a href="https://www.derivo.de/en/products/konclude/">Konclude</a> (version 0.6.2-544);</li><li><a href="http://swot.sisinflab.poliba.it/minime">Mini-ME</a> (version 2.0);</li><li><a href="http://swot.sisinflab.poliba.it/minime-swift">Mini-ME Swift</a> (version 1.0);</li><li><a href="https://github.com/stardog-union/pellet">Pellet</a> (version 2.3.1);</li><li><a href="http://trowl.org">TrOWL</a> (version 1.5).</li></ul><p>Ontologies mentioned in the csv files are part of the <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/10791">ORE 2014 Reasoner Competition</a> and <a href="https://bioportal.bioontology.org">BioPortal</a> datasets.</p><p><strong>Publication:</strong> <a href="http://sisinflab.poliba.it/Publications/2021/SBRGL21">A multiplatform energy-aware OWL reasoner benchmarking framework</a></p>
QD-AMVA: Evaluating Systems with Queue-Dependent Service Requirements - Data
<p>The data part of this release support the results <br /> presented in the paper <br /> "QD-AMVA: Evaluating Systems with Queue-Dependent Service<br /> Requirements", by G. Casale, J. F. Perez, and W. Wang, accepted <br /> to IFIP Performance 2015. </p> <p>When referring to the dataset or scripts please cite the paper above. </p> <p>The scripts released with the above paper can be found at https://zenodo.org/record/18887</p> <p> </p>
Additional Data of O.Buß and S.Jager: "Statistical Evaluation of HTS Assays for Enzymatic Hydrolysis of ß-Keto Esters")
<p>The additional data set includes:</p> <ul> <li>Pdb structure files, which were used for calculations/pictures.</li> <li>R-scripts for calculation of statistical measures like Z-factor, SSMD and others.</li> <li>Data of different activity assays, which were used for R-script calculations.</li> <li>a SDS-PAGE (gel with all used enzymes)</li> </ul> <p>View our publication under: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0146104</p>
In vitro Evaluation of Biofield Treatment on Enterobacter cloacae: Impact on Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Biotype
<p>This research work investigated the influence of biofield treatment on <em>Enterobacter cloacae</em> (ATCC 13047) against antimicrobial susceptibility. Two sets of ATCC samples were taken in this experiment and denoted as A and B. ATCC A sample was revived and divided into two parts Gr. I (control) and Gr. II (revived); likewise, ATCC B was labeled as Gr. III (lyophilized). Group II and III were given with biofield treatment. The control and treatment groups of E. cloacae cells were tested with respect to antimicrobial susceptibility, biochemical reactions pattern and biotype number. The result showed significant decrease in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of aztreonam and ceftazidime (≤ 8 μg/mL), as compared to control group (≥ 16 μg/mL). It was observed that 9% reaction was altered in the treated groups with respect to control out of the 33 biochemical reactions. Moreover, biotype number of this organism was substantially changed in group II (7731 7376) and group III (7710 3176) on day 10 as compared to control (7710 3376). The result suggested that biofield treatment had an impact on <em>E. cloacae</em> with respect to antimicrobial susceptibility, alteration of biochemical reactions pattern and biotype.</p> <p><strong>Source:</strong></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://www.trivedieffect.com/science/in-vitro-evaluation-of-biofield-treatment-on-enterobacter-cloacae-impact-on-antimicrobial-susceptibility-and-biotype">https://www.trivedieffect.com/science/in-vitro-evaluation-of-biofield-treatment-on-enterobacter-cloacae-impact-on-antimicrobial-susceptibility-and-biotype</a></li> <li><a href="https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/in-vitro-evaluation-of-biofield-treatment-on-enterobacter-cloacae-impact-onantimicrobial-susceptibility-and-biotype-2155-9597-1000241.php?aid=60445">https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/in-vitro-evaluation-of-biofield-treatment-on-enterobacter-cloacae-impact-onantimicrobial-susceptibility-and-biotype-2155-9597-1000241.php?aid=60445</a></li> </ul>
Supplementary underlying data for "Evaluating parameterization protocols for hydration free energy calculations with the AMOEBA polarizable force field"
<p>This dataset includes additional underlying data for the publication "Evaluating parameterization protocols for hydration free energy calculations with the AMOEBA polarizable force field"</p> <p>Contents:</p> <p>Tukey Honest Significant Difference (HSD) results for solutes 1-47 across all seven parameter sets, as *.txt. These are pairwise comparisons of results between all possible parameter sets. Significant differences are treated as p < 0.05.</p>
Evaluation of Android Malware Detection Based on System Calls - Dataset
<p>This is a data set accompanying a paper "Evaluation of Android Malware Detection Based on System Calls" published in the proceedings of the International Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics, New Orleans, USA, 2016.</p> <p>See README.md for details of the data set.</p>
Simulated benchmark metagenome used to demonstrate and evaluate MGLEX software
<p>This is a mock dataset of 120 000 artificial contigs of 1 kb length derived by simulating reads from 295 unique genomes and 44 species with each two or three strain genomes using the ART read simulator (Huang et al., 2012) and a lognormal abundance distribution. Genomes were chosen according to the CAMI2015 (www.cami-challenge.org) medium complexity toy dataset. The dataset contains four replicate samples with varied abundances and corresponding sequence feature files in MGLEX v0.1.1 format to use for genome reconstruction. Our aim was to create a benchmark dataset under controlled settings, minimizing potential biases introduced by specific software. This package also includes MGLEX benchmark scripts.</p>
Domain-Specific Language domain analysis and evaluation: a systematic literature review
<p>In order to successfully implement Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs), it is needed to systematically define and to support its development process; namely its Evaluation and the Domain Analysis phase. For that purpose, the studies were systematically selected from the most relevant venues that focus on the implementation of DSLs, in order to get insight if and how these development phases were performed. The special focus was given to the human-machine DSLs (excluding the machine-machine languages), the involvement of its end-users in the development process and the evaluation of DSLs usability, i.e. quality in use of DSLs. </p> <p>Preliminary results give us a notion that there is increased the state of practice of performing the evaluation of the DSLs, mostly including usability concerns, at least after its implementation. Generally, the quality of the reviewed studies was high. On another hand, rarely the assessments are done during domain analysis, which in general is not reporting inclusion of end-users or consideration of different use-cases, although the majority of studies refer to target non-programmers and to contribute easy in use. </p> <p>We did collect the valuable body of primary studies that are giving us answers to our research questions, however, to raise the credibility of the conclusions we should extend the analysis to other venues. Also, as we get insights into the categorization of practices we could specify more concretely answers that would give us means to perform more detailed meta-analysis. </p>
USE-ME Empirical evaluation pilot study
<p>We report on the pilot assessment of the feasibility of the <strong>USE-ME tool </strong>with master students in computer science which were involved into a DSL course. In total there were four groups consisted of two or three participants which were developing the following DSLs:</p> <ul> <li><strong>DSL Spreadsheets </strong>- a DSL transforms an activity graph into a Gantt chart. The target users of this DSL are to be project managers.</li> <li><strong>Gestures Kinect</strong> - a DSL which supports specification of communication between navy users using a Kinect device. The target users of this DSL are to be a navy operators.</li> <li><strong>Peddy Paper</strong> - a DSL which creates several instances of personalised paddy papers. The target users are paddy paper builders.</li> <li><strong>Smart House </strong>- a DSL which supports a design of the elements and operations that the house can have. It is meant to be used by house owners. </li> </ul> <p>The evaluation consisted of three learning session. The first one took place after four weeks of the DSL development. Students were introduced to the usability evaluation during a 2h theoretical lecture. For next 2h were introduced with the USE-ME tool and were guided to perform installation and set up working environment. Also, the students were given a participation questionnaire to fill in and describe a purpose of their DSL. In the end of a session, they were given the background questionnaire to fill till the following session which was happening 1 week after. Following two weekly 4h sessions were consisting of USE-ME hands on. The students were introduced to the modelling activities followed by Visualino example. For each activity, the same student from the group was using the tool to create USE-ME models for their DSL, while other students from the group were helping in deciding what would be a right specification. Finally, students were asked to try to finish the learned models and deliver them as a part of DSL course. After delivery, the students which were using the tool to model were asked to fill in a feedback questionnaire. </p> <p>The evaluation deliveries related to each DSL (project reports, USE-ME models), and ones related to participants (background and feedback questionnaire), as well as evaluation results, are attached in this data set. </p>
Supplementary Material: Evaluation of Cyanea capillata Sting Management Protocols Using Ex Vivo and In Vitro Envenomation Models
<p>Supplementary files for Doyle, T.K.; Headlam, J.L.; Wilcox, C.L.; MacLoughlin, E.; Yanagihara, A.A. Evaluation of <em>Cyanea capillata</em>Sting Management Protocols Using Ex Vivo and In Vitro Envenomation Models. <em>Toxins</em> <strong>2017</strong>, <em>9</em>, 215. Video S1: Vinegar Application to Gelatin-Adherent Cnidae</p>
Stimuli for the paper Perceptual Evaluation of Source Separation for Remixing Music
<p>Stimuli for the paper</p> <p>H. Wierstorf, D. Ward, R. Mason, E. M. Grais, C. Hummersone, M. D. Plumbley, "Perceptual Evaluation of Source Separation for Remixing Music," in 143rd Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, 2017.</p> <p>The files used for the experimental procedure are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.835191</p> <p>The stimuli in this publication are based on the DSD100 and submission files of the SiSEC challenge, see https://www.sisec17.audiolabs-erlangen.de</p>
Evaluation of two 4th generation point-of-care assays for the detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection.
<p>Background. Fourth generation assays detect simultaneously antibodies for HIV and the p24 antigen, identifying HIV infection earlier than previous generation tests. Previous studies have shown that the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Combo has lower than anticipated performance in detecting antibodies for HIV and the p24 antigen. Furthermore, there are currently very few studies evaluating the performance of Standard Diagnostics BIOLINE HIV Ag/Ab Combo.</p> <p>Objective: To evaluate the performance of the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Combo and the Standard Diagnostics BIOLINE HIV Ag/Ab Combo in a panel of frozen serum samples.</p> <p>Study Design: The testing panel included 133 previously frozen serum specimens from the UCLA Clinical Microbiology & Immunoserology laboratory. Reference testing included testing for HIV antibodies by a 3<sup>rd</sup> generation enzyme immunoassay followed by HIV RNA detection. Antibody negative and RNA positive sera were also tested by a laboratory 4<sup>th</sup> generation HIV Ab/Ag enzyme immunoassay.</p> <p>Results: Reference testing yielded 97 positives for HIV infection and 36 negative samples. Sensitivity of the Alere test was 95% (88-98%), while the SD Bioline sensitivity was 91% (83-96%). Both assays showed 100% (90-100%) specificity. No indeterminate or invalid results were recorded. Among 13 samples with acute infection (HIV RNA positive, HIV antibody negative), 12 were found positive by the first assay and 8 by the second. The antigen component of the Alere assay detected 10 acute samples, while the SD Bioline assay detected only one.</p> <p>Conclusions: Both rapid assays showed very good overall performance in detecting HIV infection in frozen serum samples, but further improvements are required to improve the performance in acute infection.</p>
Scalability, dynamicity and performance evaluation results of Mantus framework
<p>Datasets used for experimental results (Figure 5): (a) Compositional weaver efficiency; (b) incremental weaving efficiency; (c) relative overhead of weaving in workflow; (d) weaver efficiency vs. aspect complexity.</p> <p>Type of data: raw and processed</p> <p>Hardware/software used: Intel Xeon E5-2650 Haswell at 2.60GHz with 64 GB of RAM; Testing input for all Mantus benchmarks: OpenStack-based ORBITS template described in paper, composed of a controller node and of 3 different group instances of compute nodes (Xen, KVM, LXC), with two virtual networks and relative network resources.</p> <p>Data format: CSV</p> <p>Source: Experiments</p> <p> </p>
When fear meets anger: Attitudes toward positively versus negatively evaluated pandemic policy proposals when negative emotions are competing in society
<p>Since the outbreak of the COVID‐19 pandemic, citizens of many countries have been faced with health‐related fear, as well as anti‐establishment and anti‐governmental anger. This emotional landscape colored the ongoing efforts by the authorities to convince citizens to accept various public policy proposals. In two studies (total <em>N</em> = 528, one preregistered) conducted in Poland in two different situations, we focused on the role of the simultaneously evoked pandemic fear and anti‐government anger in shaping attitudes toward the pandemic regulations. For negatively evaluated proposals, both of these emotions worked in opposite directions: fear was associated with increasing support, while anger was associated with increasing rejection. However, for positively evaluated policy proposals, fear and anger worked in consonance, and both were associated with increasing acceptance of the proposed regulations. Thus, while fear seems to motivate the acceptance of even negatively evaluated proposals that are seen as protective ones, anger works to amplify or polarize the proposals’ basic evaluations. Our findings could help plan the implementation of public policies in societies in times of turbulent emotional landscapes.</p>
Model and observational datasets used for evaluating CHASER simulated formaldehyde (HCHO) abundances in 2019 and 2020.
<p>The dataset entails the model simulation results and the observational data (satellite, aircraft, and ground-based MAX-DOAS) used for the study titled " Evaluating CHASER V.40 global formaldehyde (HCHO) simulations using satellite aircraft and ground-based remote sensing observations", submitted for peer-review in JGR: Atmospheres. </p>
Data availability. Multivariate data analysis. Validation of an instrument for the evaluation of teaching digital competence.
<p><strong>Data availability</strong>. Multivariate data analysis. Validation of an instrument for the evaluation of teaching digital competence. </p><ul><li>SPSS DATA. Multivariate data analysis. Validation of an instrument for the evaluation of teaching digital competence (spss data.sav). The data presented in this file contains the data imported wiyh the Software IBM SPSS Statistics, versión 28.0.1.1(15).</li><li>EXCEL DATA. Multivariate data analysis. Validation of an instrument for the evaluation of teaching digital competence (spss data.sav). The data presented in this file contains the data imported wiyh the Software IBM SPSS Statistics, versión 28.0.1.1(15).</li><li>Data of Project factorial.xlsx (The data presented in this file contains the results of the statistical analysis carried out with the Software Microsoft Excel).</li><li>Data Project reliability.xlsx (The data presented in this file contains the results of the statistical analysis carried out with the Software Microsoft Excel).</li><li>FIGURES. Multivariate data analysis. Validation of an instrument for the evaluation of teaching digital competence (Figure 1.jpeg, Figure 2.jpeg, Figure 3 and Figure 4.jpeg).</li></ul>
The Kconfig Variability Framework as a Feature Model: Sampled Configurations for Manual Evaluation
<p>This dataset contains plain text files with sampled solutions used during the manual evaluation of the transformation rules presented in https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000162110. To reproduce the manual evaluation process yourself, please copy over the respective Kconfig files in a local copy of the Linux kernel Git repository and run `make menuconfig`. You need to insert an invisible `MODULES` configuration symbol to ensure that tristate configuration symbols are handled correctly by Kconfig. Additionally, you need to remove the default Linux Kconfig file and rename the Kconfig file for which you want to reproduce the evaluation process accordingly (simply remove the number prefix).</p><p>Configurations marked with KCONFIG_NONSOLUTION cannot be reconstructed in `menuconfig`, wherein configurations marked with KCONFIG_SOLUTION should be reproducable in the `menuconfig` interface.</p><p>We additionally provide the generated feature models for the 9 selected Kconfig files, alongside with the Kconfig files themselves. Kconfig{1,2,3,4,5} can be automatically evaluated with Kfeature, as they contain no tristate confsyms.</p><p>The upstream version of Kfeature can be found on Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/6b6279/Kfeature</p>
Evaluation of different seed collection systems for oysters in Brazil
<p>Aim: Evaluation of different substrates for making artificial oyster seed collectors.</p><p>1) Four substrate types were tested: sanded bottles, flexible smooth PVC strips, flexible sanded PVC strips and factory-textured PVC strips.</p><p>2) Four substrate types were tested: sanded bottles, flexible smooth PVC strips, coupelles and commercial Zapco seed collector.</p><p>Data includes number of oyster seeds collected per square centimeter. The data originates from the Brazilian Northeast coast.</p>
Evaluation of different grow-out systems for oysters in Brazil
<p>Aim: Evaluation of different grow-out systems for oysters (<i>Crassostrea gasar</i>).</p><p>1) Six systems were tested; Fixed PVC table, Fixed rope table, Floating PVC table, Galvanized steel floating table, BST basket system, Pillows fixed on rope according to the traditional method of the producers of Sergipe.</p><p>2) Three systems were tested; Fixed PVC table, Galvanized steel floating table, Pillows fixed on rope according to the traditional method of the producers of Sergipe.</p><p>Data includes growth of oysters in different grow-out systems. Data originates from the Brazilian northeast coast.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.