Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 34 in Cladistic analysis of the transisthmian genus Eurytellina (Bivalvia: Tellinoidea) based on morphological and morphometric data

Fig. 34 Strict consensus of 6 most parsimonious trees based on MATRIX 1 using unweighted characters, detailing the topology of outgroup with the ingroup. Black circles, nonhomoplastic changes; white circles, homoplastic changes

Fig. 20 in Cladistic analysis of the transisthmian genus Eurytellina (Bivalvia: Tellinoidea) based on morphological and morphometric data

Fig. 20 Mantle papillae types (Size proportional): a) Donax hanleyanus; b) Eurytellina punicea; c) Sanguinolaria sanguinolenta

Fig. 12 in Cladistic analysis of the transisthmian genus Eurytellina (Bivalvia: Tellinoidea) based on morphological and morphometric data

Fig. 12 Internal view of right valve showing the pallial sinus outline types: a) Merisca martinicensis; b) Eurytellina prora; c) E. punicea; d) Tellinota alfredensis; e) Anomalocardia brasiliana; f) Dallocardia muricata; g) Tellina iheringi; h) Phyllodina persica. Scale: 3 mm

Fig. 22 in Cladistic analysis of the transisthmian genus Eurytellina (Bivalvia: Tellinoidea) based on morphological and morphometric data

Fig. 22 Right lateral view of mantle: a) Eurytellina punicea; b) E. nitens; c) Semele proficua; d) Anomalocardia brasiliana; e) Macoma constricta; f) Sanguinolaria sanguinolenta. Scale: 4 mm

Fig. 33 in Cladistic analysis of the transisthmian genus Eurytellina (Bivalvia: Tellinoidea) based on morphological and morphometric data

Fig. 33 Cerebral (a–c) and visceral ganglia (d–f) in three species: Anomalocardia brasiliana (a and d); Eurytellina lineata (b and e); Macoma constricta (c and f, with statocyst removed). Scale: 0.5 mm

Fig. 7 in Cladistic analysis of the transisthmian genus Eurytellina (Bivalvia: Tellinoidea) based on morphological and morphometric data

Fig. 7 Detail of the hinge in some species: a) Semele proficua; b) Angulus gibber; c) Tellinota madagascariensis; d); Donax hanleyanus; e) Tagelus plebeius; f) Eurytellina punicea; g) Anomalocar-

Fig. 29 in Cladistic analysis of the transisthmian genus Eurytellina (Bivalvia: Tellinoidea) based on morphological and morphometric data

Fig. 29 Posterior auxiliary pallial muscles: a) scheme showing topological relations of three groups of muscles (apm1, apm2 and apm3) based on Eurytellina. The same muscle in three species (b–d): b) Sanguinolaria sanguinolenta; c) Angulus exerythrus; c) Eurytellina lineata. Scale: 2 mm

Fig. 30 in Cladistic analysis of the transisthmian genus Eurytellina (Bivalvia: Tellinoidea) based on morphological and morphometric data

Fig. 30 Dorsal (a–d) and lateral (e) view of cruciform muscle (cruciform membrane was resected): a) Iphigenia brasiliana; b) Semele proficua; c) Eurytellina prora; d–e) Macoma constricta; e) detail of insertion of cruciform muscle (mantle edge totally resected). Scale bar: 1 mm

Fig. 4 in Several Subspecies or Phenotypic Plasticity? A Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis of Variability of the Mayan Cichlid Mayaheros urophthalmus in the Yucatan

Fig. 4. Axis of CVA under aquatic environment approach with ellipses of the probability of 95%, and the grid of morphometric space of CVA with a factor of deformation ¼ 0.1; (A) axis 1 of CVA and (B) axis 2 of CVA.

Fig. 3. CVA 1 in Several Subspecies or Phenotypic Plasticity? A Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis of Variability of the Mayan Cichlid Mayaheros urophthalmus in the Yucatan

Fig. 3. CVA 1 vs. CVA 2 by population at geometric morphometric space delimited by minimum convex polygons, and the grid of morphometric space of CVA with a factor of deformation ¼ 0.1; (A) axis 1 of CVA and (B) axis 2 of CVA.

Fig. 1 in Several Subspecies or Phenotypic Plasticity? A Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis of Variability of the Mayan Cichlid Mayaheros urophthalmus in the Yucatan

Fig. 1. Study area, Yucatan Peninsula. Localities of M. urophthalmus taken into account for the geometric morphometric analysis, in gray numbers. Localities with genetic data, marked with an asterisk. Localities from nominal species included in the morphometric analysis: M. alborus (15), M. cienagae (10), M. conchitae (8), M. mayorum (6), and M. zebra (9).

Fig. 2 in Several Subspecies or Phenotypic Plasticity? A Geometric Morphometric and Molecular Analysis of Variability of the Mayan Cichlid Mayaheros urophthalmus in the Yucatan

Fig. 2. Constellation of landmarks and semilandmarks for the geometric morphometric analysis showing Procrustes superimposition of landmarks and semilandmarks. Anatomical positions of landmarks: Landmark 1—intersection between the posterior base of dorsal fin and caudal peduncle; Landmark 2—the most distal pore of the end of lateral line; Landmark 3—intersection between the posterior base of the pelvic fin and caudal peduncle; Landmark 4—intersection between anterior base of pelvic fin and belly; Landmark 5—apical intersection between subopercle and interopercle; Landmark 6—commissure of dentary at the more posterior end at its junction with the anguloarticular, quadrates, and ectometapterygoid bone; Landmarks 7 and 8—delimitation of the width of the commissure of dentary at its junction with the maxilla; Landmarks 9 and 10—delimitation of the width of the dentary at the more anterior end; Landmarks 10 and 12—delimitation of the width of the premaxilla at the more anterior end; Landmark 11—dorsal end of edge between opercle and cheek; Landmarks 12 to 24—the curve of 13 semilandmarks beginning at the intersection between the premaxilla and ascending process at semilandmark 12, the curve traced upwards until the base of dorsal fin at semilandmark 24.

FIGURE 14 in The flat mite Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): descriptions of all stages, ontogeny of setae and morphometric analysis

FIGURE 14. Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon. (Larva): A. Dorsum (Bahia, PC); B. Dorsal cuticule detail (Bahia, PC); C. Dorsum (Florida, SEM).

FIGURE 6 in The flat mite Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): descriptions of all stages, ontogeny of setae and morphometric analysis

FIGURE 6. Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon. (Male, Bahia, LD): A. Dorsum; B. Venter; C. Ventral opisthosoma; D. Ventral gnathosoma.

FIGURE 3 in The flat mite Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): descriptions of all stages, ontogeny of setae and morphometric analysis

FIGURE 3. Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon. (Female): A. Dorsum (Paratype, DIC); B. Dorsal setae (Paratype, DIC); C. Ventral opisthosoma (Paratype, DIC); D. Ventral details (Paratype, DIC); E. Dorsum (Florida, DIC); F. Dorsum (Florida, SEM); G. Microplates female reticulated dorsum (Florida, SEM); H. Microplates female smooth dorsum (Florida, SEM).

FIGURE 9 in The flat mite Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): descriptions of all stages, ontogeny of setae and morphometric analysis

FIGURE 9. Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon. (Deutonymph, Bahia, LD). A. Dorsum; B. Venter; C. Leg I; D. Leg II; E. Leg III; F. Leg IV.

FIGURE 13 in The flat mite Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): descriptions of all stages, ontogeny of setae and morphometric analysis

FIGURE 13. Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon. (Larva, Bahia, LD): A. Dorsum; B. Venter; C. Leg I; D. Leg II; E. Leg III.

FIGURE 10 in The flat mite Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): descriptions of all stages, ontogeny of setae and morphometric analysis

FIGURE 10. Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon. (Deutonymph): A. Dorsum (Paratype, DIC); B. Ventral opisthosoma (Paratype, DIC); C. Dorsum (Amapá, SEM); D. Dorsal gnathosoma (Amapá, SEM).

FIGURE 5 in The flat mite Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): descriptions of all stages, ontogeny of setae and morphometric analysis

FIGURE 5. Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon. (Female, Bahia, LD): A. Leg I; B. Leg II; C. Leg III; D. Leg IV.

FIGURE 2 in The flat mite Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon (Acari: Tenuipalpidae): descriptions of all stages, ontogeny of setae and morphometric analysis

FIGURE 2. Tenuipalpus uvae De Leon. (Female, Bahia, LD): A. Dorsum; B. Venter; C. Ventral gnathosoma.