Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 4 in Designation and description of a neotype of Sclerophrys maculata (Hallowell, 1854), and reinstatement of S. pusilla (Mertens, 1937) (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae)

FIGURE 4. Ten-second windows of spectrogram and oscillogram of an Sclerophrys pusilla (above; South Africa, from audio CD in Du Preez & Carruthers, 2009) and S. maculata (below, Ivory Coast, from audio CD in Rödel, 2000). Inserts show magnification of a single pulsed note.

FIGURE 1 in Designation and description of a neotype of Sclerophrys maculata (Hallowell, 1854), and reinstatement of S. pusilla (Mertens, 1937) (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae)

FIGURE 1. Bayesian phylogenetic reconstructions of pan-African sampling of individuals of the Western (Sclerophrys maculata; light grey) and Eastern (S. pusilla, dark grey) Clade. Node labels refer to posterior probabilities (only shown if above 0.9) and specimens marked with an asterisk are also included in the morphological analysis. Tree A is inferred from a five-gene concatenated alignment and Trees B, C and D are inferred from subsets of this alignment where Tree B includes only mtDNA (12S, 16S and COI), and Tree C exclusively CXCR4 and Tree D exclusively RAG1.

FIGURE 6 in Designation and description of a neotype of Sclerophrys maculata (Hallowell, 1854), and reinstatement of S. pusilla (Mertens, 1937) (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae)

FIGURE 6. Photographs of A) Sclerophrys maculata neotype (BMNH 1984.163) and B) S. pusilla holotype (SMF 22247).

FIGURE 5 in Designation and description of a neotype of Sclerophrys maculata (Hallowell, 1854), and reinstatement of S. pusilla (Mertens, 1937) (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae)

FIGURE 5. Map showing the distribution of morphological (blue circles) and molecular (green squares) samples across Africa. Symbols with darker outlines were geo-referenced based on anecdotal collection information and are thus only approximations of the true collection site. The grey overlay depicts the IUCN distribution map of Sclerophrys maculata, partitioned into a Western (dark grey) and Eastern (light grey) clade, reflecting the phylogenetic divergence between S. maculata and S. pusilla. The precise contact zone is unknown and is only estimated here based on the available genetic data.

FIGURE 3 in Designation and description of a neotype of Sclerophrys maculata (Hallowell, 1854), and reinstatement of S. pusilla (Mertens, 1937) (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae)

FIGURE 3. Plots of snout–urostyle length (SUL) and nine morphompetric ratios. Plots are grouped according to species (West = Sclerophrys maculata, light grey; East = S. pusilla, dark grey; and Ethiopia, black) and sex. All measurements were log10 transformed.

FIGURE 2 in Designation and description of a neotype of Sclerophrys maculata (Hallowell, 1854), and reinstatement of S. pusilla (Mertens, 1937) (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae)

FIGURE 2. Species tree based on *BEAST inference. Node support values at the heads of nodes refer to *BEAST posterior probabilities, where as those above and below nodes are the posterior probabilities of speciation from the BPP analyses when using algorithm0 (above) and algorithm1 (below) and four combinations of different θ and τ prior distributions.

FIGURE 5 in Neotype designation for Rhinogobius carpenteri Seale 1910, and its placement in Tukugobius Herre 1927 (Teleostei: Gobiidae)

FIGURE 5. Wangan River at La Trinidad; location where the neotype of Rhinogobius carpenteri was collected.

FIGURE 4 in Neotype designation for Rhinogobius carpenteri Seale 1910, and its placement in Tukugobius Herre 1927 (Teleostei: Gobiidae)

FIGURE 4. Map of northern Luzon Island showing the collecting localities of Tukugobius carpenteri. Arrow indicates the neotype locality. 1, Lagben River; 2, Amburayan R.; 3, Balili R.; 4, Agno R.; 5, Chico R.; 6, Cagayan R.

FIGURE 3. Tukugobius carpenteri, KIZ 2016003044 in Neotype designation for Rhinogobius carpenteri Seale 1910, and its placement in Tukugobius Herre 1927 (Teleostei: Gobiidae)

FIGURE 3. Tukugobius carpenteri, KIZ 2016003044, neotype of Rhinogobius carpenteri, 47.3 mm SL, radiograph; arrow indicates position of the first dorsal fin's seventh pterygiophore.

FIGURE 1 in Neotype designation for Rhinogobius carpenteri Seale 1910, and its placement in Tukugobius Herre 1927 (Teleostei: Gobiidae)

FIGURE 1. Tukugobius carpenteri; Benguet: La Trinidad; Balili River; upper: KIZ 2016003044, neotype of Rhinogobius carpenteri, male, 47.3 mm SL; lower: KIZ 2016003036, female, 39.6 mm.

FIGURE 2. Tukugobius carpenteri, KIZ 2016003044 in Neotype designation for Rhinogobius carpenteri Seale 1910, and its placement in Tukugobius Herre 1927 (Teleostei: Gobiidae)

FIGURE 2. Tukugobius carpenteri, KIZ 2016003044, neotype of Rhinogobius carpenteri, 47.3 mm SL, cephalic lateralis system; arrows indicate gill opening; dotted lines indicate extent of squamation. Scale bar 2 mm.

opennotspecifiedAug 2013View details →

FIGURE 1 in Neotype designation for Sinonamuropteris ningxiaensis Peng, Hong et Zhang, 2005 (Grylloblattida: Sinonamuropteridae)

FIGURE 1. Sinonamuropteris ningxiaensis Peng et al., 2005, neotype CNU-NX1-161. A, photograph (negative imprint); B, drawing.

opennotspecifiedJul 2013View details →

FIGURE 1. A in Cancer (Mantis) digitalis Herbst, 1793, an objective synonym of Oratosquillina quinquedentata (Brooks, 1886): neotype designation and reversal of precedence (Crustacea: Stomatopoda: Squillidae)

FIGURE 1. A, Cancer (Mantis) digitalis Herbst, 1793, holotype, East Indies, reproduced from Herbst, 1793, pl. 33, fig. 1. B, Oratosquillina quinquedentata (Brooks, 1886), female, total length 155 mm, northeast of Shelburne Bay, Queensland, Australia, colour faded in preservative (Australian Museum, P56920).

FIGURES 19–25 in Redescription and neotype designation of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948 (Coleoptera: Dytiscoidea: Noteridae) and notes on other species of the genus

FIGURES 19–25. Habitus of Suphis species: (19–21) Suphis intermedius Régimbart, 1903, male from Brazil, Corumbá (ZSM): (19) Dorsal aspect; (20) ventral aspect; (21) lateral aspect; (22) S. intermedius Régimbart, 1903, female from Paraguay, Reserva Natural del Bosque Mbaracayú (LEBA), dorsal aspect; (23) detail of pronotal and elytral surface showing macro- and micropunctation; (24) holotype (by monotypy) of S. insculpturatus Zimmermann, 1921, dorsal aspect; (25) detail of pronotal and elytral surface showing macropunctation and absence of micropunctation. Scale bar = 1 mm.

FIGURES 1–5 in Redescription and neotype designation of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948 (Coleoptera: Dytiscoidea: Noteridae) and notes on other species of the genus

FIGURES 1–5. Habitus of Suphis species, dorsal aspect: (1) Neotype of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948; (2) Syntype of Suphis intermedius Régimbart, 1903 (specimen EC10413 from MNHN); (3) alleged holotype of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948, to which we added two labels as follows: "Suphis notaticollis / Zimmermann, 1921 / Urcola et al. det. 2023"; "This specimen is NOT / the holotype of Suphis / fluviatilis Guignot, 1948. / See Urcola et al. 2023"; (4) paratype of Suphis bullatus Guignot, 1950; (5) syntype of Suphis notaticollis Zimmermann, 1921. Figs 2–4: MNHN: Antoine Mantilleri, 2020. Fig. 5: ZSM: Ditta Amran Balke, 2022. Scale bar = 3 mm.

FIGURES 16–18 in Redescription and neotype designation of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948 (Coleoptera: Dytiscoidea: Noteridae) and notes on other species of the genus

FIGURES 16–18. Protarsomeres of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948, male from Paraguay, Fortín Patria: (16) Anterior aspect; (17) posterior aspect; (18) detail of suction cups on protarsomeres I–III, ventral aspect. Red arrows indicate suction cups. Scale bar = 0.1 mm.

FIGURES 12–15 in Redescription and neotype designation of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948 (Coleoptera: Dytiscoidea: Noteridae) and notes on other species of the genus

FIGURES 12–15. Morphological structures of Suphis species. (12–14) Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948: (12) Pronotum (left side), dorsal aspect: a) with discal spots separated, male from Paraguay, Fortín Patria; b) with discal spots coalescent, neotype; (13) metaventrite and metacoxal processes, male from Paraguay, Fortín Patria; (14) genitalia, neotype: a) segment IX, right lateral aspect; b) left lateral lobe, right lateral aspect; c) right lateral lobe, right lateral aspect; d) median lobe, left lateral aspect; e) median lobe, dorsal aspect; f) median lobe, right lateral aspect. (15) Suphis intermedius Régimbart, 1903, genitalia, male from Brazil, Corumbá (ZSM): a) segment IX, right lateral aspect; b) left lateral lobe, right lateral aspect; c) right lateral lobe, right lateral aspect; d) median lobe, left lateral aspect; e) median lobe, dorsal aspect; f) median lobe, right lateral aspect. Scale bars = 0.25 mm.

FIGURES 6–11 in Redescription and neotype designation of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948 (Coleoptera: Dytiscoidea: Noteridae) and notes on other species of the genus

FIGURES 6–11. Habitus of Suphis fluviatilis Guignot, 1948 (Paraguay, Pozo Colorado). (6–8) Neotype male: (6) dorsal aspect; (7) ventral aspect; (8) lateral aspect; (9–11) female: (9) dorsal aspect; (10) ventral aspect; (11) lateral aspect. Scale bar = 1 mm.

FIGURE 1 in Designation of a neotype for the dendrochirotid holothuroid, Thyone fusus (Müller) (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea: Dendrochirotida: Thyonidae)

FIGURE 1. Thyone fusus (Müller). Neotype (designated herein). A. calcareous ring (ir = interradial plate; r = radial plate, labelled according to Ludwig's system); B. tables of body wall; C. rosettes of introvert; D. supporting tables of tube feet; E. rods and plates of tentacles; F. tables of introvert, G. tables of body wall of T. flexus (reproduced from holotype slides examined at NHMUK)) (A = Scale 1; B–G = Scale 2).