Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 16–20. Polydrepanum tamilum Carl, 1932. 16. Male leg 2, lateral view. 17. Entire left gonopod, mesal view. 18 in Review of the millipede tribe Polydrepanini, with the description of a new species from Kerala state, southern India (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Alogolykinae)

FIGURES 16–20. Polydrepanum tamilum Carl, 1932. 16. Male leg 2, lateral view. 17. Entire left gonopod, mesal view. 18. Distal half of left gonopod, lateral view. 19. Entire right gonopod, mesal view. 20. Distal half of right gonopod, sublateral view. 16–18: after Carl (1932); 19, 20: after Jeekel (1980b). Abbreviations: a and b, dorsal distofemoral processes; ad, adenostyle; lo, lateral protecting lobe/shield; k, basal loop of solenomere; sl, solenomere; sph, solenophore. Drawn not to scale.

FIGURES 1–5. Grammorhabdus asperrimus Carl, 1932. 1. Male leg 1, lateral view. 2. Male leg 2, lateral view. 3. Entire left gonopod, mesal view. 4, 5 in Review of the millipede tribe Polydrepanini, with the description of a new species from Kerala state, southern India (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Alogolykinae)

FIGURES 1–5. Grammorhabdus asperrimus Carl, 1932. 1. Male leg 1, lateral view. 2. Male leg 2, lateral view. 3. Entire left gonopod, mesal view. 4, 5. Distal half of left gonopod, lateral view. 1–4: after Carl (1932), 5: after Jeekel (1980B). Abbreviations: a and b, apicomesal spines; ad, adenostyle; ca, cannula; cx, coxite; fe, femorite; k, basal loop of solenomere; lo, lateral lobe; pfe, prefemoral portion; sl, solenomere; sph, solenophore. Drawn not to scale.

FIGURES 65–68. Xiphidiogonus spinipleurus Carl, 1932. 65. Male leg 1, lateral view. 66. Male leg 2, lateral view. 67. Entire right gonopod, mesal view. 68 in Review of the millipede tribe Polydrepanini, with the description of a new species from Kerala state, southern India (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Alogolykinae)

FIGURES 65–68. Xiphidiogonus spinipleurus Carl, 1932. 65. Male leg 1, lateral view. 66. Male leg 2, lateral view. 67. Entire right gonopod, mesal view. 68. Distal half of right gonopod, lateral view. After Carl (1932). Abbreviations: a, b, c and d, distofemoral processes; ad, adenostyle; fe, femorite; k, basal loop of solenomere; sl, solenomere; sph, solenophore. Drawn not to scale.

FIGURES 27–30. Delarthrum obscurum Attems, 1936. 27. Male femur 1, lateral view. 28. Entire right gonopod, lateral view. 29, 30 in Review of the millipede tribe Polydrepanini, with the description of a new species from Kerala state, southern India (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Alogolykinae)

FIGURES 27–30. Delarthrum obscurum Attems, 1936. 27. Male femur 1, lateral view. 28. Entire right gonopod, lateral view. 29, 30. Distal half of right gonopod, lateral and mesal views, respectively. After Attems (1936). Abbreviations: a, mesal distofemoral process; ad, adenostyle; sl, solenomere; sph, solenophore. Drawn not to scale.

opennotspecifiedMar 2020View details →

Figure 12. A–X, lateral lobes. A–E in Revision of the Ropalopus ungaricus/insubricus group (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Callidiini) from the western Palaearctic region

Figure 12. A–X, lateral lobes. A–E, Ropalopus ungaricus ungaricus, Slovakia, Slovakia, Poland, Austria and Montenegro, respectively. F–I, Ropalopus ungaricus gallicus, France. J–N, Ropalopus ungaricus insubricus, Italy, Croatia, Croatia, Croatia and Croatia, respectively. O, Ropalopus ungaricus boreki, Greece (Peloponnese). P–R, Ropalopus ungaricus siculus, Italy (Sicily). S, T, Ropalopus ungaricus ossae, Greece (Thessaly). U, V, Ropalopus nataliyae, Iran. W, X, Ropalopus lederi, Russia (north-west Caucasus).

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest. in Suidae

Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest.

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

Distribution. Sulawesi and adjacent Is (Buton, Kabaena, Muna, Peleng, Lembeh, and on some of the Togian Is); thought to be extinct on Selayar I. Pigs have been widely domesticated through the Indonesian archipelago and beyond. This primarily involved the Eurasian Wild Pig (S. scrofa), but also S. celebensis, the only other species of pig successfully domesticated. Mitochondrial DNA studies of the dispersion of these domesticated forms agree on three major dispersal events, two involving S. scrofa and one S. celebensis. Evidence supports an early human-mediated translocation of S. celebensis to Flores and Timor and two later, separate human-mediated dispersals of domestic pig through islands of SE Asia into Oceania. In addition to Flores and Timor, S. celebensis is also thought to occur in its domesticated form on Halmahera, Lendu, Roti, and Savur Is, and even on Simeulue and Nias Is to the W of Sumatra and far from its island of origin, Sulawesi. In the Moluccas, and possibly elsewhere in this region, introduced S. celebensis are thought to have hybridized with other introduced pigs of S. scrofa derivation, and apparent hybrids between these species are now reported to survive on a number of islands, including Salawatti, Great Kei, Dobu, Seram, Ambon, Bacan, Ternate, Morotai, and New Guinea. It is also reported that in the 19" century the sows of domestic pigs in Sulawesi frequently mated with wild animals, after which they returned to their villages. in Suidae

Distribution. Sulawesi and adjacent Is (Buton, Kabaena, Muna, Peleng, Lembeh, and on some of the Togian Is); thought to be extinct on Selayar I. Pigs have been widely domesticated through the Indonesian archipelago and beyond. This primarily involved the Eurasian Wild Pig (S. scrofa), but also S. celebensis, the only other species of pig successfully domesticated. Mitochondrial DNA studies of the dispersion of these domesticated forms agree on three major dispersal events, two involving S. scrofa and one S. celebensis. Evidence supports an early human-mediated translocation of S. celebensis to Flores and Timor and two later, separate human-mediated dispersals of domestic pig through islands of SE Asia into Oceania. In addition to Flores and Timor, S. celebensis is also thought to occur in its domesticated form on Halmahera, Lendu, Roti, and Savur Is, and even on Simeulue and Nias Is to the W of Sumatra and far from its island of origin, Sulawesi. In the Moluccas, and possibly elsewhere in this region, introduced S. celebensis are thought to have hybridized with other introduced pigs of S. scrofa derivation, and apparent hybrids between these species are now reported to survive on a number of islands, including Salawatti, Great Kei, Dobu, Seram, Ambon, Bacan, Ternate, Morotai, and New Guinea. It is also reported that in the 19" century the sows of domestic pigs in Sulawesi frequently mated with wild animals, after which they returned to their villages.

FIGURE 1. Cremastra saprophytica from the type locality. A–C. Flowering plant. D. Flower, dorsal view. E. Flower, lateral view. F in Cremastra saprophytica (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae), a new leafless autonomously self-pollinating orchid species from Gifu Prefecture, Japan

FIGURE 1. Cremastra saprophytica from the type locality. A–C. Flowering plant. D. Flower, dorsal view. E. Flower, lateral view. F. Flower, front view. Central arrow points to a small smooth callus of lip positioned at the base of midlobe, whereas the other arrows point to the inconspicuous lateral lobes. G. Fruiting plants. H. Fruiting body of Coprinellus disseminates, one of the associated fungi of C. saprophytica.

FIGURE1. Shoveliteratura pentaloba Lu, Peng & Shi sp.nov., male: A. fastigium verticis in dorsal view; B,D. pronotum: B. lateral view; D. dorsal view; C. cerci in lateral view; E. apex of abdomen in dorsal view; F. subgenital plate in ventral view; G–I. genitalia: G. dorsal view; H. latero-apical view; I. ventral view; female: J. subgenital plate in ventral view; K. ovipositor in lateral view; m. middle lobe of male genitalia. in -One-new-species-of-the-genus-Shoveliteratura-Shi,-Bian-&-Chang,-2011- (Tettigoniidae:-Meconematinae)-from-China

FIGURE1. Shoveliteratura pentaloba Lu, Peng & Shi sp.nov., male: A. fastigium verticis in dorsal view; B,D. pronotum: B. lateral view; D. dorsal view; C. cerci in lateral view; E. apex of abdomen in dorsal view; F. subgenital plate in ventral view; G–I. genitalia: G. dorsal view; H. latero-apical view; I. ventral view; female: J. subgenital plate in ventral view; K. ovipositor in lateral view; m. middle lobe of male genitalia.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Dataset related to article "Defective cyclophilin A induces TDP-43 proteinopathy: implications for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia"

<p>Dataset related to the article 10.1093/brain/awab333</p>

opennotspecifiedMar 2021View details →

FIGURE 1. Agrostis barikii. A. Ligule. B–C. Spikelets, lateral view. D–E. Spikelet with floret separated from the glumes. F in Agrostis barikii (Poaceae: Agrostidinae), a new grass species from Western Himalaya, India

FIGURE 1. Agrostis barikii. A. Ligule. B–C. Spikelets, lateral view. D–E. Spikelet with floret separated from the glumes. F. Floret in dorsal view showing the well-developed awn, G. Floret in lateral view showing the awn, the lemma glabrous at the apex, and the palea. H. Palea, ventral view. I. Anthers. J–K. Caryopsis, dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views. [Photographs from P. Agnihotri et al. 326659 (LWG)].

opennotspecifiedMar 2021View details →

FIGURE 1. Acianthera bilobulata Zambrano & Solano. A. Habit. B. Flower, lateral view. C in Acianthera bilobulata (Orchidaceae: Pleurothallidinae), a new species from Southwestern Ecuador

FIGURE 1. Acianthera bilobulata Zambrano & Solano. A. Habit. B. Flower, lateral view. C. Flower dissection and detail of the abaxial surface of the lateral sepal. D. Pedicel, ovary and column, lateral view. Drawn by B.J. Zambrano based on the holotype.

FIGURE 7. Lateral view. a in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 7. Lateral view. a. Cylapinus minusculus (♀); b. Cylapinus yasunagai (paratype); c. Cylapoides unicolor (♀); d. Peltidocylapus calyciformis (paratype); e. Peltidocylapus cerbereus (lectotype).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Lateral hypothalamic neuronal ensembles regulate pre-sleep nest-building behavior

<p>Data and codes for the paper "Lateral hypothalamic neuronal ensembles regulate pre-sleep nest-building behavior".</p>

FIGURE 5. Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980, ovigerous female NMMBA5623, ambulatory legs. A third pereiopod, lateral. B in Redescription and new record of the spongobiotic shrimp Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from Taiwan

FIGURE 5. Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980, ovigerous female NMMBA5623, ambulatory legs. A third pereiopod, lateral. B same, distal propodus and dactylus. C fourth pereiopod, lateral. D same, distal propodus and dactylus. E fifth pereiopod, lateral. F same, distal propodus and dactylus. Scale bars—1 mm (A, C, E), 0.5 mm (B, D, F). [Orig., ZĎ]

FIGURE 6. Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980, ovigerous female NMMBA5624. A carapace with rostrum, lateral. B left eye, anterolateral. C telson, dorsal. D third right pereiopod, inner. E in Redescription and new record of the spongobiotic shrimp Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from Taiwan

FIGURE 6. Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980, ovigerous female NMMBA5624. A carapace with rostrum, lateral. B left eye, anterolateral. C telson, dorsal. D third right pereiopod, inner. E exopod of right uropod. [Orig., ZĎ]

FIGURE 4. Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980, ovigerous female NMMBA5623. A right first pereiopod, lateral view. B in Redescription and new record of the spongobiotic shrimp Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from Taiwan

FIGURE 4. Periclimenaeus rastrifer Bruce, 1980, ovigerous female NMMBA5623. A right first pereiopod, lateral view. B same, distal carpus and chela, medial. C same, fingers, medial. D same, fingers, lateral. E major cheliped, lateral. F same, distal palm and fingers. G same, medial. H minor cheliped, lateral. I same, distal palm and fingers, lateral. J same, dorsolateral. K same, medial. Scale bars—1 mm. [Orig., ZĎ]

FIGURE 6. Danielatettix caudatus n. comb. A. Habitus lateral and B. Dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Fore-leg. E–F. Mid-leg variation. G. Male subgenital plate. H in The status of Micronotus Hancock, 1902 species (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae)

FIGURE 6. Danielatettix caudatus n. comb. A. Habitus lateral and B. Dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Fore-leg. E–F. Mid-leg variation. G. Male subgenital plate. H. Male terminalia in lateral view. I. Female terminalia in ventral and J. lateral view.

FIGURE 2. Bulbophyllum versicolor. A. Column with ovary. B. Lip. C. Dorsal sepal. D. Petal. E. Anther cap and pollinarium. F. Lateral sepal. G in Bulbophyllum versicolor (Orchidaceae, Malaxideae), a new species from Yunnan, China: evidence from morphology and molecular analyses

FIGURE 2. Bulbophyllum versicolor. A. Column with ovary. B. Lip. C. Dorsal sepal. D. Petal. E. Anther cap and pollinarium. F. Lateral sepal. G. Plant.

FIGURE. Multiclavula caput-serpentis (KaiR699, holotype). a. Embankment covered by the thallus, with several groups of numerous basidiocarps (arrows). b. Thallus on soil, with a group of basidiocarps. c. Basidiocarps with different shapes, +/- lateral view. d. Basidiocarps from below-lateral. Bars a = 20 cm, b = 1 cm, c, d = 2 mm. Photos by K. Reschke. in New and interesting species of Agaricomycetes from Panama

FIGURE. Multiclavula caput-serpentis (KaiR699, holotype). a. Embankment covered by the thallus, with several groups of numerous basidiocarps (arrows). b. Thallus on soil, with a group of basidiocarps. c. Basidiocarps with different shapes, +/- lateral view. d. Basidiocarps from below-lateral. Bars a = 20 cm, b = 1 cm, c, d = 2 mm. Photos by K. Reschke.