Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4. Phylogenetic relationship among the S in Fatal hepatic sarcocystosis in three captive and one free-ranging pinniped

Fig. 4. Phylogenetic relationship among the S. canis-like variants from two Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus schauinslandi) and two California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), a Pacific harbor seal (MT460246) compared against S. canis sequences from two black bears (OR336049, MW136927), a polar bear (DQ176645) and various other Sarcocystis spp. at the complete ITS1 locus. Evolutionary distances were computed using the Tamura-Nei genetic distance model. A Neighbor-Joining midpoint rooted bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 1000 MUSCLE alignment iterations. Bootstrap percentage values are indicated at the branch points.

Fig. 2 in Fatal hepatic sarcocystosis in three captive and one free-ranging pinniped

Fig. 2. TEM of a schizont with protozoa similar to S. canis in the hepatocyte of a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) "CSL 1". Merozoites contained micronemes (Mn), a conoid (Co), and a prominent nucleus (Nu), but no rhoptries. Bar = 500 nm.

Fig. 1 in Fatal hepatic sarcocystosis in three captive and one free-ranging pinniped

Fig. 1. Histologic liver sections of a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) "CSL 2" with numerous coalescing foci of acute necrosis. A. Lower magnification of acute necrosis with Sarcocystis schizonts (black arrow). B. Higher magnification of mature protozoal schizonts with a rosette of merozoites (red arrow) and a schizont with greater than 30 free merozoites (black arrow) within a foci of hepatic necrosis.

Fig. 3 in Fatal hepatic sarcocystosis in three captive and one free-ranging pinniped

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationship of the S. canis-like variant isolate CSL-2 that infects pinnipeds from a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) compared against S. canis from a black bear isolate 11–3173 (OR654898) and various other Sarcocystis spp. Within a 994 nucleotide fragment of the 18S rRNA locus. Evolutionary distances were computed using the Tamura-Nei genetic distance model. A Neighbor-Joining bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 1000 MUSCLE alignment iterations. Bootstrap percentage values are indicated at the branch points. Toxoplasma gondii was used as an outgroup.

Fig. 6 in Three new species of Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the Amami rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi (Mammalia: Leporidae)

Fig. 6. Line drawings of the Eimeria species detected in the Amami rabbit. (a) Eimeria furnessi. (b) Eimeria hilleri. (c) Eimeria sagentae. Scale bar = 10 μ

Fig. 4 in Three new species of Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the Amami rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi (Mammalia: Leporidae)

Fig. 4. Nomarski interference contrast photographs of oocysts of Eimeria hilleri from the Amami rabbit stored in a potassium dichromate solution. M: micropyle; N: nucleus; OWo: outer layer of the wall; OWi: inner layer of the wall; RB: refractile body; SB: Stieda body; SR: sporocyst residuum; SSB: substieda body. Scale bars (all in the same scale) = 10 μm.

Fig. 2 in Three new species of Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the Amami rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi (Mammalia: Leporidae)

Fig. 2. Endogenous stages of coccidian parasites found in the section of the jejunum and ileum of the Amami rabbit. HE. Scale bar = 20 μm and applies to all parts. (a) Schizont-like structures (arrows) in detached epithelial cells. (b) Immature microgamont (arrow) with basophilic small nuclei. (c) Immature macrogamont (arrow) with eosinophilic bodies. (d) Microgamont (arrow) with peripherally located basophilic nuclei. (e) Macrogamont (arrow) with peripheral arrangement of eosinophilic wall-forming bodies. (f) Unsporulated oocyst (arrow) with a central nucleus and oocyst wall. High-resolution version of these slides for use with the Virtual Microscope are available as eSlide: VM06653.

Fig. 5 in Three new species of Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the Amami rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi (Mammalia: Leporidae)

Fig. 5. Nomarski interference contrast photographs of oocysts of Eimeria sagentae from the Amami rabbit stored in a potassium dichromate solution. M: micropyle; N: nucleus; OWo: outer layer of the wall; OWi: inner layer of the wall; RB: refractile body; SB: Stieda body; SO: sporont; SR: sporocyst residuum. Scale bars (all in the same scale) = 10 μm.

Fig. 1 in Three new species of Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the Amami rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi (Mammalia: Leporidae)

Fig. 1. Map showing the location of the Amami-Oshima and Tokunoshima Islands. Circles indicate the sites where fecal samples of Amami rabbits were collected in the field.

Fig. 3 in Three new species of Eimeria (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from the Amami rabbit, Pentalagus furnessi (Mammalia: Leporidae)

Fig. 3. Nomarski interference contrast photographs of oocysts of Eimeria furnessi from the Amami rabbit stored in a potassium dichromate solution. M: micropyle; N: nucleus; OWo: outer layer of the wall; OWi: inner layer of the wall; RB: refractile body; SB: Stieda body; SO: sporont; SR: sporocyst residuum. Scale bars (all in the same scale) = 10 μm.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in Role of three bird species in the life cycle of two Sarcocystis spp. (Apicomplexa, Sarcocystidae) in the Czech Republic

Fig. 2. Maximum likelihood tree for Sarcocystis halieti isolates from intermediate and definitive hosts (red asterisk) based on internal transcribed spacer sequences (HKY + I model). Sequences of the present study in blue. The tree was rooted on Sarcocystis arctica. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Role of three bird species in the life cycle of two Sarcocystis spp. (Apicomplexa, Sarcocystidae) in the Czech Republic

Fig. 1. Sarcocystis halieti from Sturnus vulgaris. (a) Free thin-walled sarcocyst from skeletal muscle, wet mount. (b) Haematoxylin and eosin-stained histological sections of breast muscle with sarcocyst. Scale bars = 25 μm.

Fig. 13 in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 13. Morphology of male thoracic sternal plates and associated posterior setae for previously described species of Lemurpediculus, A: Lemurpediculus petterorum Paulian, 1958. B: Lemurpediculus madagascariensis Durden et al. (2018). C: Lemurpediculus claytoni Durden et al., 2017. D: Lemurpediculus verruculosus (Ward, 1951). E: Lemurpediculus robbinsi Durden et al., 2017. Scale bar, 0.1 mm.

Fig. 7 in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 7. Lemurpediculus zimmermanni, female, scanning electron micrographs: A, dorsal whole body. B, ventral whole body. Abbreviations: sgp, subgenital plate; sp, spiracle; tc, tibiotarsal claw; tsp, thoracic sternal plate; vs, ventral head spike.

Fig. 5 in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 5. Lemurpediculus zimmermanni, stacked photoimages: A, male Holotype, USNMENT00981950, whole body. B, male, Holotype, USNMENT00981950, genitalia. C, female Allotype, USNMENT00981951, whole body.

Fig. 6. Lemurpediculus zimmermanni, A in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 6. Lemurpediculus zimmermanni, A: Ventral head of male Holotype, B: Thoracic sternal plate of Holotype male, C: Genitalia of male Holotype, D: Subgenital plate of female allotype. Abbreviations: ae, anterior endomere; aen, aedeagal endomere; ba, basal apodeme; p, paramere; pe, posterior endomere; ps, pseudopenis.

Fig. 8 in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 8. Lemurpediculus gerpi, stacked photoimages: A, male Holotype, USNMENT00981952, whole body. B, male, Holotype, USNMENT00981952, genitalia.

Fig. 10 in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 10. Lemurpediculus tsinamanpesotsae, stacked photoimages: A, male Holotype, USNMENT00981954, whole body. B, male, Holotype, USNMENT00981954, genitalia. C, female Allotype, USNMENT00981955, whole body.

Fig. 14 in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 14. Morphology of female subgenital plates and associated setae for previously described species of Lemurpediculus, A: Lemurpediculus claytoni Durden et al., 2017. B: Lemurpediculus robbinsi Durden et al., 2017. C: Lemurpediculus verruculosus (Ward, 1951). D: Lemurpediculus petterorum Paulian, 1958. E: Lemurpediculus madagascariensis Durden et al. (2018).

Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogenetics of the sucking louse genus Lemurpediculus (Insecta: Phthiraptera), ectoparasites of lemurs, with descriptions of three new species

Fig. 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees based on A) elongation factor 1α (EF1α), B) cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COI) and C) internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences. Values next to the branches indicate ultrafast bootstrap support. Tree scale is in substitutions/site. Substitution models were TNe + G4 for EF1α, TPM2+F + I + G4 for COI, and F81 + F + I for ITS1. Abbreviations: F., Fahrenholzia; H., Haematopinus; L., Lemurpediculus.