Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,144
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,144 results for “ITS barcode”
Figures 4-5 from: Mally R, Huemer P, Nuss M (2018) Deep intraspecific DNA barcode splits and hybridisation in the Udea alpinalis group (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) – an integrative revision. ZooKeys 746: 51-90. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.746.22020
Figures 4-5 Distribution of investigated specimens of the Udea austriacalis species complex (4) and U. rhododendronalis (5) in Europe 4 U. austriacalis (red), U. donzelalis (green), U. cretacea (yellow) 5 U. rhododendronalis (blue); altitudes ≥ 1,000 m are marked in increasingly darker grey shades every 500 m.
Figure 6 from: Mally R, Huemer P, Nuss M (2018) Deep intraspecific DNA barcode splits and hybridisation in the Udea alpinalis group (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) – an integrative revision. ZooKeys 746: 51-90. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.746.22020
Figure 6 Distribution of investigated specimens of Udea juldusalis (blue), U. altaica (red) and U. plumbalis (yellow) in Central Asia; altitudes ³ 1,000 m are marked in increasingly darker grey shades every 500 m, altitudes ³ 4,000 m are in black. Note that the eastern locality of U. juldusalis and the localities of U. altaica and U. plumbalis are only approximations of the type localities.
Figure 1 from: Adeoba MI, Kabongo R, Van der Bank H, Yessoufou K (2018) Re-evaluation of the discriminatory power of DNA barcoding on some specimens of African Cyprinidae (subfamilies Cyprininae and Danioninae). ZooKeys 746: 105-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.746.13502
Figure 1 - Evaluation of barcode gap in the dataset. Boxplot of the interspecific (inter) and intraspecific genetic (intra) distances, indicating the existence of a barcode gap, i.e., interspecific distance is larger than intraspecific distance. The median is indicated by the horizontal line and the range as the vertical dashed lines and outliers by bold vertical lines.
Figure 3 from: Morigengaowa, Luo J-J, Knapp R, Wei H-J, Liu B-D, Yan Y-H, Shang H (2018) The identity of Hypolepis robusta, as a new synonym of Hypolepis alpina (Dennstaedtiaceae), based on morphology and DNA barcoding and the new distribution. PhytoKeys 96: 35-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.96.23470
Figure 3 Distribution of intra-taxa (black) and inter-taxa (grey) Kimura two parameter (K2P) distances based on rbcL and trnL-F sequences as barcode. Hypolepis alpina and Hypolepis robusta versus the other species of Hypolepis.
Figure 2 from: Morigengaowa, Luo J-J, Knapp R, Wei H-J, Liu B-D, Yan Y-H, Shang H (2018) The identity of Hypolepis robusta, as a new synonym of Hypolepis alpina (Dennstaedtiaceae), based on morphology and DNA barcoding and the new distribution. PhytoKeys 96: 35-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.96.23470
Figure 2 Phylogeny of 16 Hypolepis samples and Blotiella stipitata, Histiopteris incisa, and Pteridium aquilinum subsp. wightianum based on rbcL and trnL-F. Bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown along branches (ML/BI).
Figure 4 from: Morigengaowa, Luo J-J, Knapp R, Wei H-J, Liu B-D, Yan Y-H, Shang H (2018) The identity of Hypolepis robusta, as a new synonym of Hypolepis alpina (Dennstaedtiaceae), based on morphology and DNA barcoding and the new distribution. PhytoKeys 96: 35-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.96.23470
Figure 4 Hypolepis alpina. A Frond size (photographed by H. Shang in Fugong) B Lamina (photographed by R. Knapp in Nantou) C Hair (photographed by R. Knapp in Nantou) D The adventitious bud at stipe base (photographed by H. Shang in Fugong) E Indusium (photographed by R. Knapp in Nantou).
Figure 1 from: Morigengaowa, Luo J-J, Knapp R, Wei H-J, Liu B-D, Yan Y-H, Shang H (2018) The identity of Hypolepis robusta, as a new synonym of Hypolepis alpina (Dennstaedtiaceae), based on morphology and DNA barcoding and the new distribution. PhytoKeys 96: 35-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.96.23470
Figure 1 The distributions of Hypolepis alpina noted by Brownsey (1987, blue line) and new record localities since then (red stars), using a map available from http://219.238.166.215/mcp/index.asp.
Figure 4 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 4 Comparison of Q. langbianensis complex between NJ tree (left, Clade M3 of Fig. 3) and Bayesian tree (right: Clade 2 of Fig. 2).
Figure 1 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 1 Collection sites in Vietnam and Cambodia in this study, including eight national parks, four nature reserves and two conservation areas.
Figure 7 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 7 Quercus bidoupensis Binh & Ngoc. A Leafy twig B Abaxial side of mature leaf C, D Side view and base view of the cupule, respectively E Inside of cupule F Nut. Materials: A–F from Tagane et al. V4328.
Figure 11 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 11 Quercus donnaiensis A.Camus. A Leafy twig B Infructescence, young fruits and abaxial side of mature leaf C Dried specimen. Materials: A, B from Tagane S., Wai J. V4398 C from Ngoc et al. V3208.
Figure 13 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 13 Quercus langbianensis Hickel & A.Camus. A Leafy twig B Abaxial side of mature leaf C Infructescence and mature fruits D Apex of the nut E Basal scar of the nut F Inside of cupule. Materials: A, B from Tagane et al. V 4165 C–F from Tagane et al. V4166.
Figure 10 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 10 Quercus camusiae Trel. ex Hickel & A.Camus. A Branch with young fruit, B. Infructescence and young fruits C, D Abaxial side of young and mature leaf, E. Dried specimen. Materials: A–D from Tagane et al. V342 E from Toyama et al. V2173.
Figure 12 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 12 Quercus honbaensis Binh, Tagane & Yahara. A Leafy twig B Infructescence and mature fruits, C, D Side view and base view of the cupule, respectively, E. Inside of cupule, F. Nut. Materials: A–F from Toyama et al. V1378.
Figure 6 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 6 Quercus baolamensis Binh & Ngoc. A Leafy twig B Abaxial side of mature leaf C Mature fruit D Inside of cupule E Nut. Materials: A–E from Ngoc et al. V3191.
Figure 2 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 2 Bayesian phylogeny of 29 samples of Quercus and one Trigonobalanus (outgroup) based on rbcL, matK and ITS sequences. Braches are labelled with posterior probabilities.
Figure 3 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 3 NJ tree of 31 samples of Quercus and one Trigonobalanus (outgroup) based on presence/absence data of 16,809 MIG-seq loci. Branches are labelled with bootstrap supports (% of 1000 replicates).
Figure 9 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 9 Quercus cambodiensis Hickel & A.Camus. A Leafy twig B Abaxial side of mature leaf C Infructescence and fruits D Nut E Basal scar of the nut. Materials: A–E from Tagane et al. 4302.
Figure 8 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 8 Quercus blaoensis A.Camus A. Branch with fruits B Young fruit C Dried specimen Materials: A–C from Toyama et al. V1366.
Figure 5 from: Binh HT, Ngoc NV, Tagane S, Toyama H, Mase K, Mitsuyuki C, Strijk JS, Suyama Y, Yahara T (2018) A taxonomic study of Quercus langbianensis complex based on morphology, and DNA barcodes of classic and next generation sequences. PhytoKeys 95: 37-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.95.21126
Figure 5 Quercus baniensis A.Camus. A Leafy twig B Abaxial side of mature leaf C Infructescence and young fruits D Dried specimen. Materials: A, B from Hoang T.S. & Tagane S. V6922 C, D from Tagane et al. V3089.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.