Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Utilising a novel surveillance system to investigate species of Forcipomyia (Lasiohelea) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as the suspected vectors of Leishmania macropodum (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in the Darwin region of Australia

Fig. 4. Assessment of L. macropodum DNA using FTAṜ card technology. FTAṜ cards were exposed to field-collected F. (Lasiohelea). Cards with and without insects adhered were processed and parasite load was determined with qPCR. 4.83% (7/145) FTAṜ cards were positive for L. macropodum DNA. Black columns show parasite load detected on each positive FTAṜ card (numbered FTA.1 – FTA.7). Dashed columns show the number of insects adhered to each card. When dashed columns are absent, this signifies the absence of insects on the positive cards.

Fig. 1 in Utilising a novel surveillance system to investigate species of Forcipomyia (Lasiohelea) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as the suspected vectors of Leishmania macropodum (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in the Darwin region of Australia

Fig. 1. Wax-paper cups were used to contain and maintain field-collected biting midges. (A) Honey-coated FTAṜ cards were left at room temperature for 48 h allowing even absorption of honey into the cards. (B) A 2.5 cm slit was carved into the bottom of disposable cup and sealed with adhesive tape. (C) Insects were aspirated directly into the bottom of the containers through a small perforation created before field collection. Once biting midges were collected from the macropods, the small perforation was sealed with a rubber plug. Gauze was used as a lid to seal the top of the containers and fastened securely with a rubber band. The honey-coated FTAṜ card was inserted through the bottom slit after insect collection and once again sealed with adhesive tape.

Fig. 2 in Ecology of bat flies in Singapore: A study on the diversity, infestation bias and host specificity (Diptera: Nycteribiidae)

Fig. 2. Posterior mean intensity of the three species of bats and 89% HDPI (High Density Posterior Interval).

Fig. 2 in Utilising a novel surveillance system to investigate species of Forcipomyia (Lasiohelea) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as the suspected vectors of Leishmania macropodum (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in the Darwin region of Australia

Fig. 2. Leishmania macropodum DNA detection by qPCR. Individual or pools of F. (Lasiohelea) species were assessed for the presence of L. macropodum DNA. Only positive samples are shown, with each pair of columns representing results from one sample. Black columns depict the parasitic load detected and the dashed columns show the number of insects processed in that sample. Asterisks represent groups that contained ≥ 5 × 106 F. (Lasiohelea) parasites.

Fig. 1 in First detailed records of water mite larvae (Hydrachnidia: Hydrovolzidae, Hydryphantidae) parasitizing empidid flies (Diptera: Empididae: Clinocerinae)

Fig. 1. Types of habitat where infested and uninfested clinocerine species were found; a – the Mała Łąka Valley, June 2017; b – the same locality, October 2017; c – the Kościeliska Valley, May 2018; d – the same locality, November 2018; e – Białka River, Łysa Polana, August 2017; f – Cracow Gorge, June 2017 (photographs by I. Słowińska).

Figura 2 in Uso del lenguaje de programación Java para el conteo digital-automatizado a partir de imágenes de huevos de Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) (Diptera: Culicidae)

Figura 2. Conteo automático de huevos de Aedes aegypti mediante una rutina en lenguaje de programación de Java, aprovechando el alto contraste entre el color de los huevos (negro) y el color de la papeleta (blanco). / Figure 2. A Java programming language routine is used to automatically count Aedes aegypti eggs, taking advantage of the high contrast between the color of the eggs (black) and the color of the strip (white).

Figura 3 in Uso del lenguaje de programación Java para el conteo digital-automatizado a partir de imágenes de huevos de Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) (Diptera: Culicidae)

Figura 3. Diagrama de cajas de la comparación de la abundancia de huevos de Aedes aegypti contabilizados por colaboradores y mediante JAVA-CERECOVE en las diferentes categorÍas. A. Papeletas con pocos huevos (poco abundante), P= 0,903. B. Papeletas con abundantes huevos (abundante), P= 0,278. C. Papeletas con muy abundantes huevos (muy abundante), P= 0,01491. / Figure 3. A box plot of the abundance of Aedes aegypti eggs counted in different categories by collaborators and JAVA-CERECOVE. A. Pellon strips with few eggs, P = 0.903. B. Strip with abundant eggs, P = 0.278. C. Strip with very abundant eggs, P = 0.01491.

Figura 1 in Uso del lenguaje de programación Java para el conteo digital-automatizado a partir de imágenes de huevos de Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) (Diptera: Culicidae)

Figura 1. Papeletas con huevos de Aedes aegypti recolectados a través de ovitrampas y clasificadas en categorÍas. A. Papeleta con pocos huevos (poco abundante). B. Papeleta con abundantes huevos (abundante). C. Papeleta con huevos muy abundantes (muy abundante). / Figure 1. Pellon strips with Aedes aegypti eggs collected through ovitraps are classified into three categories. A. Strip with few eggs (not abundant). B. Strip with abundant eggs (abundant). C. Strip with very abundant eggs (very abundant).

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

Figure 1 in Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) species richness and abundance across a tree-height gradient: does adding CO enhance the BG-Lure?

Figure 1. Study Site and Sampling Setting. (A) Monroe County in Indiana, USA. (B) Hickory Ridge Fire Tower and Nearest Weather Station within Monroe County. (C) BG-pro mosquito trap in CDC style. (D) Tower canopy height gradient. / Figura 1. Sitio de estudio y metodologÍa de muestreo. (A) Condado Monroe, Indiana, Estados Unidos. (B) Torre de avistamiento de incendios y estación meteorológica más cercana dentro del Condado Monroe. (C) Trampa de mosquitos BG-pro configurada en estilo CDC. (D) Gradiente de altitud arbórea.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Figure 1 in Delving into the bioecology of Culex interrogator Dyar & Knab, 1906 (Diptera: Culicidae) in Camagüey, Cuba

Figure 1. Some of the breeding sites with presence of Culex interrogator in Camagüey, Cuba, in 2022. A. Ditch. B. Ground-level tank. C. Sewage pit. D. Lagoon. E. Water trough. F. Tree hole. / Figura 1. Algunos de los sitios de cría con presencia de Culex interrogator en Camagüey, Cuba, en 2022. A. Zanja. B. Tanque bajo. C. Pozo de aguas negras. D. Laguna. E. Bebedero. F. Hueco de árbol.

Figure 2 in Preliminary study of mosquitoes' diversity (Diptera: Culicidae) in tree holes in an Atlantic Forest reserve in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Figure 2. Detailed steps of the collection. (a) Measurement of circumference with a tape measure. (b) Removal of water with an artisanal siphon. (c) Basin for sorting immatures. / Figura 2. Detalle de las etapas de recolección. (a) Medición de la circunferencia con cinta métrica. (b) Extracción del agua con sifón artesanal. (c) Recipiente para la clasificación de inmaduros.

Figure 1 in Preliminary study of mosquitoes' diversity (Diptera: Culicidae) in tree holes in an Atlantic Forest reserve in Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Figure 1. Location of the study area with identification of the states of Rio Grande do Norte and ParaÍba, municipality of Baia Formosa, area of the Mata Estrela Private Natural Heritage Reserve (RPPN) and transects of the investigated hollows. Sentinel-2 images and land use and land cover classes from MapBiomas were used. / Figura 1. Ubicación del área de estudio con la identificación de los estados de Rio Grande do Norte y ParaÍba, el municipio de Baia Formosa, el área de la RPPN Mata Estrela y los transectos de las cavidades investigadas se muestran utilizando imágenes del Sentinel-2 y las clases de uso y cobertura del suelo del MapBiomas.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2004View details →

Fig. 1 in Catalog Of The Dolichopodidae (Diptera) Of America North Of Mexico

Fig. 1. Cumulative number of species described from America north of Mexico between 1758 and February 2004.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Captures of oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with torula yeast borax solution or 2- or 3-component synthetic food cones in Hawaii

Fig. 1. Captures of wild Bactrocera dorsalis in traps baited with torula yeast borax solution, 2-component cones, or 3-component cones. Symbols represent means (± 1 SE); N = 12 traps per treatment per weathering interval.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Fig. 3 in Captures of oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with torula yeast borax solution or 2- or 3-component synthetic food cones in Hawaii

Fig. 3. Captures of release Bactrocera dorsalis (top) and Zeugodacus cucurbitae (bottom) in traps baited with torula yeast borax solution (TYB), 2-component cones (2C), or 3-component cones (3C). Bar heights represent means (± 1 SE); N = 48 traps per treatment (8 traps per replicate × 6 replicates).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Figs 1–2 in FIRST RECORD OF HESPERINUS CUSPIDISTYLUS HARDY ET TAKAHASHI, 1960 (DIPTERA: HESPERINIDAE) FROM RUSSIA

Figs 1–2. Male genitalia of Hesperinus spp., dorsal view. 1 – H. rodendorfi; 2 – H. cuspidistylus. Abbreviations: ap aed - aedeagal apodeme; gcx – gonocoxite; gst – gonostylus; t9 – tergite 9.

Fig. 5 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 5. Fruit fly species response to methyl eugenol single trap, raspberry extract single trap, methyl eugenol + raspberry extract mixture traps, methyl eugenol and raspberry extract traps placed side-by-side.

Fig. 3 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 3. Dendrogram of host plant families based on presence or absence of fruit fly species pests using Ward's distance matrix.

Fig. 2 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 2. Distribution of Bactrocera zonata, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Bactrocera cucurbitae in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa as projected on elevation (a, b, c), land cover (d, e, f), and climatic zones (g, h, i) maps.

Fig. 4 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 4. Annual population dynamics of (a) number of fruit flies, (b) flies per trap per d, (c) number of species, (d) number of Bactrocera dorsalis, (e) number of Bactrocera zonata, (f) number of Bactrocera cucurbitae flies in relation to climatic factors in Peshawar District.