Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,669
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,669 results for “Environment;”
Fig. 19 in Microfacies Analysis And Depositional Environments Of The Tithonian-Valanginian Limestones From Dâmbovicioara Gorges (Cheile Dâmbovicioarei), Getic Carbonate Platform, Romania
Fig. 19 Distribution of main microfossils from Dâmbovicioarei Gorges. Facies legend: 1, reef limestone; 2, intraclastic bioclastic rudstone/grainstone with black pebbles; 3, predominantly micritic-fenestral limestone; 4, predominantly peloidal-cyanobacterial fenestral limestone; 5, bioclastic-intraclastic rudstone and grainstone; 6, marls; F-fault.
FIGURE 1 in A new endemic species of Alkanna (Lithospermeae: Boraginaceae) from hilly environments of west Iran
FIGURE 1. Distribution of Alkanna assadii sp. nov. Map by Farzaneh Khajoei Nasab.
FIGURE 2 in A new endemic species of Alkanna (Lithospermeae: Boraginaceae) from hilly environments of west Iran
FIGURE 2. Holotype of Alkanna assadii sp. nov. Photograph by Amin Zeraatkar.
Fig. 5. A in Temporal dynamics of fruit-feeding butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in two habitats in a seasonal Brazilian environment
Fig. 5. A) Temporal variation in Nymphalidae species richness captured in the dry and wet seasons and in the 2 transitional periods between those seasons, wet to dry (T.wd) and dry to wet (T.dw), in savanna (Cerrado sensu stricto, ss) and gallery forest habitats in the Fazenda Água Limpa and the Reserva Ecológica do Roncador, Brasília, DF. The rarefaction curves compare the 4 climatic periods—dry (black triangles) and wet (black circles) seasons, and the transitional periods from wet to dry (T.wd, white circles) and from dry to wet (T.dw, white triangles)—in B) gallery forest and C) savanna separately.
Figure 2 in Life in the extreme environment: Structure and species richness of bird assemblages on Yuzhny Island of Novaya Zemlya, Russia
Figure 2. Structure of bird assemblages on Yuzhny Island of Novaya Zemlya. (A) Cluster analysis of bird assemblages. Ward's classification approach was applied to a Euclidean distance matrix, which was calculated based on bird species abundances (categorical estimations by using a five-point logarithmic scale). (B)-(C) Histograms of the distribution of bird ecological groups (number of species in each group) over the range of habitats (B) and over relative occurrence of each species through habitats (C).
Historic version of the Environments - EOL project: final v2 version
the last version of the resource derived from the EOL v2 text
Gene-Environment interactions in the influence of maternal education on adolescent neurodevelopment using ABCD Study
<p>Summary statistics for gene by maternal education effects</p>
Dataset for the indoor environment
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Code to reproduce the data analysis performed in the study "EXCRETE workflow enables deep proteomics of the microbial extracellular environment"
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
FIGURES 3–17 in Description of Stauroneis saprophila sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta), a new diatom species from anthropogenic environment
FIGURES 3–17. LM images of Stauroneis saprophila. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Data for: Communicating with deaf patients in the clinical environment: Lessons learned from a virtual patient panel
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Can eDNA Present in Aquatic Environments of Rural Areas Help Identify Species Diversity in the Family Anura?
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
The conda environment for HamEPC
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Table ¹: Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles, respectively. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ¹:</b> Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil.Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles,respectively.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Skulls</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.19908517</td><td>0.0004253957</td><td>468</td><td>22.36</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00366522</td><td>0.0002036232</td><td>18</td><td>10.70</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.00890443</td><td>0.0000190266</td><td>468</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.00825565</td><td>0.0000084935</td><td>972</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.37829478</td><td>0.0003965354</td><td>954</td><td>18.57</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00547536</td><td>0.0003041869</td><td>18</td><td>14.25</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.02037065</td><td>0.0000213529</td><td>954</td><td>1.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.02201359</td><td>0.0000113239</td><td>1944</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0645902300</td><td>0.0001302222</td><td>496</td><td>5.18</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0113531900</td><td>0.0007095741</td><td>16</td><td>28.23</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0124666800</td><td>0.0000251344</td><td>496</td><td>1.88</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0136608800</td><td>0.0000133407</td><td>1024</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Mandibles</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.70443879</td><td>0.0012579264</td><td>560</td><td>8.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.16</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00549957</td><td>0.0002749783</td><td>20</td><td>1.77</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0069</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.08696012</td><td>0.0001552859</td><td>560</td><td>2.46</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.75</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.07312665</td><td>0.0000387718</td><td>1160</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>1.19843989</td><td>0.0011984399</td><td>1000</td><td>8.16</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.70</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.01169771</td><td>0.0005848855</td><td>20</td><td>3.98</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.14685738</td><td>0.0001468574</td><td>1000</td><td>3.03</td><td><0.0001</td><td>11.21</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.09880745</td><td>0.0000484350</td><td>2040</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.3269927600</td><td>0.0004808717</td><td>680</td><td>4.52</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.14</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0143644400</td><td>0.0007182221</td><td>20</td><td>6.75</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0723474900</td><td>0.0001063934</td><td>680</td><td>2.39</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.41</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0622041800</td><td>0.0000444316</td><td>1400</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table ²: Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ²:</b> Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Scapulae</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0941373400</td><td>0.0010459705</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0100439600</td><td>0.0010043960</td><td>2.88</td><td>0.0037</td><td>0.0003</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0314069500</td><td>0.0003489662</td><td>90</td><td>5.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.91</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0118544100</td><td>0.0000592721</td><td>200</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2064168200</td><td>0.0010320841</td><td>200</td><td>4.82</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.15</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0262808000</td><td>0.0026280796</td><td>10</td><td>12.28</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0022</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0428160400</td><td>0.0002140802</td><td>200</td><td>2.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.98</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0335675700</td><td>0.0000799228</td><td>420</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2508635400</td><td>0.0009291242</td><td>270</td><td>4.07</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.11</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0256608100</td><td>0.0025660812</td><td>10</td><td>11.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.87</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0616394000</td><td>0.0002282941</td><td>270</td><td>3.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>5.72</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0412323300</td><td>0.0000736292</td><td>560</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Pelvis</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0543411200</td><td>0.0004312787</td><td>126</td><td>4.63</td><td><0.0001</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043155600</td><td>0.0003082544</td><td>14</td><td>3.31</td><td>0.0002</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0117297800</td><td>0.0000930935</td><td>126</td><td>2.31</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.07</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0112943700</td><td>0.000040337</td><td>280</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1059661700</td><td>0.0003440460</td><td>308</td><td>4.42</td><td><0.0001</td><td>9.69</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0049395300</td><td>0.0003528236</td><td>14</td><td>4.53</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.0311</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0239852500</td><td>0.0000778742</td><td>308</td><td>2.00</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.64</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0251368400</td><td>0.0000390324</td><td>644</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1292837500</td><td>0.0003420205</td><td>378</td><td>5.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.51</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043550500</td><td>0.0003110747</td><td>14</td><td>5.17</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.0016</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0227608400</td><td>0.0000602139</td><td>378</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.17</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0210413800</td><td>0.0000268385</td><td>714</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
Data of the article "Predicting the 2023/24 El Niño from a multi-scale and global perspective" that published in Communications Earth & Environment
<p>MATLAB data of the article "Predicting the 2023/24 El Niño from a multi-scale and global perspective" that published in Communications Earth & Environment.</p> <p>The article is available on the Communications Earth & Environment at <a title="Predicting the 2023/24 El Niño from a multi-scale and global perspective" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01867-w">https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01867-w</a>.</p> <p>These data include ocean temperature, current, atmosphere wind, pressure, precipitation, heat flux, and more, that from reanalysis data and coupled model outputs. Additionaly, there are four figures of the article.</p> <p>The related MATLAB codes can be accessed from <a href="https://github.com/HRKsince1993/COMMSENV-24-1347.git">https://github.com/HRKsince1993/COMMSENV-24-1347.git</a></p> <p>If these data are helpful to you, please cite our article or acknowledge us in your publication, e. g.</p> <p>Hu, R. <em>et al.</em> Predicting the 2023/24 El Niño from a multi-scale and global perspective. <em>Commun. Earth Environ.</em> <strong>5</strong>, 675 (2024). </p> <p>If you have any questions, please contact Tao Lian (<a href="mailto:liantao@sio.org.cn">liantao@sio.org.cn</a>) and/or Dake Chen (<a href="mailto:dchen@sio.org.cn">dchen@sio.org.cn</a>) and/or me.</p> <p> </p> <p>Best wishes</p> <p>Ruikun Hu</p> <p>Ph.D of physical oceanography</p> <p>State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics,</p> <p>Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, China</p> <p><a href="mailto:ruikunhu@sio.org.cn">ruikunhu@sio.org.cn</a></p> <p>October 18, 2024</p> <p>Updated on November 8, 2024</p>
Divergent responses of Organic Carbon to Sedimentary Environment Transformation in a River-dominated Marginal Sea
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Fig. 129 in Diamonds in the rough: Ibotyporanga (Araneae, Pholcidae) spiders in semi-arid Neotropical environments
Fig. 129. Density plot of the distance from access routes (in km) of the points of occurrence (black bars) of species of Ibotyporanga Mello-Leitão, 1944, compared to the expected distance (blue bars) based on 200 random points sorted at a 20 km radius. Dashed lines represent the mean values (shown with the standard deviation beside them) for each class. Records of I. naideae Mello-Leitão, 1944 were excluded from this analysis.
Fig. 128 in Diamonds in the rough: Ibotyporanga (Araneae, Pholcidae) spiders in semi-arid Neotropical environments
Fig. 128. Ibotyporanga canudos Huber sp. nov. A–C. Female abdomens, ventral views, females from Brazil, Bahia, SE of Lagoa do Boi (A), ZFMK Ar 24387, Bahia, 25 km WNW of Morro do Chapéu (B), ZFMK Ar 24385, and from Bahia, 4 km SW of Andorinha (C), ZFMK Ar 24388. D–E. Cleared female genitalia, ventral and dorsal views, same specimen as in A. F. Cleared female genitalia, ventral view, same specimen as in B. G. Cleared female genitalia, ventral view, same specimen as in C. Abbreviation: es = expandable membranous sac. Scale lines: 0.3 mm.
Fig. 111 in Diamonds in the rough: Ibotyporanga (Araneae, Pholcidae) spiders in semi-arid Neotropical environments
Fig. 111. Ibotyporanga atikum Huber sp. nov., male and female from Brazil, Bahia, SE of Bom Jesus da Lapa, 'site 2', ZFMK Ar 24379. A–B. Male chelicerae, frontal and lateral views. C. Cleared female genitalia, dorsal view (asterisk: expandable membranous sac not drawn, cf. Fig. 112C). Scale lines: 0.2 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.