Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 10 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 10. Careocallus densicollis. Male holotype habitus (A); head and pronotum (B); lateral (C) and posterior (F) views; metatibia (D); protibial claw (E); parameres in dorsal (G) and lateral (H) views.

Figure 14 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 14. Posterior margin of elytra, variation in apex of sutural ridge among Diplotaxini. Apex angulate (A, F); apex subangulate (E) or rounded (B–D). Diplotaxis tristis Kirby (A); Pachrodema castanea Blanchard (B); Homalochilus punctatostriatus (C); Pacuvia philippiana Gutiérrez (D); Liogenys suturalis (E); Careocallus tehuelche (F).

Figure 6 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 6. Homalochilus nigripennis. Male holotype habitus (A); head and pronotum (B); lateral (C); posterior (D) views; metatibial apex (E); parameres in dorsal (F) and lateral (G) views. White arrow indicates the longest spur.

Figure 1 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 1. Equal weights analysis—strict consensus tree of 92 most-parsimonious trees obtained. The numbers displayed in each node correspond to the value of absolute Bremer and symmetric resampling supports (above and below, respectively).

Figure 2. Implied weighting analysis, one tree obtained with concavity constant value k in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 2. Implied weighting analysis, one tree obtained with concavity constant value k = 8.750. The numbers displayed in each node correspond to the value of relative Bremer and symmetric resampling supports (above and below, respectively).

Figure 5 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 5. Homalochilus punctatostriatus. Male habitus (A); female lectotype habitus (B) and labels (C); male in lateral (D) and posterior (E) views; male metatibial apex (F); parameres in dorsal (G) and lateral (H) views. White arrow indicates the longest spur.

Figure 9 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 9. Careocallus tehuelche. Female paratype habitus (A); lateral (B) and posterior (C) views; protarsal claw of female (D) and male (E).

Figure 13 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 13. Head in frontoventral view (A–C) and left mandible (D–G) of some Neotropical Diplotaxini. Careocallus tehuelche (A, D); Pachrodema sp. (B–G); Liogenys suturalis (Blanchard) (C, E); Homalochilus punctatostriatus (F).

Figure 4 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 4. Diagnostic features and transformations that support Homalochilus. Head in dorsal view (A), head and anterior portion of prothorax in dorsolateral view (B); head in frontal view (C); maxilla (D); labium (E); elytra, white square indicates erect setae (F); head, pronotum, scutellum and proleg (G), thoracic and abdominal ventrites, white lines indicate size of ventrites (H). White arrows in each figure indicate transformations and/or detailed features.

Figure 12 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 12. Hindwing in Careocallus, detail of radial sector. Careocallus tehuelche male (A) and female (B).

Figure 8 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 8. Careocallus tehuelche. Male holotype habitus (A), head and pronotum (B), lateral (C), metatibia (D), posterior (E), and parameres in dorsal (F) and lateral (G) views.

Figure 7 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 7. Liogenys niger (Blanchard) comb. nov.. Male neotype habitus (A), labels (E), and complete series at MLUH (D); female lectotype (B) and labels (F); non-uniform body colour variation (C); male in lateral (G) and posterior (I) views; detail of ventrites II and II with medial tubercle (H); parameres in dorsal (J) and lateral (K) views.

Figure 11 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 11. Hindwing in Careocallus. Careocallus densicollis male (A); Careocallus tehuelche male (B) and female (C).

Figure 3 in New and revised taxa of Neotropical Diplotaxini (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae): do they change the existing relationships? Revisiting systematics with morphological and molecular data

Figure 3. Phylogram of the 50% majority-rule consensus of trees for the 29-taxon dataset of Diplotaxini from Bayesian inference (BI) analysis based on the combined gene dataset (ITS2, COI). Values displayed above branches (orange) correspond to BI posterior probabilities (PP). Values displayed below branches (green) correspond to maximum likelihood (ML) ultrafast bootstrap (UB) proportions (>50%) in clades also present in the best ML tree.

Figure 6 in A global phylogeny of Elysia Risso, 1818 (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia): molecular systematic insights focusing on European taxa and description of a new species

Figure 6. Living individuals of four Elysia species from European waters used in this study. A, Elysia azorica sp. nov. (MNCN15.05/47823); B, E. flava (MNCN15.05/90931); C, E. rubeni (MNCN15.05/200080); D, E. timida (MNCN15.05/90934). Photos taken by Manuel Malaquías (A); Jakov Prkic (B); Fabio Vitale (C) and Giulia Furfaro (D). Scale bars = 1 mm.

Figure 5 in A global phylogeny of Elysia Risso, 1818 (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia): molecular systematic insights focusing on European taxa and description of a new species

Figure 5. Living individuals of the species Elysia viridis (A–F) and Elysia evelinae (G–H) used in this study. A, MNCN15.05/90901; B, MNCN15.05/90894; C, MNCN15.05/90910; D, MNCN15.05/90898; E, MNCN15.05/90906; F, MNCN15.05/90889; G, MNCN15.05/90924; H, MNCN15.05/90923. Photos taken by Peter H. van Bragt (A); Leila Carmona (B); Gianni Colucci (C); Marina Poddubetskaia (D, G–H); Alen Petani (E) and D'Onofrio (F). Scale bars = 1 mm.

Figure 7 in A global phylogeny of Elysia Risso, 1818 (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia): molecular systematic insights focusing on European taxa and description of a new species

Figure 7. Scanning electron micrographs of Elysia spp. radular teeth. A, E. azorica sp. nov. (MNCN15.05/47823); B, E. rubeni (MNCN15.05/200080); C, D, E. viridis: C, MNCN15.05/90903; D, MNCN15.05/90912; E, E. flava (MNCN15.05/90929); F, E. timida (MNCN15.05/90933); G, E. gordanae (MNCN15.05/90843); H, E. gordanae (MNCN15.05/90836); I, J, K, E. margaritae: I, J, MNCN15.05/90817; K, MNCN15.05/94854; L, E. evelinae (MNCN15.05/90924). Scale bars = 10 μm.

Figure 8 in A global phylogeny of Elysia Risso, 1818 (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia): molecular systematic insights focusing on European taxa and description of a new species

Figure 8. Elysia azorica sp. nov. reproductive system (MNCN 15.05/47823), scale bar = 100 μm. Abbreviations: ag, albumen gland; am, ampulla; fmgc, female gland complex; fp, female pore; hf, hermaphroditic follicle; gr, genital receptacle; p, penis; sr, seminal receptacle; vd, vas deferens.

Figure 4 in A global phylogeny of Elysia Risso, 1818 (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia): molecular systematic insights focusing on European taxa and description of a new species

Figure 4. Living individuals of the species Elysia gordanae (A–F) and Elysia margaritae (G–H) used in this study. A, MNCN15.05/90861; B, MNCN15.05/90854; C, MNCN15.05/90855; D, MNCN15.05/90829; E, MNCN15.05/90841; F, MNCN15.05/90839; G, MNCN15.05/90816; H, MNCN15.05/90817. Photos taken by Fabio Vitale (A, G–H); Marina Poddubetskaia (B–C, E) and Alen Petani (D). Scale bars = 1 mm.

Figure 3 in A global phylogeny of Elysia Risso, 1818 (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia): molecular systematic insights focusing on European taxa and description of a new species

Figure 3. Molecular phylogeny of Atlantic and Mediterranean Elysia species rooted on genus Bosellia (not shown), based on the combined dataset (H3 + COI + 16S) inferred by Bayesian inference analysis. Numerals in parentheses indicate the number of specimens from the same locality. Bold branches represent the Elysia species present in European waters arranged in four subclades labelled from A to D. Significant support values are given as ML bootstrap percentages (below branch) and BI posterior probabilities (above branch). Not supported branches are not labelled. Abbreviations: EA, eastern Atlantic Ocean; MED, Mediterranean Sea; WA, western Atlantic Ocean.