Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 5. Stereopairs of the articulated braincase of Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844) in left lateral (A), right lateral (B), dorsal (C), and ventral (D) views. Images are reconstructed from CT data.

Fig. 1 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 1. The relationships of Alioramus altai within Tyrannosauroidea based on the phylogenetic analyses of Brusatte et al. (2010a, 2012). The majority of comparative observations in this study are restricted to those taxa represented in bold type.

Fig. 17 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 17. Horizontal cutaway slice and line drawing of the caudoventral portion of the endocranial cavity in Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844). Note the crista tuberalis (ct) fails to divide the medial extent of the cavum metoticum (cm). See appendix 1 for other anatomical abbreviations.

Fig. 24 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 24. Horizontal slice through the braincase of Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844) showing the separate canals for the ophthalmic (V1) and maxillomandibular (V2/3) branches of the right trigeminal nerve projecting from a shared fossa within the endocranial cavity. See appendix 1 for other anatomical abbreviations.

Fig. 3 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 3. Left lateral (A) and right lateral (B) views of the articulated braincase of Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844). See appendix 1 for anatomical abbreviations.

Fig. 34 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 34. Photographs of the occipital region of the braincase in (A) Guanlong wucaii (IVPP V14531), (B) Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844), and (C) Tyrannosaurus rex (MOR 1125). The dorsal part of the occiput of Guanlong is in caudal view, but because of crushing, the ventral portion of the occiput (occipital condyle and basal tubera) is deflected somewhat ventrally and therefore viewed at an angle. The depressed center of the suproccipital/parietal suture (dc) causes the right and left bifurcations of the supraoccipital (rb and lb, respectively) to stick out as caudally projecting tabs. ''149*'' refers to the absence (0) or presence (1) of the caudally projecting tabs. Other numbers refer to the character and character states listed in the Discussion.

Fig. 29 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 29. Sagittal slice through the braincase of Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844). Note the confluence of the basisphenoid (bsr), subsellar (ssr), and basipterygoid recesses (bpr) through the interbasipterygoidal lamina (ibtl). See appendix 1 for other anatomical abbreviations.

Fig. 2 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 2. Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of the articulated braincase of Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844). See appendix 1 for anatomical abbreviations.

Fig. 23 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 23. Coronal slices through the braincase of Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844). Both slices intersect the prootic fossa (prf). See appendix 1 for other anatomical abbreviations.

Fig. 28 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 28. The dorsocaudal surface of the paroccipital process (pop) of Alioramus altai (IGM 100/1844). Note the thin process of the parietal (pa) that participates in the process and the relatively large foramen (ctra), which communicates directly with an internal cavity of the caudal tympanic recess. See appendix 1 for other anatomical abbreviations.

Fig. 35 in The Braincase Anatomy Of The Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Alioramus (Theropoda: Tyrannosauroidea)

Fig. 35. Right lateral surface of the braincase of Alioramus (IGM 100/1844). Numbers refer to the character and character states listed in the Discussion.

Figure 18 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 18. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part G. Neornithes: Piciformes, and Passeriformes. Nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 15 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 15. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part D. Neornithes: Gruiformes and Charadriiformes. Nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 11 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 11. Simplified summary tree for uppermost, supraordinal ranks of avian classification. Dashed internodes correspond to marginally supported clades. For complete classification, see Appendix 1.

Figure 14 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 14. Detailed segment of strict consensus tree of all MPTs recovered in present study. Part C. Neornithes: nodes are labelled above by percentages of bootstrapped replicates in which node was retained (italics), and below by Bremer support indices (bold type).

Figure 6 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 6. Molecular phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), VI. A, Van Tuinen et al. (2000); B, Van Tuinen et al. (2001).

Figure 5 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 5. Molecular phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), V. A, Espinosa de los Monteros (2000); B, Johansson et al. (2001).

Figure 4 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 4. Molecular phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), IV. A, Sibley & Ahlquist (1990: figs 354–356), simplified to orders, wherein parenthetical 'para' indicates paraphyly of sampled members, and 'aug' indicates unconventional content; B, Mindell et al. (1997).

Figure 2 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 2. Morphological phylogenetic trees proposed in previous studies (see Fig. 1 for details), II. A, Mayr & Clarke (2003); B, Bourdon et al. (2005).

Figure 10 in Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion

Figure 10. Ordinal-level strict consensus tree for orders of Neornithes based on 2954 morphological characters, indicating delimitations of segments detailed in Figures 12–18.