Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,960
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,960 results for “elements”
Fig. 1. A in A new early Silurian prioniodontid conodont with three P elements from Iran and associated species
Fig. 1. A. Location of the study area in East Central Iran (asterisk). B. Studied area in the Derenjal Mountains (open frame indicates location of studied sections).
FIGURE 1 in Coupling finite element analysis and multibody system dynamics for biological research
FIGURE 1. Simplification of the center of head movement as a joint in extinct Temnospondyli amphibian when biting. Elaborated from the original image (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jammerbergia_formops.jpg). Under license: CC BY-SA 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).
FIGURE 4 in Coupling finite element analysis and multibody system dynamics for biological research
FIGURE 4. Von Mises stress distribution in the skull for the Static Analysis in FEA in cases 1A, 2A, 3A, 1B, 2B and 3B.
FIGURE 2 in Coupling finite element analysis and multibody system dynamics for biological research
FIGURE 2. Studied test cases of different feeding movements when applying a force F=800 N in the direction of the red arrow (when the force is perpendicular at the view the red arrow is a red dot). Case 1A, 2A and 3A with a fixed boundary condition in the condyle without the web of beams. Case 1B, 2B and 3B with the web of beams in the condyle and a fixed boundary condition.
Fig. 7. Trace element environmental proxies for the F–F in The Frasnian-Famennian events in a deep-shelf succession, Subpolar Urals: biotic, depositional, and geochemical records
Fig. 7. Trace element environmental proxies for the F–F transition in the Syv'yu River section. Bio−productivity tracers* are normalized according to Schmitzetal.(1997).DownwardarrowedtrendsarebasedonthesinglesampleCB99−222,located2.15mbelow;recognizedMo/Alenrichment,indicative of anoxic−sulfidic deposition, is shown as well. For explanations see Fig. 4.
FIGURE 6 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study
FIGURE 6. Box-plots of Von Mises stress distributions when Quasi-Ideal Meshes (QUIM) are assumed for the 20 Cingulata mandibles analysed. The 80% of the values of the Von Mises stress distribution are represented between the upper and lower whiskers
FIGURE 3 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study
FIGURE 3. Evolution of the values of Arithmetic Mean (AM), Mesh-Weighted Arithmetic Mean (MWAM), Median (M), Mesh-Weighted Median (MWM), Percentage Error of the Arithmetic Mean (PEofAM) and Percentage Error of the Median (PEofM) in front of the size of the elements (1) and the uniformity of the mesh (2). Meshes from a Chlamyphorus truncates. S07 refers to Mesh S7 (mesh size), SE refers to Mesh SE (mesh homogeneity).
FIGURE S2 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study
FIGURE S2. Map of Von Mises stress distribution in the six meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of the homogeneity of the mesh.
FIGURE 2 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study
FIGURE 2. Six meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of the homogeneity of the mesh.
FIGURE 1 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study
FIGURE 1. Twelve meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of size of the elements in the mesh.
FIGURE 5 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study
FIGURE 5. Evolution of the box-plots of the Von Mises stress distribution. X-axes refers to meshes S01 to S12: the size of the elements (1); and meshes SA to SF: the uniformity of the mesh (2). Meshes from a Chlamyphorus truncates.
FIGURE 4 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study
FIGURE 4. Evolution of the convergence error of each iteration of Arithmetic Mean (AM), Mesh-Weighted Arithmetic Mean (MWAM), Median (M), Mesh-Weighted Median (MWM) in front of the number of nodes (1) and the percentage of Refined Area (percent value of area with homogeneous mesh) (2). Meshes from a Chlamyphorus truncates. S07 refers to Mesh S7 (mesh size), SE refers to Mesh SE (mesh homogeneity).
FIGURE S1 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study
FIGURE S1. Map of Von Mises stress distribution in the 12 meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of size of the elements in the mesh.
FIGURE 3 in Using X-ray computed tomography analysis tools to compare the skeletal element morphology of fossil and modern frog (Anura) species
FIGURE 3. Morphological bone-to-bone comparison between the 'nominal' male (CP001) and 'actual' female (CP002) Xenopus laevis. The differences are colour-coded and show female (CP002) variance relative to the nominal bone of the male (CP001) which is depicted in the figure.
FIGURE 4 in Using X-ray computed tomography analysis tools to compare the skeletal element morphology of fossil and modern frog (Anura) species
FIGURE 4. Morphological bone-to-bone comparison between the 'nominal' Xenopus laevis (CP001) with the 'actual' fossil Xenopus sp. (ZM 71336)
FIGURE 2 in Using X-ray computed tomography analysis tools to compare the skeletal element morphology of fossil and modern frog (Anura) species
FIGURE 2. Bone cortex thickness analysis on a male Xenopus laevis (CP001) (A) and a fossil Xenopus sp. (ZM 71336) (B) depicted side by side in slice view from top view (1) and side view (3) and in a 3D colour-coded analysis (2 and 3).
FIGURE 1. A in Using X-ray computed tomography analysis tools to compare the skeletal element morphology of fossil and modern frog (Anura) species
FIGURE 1. A complete Breviceps montanus (Catalogue number ZR-050053) CT scan with segmentation of humerus and femur demonstrated.
Fig. 8. Additional conodont elements from the upper L. variabilis and Y. crassus zones. A–D in Conodont faunas with Lenodus variabilis in the upper Arenigian to lower Llanvirnian of Sweden
Fig. 8. Additional conodont elements from the upper L. variabilis and Y. crassus zones. A–D. Yangtzeplacognathus crassus Chen and Zhang,1993 (in Ding et al. 1993) from samples Öl92−9 (A) and Öl87−3 (B–D), Y. crassus Zone,Gillberga quarry. A. Dextral Pa element,LO 8708t,× 50. B. Sinistral Pa element,LO 8707t,× 55. C. Dextral Pb element,LO 8710t,× 60. D. Sinistral Pb element,LO 8709t,× 40. E–I. Dzikodus hunanensis Zhang,1998b from samples HK88−3 (E, F, H) and HK88−2 (I),Hällekis quarry,and Öl93−8 (G),Gillberga quarry,all from the Y. crassus Zone. E. Sinistral juvenile Pa element,LO 8849t,× 90. F. Sinistral subadult Pa element,LO 8850t,× 50. G. Dextral? Pb element,LO 8851t,× 55. H. Sb element,LO 8852t,× 100. I. M element,LO 8853t,× 80. J–N. Parapanderodus quietus Bagnoli and Stouge,1997 from sample Öl87−1, L. variabilis Zone,Gillberga quarry. J. Slender element (?Sb),lateral view,LO 8854t, × 75. K. Slender element (?Sb),posterior−lateral view,LO 8855t,× 70. L. Small,laterally compressed element (?Sc),LO 8856t,× 100. M. Small,asymmetrical element (?Sd),LO 8857t,× 105. N. Bicostate element (?Sa),posterior view,LO 8858t,× 75. O–Q. Protopanderodus calceatus Bagnoli and Stouge,1997 from sample HK88−3,Hällekis quarry, Y. crassus Zone. O. Square−based asymmetrical element,LO 8804t,× 45. P. Short−based asymmetrical element,LO 8805t, × 60. Q. Scandodontiform element,LO 8806t,× 45. R–U. Protopanderodus rectus (Lindström,1955) from sample Vg98−4B, L. variabilis Zone,Österplana quarry. R. Scandodontiform element,LO 8807t,× 50. S. Short−based asymmetrical element,LO 8808t,× 55. T. Square−based acontiodontiform element,LO 8809t,× 50. U. High−based acontiodontiform element,LO 8810t,× 60. V–W. Parapaltodus simplicissimus Stouge,1984 from sample Öl87−3, Y. crassus Zone, Gillberga quarry. V. Scandodontiform element,LO 8829t,× 80. W. Drepanodontiform element,LO 8830t,× 45. X. Ansella jemtlandica (Löfgren,1978) from sample Öl87−3, Y. crassus Zone,Gillberga quarry,LO 8859t,× 110. Y, Z. Periodon flabellum (Lindström,1955),late form from sample Öl87−3, Y. crassus Zone,Gillberga quarry. Y. Sb element,LO 8860t,× 80. Z. M element,LO 8861t,× 80. AA. Strachanognathus parvus Rhodes,1955 from sample Öl87−2, Y. crassus Zone,Gillberga quarry,LO 8862t,× 120. AB–AD. Costiconus mysticus (Barnes and Poplawski,1973) from sample GB81−900, E. crassus Zone, Gullhögen quarry. AB. Multicostate element,LO 8831t,× 100. AC. Geniculate element,LO 8832t,× 110. AD. Scandodontiform element,LO 8833t,× 80.
FIGURE 1. Elements histologically sampled for this analysis. 1 in A new multi-faceted framework for deciphering diplodocid ontogeny
FIGURE 1. Elements histologically sampled for this analysis. 1, Digital reconstruction of Apatosaurus louisae (by K. Stevens) with sampled elements highlighted in red. Approximate location of sampling in dorsal ribs (2; from Gilmore, 1936), neural spines (3; from Hatcher, 1901), and femora (4; from Gilmore, 1936).
Fig. 8. Scolopodus striatus Pander, 1856 from the Harku section, Estonia. All elements are from the sample H−5 in Apparatus of the conodont Scolopodus striatus Pander, 1856 and a re-evaluation of Pander's species of Scolopodus
Fig. 8. Scolopodus striatus Pander, 1856 from the Harku section, Estonia. All elements are from the sample H−5, the lower part of the Baltoniodus navis Zone (Early Ordovician). A–C. Acontiodiform elements (Sa). A. PMU In 1019 in inner (A1), posterior (A2), and outer (A3) views; detail of the cusp (A4), note the absence of striation. B. PMU In 1020 in inner (B1) and posterior (B2) views. C. PMU In 1021 in posterior view. D–F. Scandodiform elements (M). D. PMU In 1022 in posterior (D1) and inner (D2) views. E. PMU In 1023 in inner (E1) and outer (E2) views. F. PMU In 1024 in outer (F1), posterior (F2), and inner (F3) views. G. Detail of the cusp, PMU In 1025, note the striation. H, I. Subrounded elements (Sa). H. PMU In 1026 in lateral (H1), posterior (H2), and lateral (H3) views. I. PMU In 1027 in lateral (I1), posterior (I2), and lateral (I3) views. Scale bars 200 µm, except A4 and G for which are 50 µm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.