Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,673
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,673 results for “practices”
Parenting Practices Questionnaire / Cuestionario de Prácticas Educativas de Padres y Madres // PARENTING_Data_CC_T6-Post
<p>Answers given by parents of children in the sixth grade of Primary Education to the 62 items of the Parenting Practices Questionnaire by Robinson, Mandleco, Olsen, and Hart (1995), translated into Spanish by García Bacete et al. (2014). Data collected in public schools in Castellón (Spain) in the spring of the school year 2014-15. The mother and father answer the questionnaire separately. The calculation of the 3 General Parenting Practices and their corresponding Dimensions (in parentheses) is included: Authoritative Strategies (Warmth and Involvement, Reasoning – Induction, Democratic Participation and Good natured – Easygoing), Authoritarian Strategies (Verbal Hostility, Corporal Punishment, Non reasoning – Punitive strategies and Directiveness), and Permissive Strategies (Lack of Follow-through, Ignoring Misbehavior and Lack of Self-confidence as a mother/father). To learn more about our research and access to other datasets of this or other measures, follow the link <a href="https://www.uji.es/departaments/psi/base/opengrei/">GREI Longitudinal Project</a>.</p> <p> </p> <p>Respuestas que los padres de niños/as de sexto curso de Educación Primaria dan a los 62 ítems del Cuestionario de Prácticas Educativas de Padres y Madres de Robinson, Mandleco, Olsen, y Hart (1995), traducido al español por García Bacete et al. (2014). Datos recogidos en centros públicos de Castellón (España) en primavera del curso escolar 2014-15. La madre y el padre responden el cuestionario por separado. Se incluye el cálculo de las 3 Prácticas Educativas Parentales Generales y sus correspondientes Dimensiones (entre paréntesis): Estrategias Democráticas (Afecto e Implicación, Razonamiento/Inducción, Participación democrática y Buen carácter/Trato relajado), Estrategias Autoritarias (Hostilidad verbal, Castigo físico, Estrategias Punitivas/No razonamiento y Directividad) y Estrategias Permisivas (Falta de supervisión, Ignorar el mal comportamiento y Falta de autoconfianza como padre/madre). Para saber más sobre nuestra investigación y acceder a otros ficheros de datos de esta medida o de otras, siga el enlace <a href="https://www.uji.es/departaments/psi/base/opengrei/">Proyecto Longitudinal GREI</a>.</p>
When the practice does not meet the theory: results from an Italian survey on the clini-cal and pathway management of inpatients with decompressive craniectomy or cranioplasty admitted to rehabilitation
<p>Cranioplasty (CP) is supposed to improve the functional outcome of severe acquired brain injury (sABI) patients with decompressive craniectomy (DC). However, ongoing controversies exist regarding its indications, optimum materials, timing, complications, and relationships with hydrocephalus (HC). For these reasons, an International Consensus Conference (ICC) on CP in traumatic brain injury (TBI) was held in June 2018 to issue some recommendations.</p> <p>AIM: To investigate cross-sectionally before the ICC the prevalence of DC/CP in sABI inpatients admitted to neurorehabilitation units in Italy; to assess the perception of Italian clinicians working in the sABI neurorehabilitation settings on the management of inpatients with DC/CP during their rehabilitation stay.</p> <p>DESIGN: Cross-sectional.</p> <p>SETTING AND POPULATION: Physiatrists or neurologists working in 38 Italian rehabilitation centers involved in the care of sABI, giving a pooled sample of 599 inpatients.</p> <p>METHODS: Survey questionnaire consisting of 21 closed-ended questions with multiple-choice answers. Sixteen questions regarded the respondents' opinions and experiences regarding the clinical and management aspects of patients. Survey data were collected via e-mail between April and May 2018.</p>
The practice and promise of temporal genomics for measuring evolutionary responses to global change
<p>Understanding the evolutionary consequences of anthropogenic change is imperative for estimating long-term species resilience. While contemporary genomic data can provide us with important insights into recent demographicic histories, investigating past change using present genomic data alone has limitations. In comparison, temporal genomics studies, defined herein as those that incorporate time series genomic data, leverage museum collections and repeated field sampling to directly examine evolutionary change. As temporal genomics is applied to more systems, species, and questions, best practices can be helpful guides to make the most efficient use of limited resources. Here, we conduct a systematic literature review to synthesize the effects of temporal genomics methodology on our ability to detect evolutionary changes. We focus on studies investigating recent change within the past 200 years, highlighting evolutionary processes that have occurred during the past two centuries of accelerated anthropogenic pressure. We first identify the most frequently studied taxa, systems, questions, and drivers, before highlighting overlooked areas where further temporal genomics studies may be particularly enlightening. Then, we provide guidelines for future study and sample designs while identifying key considerations that may influence statistical and analytical power. Our aim is to provide recommendations to a broad array of researchers interested in using temporal genomics in their work.</p>
FIGURE 2 in Harmonizing taxon names in biodiversity data: A review of tools, databases and best practices
FIGURE 2 Taxonomy as a unifying key for ecological datasets. The two sides represent two exemplary datasets, with a containing conservation status of taxa (here species) and B their traits (colours show different traits). The datasets are indexed by taxon names 'Sp1' to 'Sp6'. The rounded rectangle in the middle depicts the taxonomic harmonization process: (a) the names are extracted from each dataset, respectively in the orange and purple rectangles; (b) both lists are then compared to a taxonomic database which harmonizes all names. Here the names 'Sp1' and 'Sp6' refer to the same taxon in the taxonomic database (as indicated by the dashed lines). Without taxonomic harmonization, the exact match of names would have resulted in the loss of Sp5 and Sp6 when merging both datasets. LC, NT, VU, and CR are abbreviations of Red List statuses, meaning least concern, not threatened, vulnerable, and critically endangered, respectively
FIGURE 1 in Harmonizing taxon names in biodiversity data: A review of tools, databases and best practices
FIGURE 1 Typology of taxonomic databases according to their taxonomic breadth and their spatial scale. The x-axis represents increasing taxonomic breadth from a single taxonomic group to no clear taxonomic restriction (e.g. considering all biota or all Eukaryota). The y-axis represents spatial scale from regional to global. Each box represents a specific type of taxonomic database, with examples. LCVP, Leipzig Catalogue of Vascular Plants; WorldFlora, World Flora Online; POWO, Plants of the World Online; GermanSL, German Simple List; Vascan, Database of Vascular Plants of Canada; WoRMS, World Register of Marine Species; CASD, Chinese Animal Scientific Database; COL, Catalogue of Life; GBIF, Global Biodiversity Information Facility; TAXREF, French Taxonomic Referential; FinBIF, Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility
FIGURE 4 in Harmonizing taxon names in biodiversity data: A review of tools, databases and best practices
FIGURE 4 Diagram of different taxonomic harmonization workflows. The workflows differ in the number of steps they consider and the databases they leverage on. Rounded rectangles are lists of taxon names while diamonds represent taxonomic databases against which the names are matched. The different colours used at step 2 represent different taxonomic groups
FIGURE 3 in Harmonizing taxon names in biodiversity data: A review of tools, databases and best practices
FIGURE 3 Screenshot showing the network view of taxharmonizexplorer. The left section shows a table of each of the nodes in the network to let the user select manually nodes of interest, the top part presents a summary of the information on the selected node in the network. The right section displays the relationships between packages (which depends on which other), between databases (how one populates another one) and between packages and databases (which packages access which databases)
Dataset of paper Privacy Orientation during Online Teaching-Learning Activities: Practices Adopted and Lessons Learned
<p>Dataset of the paper accepted for publication in the Journal on Interactive Systems (JIS).</p> <p>DA SILVA, M.; VITERBO, J.; SALGADO, L. C. C.; MOURÃO, E. Privacy Orientation during Online Teaching-Learning Activities:<br> Practices Adopted and Lessons Learned. Journal on Interactive Systems, Porto Alegre, RS, 2023.</p>
Dataset of "Theoretical and practical aspects of the design and production of synthetic holograms for transmission electron microscopy"
<p>Dataset with script and article images published in https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0067528</p>
Parent-reported child appetite moderates relationships between child genetic obesity risk and parental feeding practices
<p>Data used in the manuscript "Parent-reported child appetite moderates relationships between child genetic obesity risk and parental feeding practices" by Jansen E., Naymik M., Thapaliya G., Huentelman M., Beauchemin J., D'Sa V., Lewis C.R., Deoni S., RESONANCE consortium, & Carnell S.</p>
Data sharing: an integral part of research practice? Codebook
<p>List of thematic codes for qualitative review of studies focusing on data sharing motives and barriers.</p>
The Xpert Network and the Best Practices for Computational and Data-Intensive Research
<p>This video provides a brief overview of the Xpert Network and presents the best practices for professionals who support computational and data-intensive (CDI) research projects. The practices resulted from the Xpert Network activities, an initiative that brings together major NSF-funded projects for advanced cyberinfrastructure, national projects, and university teams that include individuals or groups of such professionals. Additionally, our recommendations are based on years of experience building multidisciplinary applications and teaching computing to scientists. These practices have proven effective in various CDI research settings and are easy to adopt by both research software engineers (RSEs) and domain scientists. You can find these best practices described on the following website: <a href="https://sites.udel.edu/xpert-cdi/resources/best-practices/">https://sites.udel.edu/xpert-cdi/resources/best-practices/</a>. We value your feedback on these practices and encourage you to read our paper for further insights: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3491418.3530293">https://doi.org/10.1145/3491418.3530293</a>.</p>
Parenting Practices Questionnaire / Cuestionario de Prácticas Educativas de Padres y Madres / PARENTING_Data_IC_T1-Pre
<p>Answers given by parents of children in the first grade of Primary Education to the 62 items of the Parenting Practices Questionnaire by Robinson, Mandleco, Olsen, and Hart (1995), translated into Spanish by García Bacete et al. (2014). Data collected in public schools in Castellón (Spain) in the autumn of the school year 2010-11. The mother and father answer the questionnaire separately. The calculation of the 3 General Parenting Practices and their corresponding Dimensions (in parentheses) is included: Authoritative Strategies (Warmth and Involvement, Reasoning – Induction, Democratic Participation and Good natured – Easygoing), Authoritarian Strategies (Verbal Hostility, Corporal Punishment, Nonreasoning – Punitive strategies and Directiveness), and Permissive Strategies (Lack of Follow-through, Ignoring Misbehavior and Lack of Self-confidence as a mother/father). To learn more about our research and access to other datasets of this or other measures, follow the link <a href="https://www.uji.es/departaments/psi/base/opengrei/">GREI Longitudinal Project</a>.</p> <p>Respuestas que los padres de niños/as de primer curso de Educación Primaria dan a los 62 ítems del Cuestionario de Prácticas Educativas de Padres y Madres de Robinson, Mandleco, Olsen, y Hart (1995), traducido al español por García Bacete et al. (2014). Datos recogidos en centros públicos de Castellón (España) en otoño del curso escolar 2010-11. La madre y el padre responden el cuestionario por separado. Se incluye el cálculo de las 3 Prácticas Educativas Parentales Generales y sus correspondientes Dimensiones (entre paréntesis): Estrategias Democráticas (Afecto e Implicación, Razonamiento/Inducción, Participación democrática y Buen carácter/Trato relajado), Estrategias Autoritarias (Hostilidad verbal, Castigo físico, Estrategias Punitivas/No razonamiento y Directividad) y Estrategias Permisivas (Falta de supervisión, Ignorar el mal comportamiento y Falta de autoconfianza como padre/madre). Para saber más sobre nuestra investigación y acceder a otros ficheros de datos de esta medida o de otras, siga el enlace <a href="https://www.uji.es/departaments/psi/base/opengrei/">Proyecto Longitudinal GREI</a>.</p>
Figure 3 in Taxonomic practice, creativity and fashion: what's in a spider name?
Figure 3. Temporal trends in the way taxonomists assign etymology by region. Coloured lines are predicted values and shaded surfaces represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2 in Taxonomic practice, creativity and fashion: what's in a spider name?
Figure 2. Most frequent spider epithets. Only epithets shared by more than 30 species across the database are shown. Colour-coding refers to the most frequent use of each name (e.g. similis is most often used in a morphological sense, but in a few instances it was also used as a reference to the similarity in the geographic distribution of one species to another).
Figure 1 in Taxonomic practice, creativity and fashion: what's in a spider name?
Figure 1. Temporal variations in the way taxonomists assign spiders etymologies. A, breakdown of the total number of etymologies by category. B, temporal variations in the number of etymologies (annual sum by etymology type) between 1757 and 2019. C, plot of smooth terms for the temporal variations in the relative proportion of different types of etymologies, according to a generalized additive model. D, temporal variations in the proportional use of etymologies. In C and D, coloured lines and shaded surfaces are, respectively, the predicted trend and 95% confidence interval for each level of the factor type, according to a generalized additive model. Exact model estimates are given in the Supporting Information, Table S1.
Figure 4 in Taxonomic practice, creativity and fashion: what's in a spider name?
Figure 4. Spatial variations in the way taxonomists assign spiders etymologies. Pie charts display the proportions of etymology types by continent. Estimates (± standard errors) are based on Bernoulli generalized linear models testing for differences in the proportion of different etymology types by continent. Significant differences (P <0.001) from the baseline (Europe) are highlighted with colours (positive = turquoise; negative = red). Exact model estimates are given in the Supporting Information, Tables S2–S7.
MULTIPLIERS_WP2_Dataset on good practices in open-schooling_UCY_UAB_20230615_v1
<p>This dataset (related to Deliverable D2.1) contains data on the review of good practices in open schooling, consisting mainly in:</p> <ul> <li>A bibliographic database containing the precise list of all bibliographic items on open-schooling issues as of 2011 – 2021 as well as data documenting the article selection process,</li> <li>Instructions for data collection,</li> <li>Collected data relating to both EU and national projects related to Open Schooling.</li> </ul>
Asthma control conundrum in clinical practice – Data from a two-stage Delphi survey and literature review
<p>Definitions and measures of asthma control used in clinical trials and practice often vary, as highlighted in the manuscript, “Is asthma control more than just an absence of symptoms? An expert consensus statement”. Furthermore, the authors discussed differences between patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in terms of understanding and managing asthma. Given these disparities, there is a need for consensus regarding what constitutes well-controlled asthma and, especially, how best it can be measured and recorded. This dataset describes and provides more detail on the methodology from a two-stage Delphi survey and a structured literature review, which were designed to reach a consensus definition of asthma control and alleviate misalignments between patients and HCPs.</p>
FAIR assessment practices: Experiences from KonsortSWD and BERD@NFDI [Dataset 2 KonsortSWD]
<p>The dataset refers to the poster, which presents FAIR assessment experiences in the context of the two NFDI consortia KonsortSWD and BERD@NFDI, employing the established Research Data Alliance's FAIR Data Maturity Model (RDA-FDMM) and the F-UJI Tool, an automated solution. RDA-FDMM, a manual technique, is more comprehensive, while the automated F-UJI tool effectively detects areas of improvement in metadata presentation that automated means can address. Our experiences highlight the need to examine both machine-readable as well as non-machine-readable elements and acknowledge automated tools' limitations, while valuing their insights. As the research ecosystem advances, metadata representation should be made increasingly machine-readable. We recommend a "FAIR by design" approach from the beginning to ensure alignment with FAIR principles in project outcomes. Continuous assessments during a project’s lifetime promote ongoing research data infrastructure improvements within the NFDI consortia context, contributing to NFDI infrastructure innovation and optimization.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.