Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →

FIGURE 19 in Medusapyga LaBonte and Maddison, a New Genus of Anillini (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechinae) from the Pacific Northwest of the United States

FIGURE 19. Slot-style soil trap deployed at Medusapyga alsea type locality in 2014. Scale bar 10 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →

FIGURE 15 in Medusapyga LaBonte and Maddison, a New Genus of Anillini (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechinae) from the Pacific Northwest of the United States

FIGURE 15. Known geographic distributions of Medusapyga alsea (star) in Oregon and Medusapyga chehalis (circlein Washington.

Fig. 7 in Earliest Cretaceous mammals from the western United States

Fig. 7. The spalacotheriid "symmetrodont" mammal Infernolestes rougieri gen. et sp. nov. from OMNH locality V1243, Lakota Formation (Lower Cretaceous: upper Berriasian–Valanginian), South Dakota, USA. OMNH 62671 (holotype), right lower molar in occlusal (A, stereopair), lingual (B), and buccal (C) views.

Fig. 6. Triconodontid eutriconodontan mammals from OMNH locality V1254 in Earliest Cretaceous mammals from the western United States

Fig. 6. Triconodontid eutriconodontan mammals from OMNH locality V1254, Lakota Formation (Lower Cretaceous: upper Valanginian–lower Barremian), South Dakota, USA. A–C. Camera lucida drawings (A 1–C1) and interpretive illustrations (A2–C2) of OMNH 62800, right lower molar in occlusal (A), lingual (B), and buccal (C) views. D. OMNH 62855, right lower premolar in buccal view. A–C courtesy of Nicholas J. Czaplewski.

Fig. 10 in Earliest Cretaceous mammals from the western United States

Fig. 10. Simplified cladogram showing known North American distribution of mammalian taxa during the Jurassic and Cretaceous. Grey bar indicates temporal range of deposits of the Lakota Formation (Lower Cretaceous: upper Berriasian–lower Barremian). Closed circles indicate mammalian fossils described in this study (temporal distributions given as mid-ranges for respective estimates). Dashed lines indicate stratigraphic range extensions of groups otherwise restricted to the Late Jurassic (Morrison Formation) or unrecorded until the Aptian–Cenomanian (Antlers, Arundel, Cloverly, and Cedar Mountain formations), highlighting the transitional composition of the Lakota assemblage. Cladogram modified from Luo (2007), geologic time scale modified from Gradstein et al. (2012).

Fig. 9 in Earliest Cretaceous mammals from the western United States

Fig. 9. Stem zatherian (A) and tribosphenidan (B) mammals from OMNH locality V1254, Lakota Formation (Lower Cretaceous: upper Valanginian–lower Barremian), South Dakota, USA. A. OMNH 67137, right low- er molar in occlusal (A 1, stereopair), lingual (A 2), and distal (A 3) views. B. OMNH 64193, left lower molar (trigonid only) in occlusal (B 1, stereopair), lingual (B ), mesial (B ), buccal (B ), and distal (B ) views.

Fig. 4 in Earliest Cretaceous mammals from the western United States

Fig. 4. Stage Barn Canyon Road section (measured by BS, containing OMNH location V1254), Fuson Member of the Lakota Formation.

Fig. 1 in Earliest Cretaceous mammals from the western United States

Fig. 1. Map of exposures of the Lower Cretaceous Inyan Kara Group in southwestern South Dakota and northeastern Wyoming (USA), which includes the Lakota Formation (Berriasian–Barremian). Stars indicate OMNH localities which yielded specimens described in this study. Modified from Sames (2011a), as based on Waagé (1959) and Sohn (1979).

Fig. 5 in Earliest Cretaceous mammals from the western United States

Fig. 5. "Plagiaulacidan" multituberculate mammals from OMNH locality V1243, Lakota Formation (Lower Cretaceous: upper Berriasian–Valanginian), South Dakota, USA. A. The allodontoid Passumys angelli gen. et sp. nov., OMNH 64191 (holotype), right m1 in occlusal (A 1, stereopair), buccal (A 2), and lingual (A 3) views. B. The plagiaulacoid Bolodon hydei sp. nov., OMNH 62670 (holotype), right M2 in occlusal (B 1, stereopair) and oblique lingual (B ) views.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →

Interactive map of Heat Stress Compensability Classification (HSCC) application in 96 United States cities.

This repository includes the interactive map in format .html of the very first application of the Heat Stress Compensability Classification (HSCC) in 96 cities in the United States showing the proportion of days with compensable and uncompensable heat stress from the top 10th percentile of hottest days from 2005-2020 in each place. This map offers the detailed results of the very first application of the classification system as in the journal article: The Development of an Adaptive Heat Stress Compensability Classification Applied to the United States, published in the 4th SNP special issue in the International Journal of Biometeorology. The results of this visualization were obtained from open-source data and coding packages such as Folium, and the model results were obtained by applying the Python Human Heat Balance (PyHHB) on weather dataset freely available. The interactive map offers a detailed visualization of the results from each of the cities, allowing you to see 3 tabs when the icon of the pie chart from each location is clicked. Tab statistics: Detail per city of Figure 4b of related paper. Tab Histogram 2D: Details per city of Fig 6 of related paper Tab How to read: Figure 2 in related paper. Please for questions related to this dataset/code contact Gisel Guzman-Echavarria (gguzma20@asu.edu). Guzman-Echavarria, G., & Vanos, J. (2023). PyHHB: Physiological-based estimations of human survivability and liveability to heat in a changing climate (Nature Communications (1.0.0)). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10020137

Fig. 5 in Evaluating categories of resistance in soybean genotypes from the United States and Brazil to Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Fig. 5. Mortality (%) of Aphis glycines on 7 soybean genotypes at 5, 7, and 10 d afer infestation (23 ± 3 °C; 60 ± 10% RH; 16:8 h L:D photoperiod).

Fig. 4 in Evaluating categories of resistance in soybean genotypes from the United States and Brazil to Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Fig. 4. Cumulative aphid-days (CAD) for soybean genotypes infested with Aphis glycines at V1 and V3 stages (23 ± 3 °C; 60 ± 10% RH; 16:8 h L:D photoperiod).

Fig. 3 in Evaluating categories of resistance in soybean genotypes from the United States and Brazil to Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Fig. 3. Number (mean ± SE) of Aphis glycines individuals on 7 soybean genotypes 24 h afer infestation (23 ± 3 °C; 60 ± 10% RH; 16:8 h L:D photoperiod). Means with the same lower case letter do not differ by Fisher's LSD test (P> 0.05). (F = 1.74; df = 6; P = 0.0110).

Fig. 2 in Evaluating categories of resistance in soybean genotypes from the United States and Brazil to Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Fig. 2. Number (mean ± SE) of Aphis glycines individuals on KS4202 plants 24 h afer infestation (23 ± 3 °C; 60 ± 10% RH; 16:8 h L:D photoperiod). Means with the same lower case letter do not differ by Fisher's LSD test (P> 0.05). (F = 1.09; df = 6; P = 0.3897).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Eosinophilic meningoencephalitis associated with rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) migration in two nine-banded armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus) and an opossum (Didelphis virginiana) in the southeastern United States

Fig. 1. Caudal end of a male nematode extracted from the brain of Armadillo 1. Arrow indicates bursal rays.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

Fig. 2. Neuroparenchyma. Fig. 2a in Eosinophilic meningoencephalitis associated with rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) migration in two nine-banded armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus) and an opossum (Didelphis virginiana) in the southeastern United States

Fig. 2. Neuroparenchyma. Fig. 2a: Armadillo B. High numbers of eosinophils and lymphocytes expand the perivascular spaces. A focus of hemorrhage, eosinophils, and glial cells interrupts the neuroparenchyma. Photomicrographs are stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Bar = 200 Mm. Fig. 2b: Armadillo A. Cross section of a nematode larva (200 Mm width) within the thalamus is characterized by a smooth cuticle, coelomyarian musculature, lateral cords, and a distinct pharynx (consistent with a metastrongyle). No inflammatory cells surround the nematode. H&E, Bar = 50 Mm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2019View details →

Supplementary Data for "Combining genomics and epidemiology to track mumps virus transmission in the United States"

Supplementary data and scripts used to produce figures for "Combining genomics and epidemiology to track mumps virus transmission in the United States." Files are divided into "code" and "data" directories and a README is provided for each.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →

Turtle Shell Rattle Use by Indigenous Peoples of the Contiguous United States: Ethnographic Documentation

**When using this data and information, please cite all of the following: <blockquote> Gillreath-Brown, Andrew. 2019. Creation to Rhythm: An Ethnographic and Archaeological Survey of Turtle Shell Rattles and Spirituality in the United States. Journal of Ethnobiology 39(3):425–444. <a href="http://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-39.3.425">http://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-39.3.425</a> Gillreath-Brown, Andrew. 2019*. Turtle Shell Rattle Use by Indigenous Peoples of the Contiguous United States: Ethnographic Documentation. Version 1. Zenodo. Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2545989">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2545989</a>. Date of use: day month year.** *Please update year and DOI if you cite a newer version. The DOI changes with each version in Zenodo, or you can use the DOI to cite all versions. **Example: Date of use: 17 April 2019. </blockquote> OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS The purpose of this work is to summarize information from published and unpublished ethnographies that document how Indigenous Peoples of the contiguous United States used—and, in some cases, continue to use—turtle shell rattles. The data contained herein have been used to suggest and support interpretations of turtle shell rattle remains recovered from the archaeological record across the United States. This compendium draws on an extensive database compiled and maintained by the author. The compendium lists the relevant ethnographic references; it gives the state and region of the United States and the Indigenous group that use(d) turtle shell rattles; it identifies the turtle shell rattle type and the various chelonian taxa by both their scientific and common names; and it describes the documented uses for turtle shell rattles for specific ethnic groups. I intend this compendium to serve as a summary of, and a guide to, the extensive ethnographic literature, which I encourage the reader to consult for additional, more-detailed information, as well as to understand the unique context. I used several criteria for deciding which information to include in the compendium. First, I was interested in what Indigenous Peoples used turtle shell rattles or turtle substitute rattles for (see Gillreath-Brown 2019) across the United States. I also try to include alternate or contemporary preferred names of the Native American groups in addition to the group name used in the literature. Second, I include primary ethnographic references in addition to other supporting references. In addition to providing the references in a word document, references are also compiled in the author’s Paperpile account, which is publically available at <a href="https://paperpile.com/shared/KU55Rg">https://paperpile.com/shared/KU55Rg</a>. Third, I was also interested in the type of rattle that was used and what turtle taxa (given by its scientific name according to Turtle Taxonomy Working Group 2017) was used in the construction of the rattle(s). I also provide the common name for scientific names. Fourth, I provide a use category for the rattles, which is comprised of ritual/ceremonial, medicinal/healing, and myth/creation. Finally, an ethnographic description and additional comments are provided to give further context for the turtle shell rattles and to further expand on the use categories. For example, for a use category of ritual/ceremonial, the description and comments field will generally list the dances or ceremonies where turtle shell rattles were used. A goal of the compendium is to aid researchers in their interpretations of archaeological turtle shell rattle remains, as well as to understand and document Indigenous music. Although turtle shell rattles have been present in the United States since the Archaic Period (ca. 8000–1000 BC), the specific uses of turtle shell rattles vary from group to group and over time. Some Indigenous Peoples may not have traditionally used turtle shell rattles or at least not for specific dances (e.g., Stomp Dance). For example, Howard and Kurath (1959:6) explain that the Ponca (of the midwestern United States) likely borrowed the stomp dance from eastern groups. Many Indigenous Peoples were forced from their traditional homelands and were placed in close proximity to other Indigenous Peoples, such as in the state of Oklahoma, that they may not have interacted with the past. Additionally, the Seminoles of Oklahoma may have learned about the use of condensed-milk can rattles as a substitute for turtle shell rattles from the Natchez-Cherokees around 1920 in Gore, Oklahoma (Howard and Lena 1984:117). Turtle shell rattle type is defined by the author and is presented in Gillreath-Brown 2019 (see also Gillreath-Brown and Peres 2017, 2018). In published literature, “turtle shell rattle” is phrased many different ways including: turtle shell rattle, terrapin carapace rattles, turtle carapace rattle, shell shakers, terrapin rattle, turtle shell shakers, terrapin shell rattle, turtle shell shackles, tortoise shell rattle, turtle shell leggings, and tortoise rattle (see Gillreath-Brown 2019: Supplemental Content, Supplementary Table 4). Additionally, sometimes turtle shell is hyphenated (i.e., turtle-shell). Tortoise and terrapin are also used as substitutes for “turtle.” Download the current version of the excel file below. References cited in the description above are in the word document “References Cited” and in Paperpile, except for Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (2017). Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [Rhodin AGJ, Iverson JB, Bour R, Fritz U, Georges A, Shaffer HB, et al]. 2017. Turtles of the world: Annotated checklist and atlas of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. 8th ed. In: Rhodin AGJ, Iverson JB, van Dijk PP, Saumure RA, Buhlmann KA, Pritchard PCH, et al, editors. Conservation biology of freshwater turtles and tortoises: A compilation project of the IUCN/SSC tortoise and freshwater turtle specialist group. Chelonian Research Monographs 2017;7: 1–292. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3854/crm.7.checklist.atlas.v8.2017">https://doi.org/10.3854/crm.7.checklist.atlas.v8.2017</a> Acknowledgments This publication would not have been possible without the support of many people and institutions. I also thank the editors and reviewers for the original article (DOI) that was published in the Journal of Ethnobiology Special Issue, “Ethnobiology Through Song.” I also thank my colleague Dr. Tanya Peres, who I have worked extensively with on this topic. Andrew Gillreath-Brown is currently a PhD Candidate in the Department of Anthropology at Washington State University.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Figure 6-7 in Rhopalocera (Lepidoptera) prey records of Asilidae (Diptera) in eastern New Mexico and western Texas, United States of America

Figure 6-7. Triorla interrupta male feeding on Phyciodes picta. / Triorla interrupta macho alimentándose de Phyciodes picta.