Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
9,671
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
9,671 results for “Leaf”
Text-fig. 13. Typical elements of the flora of Velikaya Kema (coll. Geol. Inst. RAS Moscow). 1 – Abies sp. 1, twig, × 0.7; 2 – Larix sp., seed cone, × 0.7; 3 – Calocedrus sp., twig, × 0.7; 4 – Picea sp., seed, × 0.8; 5 – Abies sp. 2, seed, × 0.7; 6 – Metasequoia occidentalis (NEWBERRY) CHANEY, leafy shoot, × 0.7; 7 – Ostrya sp., involucre, × 0.7; 8 – Carpinus sp. (ex gr. C. cordata BLUME), involucre, × 0.7; 9 – Carpinus sp. 2 (ex gr. C. tschonoskii MAXIMOVITCH), involucre, × 0.7; 10 – Ulmus sp., leaf, × 0.7; 11 – Acer miocaudatum HU et CHANEY, leaf, × 0.8; 12 – Engelhardia (Alfaropsis) koreanica OISHI, ×; 13 – Comptonia naumannii NATHORST, leaf, × 0.7; 14 – Craigia oregonensis (ARNOLD) KVAČEK, BŮžEK et MANCHESTER, capsule valve, × 0.6; 15 – Cercidiphyllum crenatum (UNGER) R. BROWN, leaf, × 0.7; 16 – Sassafras subtriloba (KONNO) TANAI, leaf, × 0.7; 17 – Dicotylophyllum sp., leaf, × 0.7; 18 – Quercus kodairae HUZIOKA, leaf, × 1; 19 – Carpinus subcordata NATHORST, leaf, × 0.7; 20 – Ailanthus sp., fruit, × 1; 21 – Diospyros miokeaki HU et CHANEY, leaf, × 0.5. in Mid-Latitude Palaeogene Floras Of Eurasia Bound To Volcanic Settings And Palaeoclimatic Events - Experience Obtained From The Far East Of Russia (Sikhote-Alin') And Central Europe (Bohemian Massif)
Text-fig. 13. Typical elements of the flora of Velikaya Kema (coll. Geol. Inst. RAS Moscow). 1 – Abies sp. 1, twig, × 0.7; 2 – Larix sp., seed cone, × 0.7; 3 – Calocedrus sp., twig, × 0.7; 4 – Picea sp., seed, × 0.8; 5 – Abies sp. 2, seed, × 0.7; 6 – Metasequoia occidentalis (NEWBERRY) CHANEY, leafy shoot, × 0.7; 7 – Ostrya sp., involucre, × 0.7; 8 – Carpinus sp. (ex gr. C. cordata BLUME), involucre, × 0.7; 9 – Carpinus sp. 2 (ex gr. C. tschonoskii MAXIMOVITCH), involucre, × 0.7; 10 – Ulmus sp., leaf, × 0.7; 11 – Acer miocaudatum HU et CHANEY, leaf, × 0.8; 12 – Engelhardia (Alfaropsis) koreanica OISHI, ×; 13 – Comptonia naumannii NATHORST, leaf, × 0.7; 14 – Craigia oregonensis (ARNOLD) KVAČEK, BŮžEK et MANCHESTER, capsule valve, × 0.6; 15 – Cercidiphyllum crenatum (UNGER) R. BROWN, leaf, × 0.7; 16 – Sassafras subtriloba (KONNO) TANAI, leaf, × 0.7; 17 – Dicotylophyllum sp., leaf, × 0.7; 18 – Quercus kodairae HUZIOKA, leaf, × 1; 19 – Carpinus subcordata NATHORST, leaf, × 0.7; 20 – Ailanthus sp., fruit, × 1; 21 – Diospyros miokeaki HU et CHANEY, leaf, × 0.5.
Figure 2 in Nesting of the leaf-cutter bee Megachile (Ptilosarus) microsoma Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in Trinidad, West Indies
Figure 2. Brood cell of Megachile microsoma. (a) Partially dissected nest 1, with arrows indicating the entrance (left) and rounded bottom (right); (b) Cocoon surrounded by dried, powdery feces; (c) Central part of the cocoon showing the joint point with the operculum; (d) Female pupa extracted from her cocoon. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 1 in Nesting of the leaf-cutter bee Megachile (Ptilosarus) microsoma Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in Trinidad, West Indies
Figure 1. Nests of Megachile microsoma. (a) Nest 1 showing the female builder, (b) Nest 2. Scale bar: 1 cm.
Fig. 2 in Eight new and little-known leaf-beetles species (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae & Chrysomelidae) for the Kaliningrad region
Fig. 2. Aedeagus with flagellum, lateral view: A – Oulema melanopus (Linnaeus, 1758), B – O. duftschmidi (Redtenbacher, 1874).
Fig. 1 in Eight new and little-known leaf-beetles species (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae & Chrysomelidae) for the Kaliningrad region
Fig. 1. The finding localities of the new and littke-known for the fauna of the Kaliningrad region leaf beetles species (according to the administrative structure of the region): 1 - Zeugophora turneri Power, 1863; 2 – Oulema duftschmidi (Redtenbacher, 1874); 3 – Cryptocephalus quadripustulatus Gyllenhal, 1813; 4 - Cryptocephalus coryli (Linnaeus, 1758); 5 - Colaphus sophiae (Schaller, 1783); 6 - Prasocuris junci (Brahm, 1790); 7 - Phyllotreta dilatata Thomson, 1866; 8 - Hermaeophaga mercurialis (Fabricius, 1792).
Figure 1. A in Preliminary data on the age structure of Asaccus barani (Baran's leaf-toed gecko) from southeastern Anatolia, Turkey
Figure 1. A cross-section (17 µm thick) of the femur bone of a 5-year-old Asaccus barani individual (m.c. = marrow cavity, p. = periosteal bone). The 5 LAGs are indicated by black arrows. A double LAG is highlighted by red arrow.
Figure 2 in The leaf-miner Nemorimyza Frey, 1946 in the Neotropical region: key to species and first record of Nemorimyza posticata (Meigen, 1830) from Brazil (Diptera, Agromyzidae)
Figure 2 (A-E). Nemorimyza posticata (Meigen), adult male terminalia: (A) cercal plate; (B) postgonite; (C) phallus, ventral view; (D) phallus, lateral view; (E) ejaculatory apodeme. Scale bars: 0.01 mm.
Figure 1 in The leaf-miner Nemorimyza Frey, 1946 in the Neotropical region: key to species and first record of Nemorimyza posticata (Meigen, 1830) from Brazil (Diptera, Agromyzidae)
Figure 1 (A-D). Nemorimyza posticata (Meigen), adult male: (A) lateral view; (B) dorsal view; (C) head, frontal view; (D) abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1 mm.
Fig. 3 in The trade-off between the transmission of chemical cues and parasites: behavioral interactions between leaf-cutting ant workers of different age classes
Fig. 3. Mean ± s.e. frequencies that young and old ants were observed giving or receiving allogrooming during a 15 s observation period.
Fig. 2 in The trade-off between the transmission of chemical cues and parasites: behavioral interactions between leaf-cutting ant workers of different age classes
Fig. 2. Mean ± s.e. frequencies that young and old ants were: (a) observed selfgrooming and (b) observed engaged in mandible scraping with another ant, during a 15 s observation period.
Fig. 1 in The trade-off between the transmission of chemical cues and parasites: behavioral interactions between leaf-cutting ant workers of different age classes
Fig. 1. Overall activity levels. Mean ± s.e. frequencies that young and old ants were: (a) observed engaging in one of the focal behaviors and (b) observed engaged in antennation with another ant, during a 15 s observation period.
Figure 16 in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 16. Cremnomegachile dolichosoma (Benoist), new combination. A. Facial view of female. B. Detail of female mesoscutum. C. Female metasoma in dorsal view. D. Lateral view of female. E. Male terminal terga. F. Lateral view of male.
Figure 15. Tribes Pseudoheriadini and Ochreriadini. A in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 15. Tribes Pseudoheriadini and Ochreriadini. A. Female of Afroheriades hyalinus Griswold & Gonzalez in lateral view. B. Male terminal terga of Pseudoheriades moricei (Friese). C, D. Female of Ochreriades fasciatus (Friese) in dorsal and lateral views. E. Male terminal terga of O. fasciatus.
Figure 12 in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 12. Parsimony reconstruction of the two types of interdental laminae of the leaf-cutter bee mandible. We used the tree topology obtained from the total-evidence analysis of the full data set (122 taxa) to visualize character states on the clade of leaf-cutter bees. All photographs are outer views of the mandibles, except for the second from top to bottom, which is an inner view of the mandible below. Odontogenic lamina highlighted in green and ctenogenic lamina in pink.
Figure 11 in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 11. Total evidence dated phylogeny of Megachilini from the analysis of the full morphological data matrix (122 taxa). Majority-rule consensus tree from Bayesian analysis using fossils as terminals under the FBD tree prior. Blue bar at each node represents the 95% highest posterior density age range. Posterior probability below 100 indicated above each node. A capital letter above a node indicates a clade discussed in the text. Mandibles with interdental laminae highlighted in green (odontogenic) and pink (ctenogenic).
Figure 8 in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 8. Strict consensus tree of 30 parsimonious trees obtained under equal weighting. Numbers above nodes are standard bootstrap values, numbers below nodes are absolute Bremer values. Branches without numbers indicate bootstrap values below 50% and Bremer values of 1. A capital letter above a node indicates a clade discussed in the text. Species within boxes of the same color correspond to the same subgenus of Megachile Latreille s.l. following Michener's (2007) classification. The colored column after the species names indicates approximate number of species per subgenus. Half-colored boxes without a number correspond to species that did not cluster with the other species of the same subgenus included in the analysis. Species richness taken from Michener (2007), Moure et al. (2007), and Ascher & Pickering (2018). Mandibles with interdental laminae highlighted in green (odontogenic) and pink (ctenogenic).
Figure 9 in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 9. Preferred total evidence dated phylogeny of Megachilidae. Majority-rule consensus tree from Bayesian analysis using fossils as terminals under the FBD tree prior. Blue bar at each node represents the 95% highest posterior density age range. Posterior probability below 100 indicated above each node.
Figure 6 in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 6. Examples of the types of setae found on the male S4–S6 of Megachile Latreille s.l. A. Branched, unmodified, S4, Megachile (Acentron) albitarsis Cresson. B. Acuminate, S4, M. (Megachile) centuncularis (Linnaeus). C. Acuminate, S6, M. (Chalicodoma) sicula (Rossi). D. Fan-shaped, S6, M. (Chelostomoides) exilis Cresson. E. Capitate-spatulate, S5, M. (Chelostomoides) rugifrons (Smith). F. Capitate-spatulate, S5, M. (Xanthosarus) fortis Cresson.
Figure 4 in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 4. Some female morphological features used in the phylogenetic analysis. A, B. Lateral view of axilla. C. Dorsal view of mesoscutellum and metanotum. D, E. Outer view of apex of mesotibia. F–I. Pretarsal claws. Megachile (Melanosarus) xylocopoides Smith (A); M. (Stenomegachile) dolichosoma Benoist (B, C); M. (Chelostomoides) rugifrons (Smith) (D); M. (Megachiloides) pascoensis Mitchell (E); Dioxys productus (Cresson) (F); M. (Acentron) albitarsis Cresson (G); M. (Hackeriapis) ferox Smith (H); M. (Schizomegachile) monstrosa Smith (I).
Figure 1 in Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)
Figure 1. Species richness of currently recognized genera in the bee tribe Megachilini. A. Dorsal habitus of a female of Coelioxys sp. B. Lateral habitus of a female of Noteriades spinosus Griswold & Gonzalez. C. Male of Megachile (Zonomegachile) kalina Gonzalez, Griswold, & Engel on top of a brood cell built with leaf pieces. D. Facial habitus of leaf-cutter M. (Eutricharaea) minutissima Radoszkowski (left) and dauber bee M. (Callomegachile) pluto (Smith) (right). E. Outer surface of the female mandible of M. (Leptorachis) laeta Smith, a leaf-cutter bee, showing interdental lamina in pink. F. Dorsal habitus of M. (Rhyssomegachile) kartaboensis Mitchell. G. Dorsal views of M. (E.) minutissima (upper left) and M. (C.) pluto (right). Photographs are not at the same scale, except for the large and small species compared in figures D and G.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.