Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
36,014
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
36,014 results for “diptera”
Fig. 3 in Ecological niche difference associated with varied ethanol tolerance between Drosophila suzukii and Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae)
Fig. 3. Mortality of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila suzukii larvae exposed to varying concentrations of ethanol.
Fig. 1 in Ecological niche difference associated with varied ethanol tolerance between Drosophila suzukii and Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae)
Fig. 1. Ethanol (A) and acetaldehyde (B) contents of grapes infested by Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila suzukii.
Fig. 1 in A bucket-type emergence trap for detecting overwintered Dasineura oxycoccana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and its parasitoids in cranberry
Fig. 1. Bucket-type emergence trap seated into cranberry field. Inner bucket with mesh lid is descending into support bucket.
Fig. 1 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries
Fig. 1. The laboratory assay conducted in a wind chamber testing the effectiveness of baits to attract Drosophila suzukii.
Fig. 3 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries
Fig. 3. Mean (± SE) number of adult Drosophila suzukii captured in baited traps suspended in a wind chamber. Treatments with the same letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05).
Fig. 6 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries
Fig. 6. Mean (± SE) number of female Drosophila suzukii captured in yeast + sugar traps placed in a blueberry field in Hawthorne, Florida, USA, blocked into 4 separate treatments: border spray, mass trapping, alternative row spray, and an untreated control. Populations were monitored weekly during a 6-wk period; asterisks indicate those treatments that were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) during a sample period.
Fig. 8 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries
Fig. 8. Mean (± SE) number of Drosophila suzukii reared from blueberries collected from a field in Hawthorne, Florida, USA, blocked into 4 separate treatments: border spray, mass trapping, alternative row spray, and an untreated control. Fruit was collected weekly for 6 wk. Treatments were not significantly different (P> 0.05).
Fig. 1 in First record of Limatus durhamii Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae) in Campeche, Mexico
Fig. 1. Map of the state of Campeche and its municipalities, showing the locations of collection records of Limatus durhamii.
Fig. 1 in Spread of two invasive flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) infesting commercial fruits in southeastern Brazil
Fig. 1. Brazilian states previously invaded by Drosophila suzukii and its new dispersion area in Espírito Santo State, Brazil.
Fig. 2 in A bucket-type emergence trap for detecting overwintered Dasineura oxycoccana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and its parasitoids in cranberry
Fig. 2. Number (mean + SEM) of overwintered cranberry tipworms and parasitoids detected per emergence trap per wk in 2015. Julian Date 124 = 4 May; 152 = 1 Jun; 187 = 6 Jul; 215 = 3 Aug. Number of traps per wk was 30, 50, 59, 60, 60, 46, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 51, 51, respectively, for the 17 wk.
Fig. 5 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries
Fig. 5. Mean (± SE) number of adult Drosophila suzukii captured in yeast + sugar traps placed in a blueberry field in Hawthorne, Florida, USA, blocked into 4 separate treatments: border spray, mass trapping, alternative row spray, and an untreated control. Populations monitored weekly during a 6-wk period; asterisks indicate those treatments that were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) during a sample period.
Fig. 1 in Biology and olfactory response of Salpingogaster nigra Schiner (Diptera: Syrphidae)
Fig. 1. Olfactory response of predator Salpingogaster nigra in an olfactometer, with different treatments: spittlebug nymphs vs. air; foam produced by spittlebug vs. air; spittlebug nymphs vs. foam produced by spittlebug, and air vs. air. An asterisk (*) means significant difference using χ2 test at P <0.05.
Fig. 3 in The role of visual organs in the locomotor behavior of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Fig. 3. Take-off (%) by adult Chinese citrus flies, Bactrocera minax, males and females tested separately with 6 visual blinding treatments. Values are mean ± standard error. Histograms with different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among treatments (P <0.05).
Fig. 2 in The role of visual organs in the locomotor behavior of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Fig. 2. Schematic diagrams of experimental chambers. A. Take-off platform; B. Horizontal crawling device; C. Vertical crawling device; a. take-off platform; b. Plexiglass box; c. video camera; d. Petri dish; e. crawling column; f. ruler.
Fig. 1 in The role of visual organs in the locomotor behavior of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of visual blinding treatments on adult Chinese citrus flies, Bactrocera minax. The white arrow indicates the blinded visual organ.
Fig. 5 in The role of visual organs in the locomotor behavior of Bactrocera minax (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Fig. 5. Vertical crawling distance (cm in 30 s) of adult Chinese citrus flies, Bactrocera minax, males and females tested separately with 6 visual blinding treatments. Values are mean ± standard error. Histograms with different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among treatments (P <0.05).
Fig. 1 in Distant-dependent capture probabilities of Mediterranean and oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a food-based trap in a Hawaiian mango orchard
Fig. 1. Number of captures (A) and percentage of captures (B: captures divided by released) for Bactrocera dorsalis released from 5, 10, or 20 m from a centrally located trap baited with torula yeast borax solution. For a given replicate, 200 individuals of each sex were released. Symbols represent means with standard error (N = 7 replicates in all cases). Within each sex, numbers of captures differed significantly between distances marked with different upper case letters. Within a distance, numbers of captures differed significantly between the sexes if marked with different lower case letters.
Fig. 1 in Changing blow fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) populations in Orlando, Florida, United States
Fig. 1. Summary of species and numbers of blow fly collected in 2009 (by aerial netting) and 2010 (by Bishopp cone trap). Only 5 species of calliphorids were recovered: Chrysomya rufifacies, Chrysomya megacephala, Cochliomyia macellaria, Lucilia coeruleiviridis, and Lucilia sericata.
Fig 2 in Relationship between field captures of Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the residual amount and release rate of trimedlure from polymeric plugs
Fig 2. Captures of male medflies, Ceratitis capitata, in traps baited with fresh liquid trimedlure or weathered trimedlure plugs over the 12-wk study period in Florida in 2020 (top; means ± SE, N = 12 per treatment) and trimedlure content (means ± SD) and release rate from plugs over the study period (bottom, N = 5 per parameter).
Fig. 1 in Relationship between field captures of Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the residual amount and release rate of trimedlure from polymeric plugs
Fig. 1. Captures of male medflies, Ceratitis capitata, in traps baited with fresh liquid trimedlure or weathered trimedlure plugs over the 10-wk study period in Hawaii in 2018 (top; means ± SE, N = 12 per treatment) and trimedlure content (means ± SD) and release rate from plugs over the study period (bottom, N = 5 per parameter).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.