Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →

Figs. 9–11 in Notes on the Palaearctic fauna of Limnia (Diptera, Sciomyzidae)

Figs. 9–11. General view: 9 — female Limnia testacea; 10 — male Limnia jakovlevi; 11 — female Trypetoptera punctulata Рис. 9–11. Общий виΑ: 9 — самка Limnia testacea; 10 — самец Limnia jakovlevi; 11 — самка Trypetoptera punctulata

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →

Figs. 2–8 in Notes on the Palaearctic fauna of Limnia (Diptera, Sciomyzidae)

Figs. 2–8. Hypandrium of Limnia: 2–4, L. unguicornis: 2 — our photo; 3 — L. paludicola; 4 — L. unguicornis (3, 4 from Elberg 1965: figs. 16, 17); 5–8 — L. pacifica: 5 — our photo; 6 — (from Elberg 1965: fig. 18); 7 — (from Przhiboro 2016: fig. 13); 8 — (from Yano 1978: fig. 9)

Fig. 5 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 5. Fruit infestation and population fluctuation of Anastrepha fraterculus in (A) pears, (B) peaches, and (C) mandarins. Cn = Canelones, Py = Paysandú; FTD = flies per trap per d; Af = Anastrepha fraterculus.

Fig. 6 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 6. Population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata males (M) in Jackson traps (Cc) and females (H) in McPhail traps. A, B, C, D = cultivars where fruit infestation was recorded (A, B = Canelones; C, D = Paysandú); E, F, G, H = cultivars where no fruit infestation was recorded (E, F = Paysandú; G, H = San José).

Fig. 4 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 4. Population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata registered in McPhail traps in mandarins (A) with fruit infestation and (B) without fruit infestation. Py = Paysandú, SJ = San José, W = Washington; FTD: flies per trap per d; Cc = Ceratitis capitata.

Fig. 3 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 3. Fruit infestation and population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata registered in McPhail traps in (A) pears and (B) peaches. Cn = Canelones, SJ = San José; FTD = flies per trap per d; Cc = Ceratitis capitata.

Fig. 2 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of accumulated captures and fruit infestation of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus during the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 seasons. Ap = Apple: ERO = Early Red One, RCh = Red Chief, RD = Red Delicious; Pch = Peach: JG = June Gold, EL = Elegant Lady, RM = Rey del Monte, PC = Pavía Canario, F = Forastero; Nc = Nectarine: L = Lara, F = Fantasía; Pr = Pear: W = William's; Mn = Mandarin: E = Elenadalle, O = Ortanique, S = Satsuma; Or = Orange: V = Valencia, WN = Washington Navel; Gf = Grapefruit: SR = Star Rubí. Cc = C. capitata, Af = A. fraterculus. The accumulated captures per season were calculated by adding captures from the date that traps were installed (1 Sep, 30 Oct, and 1 Nov 2014 in San José, Canelones, and Paysandú, respectively) until 30 Jun 2015, and for the same period from spring 2015 until Jun 2016.

Fig. 1 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 1. Average number of fruit flies per McPhail trap per d (FTD) of Ceratitis capitata (Cc) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Af) in Paysandú (Py) and Canelones (Cn).

Fig. 1 in Assessing the flight capabilities of fed and starved Allograpta obliqua (Diptera: Syrphidae), a natural enemy of Asian citrus psyllid, with computerized flight mills

Fig. 1. Mean flight parameters measured for starved and fed Allograpta obliqua attached to flight mills for 24 h. Error bars indicate ± SEMs; asterisks indicate a significant (P <0.05) difference between feeding treatments.

Fig. 2 in Assessing the flight capabilities of fed and starved Allograpta obliqua (Diptera: Syrphidae), a natural enemy of Asian citrus psyllid, with computerized flight mills

Fig. 2. Mean flight parameters measured for male and female Allograpta obliqua attached to flight mills for 24 h. Error bars indicate ± SEMs; asterisks indicate a significant P <0.05) difference between sex.

Fig. 6 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 6. Grouping of assemblies Dolichopodidae flies in different habitats: vegetables, fallow, agroforestry, and native vegetation based on coefficient similarity (Bray-Curtis) on organic farms cultivating vegetables in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 5 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 5. Number of exclusive and shared (intersections) Dolichopodidae species in vegetable crops and fallow habitats, agroforestry, and native vegetation.

Fig. 2 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 2. Mean abundance (± SE) of Dolichopodidae flies collected in different rural properties with vegetable crops, fallow, agroforestry, and native vegetation in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 1 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 1. Organic vegetable farms sampled in Ceilândia (I), Taguatinga (II), Paranoá (III), and Lamarão (IV), Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 4 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 4. Adjustment to the log normal distribution model of the Dolichopodidae assembly per habitat on organic farms producing vegetable in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 3 in Diversity and spatial distribution of predacious Dolichopodidae (Insecta: Diptera) on organic vegetable fields and adjacent habitats in Brazil

Fig. 3. Distribution of relative abundance by species of Dolichopodidae flies collected on organic farms producing vegetables in the Federal District, Brazil.

Fig. 2 in Seasonal parasitism of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by phorid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in a Brazilian Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone

Fig. 2. Correlation between temperature and the number of leaf-cutting ants Atta sexdens parasitized by Apocephalus attophilus (r = −0.722; df = 9; P <0.05).

Fig. 1 in Seasonal parasitism of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by phorid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in a Brazilian Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone

Fig. 1. Number of leaf-cutting ants Atta sexdens parasitized by Apocephalus attophilus and Eibesfeldtphora tonhascai in a Brazilian Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone. The seasons are as follows: spring (Sep–Nov), summer (Dec–Feb), fall (Mar–May), and winter (Jun–Aug).

Fig. 1 in Evaluation of seedling tray drench of insecticides for cabbage maggot (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) management in broccoli and cauliflower

Fig. 1. (A) Insecticides were delivered using a syringe and (B) inoculation of Delia radicum larvae into the base of transplant seedling in the greenhouse.

Fig. 3 in Evaluation of seedling tray drench of insecticides for cabbage maggot (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) management in broccoli and cauliflower

Fig. 3. Least squares means (± SE) of (A) severity of Delia radicum feeding injury, (B) Delia radicum larvae, and (C) fresh weight of 10 cauliflower plants in the field trial 3 conducted in 2015. Means with different letters are significantly different between treatments for each parameter according to Tukey's HSD test at P <0.05.