Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2017View details →

Why do people donate to conservation? Insights from a 'real world' campaign

<p>Data set for the paper " Why do people donate to conservation? Insights from a ‘real world’ campaign "</p>

Supplementary material 3 from: Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, D'Antraccoli M, Bedini G, Carta A, Sebastiani F, Bruschi P, Peruzzi L (2017) Conservation biology of the last Italian population of Cistus laurifolius (Cistaceae): demographic structure, reproductive success and population genetics. Nature Conservation 22: 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.19809

Supplementary material 3 from: Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, D'Antraccoli M, Bedini G, Carta A, Sebastiani F, Bruschi P, Peruzzi L (2017) Conservation biology of the last Italian population of Cistus laurifolius (Cistaceae): demographic structure, reproductive success and population genetics. Nature Conservation 22: 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.19809

Supplementary material 2 from: Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, D'Antraccoli M, Bedini G, Carta A, Sebastiani F, Bruschi P, Peruzzi L (2017) Conservation biology of the last Italian population of Cistus laurifolius (Cistaceae): demographic structure, reproductive success and population genetics. Nature Conservation 22: 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.19809

Supplementary material 2 from: Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, D'Antraccoli M, Bedini G, Carta A, Sebastiani F, Bruschi P, Peruzzi L (2017) Conservation biology of the last Italian population of Cistus laurifolius (Cistaceae): demographic structure, reproductive success and population genetics. Nature Conservation 22: 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.19809

Supplementary material 1 from: Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, D'Antraccoli M, Bedini G, Carta A, Sebastiani F, Bruschi P, Peruzzi L (2017) Conservation biology of the last Italian population of Cistus laurifolius (Cistaceae): demographic structure, reproductive success and population genetics. Nature Conservation 22: 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.19809

Supplementary material 1 from: Astuti G, Roma-Marzio F, D'Antraccoli M, Bedini G, Carta A, Sebastiani F, Bruschi P, Peruzzi L (2017) Conservation biology of the last Italian population of Cistus laurifolius (Cistaceae): demographic structure, reproductive success and population genetics. Nature Conservation 22: 169-190. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.19809

Supplementary material 1 from: Poirazidis K (2017) Systematic Raptor Monitoring as conservation tool: 12 year results in the light of landscape changes in Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli National Park. Nature Conservation 22: 17-50. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.20074

Map of Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli National Park, vantage points and line transects : Data type: PNG image file

Fig. 29 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 29. Pultenaea praecipua subsp. temperata (=P. sp. Nullo Mountain (M. A. M. Renner et al. 903)) photos. (a) Habit, showing the glaucous adaxial leaf surfaces and irregular branching. (b–f) Flowering shoots, showing buds produced in association with normal vegetative leaves. All from plants growing in the vicinity of NSW 1052799.

Fig. 26 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 26. Pultenaea praecipua subsp. praecipua (= P. sp. Genowlan Point (NSW 417813)) line drawing. (a) Flowering branch detail; (b) habit; (c) stipule; (d) flower, lateral view; (e) flower, perianth removed, lateral view; (f) standard petal, ventral view; (g) wing, lateral view; (h) keel, lateral view; (l) leaf abaxial surface; (j) leaf, adaxial surface; (k) leaf cross-section and adaxial surface; (l) leaf cross-section and abaxial surface. Scale bar: 10 mm (a); 26.7 mm (b); 2.7 mm (c); 8 mm (d–h); 5 mm (i, j), 1.6 mm (k, l). All from NSW 1052720, b from dried material, a, c–l from spirit.

Fig. 23 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 23. Pultenaea aculeata (= P. sp. Olinda (R. Coveny 6166)) line drawing. (a) Habit, (b) flowering branch detail, (c) flower, side view, (d) standard petal, (e) wing, (f) keel, (g) flower, side view, petals removed, (h) magnified calyx, side view, (i) ovary detail (j) stem detail showing stipule, (k) leaf, adaxial surface, (l) leaf, abaxial surface, (m) leaf surface detail, adaxial, (n) leaf surface detail, abaxial. Scale bar: 26.7 mm (a); 10 mm (b); 8 mm (c–g); 4 mm (h); 2.67 mm (i, j); 5 mm (k, l); 1.6 mm (m, n). All from NSW 1052810, a from dried material, b–n from spirit.

Fig. 20 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 20. Pultenaea mutabilis var. mutabilis (= P. sp. Lees Pinch (L. A. S. Johnson s.n.: NSW 17642)) photos. (a) A typical shoot, showing the flowers scattered among the leaves. (b–e) Close-ups of flowering shoot sectors, showing flowers produced in association with normal vegetative leaves, the green upper and lower leaf surfaces, the calyces that appear glabrous, but which bear short antrorse hairs, and the pale yellow keel. Note the short sparse hairs on the branchlets in e. All from plants at Mount Irvine, growing in the vicinity of NSW1058848.

Fig. 17 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 17. Pultenaea tenebrosa (= P. sp. Wolgan Cliffs (S. Clarke 602)) seedlings observed on 5 June 2021.

Fig. 16 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 16. Pultenaea tenebrosa (= P. sp. Wolgan Cliffs (S. Clarke 602)) photos. (a) Shoot apex showing flower in frontal view, note the splayed wings and nearly oblong standard which is taller than it is wide, in contrast to other members of the P. glabra complex; note also the strong glaucous bloom on the adaxial surface of the nearly terete leaves. (b) Close-up of flower buds showing the presence of sparse, long spreading hairs and the long, pungent bracteole, which extend as far as or beyond the calyx lobes; note also the production of normal or nearly normal leaves beneath each flower bud. (c) A flowering shoot, showing the flowers at the shoot apex in a close-set series, in which the internodes are of similar spacing to those separating adjacent vegetative leaves, note the leaves spreading perpendicular to the shoot below the flowers. (d) A group of flowers at the shoot apex, note the long pungent bracteoles, and the glaucous leaf adaxial surface, also note that the wings do not conceal the keel apex, in contrast to P. glabra. (e) Another view of flower buds. (f) Habit. (g) Close-up shoot showing mature stipules, which are characteristically charcoal–black and whose lobes are recurved, note again the leaves spreading perpendicular to the stem axis. All from plants growing in the vicinity of voucher NSW 1058842.

Fig. 15 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 15. Pultenaea tenebrosa (= P. sp. Wolgan Cliffs (S. Clarke 602)) line drawing. (a) Flowering branch detail; (b) habit; (c) stipule; (d) flower, lateral view; (e) flower, perianth removed, lateral view; (f) standard petal, ventral view; (g) wing, lateral view; (h) keel, lateral view; (l) leaf abaxial surface; (j) leaf, adaxial surface; (k) leaf cross section and adaxial surface; (l) leaf cross section and abaxial surface. Scale bar: 10 mm (a); 26.7 mm (b); c, 2.7 mm (c); 8 mm (d–h); 5 mm (i, j); 1.6 mm (k, l). All from NSW 1058844, b from dried material, a, c–l from spirit.

Fig. 13 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 13. Pultenaea furcata (=P. sp. Dingo Creek (NSW 1058819)) line drawing (a) habit, (b) flowering branch detail, (c) flower, side view, (d) standard petal, (e) keel, (f) wing, (g) flower side view, petals removed, (h) magnified calyx, side view, (i) stem detail showing stipule, (j) ovary detail, (k) leaf, abaxial surface, (l) leaf, adaxial surface, (m) leaf-surface detail, abaxial, (n) leaf-surface detail, adaxial. Scale bar: 26.7 mm (a); 10 mm (b); 8 mm (c–g); 4 mm (h); 2.7 mm (i, j), 5 mm (k, l); 1.6 mm (m, n). All from NSW 1058832, a, i from dried material, b–m from spirit.

Fig. 28 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 28. Pultenaea praecipua subsp. temperata (= P. sp. Nullo Mountain (M. A. M. Renner et al. 903) line drawing. (a) Flowering branch detail; (b) habit; (c) stipule; (d) bud; (e) leaf abaxial surface; (f) leaf, adaxial surface; (g) leaf cross-section and adaxial surface; (h) leaf cross-section and abaxial surface. Scale bar: 10 mm (a); 26.7 mm (b); 2.7 mm (c); 4 mm (d); 5 mm (e, f); 1.6 mm (g, h). All from NSW 1022438, all from dried material.

Fig. 12 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 12. Pultenaea flexilis photos. (a) Flowering shoot showing production of flowers in the axils of normal leaves; note the conspicuous mid-vein on the abaxial leaf surface. (b) A flowering shoot bearing a cluster of flowers at its apex, with each flower subtended by a normal leaf, and the shoot continuing vegetative growth from amidst the flowers. (c) A flowering shoot from below, showing the production of buds in the axils of leaves on short lateral branches, and the conspicuous mid-vein on the leaf abaxial surface. (d) Close-up of flowering shoot showing the glabrous calyx with short triangular inconspicuous bracteole, and the short linear stipules that are similar in size on vegetative leaves and below flowers. (e) A flowering shoot from above, showing a loose cluster of flowers at the shoot apex, each subtended by a normal leaf, although this does progressively reduce in size. (f) The same shoot as in e in lateral view, illustrating how similar a terminal group of flowers in P. flexilis can appear to those in P. glabra, despite their different fundamental structure.

Fig. 11 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 11. Pultenaea flexilis × P. glabra photos. (a) Flowering shoot showing the production of flowers close to the shoot apex, with normal leaves subtending each flower, which are separated by internodes that are not contracted. (b) Portion of a vegetative shoot showing the oblanceolate leaves that have a hint of the angular base as occurs in P. flexilis, but which bear the distinct glaucous bloom of P. glabra. (c–e) Close up of an inflorescence showing the flowers produced close to the shoot apex, the glabrous calyx with coriaceous bracteoles, the flowers subtended by normal leaves, and note the conspicuous mid-vein on the underside of the leaf, where the leaf underside is visible. All from the Lawson population of P. glabra at Hazelwood dam, in the vicinity of voucher NSW 1052820.

Fig. 19 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 19. Pultenaea mutabilis var. mutabilis (= P. sp. Lees Pinch (L. A. S. Johnson s.n.: NSW 17642)) photos from Lees Pinch. (a, b) Two views of a typical shoot, showing the flowers scattered among leaves. (c) Close up of flowering shoot, showing the nearly orbicular standard, the reddish keel, and the calyx, which appears glabrous but in fact bears short antrorse hairs. (d) Dorsal view of flowering shoot; note the glaucous bloom on adaxial leaf surface. (e) Ventral view of flowering shoot; note the glossy, green and thick-textured abaxial leaf surface. (f) Close-up of flower from front, showing prominent nectar guides, reddish keel and orbicular standard. (g, h) Close-up of flowering shoot sector, showing narrow stipules subtending leaves beneath flowers, and the papery bracteole on the calyx. All from plants at Lees Pinch, growing in the vicinity of voucher NSW 1052693.

Fig. 10 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 10. Pultenaea glabra photos. (a, b) Flowers showing arrangement in a terminal head subtended by reflexed leaves, and absence of normal leaves among flowers. Also evident are the glabrous calyces. (c) Flowers showing the concave standard, red nectar guides, and green wash on the keel. (d) Flowers from below, showing the consistent expression of a green wash to the keel. (e–g) Three views of flowering shoots showing the inflorescence comprising closely spaced flowers terminating the shoot, and the whorl of reflexed leaves subtending the inflorescence. All from plants growing at Bullaburra, in the vicinity of voucher NSW 1052715.

Fig. 9 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 9. Pultenaea glabra line drawing. (a) Habit, (b) flowering branch detail, (c) flower, side view, (d) standard petal, (e) keel, (f) wing, (g) magnified calyx, side view, (h) ovary detail, (i) stem detail showing stipule, (j) leaf, adaxial surface, (k) leaf, abaxial surface, (l) leaf surface detail, abaxial, (m) leaf surface detail, adaxial. Scale bar: 26.7 mm (a), 10 mm (b), 8 mm (c–f), 4 mm (g), 2.7 mm (h), 5.3 mm (i), 5 mm (j, k), 1.6 mm (l, m). All from NSW 1058858, a from dried material, b–m from spirit.

Fig. 8 in Morphological and molecular evidence refute a broad circumscription for Pultenaea glabra (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae), with implications for taxonomy, biogeography, and conservation

Fig. 8. The most likely tree returned by IQ Tree. Clades corresponding to species accepted in our revision are demarcated by black circles on their corresponding ancestral node. The composition of those clades, in terms of informal taxa tested by this study, is indicated. Numbers above branches are Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood-ratio test support, and ultrafast bootstrap support respectively, both expressed as percentages. The tree is rooted on Pultenaea flexilis, on the assumption that this species is related to, but not part of, the P. glabra complex. Flower images P. glabra (top) and P. sp. Lees Pinch (bottom).