Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,761
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,761 results for “phylogenetic relationship”
Figure 5 in Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of Orbiniidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) based on molecular data
Figure 5. Maximum likelihood tree of the combined dataset based on the GTR + I + G model of sequence evolution (–lnL = 14756.30445). The first value at each node represents the ML bootstrap support, the second the Bayesian posterior probability. Taxa which are discussed in detail in the discussion are in bold type.
Figure 70 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 70. Strict consensus of 98 MPTs (tree length = 4767, CI = 0.240, RI = 0.741) based on the whole data set, with 'chaetosemata' characters inactivated, under EW. Tinted boxes indicate the main topological differences from Fig. 57.
Figure 53 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 53. Adult and larval chemical defence of Chalcosiinae. A., cyanic foam released from the membranized mandibles (mdb) of Eterusia aedea formosana. B, cyanic foam released from the intersegmental membrane between patagia (ptg) and parapatagia (pptg) of Erasmia pulchella hobsoni. C, cyanic fluid released from dorsal (D) cuticular cavities of Pidorus atratus. D, a larva of Eterusia aedea formosana Jordan releases cyanic fluid from the dorsal and subdorsal cuticular cavities.
Figure 40 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 40. Stylized drawings of selected characters of female genitalia and the associated sclerites. A, C, modifications of 8th tergite. B, internal ducts. D, sternite 7, ventral view. E, tergite 7, lateral view. F, sternite 7, lateral view. G, modifications of the 7th sternite and sclerites posterior to ostium.
Figure 35 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 35. Male genitalia of Chalcosiinae. A, Soritia proprimarginata, dorsal view. B, ditto, ventral view. C, Soritia elizabethae, ventral view. D, ditto, dorsal view. E, Eterusia vitessa, dorsal view. F, ditto, ventral view. G, Eterusia aedea formosana, ventral view. H, Eterusia risa, dorsal view. I, ditto, ventral view.
Figure 29 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 29. Stylized drawings of selected characters of male genitalia. A–D, uncus-tegumen complex. E, tegumen (white), derived protuberances (light grey), apodemes (dark grey) and juxta (black). F, valvae (black: sacculus; white: cucullus). G, vinculum. H, saccus.
Figure 47 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 47. Larvae of different zygaenoid groups. Phaudinae: A, Phauda arikana. Procridinae: B, Clelea formosana. C, Illiberis silvestris. D, Artona martini. E, Adscita statices. Zygaeninae: F, Zygaena filipendulae. G, Pryeria sinica. Callizygaeninae: H, Callizygaena ada (courtesy of Hans Malicky). Chalcosiinae: I, Formozygaena shibatai. J, Aglaope infausta. K, Achelura sanguifasciata. L, Elcysma delavayi. M, Agalope trimacula. N, Cyclosia papilionaris. O, Rhodopsona marginata.
Figure 61 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 61. Strict consensus of two MPTs (tree length = 1875, CI = 0.196, RI = 0.681) based on female characters under EW.
Figure 58. Detailed topological differences between the 35 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 58. Detailed topological differences between the 35 MPTs under EW (left row) and 54 MPTs under SAW (right row). A–J, differences between the outgroups and 'clade 3'.
Figure 18 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 18. Wing venation of Chalcosiinae. A, Cadphises moorei. B, Campylotes maculatus. C, Campylotes sikkimensis. D, Panherpina basiflava. E, Philopator rotundata. F, Watermenia bifasciata. G, Hampsonia pulcherrima.
Figure 10 in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 10. Chalcosiine moths (ingroup). From top to bottom, left to right. Row I: Eterusia sublutea, Soritia major s.l. (female), Eusphalera milionioides, Aglaope labasi (left), Arbudas submacula (right), Psaphis azurea, Psaphis euschemoides, Philopator basimaculata, Cyclosia papilionaris (male), Trypanophora hosemanni, Cyclosia pieridoides (female). Row II: Rhodopsona costata, Cadphises moorei, Agalope harutai, Amesia sanguiflua viriditincta, Gynautocera philomera pavo, Campylotes kokotzechi, Histia flabellicornis flabellicornis, Elcysma delavayi. Row III: Pidorus sp., Soritia major (male), Pseudonyctemera adalifoides, Aphantocephala fragilis (left), Caprima gelida (right), Eusphalera pernitens, Cyclosia pieroides (female), Chalcosia pretiosa, Eusphalera semiflava, Papuaphlebohecta bicdora (female), Cyclosia midama (female).
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships among 12 in Relationships among extant and fossil echimyids (Rodentia: Hystricognathi)
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships among 12 genera of echimyid based on cytochrome b sequences (Lara et al., 1996; redrawn and modified from fig. 2). The decay indices (different from 1) and bootstrap indices (> 50%) are indicated below the branches.
Figure 3 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of a new eschrichtiid genus (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the Early Pliocene of northern Italy
Figure 3. Eschrichtioides gastaldii gen. nov., comb. nov.: skull. A, dorsal view. B, right lateral view. C, ventral view. See Anatomical abbreviations for explanation of lettering. Scale bar = 20 cm.
Figure 1 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of a new eschrichtiid genus (Cetacea: Mysticeti) from the Early Pliocene of northern Italy
Figure 1. Discovery area of Eschrichtioides gastaldii. A, Italian peninsula; white rectangle represents the Cortandone area. B, Cortandone area.
Figure 7 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 7. Areas of endemism and the area cladogram illustrating the relationship among species of Rhinoclemmys. Sources of these areas of endemism are from Savage (2002) (Central America), Cracraft (1985), and Haffer (1985) as assigned to zoographical regions of Stotz, Fitzpatrick & Moskovits (1996) (South America): AL, Atlantic Lowland; AN, Amazon North; AS, Amazon South; CHO, Choco; NSA, Northern South America; NUH, Nuclear Highland; PH, Panamanian Herpetofauna; PL, Pacific Lowland.
Figure 5 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 5. Phylogram generated from ML and Bayesian analysis using the GTR+G+I model of molecular evolution with the following parameters: K = 10; Base frequencies: freqA = 0.2945, freqC = 0.2856, freqG = 0.1962, freqT = 0.2237; rate matrix: A–C = 3.2207, A–G = 12.8698, A–T = 2.6852, C–G = 0.7080, C–T = 37.6846, G–T = 1.0000; proportion of invariable sites (I) = 0.4881; gamma distribution shape parameter = 0.4998. Score of the best tree found in the ML analysis = 18781.70 and total number of rearrangements tried = 9661. Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values (> 50%) from 100 replicates of the ML analysis and the posterior probability of the Bayesian analysis, respectively.
Figure 50 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 50. Right side of Weberian apparatus of Leporellus vittatus, INHS 56128, 78.2 mm SL; lateral view; drawing reversed to place anterior at left.
Figure 35 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 35. Left upper and lower jaws, Leporinus fasciatus, USNM 225991, 87.8 mm SL; lateral view, jaws spread wider in drawing of dissected specimen than typical in life.
Figure 24 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 24. Anterior portion of neurocranium of Leporinus agassizi, FMNH 102219; 98.6 mm SL, mm SL; ventral view.
Figure 19 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)
Figure 19. Anterior portion of neurocranium of Anostomoides laticeps, INHS 53677, 106.6 mm SL; dorsal view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.